Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Vitamin A supplementation for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in infants six months of age or less

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

Primary:

  1. To evaluate the effect of synthetic vitamin A supplementation in postpartum mothers in developing countries irrespective of antenatal vitamin A supplementation status, on mortality, morbidity, and adverse effects in their infants until the age of one year.

  2. To evaluate the effect of synthetic vitamin A supplementation initiated in the first half of infancy (< 6 months of age) in developing countries irrespective of maternal antenatal or postnatal vitamin A supplementation status on mortality, morbidity, and reactions until the age of one year.

Subgroup analyses:

The proposed subgroup analyses for the infant mortality component in the maternal postpartum supplementation review are:

  • Cumulative vitamin A dose received by the mother; low dose (< 200,000 IU) vs. high dose (> 200,000 IU)

  • Baseline maternal vitamin A status; maternal night blindness prevalences of < 5% (low) vs . > 5% (high), and mean maternal antenatal or postpartum serum retinol levels of > 1.1 micromoles/L (low) vs . <1.1 micromoles/L (high)

  • Birth weight; <2500 grams (low birth weight) vs. > 2500 grams (normal birth weight)

The proposed subgroup analyses for the infant mortality component in the infant supplementation review are:

  • Age at initiation of prophylactic vitamin A supplementation; neonatal period (0 ‐ 1 month) vs. post‐neonatal period (1 ‐ 6 months)

  • Cumulative vitamin A dose received by the infant until the age of six months; low dose (< 50,000 IU) vs. high dose (> 50,000)

  • Maternal postpartum vitamin A supplementation; received vs. not received

  • Baseline maternal vitamin A status; maternal night blindness prevalences of < 5% (low) vs. > 5% (high), and mean maternal antenatal or postpartum serum retinol levels of > 1.1 micromoles/L (low) vs . < 1.1 micromoles/L (high)

  • Birth weight; < 2500 grams (low birth weight) vs. > 2500 grams (normal birth weight)

Background

Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is a significant public health problem in developing countries, especially in Africa and Southeast Asia, most seriously affecting the young children and pregnant women. According to the present estimates, there are 127 million pre‐school children with VAD (serum retinol < 0.70 mmo/L or displaying abnormal impression cytology) and 4.4 million preschool children with xerophthalmia in the developing world (West 2002). More than 7.2 million pregnant women in the developing world are vitamin A deficient (serum or breast‐milk vitamin A concentrations < 0.70 µmol/L) and another 13.5 million have low vitamin A status (0.70 ‐ 1.05 µmol/L) (West 2002). Annually, more than six million women develop night blindness (XN) during pregnancy West 2002.

VAD is believed to cause an increased susceptibility to infections by impeding normal regeneration of damaged mucosal barriers and by diminishing the function of neutrophils, macrophages, and natural killer cells. Vitamin A is also required for adaptive immunity and plays a role in the development of T ‐helper (Th) cells and B‐cells (Stephensen 2001). Vitamin A deficiency also diminishes antibody‐mediated responses directed by Th2 cells, although some aspects of Th1‐mediated immunity are also diminished Stephensen 2001. These factors may account for the increased mortality seen in vitamin A‐deficient infants, young children, and pregnant women. Deficiency of vitamin A causes xerophthamia and significantly increases the risk of severe illness and death from such common childhood infections as diarrhoeal disease and measles Humphrey 1992; Christian 2001. An estimated 250,000 to 500,000 vitamin A deficient children become blind every year, half of them dying within 12 months of losing their sight West 2002.

The main causes of childhood vitamin A deficiency in the developing world include maternal vitamin A deficiency resulting in low concentrations of vitamin A in breast milk, inadequate dietary intake of vitamin A during and after weaning; and repeated bouts of infectious illnesses, which further decrease vitamin A levels Miller 2002. The current U.S. recommended dietary allowance (RDA) established by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) for nonpregnant, nonlactating women, aged 19 ‐ 50 years is 700 µg of vitamin A per day IOM 2001. The recommended dietary allowance increases to only 770 µg/d during pregnancy but nearly doubles to 1300 µg/d during lactation. Mothers in developing countries are commonly vitamin A deficient because they consume diets low in vitamin A. Median dietary intake of vitamin A is 403 µg/d in rural Bangladeshi women, which provides 57% of their RDA if they are not pregnant or lactating and only 31% of their RDA during lactation Zeitlin 1992. Maternal vitamin A deficiency seems to have little effect on fetal status, because even well‐nourished women transfer very little vitamin A to the infant. Therefore, all babies are physiologically vitamin A "depleted" at birth, having little in the way of vitamin A stores in their livers. Young infants in developing countries have even less vitamin A stores. However, during lactation well‐nourished women transfer about 71,500 µg of vitamin A to their infant (130 L of breast milk consumed during the entire period of lactation containing 55 µg/dL vitamin A), whereas women in developing countries transfer only about half that amount because average milk vitamin A concentrations are about 30 µg/dL Wallingford 1986. As a result, during lactation, breast‐fed babies of well‐nourished women accrue adequate stores, whereas breast‐fed babies of vitamin A‐deficient women remain depleted. Furthermore, if weaning foods are lower in vitamin A than the breast milk they partially replace the child's risk of vitamin A deficiency increases further when breast‐feeding stops. Dietary vitamin A reference intakes for infants and young children established by IOM in the United States and by the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) recommend intakes from 350 to 500 µg/d for infants and from 300 to 400 µg/d for one to six year old children FAO/WHO 1988; IOM 2001. In studies of preschool children in Egypt, Mexico, Kenya, and India median intakes of animal sources of vitamin A were 174, 119, 50 and 33 µg/d, respectively, providing only 11 ‐ 58% of the RDA and leaving these children largely dependent on plant sources Calloway 1993; Ramakrishnan 1999. In a study of Bangladeshi children, virtually the only source of preformed vitamin A consumed was breast milk; weaned children consumed only negligible amounts of vitamin A from animal sources Zeitlin 1992.

There are two approaches to supplementing vitamin A intake during the first half of infancy. First, supplement all lactating mothers so that their infants can increase vitamin A intake through breast milk. Second, give vitamin A supplements to all infants when they come in contact with the health care system. Such possible contacts occur immediately after birth, during postnatal visits or during immunization visits. The International Vitamin A Consultative Group (IVACG)  recommends that three 50,000‐international unit (IU) doses of vitamin A should be given at the same time as infant vaccines during the first six months of life. Recent kinetic studies have indicated that this regimen would be safe and would maintain the infant's vitamin A stores even when the mother is also given 400,000 IU within the first six weeks after delivery Ross 2002.

The role of prophylactic vitamin A supplementation in apparently healthy children (more than six months of age) residing in developing countries in reducing childhood mortality has been the subject of several systematic and narrative reviews. For deficient children more than six months of age, vitamin A supplementation is estimated to reduce mortality by 23 ‐ 30% overall. Most of the reduction is due to the effect on diarrhea and measles mortality Beaton 1993; Fawzi 1993; Glasziou 1993. Periodic vitamin A supplementation to children over six months old is being implemented in > 70 countries and is considered by many international agencies to be one of the most effective public health interventions ever undertaken Fawzi 2006. Supplementation with a standard WHO protocol (200,000 IU to mothers early postpartum, 100,000 IU to infants at nine months, and 200,000 IU at four to six month intervals thereafter) has been adopted as national policy in most developing countries Darboe 2007. Side‐effects of vitamin A supplementation are rare in children aged six months or older but there are reports of toxic effects in the first six months of life, such as raised intracranial pressure manifested by vomiting, bulging of the anterior fontanelle and irritability Baqui 1995; Agoestina 1994; de Francisco 1993.

Because infants are at higher risk of mortality when compared to older children, improving the vitamin A status of infants could potentially save the greatest number of lives. Therefore, the available evidence on the beneficial effects on mortality and morbidity of this intervention during the first six months of life needs to be systematically reviewed. Moreover, the concern about the safety of vitamin A supplementation in young infants, particularly during the neonatal period, needs to be addressed and the optimum dose determined. Also, the differential effect on mortality and morbidity with respect to the vitamin A status of mothers, birthweight and infant mortality rate needs to be studied. Therefore, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials is being proposed to evaluate the effect of prophylactic vitamin A supplementation on mortality and morbidity in infants six months of age or less in developing countries, with particular reference to supplementation of mothers during lactation and of infants at different times during the first half of infancy.

Objectives

Primary:

  1. To evaluate the effect of synthetic vitamin A supplementation in postpartum mothers in developing countries irrespective of antenatal vitamin A supplementation status, on mortality, morbidity, and adverse effects in their infants until the age of one year.

  2. To evaluate the effect of synthetic vitamin A supplementation initiated in the first half of infancy (< 6 months of age) in developing countries irrespective of maternal antenatal or postnatal vitamin A supplementation status on mortality, morbidity, and reactions until the age of one year.

Subgroup analyses:

The proposed subgroup analyses for the infant mortality component in the maternal postpartum supplementation review are:

  • Cumulative vitamin A dose received by the mother; low dose (< 200,000 IU) vs. high dose (> 200,000 IU)

  • Baseline maternal vitamin A status; maternal night blindness prevalences of < 5% (low) vs . > 5% (high), and mean maternal antenatal or postpartum serum retinol levels of > 1.1 micromoles/L (low) vs . <1.1 micromoles/L (high)

  • Birth weight; <2500 grams (low birth weight) vs. > 2500 grams (normal birth weight)

The proposed subgroup analyses for the infant mortality component in the infant supplementation review are:

  • Age at initiation of prophylactic vitamin A supplementation; neonatal period (0 ‐ 1 month) vs. post‐neonatal period (1 ‐ 6 months)

  • Cumulative vitamin A dose received by the infant until the age of six months; low dose (< 50,000 IU) vs. high dose (> 50,000)

  • Maternal postpartum vitamin A supplementation; received vs. not received

  • Baseline maternal vitamin A status; maternal night blindness prevalences of < 5% (low) vs. > 5% (high), and mean maternal antenatal or postpartum serum retinol levels of > 1.1 micromoles/L (low) vs . < 1.1 micromoles/L (high)

  • Birth weight; < 2500 grams (low birth weight) vs. > 2500 grams (normal birth weight)

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Randomized or quasi‐randomized placebo controlled trials (individual as well as cluster randomized) involving synthetic vitamin A supplementation to the postpartum mother and/or infant (< 6 months of age) will be included in this review.

Types of participants

Apparently healthy infants from developing countries born to mothers receiving synthetic vitamin A supplementation initiated in the postpartum period (< 6 weeks) irrespective of antenatal vitamin A supplementation.

Apparently healthy infants from developing countries, breastfed or non‐breastfed, receiving vitamin A supplementation initiated before the age of six months (irrespective of maternal supplementation during pregnancy/lactation).

Trials done on selected subgroups of infants, such as those who are very low birth weight (< 1500 grams), who are born to known HIV positive mothers, or who are sick or hospitalized will be excluded. Although such studies may be of clinical interest, they do not address the research question of this review and have been the subject of previously published Cochrane reviews Shey 2002; Wiysonge 2005; Darlow 2007.

Types of interventions

Synthetic oral vitamin A supplementation in one or more of the following forms will be compared against a placebo:

  • Synthetic vitamin A supplemention to lactating mothers (first six weeks post‐partum)

  • Synthetic vitamin A supplementation to infants less than six months of age (breast fed or non‐breast fed)

Trials providing additional interventions will be considered if the only difference between the treatment arms is vitamin A supplementation. In studies involving the comparison of effect of different doses of vitamin A with placebo, the intervention groups will be combined to create a single pair‐wise comparison in order to address the unit‐of‐analysis error. Studies evaluating the effects of food fortification, consumption of  vitamin A rich foods or beta‐carotene supplementation will be excluded.

Types of outcome measures

Primary

Mortality:

  • during infancy, in the period between initiation of intervention and the last follow‐up until the age of one year

  • during the neonatal period between initiation of intervention and the last follow‐up until the age of one month

Secondary

Cause specific mortality (as defined by the authors, irrespective of ascribing a single or multiple causes of death) due to:

  • diarrhea

  • acute respiratory infections

  • other causes

Morbidity during infancy (as defined by the authors, irrespective of ascribing a single or multiple causes), in the period between initiation of intervention and the last follow‐up until the age of one year:

  • diarrhea

  • acute respiratory infection or respiratory difficulty

  • cough or running nose

  • ear infection

  • fever

  • vomiting

Adverse effects within one week following the intervention:

  • bulging fontanel

  • vomiting

  • irritability

  • diarrhea

  • fever

 

Search methods for identification of studies

The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group will be used. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2007), EMBASE and MEDLINE (1966 ‐ December 2007) via PubMed and clinical trials websites e.g. clinicaltrials.gov will be searched using the following search terms: (Newborn OR infan* OR neonat*) AND ("vitamin A" OR retino*)

The search would be limited to "humans" and "clinical trial" without language restriction. A lateral search using the related articles link in PubMed would be done for the articles initially included from the search strategy. We will also review the reference lists of identified articles and hand search reviews, bibliographies of books and abstracts. Donor agencies, 'experts' and authors of recent vitamin A supplementation trials will be contacted to identify any additional unpublished or ongoing trials.

Data collection and analysis

Selection of studies

Eligibility of the trials will be assessed independently by two review authors. Review authors will select studies as being potentially relevant by screening the titles and abstracts, if available. If a decision cannot be made by screening the title and the abstract, the full text of the article will be retrieved and reviewed. Review authors will retrieve the full texts of all potentially relevant articles and will independently assess the eligibility by filling out eligibility forms designed in accordance with the specified inclusion criteria. Any disagreements will be resolved by discussion. Requests to the original investigators for additional data and information regarding definitions of outcomes will be made when required. In case of conference abstracts, if additional data is not forthcoming, the information provided in the abstract will used for review purposes.

Data extraction and management

Data extraction will be done using a data extraction form which will be designed and pilot tested by the review authors. The reviewers will extract the data independently. Differences will be resolved by discussion. Study investigators will be contacted for additional information or data as required. For dichotomous outcomes, the total number of participants for each group and the number of participants experiencing an event will be extracted. For continuous outcomes, the mean, standard deviation (or data required to calculate this) and the total number of participants for each group will be extracted. For extraction of data from cluster randomised trials, authors will be contacted for intra‐cluster correlation estimates (ICC). With the help of ICC estimates, design effect will be calculated and the sample size will be reduced to 'effective sample size', which will then be used in the review.

Assessment of risk of bias in included studies

The standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group would be used. Eligible studies will be assessed using the following key criteria: allocation concealment (blinding of randomisation), blinding of intervention, completeness of follow up and blinding of outcome measurement.

Assessment of heterogeneity

Metaregression will be used to further explore heterogeneity. All statistical analyses will be done using Revman version 5 RevMan and Intercooled Stata version 9.2 for Windows Stata.

Data synthesis

Analysis of the outcome will be based on available case analysis. Relative risk (RR) will be used for dichotomous outcome and weighted mean difference will be used for continuous outcomes. In a hierarchical pattern, preference will be given to the RR stated by authors with a recheck of the calculations from the stated numbers. If RR is not stated, it will be computed with the following preference order for the denominator ‐ stated child‐years, numbers with definite outcome known until completion of intervention period, or number randomized. In studies where intention to treat data is available, the same will be used in case the authors report otherwise. A sensitivity analysis will be performed for studies of varying methodological quality. It is possible that some cluster randomized trials report data only as RR and confidence intervals (CI) with absence of numerical data (actual numbers) about mortality, morbidity and adverse effects. In such a scenario, RR and standard error (SE) will be calculated for individually randomized trials and combined with the RR and SE from the cluster randomized trials (adjusted as discussed above for cluster effect) using the generic inverse variance method to allow combinability of data. Heterogeneity among the trials will be measured by the visual inspection of forest plots and by calculating the I statistic. If I2 exceeds 25% and visual inspection of forest plots is indicative, heterogeneity will be considered to be substantial and reasons for it will be sought, such as:

  1. Time point of initiation of vitamin A supplementation

  2. Recipient of vitamin A supplement; lactating female, infant

  3. Cumulative dose of vitamin A supplementation

  4. Vitamin A status of mother

  5. Birth weight of neonates

  6. High baseline infant mortality