Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Canto como terapia complementaria para niños y adultos con fibrosis quística

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008036.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 10 junio 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Fibrosis quística y enfermedades genéticas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • J. Yoon Irons

    Correspondencia a: c/o CFGD Group, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Peter Petocz

    Department of Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

  • Dianna Theadora Kenny

    Behavioural and Social Sciences in Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia

  • Anne B Chang

    Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia

Contributions of authors

Protocol stage: draft the protocol

JY Irons, AB Chang, DT Kenny

Review stage: select which trials to include (2 + 1 arbiter)

JY Irons, AB Chang + DT Kenny

Review stage: draft the final review

JY Irons, AB Chang, DT Kenny

Update stage: update the review

JY Irons, AB Chang, P Petocz

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • NHMRC, Australia.

    AC is supported by an NHMRC practitioner fellowship (grant number 545216)

Declarations of interest

The authors of the original review have conducted the only trial included in this review ‐ a randomised controlled trial with inpatients with CF. Clinical trial registration (ACTRN 12609000471280).

Acknowledgements

The review authors wish to thank Nikki Jahnke and the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Review Group for their support.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Jul 12

Singing as an adjunct therapy for children and adults with cystic fibrosis

Review

J. Yoon Irons, Peter Petocz, Dianna Theadora Kenny, Anne B Chang

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008036.pub5

2016 Sep 15

Singing as an adjunct therapy for children and adults with cystic fibrosis

Review

J. Yoon Irons, Peter Petocz, Dianna Theadora Kenny, Anne B Chang

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008036.pub4

2014 Jun 10

Singing as an adjunct therapy for children and adults with cystic fibrosis

Review

J. Yoon Irons, Peter Petocz, Dianna Theadora Kenny, Anne B Chang

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008036.pub3

2010 May 12

Singing for children and adults with cystic fibrosis

Review

Jung Yoon Irons, Dianna Theadora Kenny, Anne B Chang

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008036.pub2

2009 Oct 07

Singing for children and adults with cystic fibrosis

Protocol

Jung Yoon Irons, Dianna Theadora Kenny, Anne B Chang

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008036

Differences between protocol and review

In a post hoc change, the authors considered that reporting the differences (change scores) from baseline to post‐intervention or follow up, or both, in the outcome measures to be appropriate in this review.

In order to assess possible adverse effects from both treatment and control interventions "Adverse effects of the intervention" has been changed into "Adverse effects".

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Adolescent; Adult; Child; Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Respiratory muscle strength tests, Outcome 1 Change in maximal inspiratory pressure (cm H2O).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Respiratory muscle strength tests, Outcome 1 Change in maximal inspiratory pressure (cm H2O).

Comparison 1 Respiratory muscle strength tests, Outcome 2 Change in maximal expiratory pressure (cm H2O).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Respiratory muscle strength tests, Outcome 2 Change in maximal expiratory pressure (cm H2O).

Comparison 2 Spirometry, Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 (L/sec).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Spirometry, Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 (L/sec).

Comparison 2 Spirometry, Outcome 2 Change in FVC (L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Spirometry, Outcome 2 Change in FVC (L).

Comparison 2 Spirometry, Outcome 3 Change in FEF25‐75% (L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Spirometry, Outcome 3 Change in FEF25‐75% (L).

Table 1. Glossary

Term

Explanation

cough peak flow

highest expiratory flow generated during a forced cough manoeuvre, measured in litre per second

visual analogue scale

a response scale commonly used in questionnaires, to indicate levels of agreement or disagreement to a statement on a continuous line, e.g. strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Glossary
Table 2. QoL results

Domain

Time

Treatment group

medians (IQR)

Statistical significance in

change from baseline

Control group

medians (IQR)

Statistical significance in

change from baseline

Physical

baseline

80.50 (54.1 to 88.88)

72.21 (56.94 to 88.80)

post‐intervention

83.30 (62.48 to 93.74)

83.30 (51.39 to 95.46)

follow up

83.30 (70.8 to 95.83)

91.66 (75.00 to 100.00)

Emotional

baseline

81.65 (71.46 to 87.50)

84.97 (60.63 to 92.88)

post‐intervention

83.30 (73.73 to 92.91)

P = 0.031

80.00 (64.58 to 91.65)

follow up

75.00 (66.60 to 91.60)

83.30 (66.66 to 100.00)

Social

baseline

71.42 (57.10 to 79.76)

71.80 (61.90 to 85.70)

post‐intervention

71.81 (62.48 to 83.30)

66.60 (54.50 to 76.17)

P = 0.044

follow up

71.42 (66.6 to 85.71)

72.20 (52.38 to 90.47)

Body image

baseline

83.29 (66.62 to 100.00)

77.77 (69.42 to 100.00)

post‐intervention

94.44 (66.66 to 100.00)

83.25 (66.66 to 97.22)

follow up

100.00 (66.60 to 100.00)

88.80 (77.70 to 100.00)

Eating

baseline

100.00 (55.55 to 100.00)

100.00 (66.62 to 100.00)

post‐intervention

88.88 (66.60 to 100.00)

83.29 (66.62 to 100.00)

follow up

88.88 (66.60 to 100.00)

100.00 (88.80 to 100.00)

Treatment burden

baseline

66.63 (55.50 to 77.77)

61.08 (47.21 to 77.70)

post‐intervention

77.74 (66.62 to 97.20)

P = 0.014

66.60 (44.44 to 94.44)

P = 0.026

follow up

77.70 (55.50 to 100.00)

P = 0.031

66.60 (44.40 to 77.77)

Respiratory symptoms

baseline

66.60 (52.08 to 77.03)

58.30 (50.00 to 2.92)

post‐intervention

80.54 (75.00 to 88.80)

P = 0.001

79.15 (60.38 to 87.43)

P = 0.002

follow up

83.30 (72.20 to 91.66)

P = 0.016

83.30 (66.60 to 88.80)

P = 0.013

Digestion

baseline

83.33 (66.62 to 100.00)

94.40 (66.60 to 100.00)

post‐intervention

100.00 (88.88 to 100.00)

P = 0.024

100.00 (66.62 to 100.00)

follow up

100.00 (88.80 to 100.00)

100.00 (66.66 to 100.00)

Vitality

baseline

45.80 (33.32 to 54.17)

49.95 (33.32 to 64.55)

post‐intervention

41.63 (33.30 to 66.62)

66.65 (45.83 to 91.60)

P = 0.043

follow up

50.00 (41.67 to 58.33)

75.00 (49.95 to 85.40)

Health perception

baseline

61.05 (38.86 to 80.50)

44.42 (30.53 to 80.48)

post‐intervention

61.05 (47.18 to 83.28)

77.70 (61.06 to 100.00)

follow up

55.50 (33.31 to 83.29)

88.80 (58.32 to 94.40)

Role

baseline

58.33 (47.90 to 77.08)

62.47 (54.13 to 87.48)

post‐intervention

58.30 (39.53 to 66.62)

66.63 (58.30 to 77.08)

follow up

75.00 (58.33 to 75.00)

83.30 (49.95 to 95.83)

Weight

baseline

100.00 (0.00 to 100.00)

33.30 (24.98 to 50.00)

post‐intervention

100.00 (24.98 to 100.00)

66.60 (33.32 to 100.00)

follow up

100.00 (0.00 to 100.00)

66.60 (33.31 to 100.00)

IQR: inter‐quartile range

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. QoL results
Comparison 1. Respiratory muscle strength tests

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in maximal inspiratory pressure (cm H2O) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 short term (up to 1 month)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 medium term (> 1 month and < 6 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in maximal expiratory pressure (cm H2O) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 short term (up to 1 month)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 medium term (> 1 month and < 6 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Respiratory muscle strength tests
Comparison 2. Spirometry

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 (L/sec) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 short term (up to 1 month)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 medium term (> 1 month and < 6 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FVC (L) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 short term (up to 1 month)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 medium term (> 1 month and < 6 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in FEF25‐75% (L) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 short term (up to 1 month)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 medium term (> 1 month and < 6 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Spirometry