Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Dosis única oral de lornoxicam para el dolor posoperatorio agudo en pacientes adultos

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Moller 2008 {published data only}

Moller PL, Norholt SE. Analgesic efficacy of quick‐release versus standard lornoxicam for pain after third molar surgery: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, single‐dose trial. Clinical drug investigation 2008;28(12):757‐66. [PUBMED: 18991469]CENTRAL

Norholt 1995 {published data only}

Norholt SE, Sindet‐Pedersen S, Bugge C, Branebjerg PE, Ersboll BK, Bastian HL. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐response study of the analgesic effect of lornoxicam after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Journal of clinical pharmacology 1995;35(6):606‐14. [PUBMED: 7665721]CENTRAL

Patel 1991 {published data only}

Patel A, Skelly AM, Kohn H, Preiskel HW. Double‐blind placebo‐controlled comparison of the analgesic effects of single doses of lornoxicam and aspirin in patients with postoperative dental pain. British Dental Journal 1991;170(8):295‐9. [PUBMED: 2036277]CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

Cooper 1996 {published data only}

Cooper SA, Fielding AF, Lucyk D, Hersh EV, Quinn PD, Betts N, et al. Lornoxicam: Analgesic efficacy and safety of a new oxicam derivative. Advances in Therapy 1996;13(1):67‐77. CENTRAL

Additional references

Barden 2004

Barden J, Edwards JE, McQuay HJ, Wiffen PJ. Relative efficacy of oral analgesics after third molar extraction. British Dental Journal 2004;197(7):407‐11.

Barden 2006

Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Bias from industry trial funding? A framework, a suggested approach, and a negative result. Pain 2006;121(3):207‐18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.12.011]

Berg 1999

Berg J, Fellier H, Christoph T, Grarup J, Stimmeder D. The analgesic NSAID lornoxicam inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX)‐1/‐2, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and the formation of interleukin (IL)‐6 in vitro. Inflammation Research 1999;48:369‐79.

Berry 1992

Berry H, Bird HA, Black C, Blake DR, Freeman AM, Golding DN, et al. A double blind, multicentre, placebo controlled trial of lornoxicam in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1992;51(2):238‐42. [PUBMED: 1550410]

Clarke 2009

Clarke R, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ 2009, Issue. Single dose oral etoricoxib for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004309.pub2]

Collins 1997

Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?. Pain 1997;72:95‐7.

Collins 2001

Collins SL, Edwards J, Moore RA, Smith LA, McQuay HJ. Seeking a simple measure of analgesia for mega‐trials: is a single global assessment good enough?. Pain 2001;91(1‐2):189‐94.

Cook 1995

Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ 1995;310(6977):452‐4.

Cooper 1991

Cooper SA. Single‐dose analgesic studies: the upside and downside of assay sensitivity. The Design of Analgesic Clinical Trials. Advances in Pain Research Therapy 1991;18:117‐24.

Derry 2008

Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Single dose oral celecoxib for acute postoperative pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004233]

Derry C 2009a

Derry C, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Single dose oral naproxen and naproxen sodium for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004234.pub2]

Derry C 2009b

Derry C, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Single dose oral ibuprofen for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001548.pub2]

Derry P 2009

Derry P, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Single dose oral diclofenac for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004768.pub2]

Dittrich 1990

Dittrich P, Radhofer‐Welte S, Magometschnigg D, Kukovetz WR, Mayerhofer S, Ferber HP. The effect of concomitantly administered antacids on the bioavailability of lornoxicam, a novel highly potent NSAID. Drugs Under Experimental and Clinical Research 1990;16:57‐62.

Erdogan 2008

Erdogan I, Cakan T, Ozcan A, Turkyilmaz E, Baltaci B, Dikmen B. Effect of lornoxicam on postoperative analgesia after myomectomy. Agri: Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology 2008;20(1):26‐31. [PUBMED: 18338276]

Fitzgerald 2001

FitzGerald GA, Patrono C. The coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase‐2. England Journal of Medicine 2001;345(6):433‐42.

Gaskell 2009

Gaskell H, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Single dose oral oxycodone and oxycodone plus paracetamol (acetaminophen) for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002763.pub2]

Hawkey 1999

Hawkey CJ. Cox‐2 inhibitors. Lancet 1999;353(9149):307‐14.

Hitzenberger 1990

Hitzenberger G, Radhofer‐Welte S, Takacs F, Rosenow D. Pharmacokinetics of lornoxicam in man. Postgraduate Medical Journal 1990;66(Suppl. 4):S22‐7.

Jadad 1996a

Jadad AR, Carroll D, Moore RA, McQuay H. Developing a database of published reports of randomised clinical trials in pain research. Pain 1996;66(2‐3):239‐46.

Jadad 1996b

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17:1‐12.

L'Abbé 1987

L'Abbe KA, Detsky AS, O'Rourke K. Meta‐analysis in clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987;107:224‐33.

Lloyd 2009

Lloyd R, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Intravenous or intramuscular parecoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004771.pub4]

McQuay 2005

McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Placebo. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005;81:155‐60. [DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.024737]

Moore 1996

Moore A, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics. Pain 1996;66(2‐3):229‐37. [DOI: 10.1016/0304‐3959(96)03032‐1]

Moore 1997a

Moore A, Moore O, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: use of pain intensity and visual analogue scales. Pain 1997;69(3):311‐5. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(96)03306‐4]

Moore 1997b

Moore A, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: verification from independent data. Pain 1997;69(1‐2):127‐30. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(96)03251‐4]

Moore 1998

Moore RA, Gavaghan D, Tramer MR, Collins SL, McQuay HJ. Size is everything‐large amounts of information are needed to overcome random effects in estimating direction and magnitude of treatment effects. Pain 1998;78(3):209‐16. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(98)00140‐7]

Moore 2003

Moore RA, Edwards J, Barden J, McQuay HJ. Bandolier's Little Book of Pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. [ISBN: 0‐19‐263247‐7]

Moore 2005

Moore RA, Edwards JE, McQuay HJ. Acute pain: individual patient meta‐analysis shows the impact of different ways of analysing and presenting results. Pain 2005;116(3):322‐31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.001]

Moore 2006

Moore A, McQuay H. Bandolier's Little Book of Making Sense of the Medical Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. [ISBN: 0‐19‐856604‐2]

Morris 1995

Morris JA, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for relative risk, odds ratio and standardised ratios and rates. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG editor(s). Statistics with Confidence ‐ Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines. London: British Medical Journal, 1995:50‐63.

Papadima 2007

Papadima A, Lagoudianakis EE, Antonakis PT, Pattas M, Kremastinou F, Katergiannakis V, et al. Parecoxib vs. lornoxicam in the treatment of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized placebo‐controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2007;24(2):154‐8. [PUBMED: 16938157]

Sener 2008

Sener M, Yilmazer C, Yilmaz I, Bozdogan N, Ozer C, Donmez A, et al. Efficacy of lornoxicam for acute postoperative pain relief after septoplasty: a comparison with diclofenac, ketoprofen, and dipyrone. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2008;20(2):103‐8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.09.009]

Toms 2008

Toms L, McQuay HJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004602]

Tramèr 1997

Tramèr MR, Reynolds DJ, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta‐analysis: a case study. BMJ 1997;315(7109):635‐40.

Warrington 1990a

Warrington SJ, Debbas NM, Farthing M, Horton M, Johnston A, Thillainayagam A, et al. Lornoxicam, indomethacin and placebo: comparison of effects on faecal blood loss and upper gastrointestinal endoscopic appearances in healthy men. Postgraduate Medical Journal 1990;66(778):622‐6. [PUBMED: 2217030]

Warrington 1990b

Warrington SJ, Lewis Y, Dawnay A, Johnston A, Kovacs IB, Lamb E, et al. Renal and gastrointestinal tolerability of lornoxicam, and effects on haemostasis and hepatic microsomal oxidation. Postgraduate Medical Journal 1990;66 Suppl 4:S35‐40. [PUBMED: 2284219]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Moller 2008

Methods

RCT, DB, DD, placebo‐controlled parallel‐group study, single oral dose after onset of moderate‐severe pain, 24 hour study

Participants

Postoperative dental surgery ‐ third molar tooth extraction

N = 200

M = 93, F = 107

Age 18‐40 years

Mean age 25 years

Interventions

Lornoxicam 8 mg standard release, n = 80

Lornoxicam 8 mg quick release, n = 80

Placebo, n = 40

Outcomes

PI: 100 mm VAS

PR: standard 5 point scale

PGE: standard 5 point scale

Number using rescue medication

Time to use of rescue medication

Adverse events: any, serious

Withdrawals: all cause, adverse event

Notes

QS = 4 (R1, D2, W1)

Norholt 1995

Methods

RCT, DB, placebo and active controlled, parallel group study, single oral dose after moderate‐severe pain, 8 hour study

Participants

Postoperative dental surgery ‐ third molar tooth extraction

N = 278

M = 160, F = 118

Age 17‐40 years

Mean age 26 years

Interventions

Lornoxicam 4 mg, n = 43

Lornoxicam 8 mg, n = 45

Lornoxicam 16 mg, n = 48

Lornoxicam 32 mg, n = 48

Ketorolac 10 mg, n = 46

Placebo, n = 48

Outcomes

PI: non‐standard scale

PR: standard 5 point scale

PGE: standard 5 point scale

Time to use of rescue medication

Adverse events: any

Withdrawals: all cause withdrawal, adverse event withdrawal

Notes

QS = 3 (R1, D1, W1)

Patel 1991

Methods

RCT, DB, placebo and active controlled, parallel group study, single oral dose after moderate‐severe pain, 8 hour study

Participants

Postoperative dental surgery ‐ third molar tooth extraction

N = 150

M = 71, F = 79

Age >16 years

Mean age 24 years

Interventions

Lornoxicam 2 mg, n = 30

Lornoxicam 4 mg, n = 30

Lornoxicam 8 mg, n = 30

Aspirin 650 mg, n = 30

Placebo, n = 30

Outcomes

PI: standard 4 point scale

PR: standard 5 point scale

PGE: standard 5 point scale

Adverse events: any, serious

Withdrawals: all cause, adverse event

Notes

QS = 3 (R1, D1, W1)

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Cooper 1996

Pre‐emptive pain relief

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Lornoxicam versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 6 hours Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Lornoxicam versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 6 hours.

Comparison 1 Lornoxicam versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 6 hours.

1.1 Lornoxicam 4 mg

2

151

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.35 [1.33, 4.14]

1.2 Lornoxicam 8 mg

3

273

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.69 [2.70, 8.12]

2 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Lornoxicam versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 1 Lornoxicam versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with any adverse event.

2.1 Lornoxicam 2 to 8 mg

2

320

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [0.92, 2.17]

2.2 Lornoxicam 8 mg

2

260

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.43 [0.92, 2.21]

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Lornoxicam versus placebo, outcome: 3.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Lornoxicam versus placebo, outcome: 3.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 6 hours.

Comparison 1 Lornoxicam versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Lornoxicam versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 6 hours.

Comparison 1 Lornoxicam versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with any adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Lornoxicam versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with any adverse event.

Table 1. Summary of outcomes: analgesia and rescue medication

Analgesia

Rescue medication

Study ID

Treatment

PI or PR

Number with 50% PR

PGE: v good or excellent

Median time to use (h)

% using

Moller 2008

(1) Lornoxicam 8 mg SR, n = 80

(2) Lornoxicam 8 mg QR, n = 80

(3) Placebo, n = 40

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 8.1

(2) 11.3

(3) 1.8

(1) 27/80

(2) 41/80

(3) 0/40

No usable data

(1) 4.0

(2) 5.7

(3) 1.1

at 8 h:

(1) 48/80

(2) 50/80

(3) 37/40

Norholt 1995

(1) Lornoxicam 4 mg, n = 43

(2) Lornoxicam 8 mg, n = 45

(3) Lornoxicam 16 mg, n = 48

(4) Lornoxicam 32 mg, n = 48

(5) Ketorolac 10 mg, n = 46

(6) Placebo, n = 48

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 9.6

(2) 13.7

(3) 15.0

(4) 17.7

(6) 3.7

(1) 18/43

(2) 29/45

(3) 34/48

(4) 42/48

(6) 4/48

(1) 12/43

(2) 23/45

(3) 27/48

(4) 32/48

(5) 25/46

(6) 4/48

Mean:

(1) 3.1

(2) 4.1

(3) 4.9

(4) 5.1

(6) 1.7

No data

Patel 1991

(1) Lornoxicam 2 mg, n = 30

(2) Lornoxicam 4 mg, n = 30

(3) Lornoxicam 8 mg, n = 30

(4) Aspirin 650 mg, n = 30

(6) Placebo, n = 30

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 8.43

(2) 8.99

(3) 11.12

(5) 7.38

(1) 11/30

(2) 11/30

(3) 15/30

(5) 9/30

No usable data

No data

No data

QR ‐ quick release; SR ‐ slow release

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Summary of outcomes: analgesia and rescue medication
Table 2. Summary of outcomes: adverse events and withdrawals

Adverse events

Withdrawals

Study ID

Treatment

Any

Serious

Adverse event

Other

Moller 2008

(1) Lornoxicam 8 mg SR, n = 80

(2) Lornoxicam 8 mg QR, n = 80

(3) Placebo, n = 40

at 7 days:

(1) 39/80

(2) 43/80

(3) 14/40

None

None

None

Norholt 1995

(1) Lornoxicam 4 mg, n = 43

(2) Lornoxicam 8 mg, n = 45

(3) Lornoxicam 16 mg, n = 48

(4) Lornoxicam 32 mg, n = 48

(5) Ketorolac 10 mg, n = 46

(6) Placebo, n = 48

No usable data

None reported

None

None

Patel 1991

(1) Lornoxicam 2 mg, n = 30

(2) Lornoxicam 4 mg, n = 30

(3) Lornoxicam 8 mg, n = 30

(4) Aspirin 650 mg, n = 30

(6) Placebo, n = 30

at 8 h:

(1) 3/30

(2) 1/30

(3) 2/30

(4) 2/30

(5) 2/30

None

None

None

QR ‐ quick release; SR ‐ slow release

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Summary of outcomes: adverse events and withdrawals
Comparison 1. Lornoxicam versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 6 hours Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Lornoxicam 4 mg

2

151

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.35 [1.33, 4.14]

1.2 Lornoxicam 8 mg

3

273

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.69 [2.70, 8.12]

2 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Lornoxicam 2 to 8 mg

2

320

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [0.92, 2.17]

2.2 Lornoxicam 8 mg

2

260

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.43 [0.92, 2.21]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Lornoxicam versus placebo