Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Kesan jangka panjang ubat penurun berat badan dalam kalangan orang dengan hipertensi

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007654.pub5Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 17 enero 2021see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Hipertensión

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Andrea Siebenhofer

    Correspondencia a: Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    Institute for General Practice, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

  • Sebastian Winterholer

    Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

  • Klaus Jeitler

    Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

    Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

  • Karl Horvath

    Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

  • Andrea Berghold

    Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

  • Cornelia Krenn

    Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

  • Thomas Semlitsch

    Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Contributions of authors

Andrea Siebenhofer: protocol development, quality assessment of trials, data extraction, development of final review and review update, corresponding author.

Klaus Jeitler: protocol development, searching for trials, quality assessment of trials, data extraction, development of review update.

Karl Horvath: protocol development, quality assessment of trials, data extraction, development of final review and review update.

Andrea Berghold: statistical analysis, development of final review and review update.

Sebastian Winterholer: selection of studies, quality assessment of trials, data extraction, development of review update.

Cornelia Krenn: selection of studies, quality assessment of trials, data extraction, development of review update.

Thomas Semlitsch: searching for trials, selection of studies, quality assessment of trials, data extraction, development of review update.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Medical University of Graz, Austria

    Salary, office space, computer support, library resources

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Andrea Siebenhofer, Klaus Jeitler, and Karl Horvath were involved in the preparation of a report on the evaluation of the benefits and harms of non‐drug treatment strategies in people with essential hypertension: weight reduction for the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (iqwig.de/).

Andrea Berghold: none known.

Sebastian Winterholer: none known.

Cornelia Krenn: none known.

Thomas Semlitsch: none known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Douglas Salzwedel for helping to update the literature search, Phillip Elliott for the final editing of the manuscript, Ulrich Siering for assisting in the development of the original review, and Nicole Posch and Jutta Meschik for assisting in the development of the previous update of the review. We also thank Prof. Le Roux, Dr. Kolotkin, Dr. Finkelstein, Dr. Fidler, Dr. Wadden, Dr. Greenway, Mr. Quesenberry and Mr. Gould from Currax Pharmaceuticals, and Mrs. Olsen from Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals for replying to our information requests, and Dr. Cocco, Dr. Nissen and Mrs. Wolski for providing additional data with relevance to our review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Jan 17

Long‐term effects of weight‐reducing drugs in people with hypertension

Review

Andrea Siebenhofer, Sebastian Winterholer, Klaus Jeitler, Karl Horvath, Andrea Berghold, Cornelia Krenn, Thomas Semlitsch

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007654.pub5

2016 Mar 02

Long‐term effects of weight‐reducing drugs in people with hypertension

Review

Andrea Siebenhofer, Klaus Jeitler, Karl Horvath, Andrea Berghold, Nicole Posch, Jutta Meschik, Thomas Semlitsch

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007654.pub4

2013 Mar 28

Long‐term effects of weight‐reducing drugs in hypertensive patients

Review

Andrea Siebenhofer, Klaus Jeitler, Karl Horvath, Andrea Berghold, Ulrich Siering, Thomas Semlitsch

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007654.pub3

2009 Jul 08

Long‐term effects of weight‐reducing drugs in hypertensive patients

Review

Andrea Siebenhofer, Karl Horvath, Klaus Jeitler, Andrea Berghold, Anne K Stich, Eva Matyas, Nicole Pignitter, Ulrich Siering

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007654.pub2

2009 Jan 21

Long‐term effects of weight‐reducing drugs in hypertensive patients

Protocol

Andrea Siebenhofer, Karl Horvath, Klaus Jeitler, Andrea Berghold, Anne K Stich, Eva Matyas, Nicole Pignitter, Ulrich Siering

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007654

Differences between protocol and review

Two review authors (Anne Stich and Eva Matyas) did not contribute to the 2013 update of this review and were removed from the list of authors.

Thomas Semlitsch joined the team of review authors for the 2013 version of this review and provided substantive intellectual contributions that justify his inclusion as author.

Ulrich Siering did not contribute to the 2015 update of this review and was removed from the list of authors.

Jutta Meschik joined the team of review authors for the 2015 version of this review and provided substantive intellectual contributions that justify her inclusion as author.

Nicole Posch and Jutta Meschik did not contribute to the 2020 update of this review and were removed from the list of authors.

Sebastian Winterholer and Cornelia Krenn joined the team of review authors for the 2020 version of this review and provided substantive intellectual contributions that justify their inclusion as authors.

Since current guidelines for the pharmacological management of obesity quote four additional medications (liraglutide, lorcaserin, phentermine/topiramate, or naltrexone/bupropion) for long‐term weight reduction, we extended the search to include these drugs in the 2015 version of this review.

Since the market approvals of rimonabant and sibutramine have been withdrawn since 2009 and 2010, respectively, these two drugs were no longer considered as relevant for long‐term weight management and were therefore excluded from the 2020 version of this review.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Orlistat versus placebo, outcome: 1.3 Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up) [kg].

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Orlistat versus placebo, outcome: 1.3 Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up) [kg].

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Orlistat versus placebo, outcome: 1.4 Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up) [mm Hg].

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Orlistat versus placebo, outcome: 1.4 Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up) [mm Hg].

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Orlistat versus placebo, outcome: 1.5 Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up) [mm Hg].

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Orlistat versus placebo, outcome: 1.5 Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up) [mm Hg].

Comparison 1: Orlistat versus placebo, Outcome 1: Serious adverse events

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Orlistat versus placebo, Outcome 1: Serious adverse events

Comparison 1: Orlistat versus placebo, Outcome 2: All adverse events

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Orlistat versus placebo, Outcome 2: All adverse events

Comparison 1: Orlistat versus placebo, Outcome 3: Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Orlistat versus placebo, Outcome 3: Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up)

Comparison 1: Orlistat versus placebo, Outcome 4: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Orlistat versus placebo, Outcome 4: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up)

Comparison 1: Orlistat versus placebo, Outcome 5: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1: Orlistat versus placebo, Outcome 5: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up)

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 1: All adverse events

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 1: All adverse events

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 2: Serious adverse events

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 2: Serious adverse events

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 3: Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top low dose (13 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 3: Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top low dose (13 months follow‐up)

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 4: Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top high dose (13 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 4: Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top high dose (13 months follow‐up)

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 5: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top low dose (13 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 5: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top low dose (13 months follow‐up)

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 6: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top high dose (13 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 6: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top high dose (13 months follow‐up)

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 7: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top low dose (13 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 7: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top low dose (13 months follow‐up)

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 8: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top high dose (13 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2: Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo, Outcome 8: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top high dose (13 months follow‐up)

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 1: Total mortality

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 1: Total mortality

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 2: Cardiovascular morbidity

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 2: Cardiovascular morbidity

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 3: All adverse events

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 3: All adverse events

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 4: Serious adverse events

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 4: Serious adverse events

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 5: Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (28 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 5: Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (28 months follow‐up)

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 6: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (28 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 6: Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (28 months follow‐up)

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 7: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (28 months follow‐up)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3: Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo, Outcome 7: Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (28 months follow‐up)

Summary of findings 1. Orlistat versus placebo for weight reduction

Orlistat compared with placebo for weight reduction

Patient or population: Men and non‐pregnant women ≥ 18 years old with essential hypertension

Intervention: Orlistat

Comparison: Placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with orlistat

Total mortality

Follow‐up: 24 ‐ 208 weeks

2 deaths (OD subgroup) and 1 death (OS subgroup) with orlistat, and no deaths with placebo in 1 trial; no deaths with orlistat or placebo in 2 other trials

1488 (3 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

Very low event rate.

Cardiovascular morbidity

Follow‐up: 24 weeks

see comment

1811 (3 studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

very lowb

Reporting of results too diverse to allow a meta‐analysis and small number of events. The effects of orlistat compared with placebo for this outcome are uncertain.

Serious adverse events

Follow‐up: 24 ‐ 208 weeks

101 per 1000

146 per 1000 (111 to 192)

RR 1.45 (1.10 to 1.91)

1476 (3 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatec

All adverse events

Follow‐up: 24‐208 weeks

865 per 1000

977 per 1000 (727 to 1000)

RR 1.13 (0.84 to 1.54)

1386 (2 studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowd

98% heterogeneity

Change in systolic blood pressure compared to placebo

(mm Hg) from baseline to end of study

Follow‐up: 24 ‐ 52 weeks

Reduction of systolic blood pressure ranged across control groups from 0.9 to 11.0 mm Hg

MD 2.58 mm Hg lower (3.78 lower to 1.37 lower)

2058
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatec

Change in diastolic blood pressure compared to placebo

(mm Hg) from baseline to end of study

Follow‐up: 24 ‐ 52 weeks

Reduction of diastolic blood pressure ranged across control groups from 0.8 to 9.2 mm Hg

MD 1.97 mm Hg lower (2.72 lower to 1.22 lower)

2058
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatec

Change in body weight compared to placebo

(kg) from baseline to end of study

Follow‐up: 24 ‐ 52 weeks

Reduction of body weight ranged across control groups from 1.8 to 6.93 kg

MD 3.74 kg lower (4.70 lower to 2.78 lower)

2080
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowd

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OD: orlistat and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; OS: orlistat and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded by two levels because of serious imprecision (small number of trials, very low event rates) ‐ see Appendix 1.
bDowngraded by two levels because of serious imprecision (small number of trials, very low event rates) and by one level because of high risk of bias (attrition bias) ‐ see Appendix 1.
cDowngraded by one level because of imprecision (small number of trials) ‐ see Appendix 1.
dDowngraded by one level because of imprecision (small number of trials) and by two levels because of severe inconsistency (98% heterogeneity) ‐ see Appendix 1.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Orlistat versus placebo for weight reduction
Summary of findings 2. Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo for weight reduction

Phentermine/topiramate compared with placebo for weight reduction

Patient or population: Men and non‐pregnant women ≥ 18 years old with essential hypertension

Intervention: Phentermine/topiramate

Comparison: Placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with phentermine/topiramate

Total mortality

Follow‐up: 56 weeks

see comment

1305 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

No death occurred in the hypertensive subgroup of the only included RCT.

Cardiovascular morbidity

Follow‐up: 56 weeks

see comment

1305 (1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

very lowb

2.3% of the hypertensive participants in the low‐dose phen/top group, 3.7% in the high‐dose phen/top group, and 1.7% in the placebo group experienced treatment‐emergent cardiovascular adverse events.

Serious adverse events

Follow‐up: 56 weeks

42 per 1000

36 per 1000 (21 to 62)

RR 0.85 (0.49 to 1.48)

1305 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

All adverse events

Follow‐up: 56 weeks

773 per 1000

873 per 1000 (835 to 927)

RR 1.13 (1.08 to 1.20)

1305 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

Change in systolic blood pressure compared to placebo

(mm Hg) from baseline to end of study

Follow‐up: 56 weeks

Reduction of systolic blood pressure was −4.9 mm Hg

Low dose:

MD 2.0 mm Hg lower (3.97 lower to 0.03 lower)

772 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

High dose:

MD 4.2 mm Hg lower (5.85 lower to 2.55 lower)

1030 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

Change in diastolic blood pressure compared to placebo

(mm Hg) from baseline to end of study

Follow‐up: 56 weeks

Reduction of diastolic blood pressure was −4.9 mm Hg

Low dose: MD 1.3 mm Hg lower (2.6 lower to 0.0 lower)

772 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

High dose: MD 1.9 mm Hg lower (2.88 lower to 0.92 lower)

1030 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

Change in body weight as compared to placebo

(%) from baseline to end of study

Follow‐up: 56 weeks

Reduction of body weight was −1.9 %

Low dose: MD 6.3 % lower (7.37 lower to 5.23 lower)

772 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

Percentage change from initial body weight.

High dose: MD 8.2 % lower (9.09 lower to 7.31 lower)

1030 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowa

Percentage change from initial body weight.

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded by two levels because of serious imprecision (single study) ‐ see Appendix 2.
bDowngraded by two levels because of serious imprecision (single study) and by one level because of high risk of bias (attrition bias) ‐ see Appendix 2.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo for weight reduction
Summary of findings 3. Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo for weight reduction

Naltrexone/bupropion compared with placebo for weight reduction

Patient or population: Men and non‐pregnant women ≥ 18 years old with essential hypertension

Intervention: Naltrexone/bupropion

Comparison: Placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with naltrexone/bupropion

Total mortality

Follow‐up: 121 weeks

15 per 1000

15 per 1000 (11 to 21)

RR 0.99 (0.70 to 1.40)

8283 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatea

Cardiovascular morbidity

Follow‐up: 121 weeks

29 per 1000

32 per 1000 (25 to 40)

RR 1.11 (0.87 to 1.41)

8283 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowb

MI, stroke + hospitalisation for unstable angina.

Serious adverse events

Follow‐up: 121 weeks

205 per 1000

215 per 1000 (196 to 233)

RR 1.05 (0.96 to 1.14)

8283 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatea

All adverse events

Follow‐up: 121 weeks

256 per 1000

432 per 1000 (404 to 460)

RR 1.69 (1.58 to 1.80)

8283 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatea

Change in systolic blood pressure as compared to placebo

(mm Hg) from baseline to end of study

Follow‐up: 56 weeks

Increase of systolic blood pressure was 2.2 mm Hg

MD 0.0 mm Hg higher (0.6 lower to 0.6 higher)

8283 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatea

Change in diastolic blood pressure as compared to placebo

(mm Hg) from baseline to end of study

Follow‐up: 121 weeks

Increase of diastolic blood pressure was 1.1 mm Hg

MD 0.3 mm Hg higher (0.08 lower to 0.68 higher)

8283 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatea

Change in body weight as compared to placebo

(kg) from baseline to end of study

Follow‐up: 121 weeks

Reduction of body weight was 0.0 kg

MD 1.9 kg lower (2.07 lower to 1.73 lower)

8283 (1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderatea

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded by one level because of imprecision (single study).
bDowngraded by two levels because of imprecision (single study) and increased risk of bias (other bias: only 50% of the planned number of cardiovascular events were reported) ‐ see Appendix 3

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo for weight reduction
Table 1. Overview of study populations

Study

Intervention(s) and comparator(s)

Description of power and sample size calculation

Randomised
(N)

Safety (N)

ITT
(N)

Finishing trial
(N)

Randomised finishing trial
(%)

Follow‐up
(extended follow‐up)

Orlistat vs placebo

Bakris 2002

Orlistat

The sample size determination for the present trial was based on a 2‐sample t‐test (2‐tailed). Since there were 2 primary efficacy parameters in this trial, body weight reduction and sitting diastolic BP reduction, Holm’s sequential rejection procedure was used to project the overall type I error rate 0.05, and α = 0.025 was chosen for the calculation of sample size for each parameter. A mean body weight change of 2.1 kg and a within‐group standard deviation of 6.1 kg would require 161 participants per group to provide a power of 0.8 at α = 0.025. A mean change of 3.0 mm Hg in sitting diastolic BP with a within‐group standard deviation of 8.5 mm Hg would require 153 participants per group to provide power of 0.8 with α = 0.025. Based on these calculations, and assuming a dropout rate of 35%, 496 participants (248 participants per group) had to be enrolled to ensure an adequate statistical power of at least 80% in either of the 2 primary efficacy parameters.

278

nr

267

162

58

24 weeks

Placebo

276

nr

265

108

36

Cocco 2005

Orlistat

nr

45

45

45

45

100

24 weeks

Placebo

45

45

45

45

100

Guy‐Grand 2004

Orlistat

Power calculations indicated that, with a power of 80% at the 0.05 significance level, 408 participants were needed to detect a 2.5 mm Hg difference in diastolic BP, 152 participants were needed to detect a 0.05% difference in HbA1c. 140 participants were needed to detect a 0.35 mmol/l difference in LDL‐cholesterol.

499 (HT: 304)

nr

499 (HT: 304)

458 (HT: nr)

91.6% (HT: nr)

24 weeks

Placebo

505 (HT: 310)

nr

505 (HT: 310)

458 (HT: nr)

90.7% (HT: nr)

XENDOS 2001‐2006

Orlistat

(DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [OD]

A 2‐sided log‐rank test would require a minimum of ~ 95 primary cases of type 2 diabetes in both study groups combined to have 90% power of detecting a significant outcome at α = 0.05. With this event‐based design, 3305 participants were randomised and followed until sufficient events occurred. As a consequence of the design, study power would be unaffected by dropout rate.

1650

(HT: 408)

nr

1640 (HT: nr)

(HT: 386)

94.6

208 weeks

Orlistat

(SBP ≥ 140mm Hg) [OS]

(HT: 516)

nr

(HT: 491)

95.2

Placebo

(DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [PD]

1655

(HT: 441)

nr

1637 (HT: nr)

(HT: 421)

95.5

Placebo

(SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg) [PS]

(HT: 509)

nr

(HT: 487)

95.7

Phentermine/topiramate vs placebo

CONQUER 2013

Phen/Top [LD]

Power analysis based on data from a previous study suggested that 250 participants in each group would provide > 95% power to detect a difference of 4.4% in weight loss between placebo and active treatments at a significance level of 0.05. To enhance the power for detecting differences in safety outcomes, we planned to enrol about 2500 participants.

498 (HT: 261)

398 (HT: 261)

488 (HT: 261)

374 (HT: 256)

75.1 (HT: 98.1)

56 weeks

Phen/Top [HD]

995 (HT: 520)

994 (HT: 520)

981 (HT: 520)

733 (HT: 514)

73.7 (HT: 98.8)

Placebo

994 (HT: 524)

993 (HT: 524)

976 (HT: 524)

616 (HT: 516)

61.9 (HT: 98.5)

Naltrexone/bupropion vs placebo

Nissen 2016

Nal/Bup

The trial was designed to provide 90% power to rule out the 1.4 margin (i.e. the upper limit of the confidence interval would not exceed 1.4) when the true HR is 1.0, which required 378 primary events. The early pre‐approval analysis to rule out the 2.0 margin required 87 primary events to provide 90% power when the true HR is 1.0. In both settings, a 1‐sided type I error (α) of 2.5% was used. To obtain sample sizes, an annualised rate of primary events of 1.5% in the placebo group was assumed. The recruitment was assumed to take 1.5 years, with maximum participant follow‐up of 4 years. It was assumed that 7% of the study population would discontinue during the lead‐in period, with a loss–to–follow‐up rate of 1.2% annually.

4456 (HT: 4164)

4455 (HT: 4164)

4455 (HT: 4164)

705 (HT: nr)

15.8% (HT: nr)

121 weeks

Placebo

4454 (HT: 4123)

4450 (HT: 4119)

4450 (HT: 4119)

275 (HT: nr)

6.2% (HT: nr)

DBD: diastolic blood pressure; HR: hazard ratio; HT: hypertensive subgroup; ITT: intention‐to‐treat; nr: not reported; [OD]: orlistat and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [OS]: orlistat and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; Phen/Top [HD]: phentermine/topiramate high dose (15 mg/92 mg); Phen/Top [LD]: phentermine/topiramate low dose (7.5 mg/46 mg); [PD]: placebo and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [PS]: placebo and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; SBD: systolic blood pressure.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Overview of study populations
Table 2. Baseline characteristics (I)

Study

Intervention(s) and comparator(s)

Description of participants

Nationality

Setting

Ethnic groups (%)

Duration of disease (mean years (SD))

Antihypertensive treatment (%)

Orlistat vs placebo

Bakris 2002

Orlistat

Obese individuals with insufficiently controlled hypertension

USA

Outpatient clinic

White (85)

African American (11)

Hispanic (4)

Other (0)

nr

Antihypertensive‐treatment at trial onset: 95%

ACE‐inhibitor (27)

Ca‐antagonists (29)

β‐blocker (27)

Diuretic (19)

AT‐II‐receptor antagonists (6)

α‐blocker (10)

Other (11),

Placebo

White (86)

African American (12)

Hispanic (1)

Other (1)

nr

antihypertensive‐treatment at trial onset: 94%

ACE‐inhibitor (35)

Ca‐antagonist (30)

β‐blocker (26)

Diuretic (14)

AT‐II‐receptor antagonists (10)

α‐blocker (8)

Other (9)

Cocco 2005

Orlistat

Obese individuals with metabolic syndrome, diabetes type 2, hypertension, mostly with coronary heart disease (77%) and concomitant cardiac dysfunction

Switzerland

Outpatient clinic

White (100)

nr

Antihypertensive‐treatment at trial onset: 100%

ACE‐inhibitor (36)

Ca‐antagonist (18)

β‐blocker (49)

Diuretic (low‐dose hydrochlorothiazide) (60)

AT‐II‐receptor antagonists (49)

Placebo

Guy‐Grand 2004

Orlistat

Obese individuals with diabetes type 2, hypertension or hypercholesterolaemia

France

Private practices (endocrinologists)

nr

nr

Antihypertensive‐treatment at trial onset: 70%

Placebo

XENDOS 2001‐2006

Orlistat (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [OD]

Obese individuals with normal or impaired glucose tolerancea

Sweden

Medical centres

nr

nr

ACE‐inhibitors (7)

Ca‐antagonists (6)

β‐blockers (17)

Diuretics (7)

AT‐II‐receptor antagonists (2)

Orlistat (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg) [OS]

ACE‐inhibitors (6)

Ca‐antagonists (6)

β‐blockers (14)

Diuretics (8)

AT‐II‐receptor antagonists (2)

Placebo (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [PD]

ACE‐inhibitors (7)

Ca‐antagonists (7)

β‐blockers (13)

Diuretics (11)

AT‐II‐receptor antagonists (1)

Placebo (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg) [PS]

ACE‐inhibitors (8)

Ca‐antagonists (8)

β‐blockers (13)

Diuretics (10)

AT‐II‐receptor antagonists (2)

Phentermine/topiramate vs placebo

CONQUER 2013

Phen/Top [LD]

Obese or overweight individuals with 2 or more comorbidities (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes or prediabetes, or abdominal obesity)a

USA

Outpatient clinic

White (83)

African American (15)

Hispanic or Latino (10)

nr

ACE inhibitors alone (26.9)

β‐blockers alone (24.1)

AT‐II‐receptor antagonists alone (15.5)

ACE inhibitors + diuretics (5.8)

ACE inhibitors + Ca‐antagonists (3.5), AT‐II‐receptor antagonists + diuretics (12.4)

AT‐II‐receptor antagonists + Ca‐antagonists (0.9)

Phen/Top [HD]

Placebo

Naltrexone/bupropion vs placebo

Nissen 2016

Nal/Bup

Overweight or obese people at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes

USA

Medical sites

White (83.3)

Black (15.3)

Other (1.4)

12.2 (9.40)

97.1

Placebo

White (82.3)

Black (15.3)

Other (2.4)

11.6 (9.03)

97.2

a only data for the predefined subgroup of hypertensive participants are reported here.

ACE inhibitors: angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors; AT‐II‐receptor antagonists: angiotensin II‐receptor antagonists; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; nr: not reported; [OD]: orlistat and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [OS]: orlistat and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; Phen/Top; [HD]: phentermine/topiramate high dose (15 mg/92 mg); Phen/Top [LD]: phentermine/topiramate low dose (7.5 mg/46 mg); [PD]: placebo and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [PS]: placebo and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; SBD: systolic blood pressure; SD: standard deviation.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Baseline characteristics (I)
Table 3. Baseline characteristics (II)

Study

Intervention(s) and comparator(s)

Age (mean years (SD))

Sex
(female %)

BMI
(mean kg/m² (SD))

Body weight (mean kg (SD))

Sitting systolic blood pressure (mean mm Hg (SD))

Sitting diastolic blood pressure (mean mm Hg (SD))

Comorbid conditions (%)

Orlistat vs placebo

Bakris 2002

Orlistat

53.2 (0.5)

63

35.8 (3.9)

101.2 (1.0)

154.2 (13.4)

98.4 (3.7)

diabetes (8)

Placebo

52.5 (0.5)

59

35.4 (4.0)

101.5 (1.0)

150.8 (12.7)

98.3 (35)

diabetes (8)

Cocco 2005

Orlistat

54.9 (5.1)

51

36.5 (1.9)

107.0 (5.7)

145.8 (9.8)

87.8 (7.3)

metabolic syndrome (100)

coronary heart disease (77)

myocardial infarction (47)

Placebo

54.5 (4.5)

51

36.1 (1.8)

106.0 (5.9)

142.1 (6.2)

85.3 (5.6)

Guy‐Grand 2004

Orlistat

49.1 (0.6)

69

34.3 (0.2)

93.9 (0.8)

150.0 (0.8)

96.9 (0.3)

nr

Placebo

49.5 (0.5)

65

33.9 (0.2)

93.5 (0.8)

152.2 (0.9)

97.0 (0.3)

nr

XENDOS 2001‐2006

Orlistat (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [OD]

46 (7)

3862

nr

116 (17)

146 (13)

95 (5)

nr

Orlistat (SBP ≥ 140mm Hg) [OS]

47(7)

42

nr

116 (17)

149 (10)

91 (9)

nr

Placebo (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [PD]

46 (7)

4456

nr

114 (18)

142 (126)

95 (5)

nr

Placebo (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg) [PS]

47(7)

42

nr

115 (18)

149 (8)

91 (8)

nr

Phentermine/topiramate vs placebo

CONQUER 2013

Phen/Top [LD]

53.0 (9.8)

65.9%

36.7 (4.6)

104.4 (18.4)

134.2 (13.0)

83.7 (9.1)

nr

Phen/Top [HD]

Placebo

Naltrexone/bupropion vs placebo

Nissen 2016

Nal/Bup

61.8 (7.27)

54.5

37.1 (5.27)

106 (19.09)

126.1 (12.55)

74.5 (9.01)

History of cardiovascular disease (30.3)

History of Type 2 diabetes (86.4)

History of dyslipidaemia (92.4)

History of low LDL (27.8)

Current smoker (8.4)

Placebo

61.6 (7.38)

54.4

37.3 (5.42)

106.6 (19.17)

125.7 (12.62)

74.4 (9.14)

History of cardiovascular disease (31.3)

History of type 2 diabetes (86.9)

History of dyslipidemia (92.1)

History of low LDL (28.2)

Current smoker (8.5)

BMI: body mass index; LDL: low‐density lipoprotein; nr: not reported; [OD]: orlistat and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [OS]: orlistat and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; Phen/Top [HD]: phentermine/topiramate high dose (15 mg/92 mg); Phen/Top [LD]: phentermine/topiramate low dose (7.5 mg/46 mg); [PD]: placebo and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [PS]: placebo and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; SBD: systolic blood pressure; SD: standard deviation.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Baseline characteristics (II)
Table 4. Adverse events (I)

Study

Intervention(s) and comparator(s)

Randomised/Safety (N)

Death (n (%))

All adverse events (n (%))

Leading to withdrawal (n (%))

Serious adverse events (n (%))

Orlistat vs placebo

Bakris 2002

Orlistat

278/268a

0 (0)

239 (89)

18 (6.7)

31 (11.7)

Placebo

276/274a

0 (0)

195 (71)

20 (7.3)

24 (8.6)

Cocco 2005

Orlistat

45/45

0 (0)

nr

nr

0 (0)

Placebo

45/45

0 (0)

nr

nr

0 (0)

Guy‐Grand 2004

Orlistat

304/304

nr

nr

nr

nr

Placebo

310/310

nr

nr

nr

nr

XENDOS 2001‐2006

Orlistat (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [OD]

408/407

2 (0.5)

403 (99)

37 (9)

73 (18)

Orlistat (SBP ≥ 140mm Hg) [OS]

516/513

1 (0.2)

508 (99)

46 (9)

92 (18)

Placebo (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [PD]

441/437

0 (0)

420 (96)

17 (4)

52 (12)

Placebo (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg) [PS]

509/508

0 (0)

493 (97)

20 (4)

60 (12)

Phentermine/topiramate vs placebo

CONQUER 2013

Phen/Top [LD]

261/261

0 (0)

223 (85.4)

31 (11.9)

9 (3.4)

Phen/Top [HD]

520/520

0 (0)

462 (88.8)

103 (19.8)

19 (3.7)

Placebo

524/524

0 (0)

405 (77.3)

51 (9.7)

22 (4.2)

Naltrexone/bupropion vs placebo

Nissen 2016

Nal/Bup

4164/4164

63 (1.5) / P = 0.916

1796 (43.1) / P < 0.001

1273 (30.6) / P < 0.001

891 (21.4) / P = 0.297

Placebo

4119/4119

63 (1,5)

1053 (25.6)

379 (9.2)

843 (20.5)

aCalculated from percentage rates

DBP: diastolic blood pressure; nr: not reported; [OD]: orlistat and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [OS]: orlistat and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; Phen/Top [HD]: phentermine/topiramate high dose (15 mg/92 mg); Phen/Top [LD]: phentermine/topiramate low dose (7.5 mg/46 mg); [PD]: placebo and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [PS]: placebo and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; SBD: systolic blood pressure.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Adverse events (I)
Table 5. Adverse events (II)

Study

Intervention(s) and comparator(s)

Randomised/Safety /N)

Gastrointestinal AE (n (%))

Musculoskeletal AE (n (%))

Dermatological AE (n (%))

Vascular AE (n (%))

Cardiac AE (n (%))

Nervous system AE (n (%))

Respiratory AE (n (%))

Orlistat vs placebo

Bakris 2002

Orlistat

278/nr

200 (72.5)

nr (22.8)

nr

nr

5 (nr)a

nr

nr

Placebo

276/nr

120 (43.6)

nr (15.5)

nr

nr

5 (nr)a

nr

nr

Cocco 2005

Orlistat

45/45

16 (35.6)b

nr

nr

nr

nr

nr

nr

Placebo

45/45

11 (24.4)b

nr

nr

nr

nr

nr

nr

Guy‐Grand 2004

Orlistat

304/304

nr

nr

nr

nr

nr

nr

nr

Placebo

310/310

nr

nr

nr

nr

nr

nr

nr

XENDOS 2001‐2006

Orlistat (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [OD]

408/407

379 (93)

265 (65)

81 (20)

69 (17)

nr

159 (39)

nr

Orlistat (SBP ≥ 140mm Hg) [OS]

516/513

477 (93)

333 (65)

113 (22)

87 (17)

nr

205 (40)

nr

Placebo (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [PD]

441/437

306 (70)

271 (62)

74 (17)

83 (19)

nr

170 (39)

nr

Placebo (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg) [PS]

509/508

361 (71)

320 (63)

86 (17)

97 (19)

nr

188 (37)

nr

Phentermine/topiramate vs placebo

CONQUER 2013

Phen/Top [LD]

261/261

Constipation: 41 (15.7)

nr

nr

nr

6 (2.3)

Dry mouth: 37 (14.2)

Paresthesia: 37 (14.2)

Dysgeusia: 20 (7.7)

Insomnia: 15 (5.7)

Headache: 13 (5.0)

Dizziness: 17 (6.5)

Upper respiratory tract infection: 33 (12.6)

Nasopharyngitis: 27 (10.3)

Sinusitis: 14 (5.4)

Phen/Top [HD]

520/520

Constipation: 94 (18.1)

nr

nr

nr

19 (3.7)

Dry mouth: 118 (22.7)

Paresthesia: 116 (22.3)

Dysgeusia: 57 (11.0)

Insomnia: 57 (11.0)

Headache: 56 (10.8)

Dizziness: 63 (12.1)

Upper respiratory tract infection: 63 (12.1)

Nasopharyngitis: 53 (10.2)

Sinusitis: 43 (8.3)

Placebo

524/524

Constipation: 29 (5.5)

nr

nr

nr

9 (1.7)

Dry mouth: 12 (2.3)

Paresthesia: 12 (2.3)

Dysgeusia: 4 (0.8)

Insomnia: 25 (4.8)

Headache: 44 (8.4)

Dizziness: 16 (3.1)

Upper respiratory tract infection: 62 (11.8)

Nasopharyngitis: 46 (8.8)

Sinusitis: 34 (6.5)

Naltrexone/bupropion vs placebo

Nissen 2016

Nal/Bup

4164/4164

718 (17.2) / P < 0.001

181 (4.3) / P = 0.749

45 (1.1) / P = 0.002

158 (3.8)c / P = 0.978

313 (7.5) / P < 0.001

74 (1.8) / P = 0.947

Placebo

4119/4119

142 (3.4)

185 (4.5)

20 (0.5)

155 (3.8)c

111 (2.7)

74 (1.8)

aOnly serious cardiac events.
bNo data on adverse events were reported for the whole study duration. The data above refer to 4 and 3 weeks of treatment in the orlistat and placebo group, respectively. After 3 months, the number of participants with events decreased to 5 (11%) [O] with flatulence and mild abdominal cramps versus 6 (13%) [P] with nausea and hunger feeling.
c Major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, non‐fatal stroke, non‐fatal myocardial infarction) + hospitalisation for unstable angina.

AE: adverse events; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; nr: not reported; [OD]: orlistat and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [OS]: orlistat and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; Phen/Top [HD]: phentermine/topiramate high dose (15 mg/92 mg); Phen/Top [LD]: phentermine/topiramate low dose (7.5 mg/46 mg); [PD]: placebo and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [PS]: placebo and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; SBD: systolic blood pressure.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 5. Adverse events (II)
Table 6. Body weight

Study

Intervention(s) and comparator(s)

Baselinea

6 moa

12 moa

48 moa

Change from baseline to endpointa

Orlistat vs placebo

Bakris 2002 b

Orlistat

101.2 (1.0)c

nr

nr

na

−5.4 (6.4) / P < 0.001 (after 12 months)

Placebo

101.5 (1.0)c

nr

nr

na

−2.7 (6.4) (after 12 months)

Cocco 2005

Orlistat

106.9 (5.7)

101.6(4.5)

na

na

−5.4c /P < 0.001 (after 6 months)

Placebo

105.9 (5.9)

103.5 (5.3)

na

na

−2.5c (after 6 months)

Guy‐Grand 2004

Orlistat

93.9 (0.8)d

nr

na

na

−5.8 (0.3) / P < 0.0001 (after 6 months)

Placebo

93.5 (0.8)d

nr

na

na

−1.8 (0.2) (after 6 months)

XENDOS 2001‐2006

Orlistat (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [OD]e

117 (18)

106 (17)

105 (18)

110 (19)

−11.9 (8.2) / P = nr (after 12 months)f

−6.6 (8.6) / P < 0.001 (after 48 months)

Orlistat (SBP ≥ 140mm Hg ) [OS]e

117 (17)

106 (17)

105 (17)

110 (18)

−6.8 (8.7) / P < 0.001 (after 48 months)

Placebo (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [PD]e

115 (18

108 (18)

108 (19)

111 (20)

−6.9 (7.6) (after 12 months)f

−3.8 (7.8) (after 48 months)

Placebo (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg) [PS]e

116 (18)

109 (18)

110 (19)

113 (19)

−3.2 (7.4) (after 48 months)

Phentermine/topiramate vs placebo

CONQUER 2013

Phen/Top [LD]

104 (18)g

nr

nr

na

−8.2% (95% CI 7.3; 9.0) / P < 0.0001 (after 13 months)

Phen/Top [HD]

nr

nr

na

−10.1% (95% CI 9.5; 10.7) / P < 0.0001 (after 13 months)

Placebo

nr

nr

na

−1.9% (95% CI 1.3; 2.6) (after 13 months)

Naltrexone/bupropion vs placebo

Nissen 2016

Nal/Bup

106 (19.09)

nr

nr

nr

−1.9 (4.26) / P < 0.001 (after 28 months)

Placebo

106.6 (19.17)

nr

nr

nr

−0.0 (3.50) (after 13 months)

aMean kg (SD), unless otherwise indicated.
bData are reported for 267 of 278 [O] and 265 of 276 [P] participants only.
cPublished values are different, but data were corrected after personal communication with the author.
dReported as being the standard deviation but probably the standard error due to its small number.
eBased on data of 407 [OD], 437 [PD], 513 [OS], and 508 [PS] participants.
f12 months results used for meta‐analysis.
gReported only combined for all three study groups.

CI: confidence interval; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; mo: months; na: not applicable; nr: not reported; [OD]: orlistat and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [OS]: orlistat and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; Phen/Top [HD]: phentermine/topiramate high dose (15 mg/92 mg); Phen/Top [LD]: phentermine/topiramate low dose (7.5 mg/46 mg); [PD]: placebo and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [PS]: placebo and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; SBD: systolic blood pressure; SD: standard deviation.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 6. Body weight
Table 7. Systolic blood pressure

Study

Intervention(s) and comparator(s)

Baselinea

6 moa

12 moa

48 moa

Change from baseline to endpointa

Orlistat vs placebo

Bakris 2002 b

Orlistat

154 (13)

nr

nr

na

−13.3 (15.2) / ns (after 12 months)

Placebo

151 (13)

nr

nr

na

−11.0 (15.0) (after 12 months)

Cocco 2005

Orlistat

145.8 (9.8)

141.5 (12.5)

na

na

−4.3 / P = 0.025 (after 6 months)

Placebo

142.1 (6.2)

141.2 (8.8)

na

na

−0.9 (after 6 months)

Guy‐Grand 2004

Orlistat

150.0 (0.8)c

nr

na

na

−9.8 (1) / ns (after 6 months)

Placebo

152.2 (0.9)c

nr

na

na

−9.8 (1) (after 6 months)

XENDOS 2001‐2006

Orlistat (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [OD]d

146 (13)

135 (14)

135 (14)

137 (15)

−11.2 (13.5) / P = nr (after 12 months)e

−8.8 (14.8) / P = 0.024 (after 48 months)

Orlistat (SBP ≥ 140mm Hg) [OS]d

149 (10)

125 (14)

135 (14)

138 (15)

−11.5 (14.9) / P < 0.002 (after 48 months)

Placebo (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [PD]d

146 (12)

136 (15)

138 (16)

139 (16)

−7.7 (13.8) (after 12 months)e

−6.4 (15.1) (after 48 months)

Placebo (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg) [PS]d

149 (8)

138 (14)

140 (14)

140 (15)

−8.6 (14.3) (after 48 months)

Phentermine/topiramate vs placebo

CONQUER 2013

Phen/Top [LD]

134.3 (nr)

nr

nr

na

−6.9 (95% CI 5.3; 8.5) / P = 0.0475 (after 13 months)

Phen/Top [HD]

133.1 (nr)

nr

nr

na

−9.1 (95% CI 7.9; 10.3) / P < 0.001 (after 13 months)

Placebo

135.2 (nr)

nr

nr

na

−4.9 (95% CI 3.7; 6.1) (after 13 months)

Naltrexone/bupropion vs placebo

Nissen 2016

Nal/Bup

126.1 (12.55)

nr

nr

nr

−2.2 (14.45) / P = 0.706 (after 28 months)

Placebo

125.7 (12.62)

nr

nr

nr

−2.2 (13.51) (after 28 months)

aMean mm Hg (SD), unless otherwise indicated.
bData are reported for 267 of 278 [O] and 265 of 276 [P] participants only.
cReported as being the standard deviation but probably the standard error due to its small number.
dBased on last observation carried forward data on 399 [OD], 423 [PD], 493 [OS], and 504 [PS] participants.
e12 months results used for meta‐analysis.

DBP: diastolic blood pressure; mo: months; na: not applicable; nr: not reported; [OD]: orlistat and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [OS]: orlistat and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; Phen/Top [HD]: phentermine/topiramate high dose (15 mg/92 mg); Phen/Top [LD]: phentermine/topiramate low dose (7.5 mg/46 mg); [PD]: placebo and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [PS]: placebo and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; SBD: systolic blood pressure; SD: standard deviation.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 7. Systolic blood pressure
Table 8. Diastolic blood pressure

Study

Intervention(s) and comparator(s)

Baselinea

6 moa

12 moa

48 moa

Change from baseline to endpointa

Orlistat vs placebo

Bakris 2002 b

Orlistat

98.4 (3.7)

nr

nr

na

−11.4 (8.3) / P = 0.002 (after 12 months)

Placebo

98.3 (3.5)c

nr

nr

na

−9.2 (8.4) (after 12 months)

Cocco 2005

Orlistat

87.8 (7.3)

84.2 (8.6)

na

na

−3.6 / P = 0.012 (after 6 months)

Placebo

85.3 (5.6)

84.5 (7.3)

na

na

−0.8 (after 6 months)

Guy‐Grand 2004

Orlistat

96.9 (0.3)d

nr

na

na

−7.5 (0.6) / ns (after 6 months)

Placebo

97.0 (0.3)d

nr

na

na

−7.3 (0.6) (after 6 months)

XENDOS 2001‐2006

Orlistat (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [OD]e

95 (6)

86 (8)

86 (8)

87 (9)

−9.1 (7.9) / P = nr (after 12 months)f

−8.1 (9.3) / P < 0.006 (after 48 months)

Orlistat (SBP ≥ 140mm Hg) [OS]e

91 (9)

84 (9)

85 (9)

86 (9)

−5.0 (9.9) / P < 0.001 (after 48 months)

Placebo (DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg) [PD]e

95 (5)

88 (9)

88 (10)

89 (10)

−6.7 (9.6) (after 12 months)f

−6.2 (9.9) (after 48 months)

Placebo (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg) [PS]e

91 (8)

87 (9)

88 (10)

88 (10)

−3.0 (10.4) (after 48 months)

Phentermine/topiramate vs placebo

CONQUER 2013

Phen/Top [LD]

83.4 (nr)

nr

nr

na

−5.2 (95% CI 4.1; 6.3) / P = 0.04 (after 13 months)

Phen/Top [HD]

83.2 (nr)

nr

nr

na

−5.8 (95% CI 5.1; 6.5) / P = 0.0003 (after 13 months)

Placebo

84.5 (nr)

nr

nr

na

−3.9 (95% CI 3.2; 4.6) (after 13 months)

Naltrexone/bupropion vs placebo

Nissen 2016

Nal/Bup

74.5 (9.01)

nr

nr

na

1.4 (9.05) / P = 0.326 (after 28 months)

Placebo

74.4 (9.14)

nr

nr

na

1.1 (8.50) (after 28 months)

aMean mm Hg (SD), unless otherwise indicated.
bData are reported for 267 of 278 [O] and 265 of 276 [P] participants only.
cThe standard deviation was published as being 35 but should probably be 3.5.
dReported as being the standard deviation but probably the standard error due to its small number.
eBased on last observation carried forward data on 399 [OD], 423 [PD], 493 [OS], and 504 [PS] participants.
f12 months results used for meta‐analysis.

DBP: diastolic blood pressure; mo: months; na: not applicable; nr: not reported; [OD]: orlistat and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [OS]: orlistat and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; Phen/Top [HD]: phentermine/topiramate high dose (15 mg/92 mg); Phen/Top [LD]: phentermine/topiramate low dose (7.5 mg/46 mg); [PD]: placebo and diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; [PS]: placebo and systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg; SBD: systolic blood pressure; SD: standard deviation.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 8. Diastolic blood pressure
Comparison 1. Orlistat versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Serious adverse events Show forest plot

3

1476

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.45 [1.10, 1.91]

1.2 All adverse events Show forest plot

2

1386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.84, 1.54]

1.3 Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

4

2080

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.74 [‐4.70, ‐2.78]

1.4 Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

4

2058

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.58 [‐3.78, ‐1.37]

1.5 Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (6 to 12 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

4

2058

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.97 [‐2.72, ‐1.22]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Orlistat versus placebo
Comparison 2. Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 All adverse events Show forest plot

1

1305

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [1.08, 1.20]

2.2 Serious adverse events Show forest plot

1

1305

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.49, 1.48]

2.3 Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top low dose (13 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

1

772

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.30 [‐7.37, ‐5.23]

2.4 Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top high dose (13 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

1

1030

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.20 [‐9.09, ‐7.31]

2.5 Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top low dose (13 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

1

772

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.00 [‐3.97, ‐0.03]

2.6 Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top high dose (13 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

1

1030

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.20 [‐5.85, ‐2.55]

2.7 Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top low dose (13 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

1

772

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.30 [‐2.60, 0.00]

2.8 Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint: Phen/Top high dose (13 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

1

1030

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.90 [‐2.88, ‐0.92]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Phentermine/topiramate versus placebo
Comparison 3. Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3.1 Total mortality Show forest plot

1

8283

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.70, 1.40]

3.2 Cardiovascular morbidity Show forest plot

1

8283

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.87, 1.41]

3.3 All adverse events Show forest plot

1

8283

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.69 [1.58, 1.80]

3.4 Serious adverse events Show forest plot

1

8283

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.96, 1.14]

3.5 Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (28 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

1

8283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.90 [‐2.07, ‐1.73]

3.6 Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (28 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

1

8283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐0.60, 0.60]

3.7 Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (28 months follow‐up) Show forest plot

1

8283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [‐0.08, 0.68]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Naltrexone/bupropion versus placebo