Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intervenciones psicológicas para adultos que han cometido delitos sexuales o que están en riesgo de cometerlos

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 diciembre 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Problemas de desarrollo, psicosociales y de aprendizaje

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jane A Dennis

    c/o Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK

  • Omer Khan

    Mental Health and Personality Disorder Directorate, Rampton Hospital, Retford, UK

    The Priory Group, Milton Keynes, UK

  • Michael Ferriter

    Forensic Division, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Woodbeck, UK

  • Nick Huband

    Forensic Mental Health, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Nottingham, UK

  • Melanie J Powney

    Department of Clinical Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Conor Duggan

    Correspondencia a: Forensic Mental Health, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Nottingham, UK

    [email protected]

    Partnerships in Care, Borehamwood, UK

Contributions of authors

MF drafted the protocol with input from CD, NH and former authors Nadja Smailagic and Charlotte Bilby. The search strategy was originally written by Mark Fenton and was updated and rerun at the editorial base of the Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Review Group (CDPLPG). NH and JD led the search for grey literature/ongoing studies/contact of experts in the field. MF, NH, MP and JD screened titles and abstracts with assistance from Nadja Smailagic and Hannah Jones. The editorial base of the CDPLPG assisted in retrieving potentially eligible new studies as well as copies of studies from the previous version of this review. All authors worked in pairs to make eligibility decisions. NH and JD independently extracted data and entered it into RevMan 5.  All authors contributed to the final write‐up of the review, with CD taking special responsibility for the Discussion.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust, UK.

External sources

  • NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant Scheme, UK.

Declarations of interest

Omer Khan ‐ none known.
Michael Ferriter ‐ The Institute of Mental Health at the University of Nottingham (who were at the time 0.5 FTE employer) received a grant from the National Institute for Health Research for the completion of this review (amongst others).
Nick Huband ‐ holds a full time post as Clinical Research Fellow with Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust and the Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, and was employed in that role during the production of this review.
Jane Dennis ‐ received payment from the Institute of Mental Health at the University of Nottingham, which had received a grant from the National Institute for Health Research for the completion of this review (amongst others).
Conor Duggan ‐ in October 2011, I began a part‐time appointment as Head of Research and Development for Partnerships in Care, an independent secure hospital provider.
Melanie Powney ‐ none known. At the time of the review, I was affiliated with the Forensic Division of Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust.

Acknowledgements

The review authors thank the authors of the previous version of this review (Kenworthy 2003): Tracy Kenworthy, Clive Adams, Belinda Brooks‐Gordon, Charlotte Bilby and Mark Fenton. We also thank both Nadja Smailagic and Hannah Jones, authors on the protocol for this review.

Thanks are due to Joanne Abbott and Margaret Anderson, former and current Trial Search Co‐ordinators of the Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Review Group, for their help in running searches and obtaining articles. We also thank Dot Jeffcott of the Prison Service College Library (UK) for helping us acquire a copy of a 1991 study by Ruth Hopkins, which is included in this review, and to Dr Jo Yaffe (USA) of the Campbell Collaboration, for her help in accessing a key dissertation from 1972 relevant to another included study within this review.

Thanks also to Professor Moira Livingston (UK) for her attempts to help us locate contact details for Dr Ruth Marshall (neé Hopkins) (Australia) and to Dr Marshall, Dr McAnaney (USA), Dr Anderson‐Varney (USA), Professor Alex Blaszczynski (Australia), Professor Paul Federoff (Canada), Dr Janice Marques (USA) and Professor Linda Williams (USA) for supplying helpful clarifications on methods/additional outcome data for eight of the 10 studies included in this review.

We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the National Institute for Health Research through their NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme Grant Scheme.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Dec 12

Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending

Review

Jane A Dennis, Omer Khan, Michael Ferriter, Nick Huband, Melanie J Powney, Conor Duggan

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2

2008 Oct 08

Psychological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending

Protocol

Charlotte Bilby, Michael Ferriter, Hannah Jones, Nick Huband, Nadja Smailagic

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007507

Differences between protocol and review

  • Author byline has changed. Nadja Smalagic and Charlotte Bilby are no longer authors; Jane Dennis and Melanie Powney are on the author byline now.

  • Under 'Types of interventions' we added the sentence "We will include studies of psychological interventions where medication is given as an adjunctive intervention." It was omitted from the protocol in error.

  • The review includes four additional 'proxy' outcomes not specified in the original protocol. These were: cognitive distortions (measured in two trials, Anderson‐Varney 1991 and Ryan 1997); sexual obsessions (measured in Ryan 1997); anxiety (measured in McAnaney 1981; McConaghy 1985; McConaghy 1988; Anderson‐Varney 1991; Hopkins 1991 and Rooth 1974), and finally anomalous urges (measured in McConaghy 1985; McConaghy 1988 and Brown 1996). This was done because it was decided these admittedly proxy outcomes best assessed inappropriate arousal and stress and had a sound evidence base in terms of being 'dynamic risk factors' for recidivism.

  • More authors contributed to the scanning and selection of studies than were initially described in the protocol (Bilby 2008).

  • Methods for dealing with 'Unit of Analysis' and 'Multiple treatment arms', absent from the protocol (Bilby 2008), were added.

  • Inclusion of rearrest data as a measure of the primary outcome.

Notes

This review updates the out‐of‐date review with the same title withdrawn at Issue 4, 2008 (Kenworthy 2003). It is based on the updated protocol published in the same issue (Bilby 2008).