Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Comunicación de los resultados de estudios médicos mediante mensajes de telefonía celular

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007456.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 13 junio 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Consumidores y comunicación

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Ipek Gurol‐Urganci

    Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

  • Thyra de Jongh

    Gephyra IHC, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Vlasta Vodopivec‐Jamsek

    Department of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana‐Medical Faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia

  • Josip Car

    Correspondencia a: Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Rifat Atun

    Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK

Contributions of authors

Josip Car conceived the review together with Rifat Atun. He is the contact author for the reviews and coordinated all stages of the study, including the protocol stage. He advised on designing the search strategy, screening search results against inclusion criteria, and appraising quality of the papers. He assisted in interpreting the data and contributed to writing the review, providing clinical and consumer perspectives and will be responsible for leading the update of this review.

Ipek Gurol‐Urganci developed the protocols. She has lead the search process and assisted in screening the papers. She collected, analysed and interpreted data and contributed to writing the review, providing methodological and policy perspectives. 

Vlasta Vodopivec Jamek developed the protocols. She has been involved in the screening and quality appraisal process and assisted in undertaking searches. She has collected, analysed and interpreted data and contributed to writing the review, providing clinical and consumer perspectives.

Thyra de Jongh coordinated data extraction and management and was involved in the screening and quality appraisal process. She has collected, analysed and interpreted data and contributed to writing the review, providing a methodological perspective.

Rifat Atun provided general direction for the studies and assisted in writing and revising the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College, UK.

    salaries, office space

  • Centre for Health Management, Tanaka Business School, Imperial College, UK.

    salaries, office space

  • Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.

    salaries, office space

  • Imperial College London, UK.

    salaries, office space

  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Health Services Research Unit, UK.

    salaries, office space

External sources

  • Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology, Slovenia.

    grant funding

Declarations of interest

JC is an adviser to iPLATO a health text‐messaging company. iPLATO had no connection to this review.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the very helpful support of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group editors and staff, particular Dr. Megan Prictor and Dr. Sophie Hill, at different stages of this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Jun 13

Mobile phone messaging for communicating results of medical investigations

Review

Ipek Gurol‐Urganci, Thyra de Jongh, Vlasta Vodopivec‐Jamsek, Josip Car, Rifat Atun

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007456.pub2

2008 Oct 08

Mobile phone messaging for communicating results of medical investigations

Protocol

Ipek Gurol‐Urganci, Thyra de Jongh, Vlasta Vodopivec‐Jamsek, Josip Car, Rifat Atun

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007456

Differences between protocol and review

Search strategy

We were not able to search the following databases we listed in the protocol:

  • Proceedings from the MEDNET Congresses: We could not access the proceedings.

  • TrialsCentralTM (www.trialscentral.org): The website for the data base was not functional and did not allow for the search of clinical trials.

  • African Trials Register: The trials in the African Trials Register are collected with a search strategy using the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the African Health Anthology (AHA). As we searched both original sources, it was not necessary to access the African Trials Register separately.

  • Health Star: The database ceased to exist as of December 2000, with all peer‐reviewed journal articles transferred to PubMed.

Subgroup analysis

We conducted a post‐hoc subgroup analysis according to differences in outcomes for participants who received positive versus negative results from their medical investigations.

We were unable to conduct subgroup analyses by participant age (0 to 18, 18 to 55, over 55), as planned, because only one study was included.