Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intervenciones no quirúrgicas para el orzuelo interno agudo

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007742.pub4Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 09 enero 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud ocular y de la visión

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Kristina Lindsley

    Correspondencia a: Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA

    [email protected]

  • Jason J Nichols

    Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development, Office of Industry Engagement, Clinical Trials Office, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA

  • Kay Dickersin

    Center for Clinical Trials and US Cochrane Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the review: KD, KL
Designing the review: KL, JJN
Co‐ordinating the review: KL

Data collection for the review:

  • Designing and undertaking electronic search strategies: Iris Gordon and Lori Rosman

  • Screening search results: KL, JJN

  • Organizing retrieval of papers: KL

  • Screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria: KL, JJN

  • Appraising risk of bias of papers: KL, JJN

  • Extracting data from papers: KL, JJN

  • Writing to authors of papers for additional information: KL

  • Providing additional data about papers: KL, JJN

  • Obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies: KL, JJN

Data management for the review:

  • Entering data into RevMan: KL, JJN

Analysis of data: KL, JJN, KD

Interpretation of data:

  • Providing a methodological perspective: KL, KD

  • Providing a clinical perspective: JJN

  • Providing a policy perspective: JJN

Writing the review: KL, JJN, KD
Providing general advice on the review: KL, JJN, KD
Securing funding for the review: KD

Updating the review:

  • KL reviewed search results, extracted data, and wrote the review

  • JJN and KD revised and edited the review

We acknowledge Sueko Matsumura and Chris Khanoyan for assistance in screening search results for the update.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Grant 1 U01 EY020522, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA.

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    • Richard Wormald, Co‐ordinating Editor for Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) acknowledges financial support for his CEV research sessions from the Department of Health through the award made by the NIHR to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology for a Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology.

    • The NIHR also funds the CEV editorial base in London.

    The views expressed in this publication are those of the review authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the NHS or the Department of Health.

Declarations of interest

KL: none known.
JJN: none known.
KD: none known.

Acknowledgements

We thank Iris Gordon and Lori Rosman for devising and implementing the electronic search strategy for the review. We thank the Cochrane Eyes and Vision editorial team for assisting with preparation of the protocol, review, and updates to the review. We also thank Barbara Hawkins, Karen Blackhall, Daniel Ezra, and John Bladen for their comments; Takeshi Iwase and Sueko Matsumura for their assistance with evaluating Japanese‐language articles; and Tsung Yu and Xue Wang for their assistance with evaluating Chinese‐language articles. We especially thank Nancy Fitton for her work on writing the Plain Language Summary, and Sarah Money for editing the Plain Language Summary.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Jan 09

Non‐surgical interventions for acute internal hordeolum

Review

Kristina Lindsley, Jason J Nichols, Kay Dickersin

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007742.pub4

2013 Apr 30

Interventions for acute internal hordeolum

Review

Kristina Lindsley, Jason J Nichols, Kay Dickersin

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007742.pub3

2010 Sep 08

Interventions for acute internal hordeolum

Review

Kristina Lindsley, Jason J Nichols, Kay Dickersin

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007742.pub2

2009 Apr 15

Interventions for acute internal hordeolum

Protocol

Kristina Lindsley, Jason J Nichols, Kay Dickersin

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007742

Differences between protocol and review

We added methods related to the production of a 'Summary of findings' table, and assessment of the certainty of the body of evidence, using the GRADE approach. These methods were not included in the protocol or previous versions of this review.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva