Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dosis de clorpromazina en pacientes con esquizofrenia

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007778.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 13 abril 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Esquizofrenia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Katharine Dudley

    Correspondencia a: Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    [email protected]

  • Xiaomeng Liu

    Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Saskia De Haan

    GGZ Noord Holland Noord, Alkmaar, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

Katharine Dudley ‐ data re‐extraction, 'Risk of bias' tables, 'Summary of findings' tables, analyses, re‐writing the report (2014, 2016 searches).
Saskia de Haan ‐ development of the protocol, data extraction, analyses, writing the report (2009 search).
Xiaomeng Liu ‐ development of the protocol, data extraction, analyses, writing the report (2009 search).

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Nottingham, UK.

  • Utrecht University, Netherlands.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff at the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group for their help and assistance, in particular Hirsto Girgorov for translating a Russian paper, Jun Xia for her help with Chinese papers and Farhad Shokraneh the Information Scientist. Special thanks to Professor Clive Adams for his guidance and support. We have used the generic text supplied by the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group for the Methods section and adapted it to our needs.

We would like to thank Lorna Lawrence for peer reviewing this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Apr 13

Chlorpromazine dose for people with schizophrenia

Review

Katharine Dudley, Xiaomeng Liu, Saskia De Haan

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007778.pub2

2009 Apr 15

Chlorpromazine dose for people with schizophrenia

Review

Xiaomeng Liu, Saskia De Haan

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007778

Differences between protocol and review

For the 2014 update, we included data from Wode‐Helgodt 1978 for extrapyramidal adverse effects that had been reported using a modification of a previously published scale (Simpson 1970). We realise that this is not entirely in keeping with our previous methods where we stated that we should not use any modified scales ‐ citing Marshall 2000. However, we felt these outcomes to be important although they must carry high risk of bias.

We have moved the outcome of leaving the study early to below global and mental state, moved 'death' to adverse effects.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Chlorpromazine structure
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Chlorpromazine structure

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Study flow diagram

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 1 Global state: 1. Not improved ‐ short term (CGI‐SI).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 1 Global state: 1. Not improved ‐ short term (CGI‐SI).

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 2 Global state: 2. Requiring additional medication (sedation with chloral hydrate or a barbiturate > 5 times) ‐ medium term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 2 Global state: 2. Requiring additional medication (sedation with chloral hydrate or a barbiturate > 5 times) ‐ medium term.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 3 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 3 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Average endpoint score (BPRS total, high = poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 4 Mental state: 1a. Average endpoint score (BPRS total, high = poor).

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. Average endpoint score (PANSS total and subscores, high = poor).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 5 Mental state: 1b. Average endpoint score (PANSS total and subscores, high = poor).

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 1. Central nervous system ‐ extrapyramidal symptoms.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 1. Central nervous system ‐ extrapyramidal symptoms.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 2. Anticholinergic.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 2. Anticholinergic.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 3. Cardiovascular.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 3. Cardiovascular.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 4. Central nervous system ‐ other than extrapyramidal symptoms.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 4. Central nervous system ‐ other than extrapyramidal symptoms.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 5. Dermatological.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 5. Dermatological.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 6. Endocrine and metabolic.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 6. Endocrine and metabolic.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 7. Gastrointestinal.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 12 Adverse effects: 7. Gastrointestinal.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 8. Genitourinary.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 13 Adverse effects: 8. Genitourinary.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 9. Haematological.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 14 Adverse effects: 9. Haematological.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 15 Adverse effects: 10. Hepatological.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 15 Adverse effects: 10. Hepatological.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 16 Adverse effects: 11. Others.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day), Outcome 16 Adverse effects: 11. Others.

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 1 Global state: Not improved, severely ill, relapse (GAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 1 Global state: Not improved, severely ill, relapse (GAS).

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 2 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 2 Leaving the study early.

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 3 Adverse effects: 1. Central nervous system ‐ extrapyramidal symptoms.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 3 Adverse effects: 1. Central nervous system ‐ extrapyramidal symptoms.

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 4 Adverse effects: 2. Anticholinergic symptoms.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 4 Adverse effects: 2. Anticholinergic symptoms.

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 5 Adverse effects: 3. Central nervous system ‐ other than extrapyramidal symptoms.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 5 Adverse effects: 3. Central nervous system ‐ other than extrapyramidal symptoms.

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 4. Cardiovascular.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 4. Cardiovascular.

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 5. Dermatological.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 5. Dermatological.

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 6. Gastrointestinal.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 6. Gastrointestinal.

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 7. Genitourinary.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 7. Genitourinary.

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 8. Others.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term), Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 8. Others.

Table 1. Reviews suggested by excluded studies

Medication

Comparison

For people with

Relevant excluded study

Relevant existing Cochrane review

Antiparkinsonian drug ‐ unspecified

Antiparkinsonian treatment versus placebo

Movement disorders

Caffey 1975

Antipsychotic drugs ‐ unspecified

Doses

Any antipsychotic at high chlorpromazine equivalent dosages vs lower chlorpromazine equivalent dosages

Schizophrenia

Lehmann 1983

Dose reduction of multiple antipsychotics versus control group

Sukegawa 2008; Sukegawa 2014

Timing of treatment

Treatment days per week of antipsychotics

Caffey 1975

Chlorpromazine

Mostly versus other antipsychotic drug

Chlorpromazine brand comparisons

Ota 1974

Chlorpromazine versus clopenthixol

Clark 1970b

Kumar 2005

Chlorpromazine versus clozapine

Chen 2002

Essali 2009; Saha 2016

Chlorpromazine versus haloperidol

Eitan 1992

Leucht 2008; Tardy 2014

Chlorpromazine versus placebo

Borison 1991; Clark 1967; Clark 1970a; Clark 1970b; Eitan 1992

Adams 2014

Chlorpromazine versus rimcazole

Borison 1991

Chlorpromazine versus risperidone

Chen 2002

Hunter 2003; Saha 2016

Chlorpromazine versus thioridazine

Altman 1973; Eitan 1992

Fenton 2007

Chlorpromazine versus trifluoperazine

Eitan 1992

de Oliveira Marques 2004; Tardy 2014a

Doses

Ultra‐low doses of chlorpromazine

Altman 1973; Andrews 1976; Gibbs 1956; Yuan‐Guang 1994

Ultra‐low doses of thioridazine

Altman 1973

Timing of treatment

Night doses versus daytime doses of chlorpromazine

Altman 1973; Kalyanasundaram 1981

Single doses versus divided doses of chlorpromazine

Altman 1973; Kalyanasundaram 1981

Q.I.D versus O.D of chlorpromazine

Jeste 1977

Clopenthixol

Clopenthixol versus placebo

Clark 1970b

Kumar 2005

Clozapine

Clozapine versus risperidone

Chen 2002

Komossa 2011; Tuunainen 2000

Dextroamphetamine

Dextroamphetamine versus imipramine

Casey 1961

Rummel‐Kluge 2006

Dextroamphetamine versus isocarboxazid

Rummel‐Kluge 2006

Dextroamphetamine versus placebo

Dextroamphetamine versus trifluoperazine

Haloperidol

Haloperidol versus placebo

Eitan 1992

Adams 2013

Haloperidol versus trifluoperazine

de Oliveira Marques 2004; Dold 2015

Haloperidol versus thioridazine

Fenton 2007; Tardy 2014

Imipramine

Casey 1961

Isocarboxazid

Isocarboxazid versus placebo

Casey 1961

Rummel‐Kluge 2006

Isocarboxazid versus trifluoperazine

Rummel‐Kluge 2006

Rimcazole

Rimcazole versus placebo

Borison 1991

Doses

Rimcazole dose

Risperidone

Chen 2002

Thioridazine

Thioridazine versus placebo

Eitan 1992

Fenton 2007

Timing of treatment

Night doses versus daytime doses of thioridazine

Altman 1973

Timing of treatment

Thioridazine ‐ single doses versus divided doses

Trifluoperazine

Trifluoperazine versus placebo

Casey 1961; Eitan 1992

Koch 2014

Trifluoperazine versus thioridazine

Eitan 1992

de Oliveira Marques 2004; Fenton 2007; Tardy 2014a

Trihexyphenidyl

Trihexyphenidyl versus placebo

Movement disorders

Yuan‐Guang 1994

Vitamin preparation

Vitamin preparation versus placebo

Schizophrenia

Joshi 1982

Magalhaes 2016

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Reviews suggested by excluded studies
Table 2. Suggested design for trial

Methods

Allocation: clearly randomised, well‐described concealment.

Blindness: triple‐blinding clearly described including information on method administration, volume and concentration of chlorpromazine.

Duration: 28 weeks (2 weeks of no antipsychotic medication).

Participants

Diagnosis: people with schizophrenia ‐ diagnosed by any criteria.

Age: any.

Sex: both.

N = 450.*

History: acute or long‐term illness.

Excluded: borderline cases, mental deficiency (IQ < 70), bad physical health with complicating organic illness or known brain damage, medical conditions constraining use of high doses, alcoholism or drug use, showing severe suicidal or aggressive impulses.

Interventions

1. Chlorpromazine: dose 300 mg/day. N = 150.
2. Chlorpromazine: dose 600 mg/day. N = 150.
3. Chlorpromazine: dose 900 mg/day. N = 150.

Outcomes

Leaving the study early (reasons, timing, gender and treatment group provided).

Deaths.

Adverse effects (clinically important and specific).

Needing additional medication (information about doses, timings and reasons for drug administration provided).

Effectiveness:

  1. Total number improved/not improved global state.

  2. Total number improved/not improved mental state.

  3. Total number improved/not improved behavioural state.

  4. Total number with improved quality of life.

  5. Total number satisfied with treatment.

  6. Total number with improved social skills.

  7. Total number with improved life skills

Notes

* 150 in each group allows for good statistical power.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Suggested design for trial
Summary of findings for the main comparison. CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤ 400 mg/day) compared to MEDIUM DOSE (401 mg/day to 800 mg/day) for people with schizophrenia

CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤ 400 mg/day) compared to MEDIUM DOSE (401 mg/day to 800 mg/day) for people with schizophrenia

Patient or population: people with schizophrenia
Settings: hospital
Intervention: CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤ 400 mg/day)
Comparison: MEDIUM DOSE (401 mg/day to 800 mg/day)

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day)

CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤ 400 mg/day)

Global state: no improvement ‐ short term

Low1

RR 0.83
(0.28 to 2.44)

60
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2,4

100 per 1000

83 per 1000
(28 to 244)

Moderate1

200 per 1000

166 per 1000
(56 to 488)

High1

300 per 1000

249 per 1000
(84 to 732)

Global state: needing additional medication (sedation with chloral hydrate or a barbiturate > 5 times) ‐ medium term

Low1

RR 3.09
(0.4 to 23.64)

50
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3,4,

20 per 1000

62 per 1000
(8 to 473)

Moderate1

60 per 1000

185 per 1000
(24 to 1000)

High1

100 per 1000

309 per 1000
(40 to 1000)

Mental state: average endpoint score (PANSS total, high=poor)

The mean mental state: average endpoint score (PANSS total, high = poor) in the intervention groups was
0.36 higher
(5.39 lower to 6.11 higher)

60
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,4,5

Leaving the study early ‐ any reason

Low1

RR 1.06
(0.32 to 3.55)

70
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate6

50 per 1000

53 per 1000
(16 to 177)

Moderate1

100 per 1000

106 per 1000
(32 to 355)

High1

150 per 1000

159 per 1000
(48 to 532)

Behaviour: agitation and restlessness ‐ medium term (categorised as adverse event)

Study population

RR 1.59
(0.07 to 37.03)

50
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low3,4,7

0 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

Moderate

0 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

Adverse effects: extrapyramidal symptoms (unspecified extrapyramidal symptoms ‐ short term)

Low

RR 0.47
(0.30 to 0.74)

108
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate8

200 per 1000

94 per 1000
(60 to 148)

Moderate

500 per 1000

235 per 1000
(150 to 370)

High

800 per 1000

376 per 1000
(240 to 592)

Adverse event: death

No trial reported this outcome

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Indirectness: rated serious: downgraded by 1 ‐ unclear if clinically important improvement, no prespecified medium‐term data available.
2 Risk of bias: rated 'serious': downgraded by 1 ‐ randomisation not described well, no mention of allocation concealment or blinding.
3 Risk of bias: rated 'serious': downgraded by 1 ‐ randomisation not described well, no mention of allocation concealment, unclear regarding selection bias or management of lost data, industry partnering of author.
4 Imprecision: rated 'serious': downgraded by 1 ‐ only one study providing data, there are very few participants, number of events small.
5 Indirectness: rated 'serious': downgraded by 1 ‐ no data available for prespecified outcome of 'no clinically important change in general mental state' ‐ only scale scores reported.
6 Risk of bias: rated 'serious' : downgraded by 1 ‐ randomisation not described well, no mention of allocation concealment, unclear if loss to follow‐up data for Chouinard 1976 accurate as we have made assumptions it is zero in these groups.
7 Indirectness: rated 'serious' : downgraded by 1 ‐ no data available for prespecified outcome of no clinically important change in general behaviour ‐ behaviour of agitation/restlessness rated within trial as adverse event.
8 Risk of bias: rated 'serious' : downgraded by 1 ‐ randomisation not described well, no mention of allocation concealment, Xu 2009 not blinded, concern regarding selective reporting (Wode‐Helgodt 1978 ).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤ 400 mg/day) compared to MEDIUM DOSE (401 mg/day to 800 mg/day) for people with schizophrenia
Summary of findings 2. CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤ 400 mg/day) compared to HIGH DOSE (> 800 mg/day ‐ all medium term) for people with schizophrenia

CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤ 400 mg/day) compared to HIGH DOSE (> 800 mg/day‐ all medium term) for people with schizophrenia

Patient or population: patients with people with schizophrenia
Settings:
Intervention: CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤ 400 mg/day)
Comparison: HIGH DOSE (> 800 mg/day ‐ all medium term)

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comment

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day‐ all medium term)

CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤ 400 mg/day)

Global state: no clinically important improvement ‐ medium term

Low1

RR 1.13
(1.01 to 1.25)

416
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

300 per 1000

339 per 1000
(303 to 375)

Moderate1

700 per 1000

791 per 1000
(707 to 875)

High1

900 per 1000

1000 per 1000
(909 to 1000)

Global state: requiring additional medication (sedation with chloral hydrate or a barbiturate > 5 times)

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

0
(0)

See comment

No data available

Mental state: no clinically important change in mental state

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

0
(0)

See comment

No data available

Leaving the study early ‐ any reason

Low1

RR 0.60
(0.40 to 0.89)

416
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

100 per 1000

60 per 1000
(40 to 89)

Moderate1

250 per 1000

150 per 1000
(100 to 222)

High1

500 per 1000

300 per 1000
(200 to 445)

Behaviour: deterioration of behaviour (categorised as reason to leave early)

Low

RR 2.70
(1.34 to 5.44)

416
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

20 per 1000

54 per 1000
(27 to 109)

Moderate

50 per 1000

135 per 1000
(67 to 272)

High

100 per 1000

270 per 1000
(134 to 544)

Adverse effects: unspecified extrapyramidal symptoms

Low

RR 0.43
(0.32 to 0.59)

416
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

200 per 1000

86 per 1000
(64 to 118)

Moderate

500 per 1000

215 per 1000
(160 to 295)

High

700 per 1000

301 per 1000
(224 to 413)

Adverse event: death

Low

RR 0.33
(0.01 to 8.14)

416
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

0 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

Moderate

5 per 1000

2 per 1000
(0 to 41)

High

50 per 1000

17 per 1000
(0 to 407)

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Risk of bias: rated serious: downgraded by 1 ‐ randomisation not described well, no mention of allocation concealment, concern regarding selective reporting.

2Indirectness: rated serious: downgraded by 1 ‐ unclear if clinically important change in behaviour, rated within trial as leaving the study early outcome.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤ 400 mg/day) compared to HIGH DOSE (> 800 mg/day ‐ all medium term) for people with schizophrenia
Comparison 1. CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Global state: 1. Not improved ‐ short term (CGI‐SI) Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.28, 2.44]

2 Global state: 2. Requiring additional medication (sedation with chloral hydrate or a barbiturate > 5 times) ‐ medium term Show forest plot

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.09 [0.40, 23.64]

3 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 any reason

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.32, 3.55]

3.2 adverse effects

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.23 [0.02, 2.32]

3.3 inefficacy of treatment

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.24 [0.24, 74.01]

3.4 other reason

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.09, 9.27]

4 Mental state: 1a. Average endpoint score (BPRS total, high = poor) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 anxious depression

1

22

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐1.35, 0.15]

4.2 thinking disturbance

1

22

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.60 [‐0.24, 5.44]

4.3 withdrawal retardation

1

22

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.0 [‐3.76, ‐0.24]

5 Mental state: 1b. Average endpoint score (PANSS total and subscores, high = poor) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 negative

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐2.34, 2.00]

5.2 positive

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐1.98, 1.50]

5.3 total

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [‐5.39, 6.11]

6 Adverse effects: 1. Central nervous system ‐ extrapyramidal symptoms Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 akathisia ‐ short term

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.28, 6.68]

6.2 akinesia ‐ short term

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.05, 4.75]

6.3 dystonia ‐ short term

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.05, 1.29]

6.4 gait disturbance ‐ short term

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.11, 1.17]

6.5 muscle tension ‐ short term

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [0.03, 0.67]

6.6 rigidity ‐ elbow ‐ short term

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.21, 1.31]

6.7 rigidity ‐ unspecified ‐ short term

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.07, 14.05]

6.8 tremor ‐ short term

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.17, 1.10]

6.9 unspecified extrapyramidal symptoms ‐ short term

2

108

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.30, 0.74]

6.10 unspecified extrapyramidal symptoms ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.05, 1.27]

7 Adverse effects: 2. Anticholinergic Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 blurred vision ‐ short term

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.06, 1.63]

7.2 ejaculation disturbance ‐ short term

1

20

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.3 erectile disturbance ‐ short term

1

20

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.4 constipation ‐ short term

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [0.42, 7.99]

7.5 constipation ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.01, 2.09]

7.6 salivation ‐ dry mouth ‐ short term

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.58, 2.34]

7.7 salivation ‐ too much ‐ short term

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.00, 1.85]

7.8 tachycardia ‐ short term

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.05, 4.75]

7.9 urinary disturbance/trouble starting urination ‐ short term

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.37, 24.58]

8 Adverse effects: 3. Cardiovascular Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 electrocardiogram abnormal ‐ short term

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.05, 0.94]

8.2 orthostatic symptoms (faint, dizzy, weak) ‐ short term

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.0 [0.21, 18.98]

8.3 orthostatic symptoms ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.01, 2.09]

8.4 tachycardia ‐ short term

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.05, 4.75]

8.5 vertigo ‐ short term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.21, 5.07]

9 Adverse effects: 4. Central nervous system ‐ other than extrapyramidal symptoms Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 depression ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 drowsiness ‐ short term

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.47, 2.14]

9.3 EEG abnormal ‐ short term

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.33, 1.82]

9.4 head feels heavy ‐ short term

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [0.02, 1.34]

9.5 headache ‐ short term

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.35 [0.12, 46.22]

9.6 sedation ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.05, 0.55]

9.7 somnolence ‐ short term

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.59, 2.08]

9.8 vertigo ‐ short term

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.19, 4.43]

10 Adverse effects: 5. Dermatological Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 dermatitis ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.59 [0.07, 37.03]

10.2 rash ‐ short term

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.33 [0.39, 4.62]

10.3 rash ‐ 'photosensitivity: erythema' ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.03, 7.74]

11 Adverse effects: 6. Endocrine and metabolic Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 amenorrhoea ‐ short term

1

28

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.03, 6.74]

11.2 lactation ‐ short term

1

28

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.01, 3.73]

11.3 metrorrhagia ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.01, 4.11]

12 Adverse effects: 7. Gastrointestinal Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 constipation ‐ short term

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.82 [0.42, 7.99]

12.2 constipation ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.01, 2.09]

12.3 unspecified ‐ short term

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.27, 93.55]

13 Adverse effects: 8. Genitourinary Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 urinary disturbance/trouble starting urination ‐ short term

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.37, 24.58]

14 Adverse effects: 9. Haematological Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

14.1 agranulocytosis ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.59 [0.07, 37.03]

14.2 anaemia ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.59 [0.07, 37.03]

15 Adverse effects: 10. Hepatological Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 abnormal liver function ‐ short term

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.33 [0.33, 5.45]

16 Adverse effects: 11. Others Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

16.1 agitation and restlessness ‐ medium term

1

50

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.59 [0.07, 37.03]

16.2 excitement ‐ short term

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.07, 14.05]

16.3 restlessness, insomnia ‐ short term

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.22, 2.60]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400 mg/day) vs MEDIUM DOSE (401‐800 mg/day)
Comparison 2. CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Global state: Not improved, severely ill, relapse (GAS) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 no clinically important improvement

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [1.01, 1.25]

1.2 severely ill

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.96, 1.24]

1.3 relapse

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.25 [1.17, 4.32]

2 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 any reason

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.40, 0.89]

2.2 adverse effects

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.03, 0.26]

2.3 death

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.14]

2.4 deterioration of behaviour

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.7 [1.34, 5.44]

3 Adverse effects: 1. Central nervous system ‐ extrapyramidal symptoms Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 akathisia

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.55, 1.83]

3.2 dystonia

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.02, 0.45]

3.3 parkinsonian reaction

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.30, 0.90]

3.4 required antiparkinsonian medication

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.26, 0.59]

3.5 unspecified

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.32, 0.59]

4 Adverse effects: 2. Anticholinergic symptoms Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 blurred vision

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.2 [0.01, 4.14]

4.2 constipation

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.09, 0.79]

4.3 salivation ‐ too little (dry mouth)

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.07, 0.61]

4.4 salivation ‐ too much

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.2 [0.04, 0.90]

4.5 urinary disturbance

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.09, 2.70]

5 Adverse effects: 3. Central nervous system ‐ other than extrapyramidal symptoms Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 drowsiness

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.27, 0.57]

5.2 seizures

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.04, 0.74]

6 Adverse effects: 4. Cardiovascular Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 dizziness, faintness

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.3 [0.16, 0.56]

6.2 peripheral oedema

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.07, 1.63]

6.3 syncope

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.09, 2.70]

7 Adverse effects: 5. Dermatological Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 photosensitivity

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.03, 0.24]

7.2 rashes, itching

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.03, 0.58]

8 Adverse effects: 6. Gastrointestinal Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 constipation

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.09, 0.79]

8.2 diarrhoea

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.09, 2.70]

8.3 nausea, vomiting

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.19, 2.33]

9 Adverse effects: 7. Genitourinary Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 urinary disturbance

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.09, 2.70]

10 Adverse effects: 8. Others Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 occular ‐ any lens/corneal opacities

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.23, 0.52]

10.2 occular ‐ corneal changes only

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [0.02, 0.30]

10.3 occular ‐ lens changes only

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.75 [0.88, 3.46]

10.4 occular ‐ lens and corneal changes

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [0.02, 0.26]

10.5 nasal congestion

1

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.14, 7.03]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. CHLORPROMAZINE LOW DOSE (≤400mg/day) vs HIGH DOSE (>800 mg/day ‐ all medium term)