Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

نقش NSAIDهای موضعی در درمان درد حاد عضلانی‌اسکلتی در بزرگسالان

Appendices

Appendix 1. CENTRAL search strategy (via CRSO) for 2015 update

  1. MESH DESCRIPTOR Anti‐Inflammatory Agents, Non‐Steroidal EXPLODE ALL TREES (13419)

  2. (bufexamac OR bufexine OR calmaderm OR ekzemase OR dicoflenac OR solaraze OR pennsaid OR voltarol OR emugel OR voltarene OR voltarol OR optha OR voltaren OR etofenamate OR afrolate OR algesalona OR bayro OR deiron OR etofen OR flexium OR flogoprofen OR rheuma‐gel OR rheumon OR traumalix OR traumon OR zenavan OR felbinac OR dolinac OR flexfree OR napageln OR target OR traxam OR fentiazac OR domureuma OR fentiazaco OR norvedan OR riscalon OR fepradinol OR dalgen OR flexidol OR cocresol OR rangozona OR reuflodol OR pinazone OR zepelin OR flufenamic OR dignodolin OR rheuma OR lindofluid OR sastridex OR lunoxaprofen OR priaxim OR flubiprofen OR fenomel OR ocufen OR ocuflur OR "Trans Act LAT" OR tulip OR ibuprofen OR cuprofen OR "deep relief" OR fenbid OR ibu‐cream OR ibugel OR ibuleve OR ibumousse OR ibuspray OR "nurofen gel" OR proflex OR motrin OR advil OR radian OR ralgex OR ibutop OR indomethacin OR indocin OR indospray OR isonixin OR nixyn OR ketoprofen OR tiloket OR oruvail OR powergel OR solpaflex OR ketorolac OR acular OR trometamol OR meclofenamic OR naproxen OR naprosyn OR niflumic OR actol OR flunir OR niflactol topico OR niflugel OR nifluril OR oxyphenbutazone OR californit OR diflamil OR otone OR tanderil OR piketoprofen OR calmatel OR triparsean OR piroxicam OR feldene OR pranoprofen OR oftalar OR pranox OR suxibuzone OR danilon OR flamilon OR ufenamate OR fenazol OR flector OR benzydamine): TI,AB,KY (25220)

  3. 1 OR 2 (32484)

  4. MESH DESCRIPTOR Administration, Topical EXPLODE ALL TREES (2169)

  5. (topical* OR cutaneous OR dermal OR transcutaneous OR transdermal OR percutaneous OR skin OR massage OR embrocation OR gel OR ointment OR aerosol OR cream OR crème OR lotion OR mouse OR foam OR liniment OR spray OR rub OR balm OR salve OR emulsion OR oil OR patch OR plaster):TI,AB,KY (67940)

  6. 4 OR 5 (70486)

  7. MESH DESCRIPTOR Athletic Injuries EXPLODE ALL TREES (411)

  8. (strain OR sprain* OR contusion OR distortion OR compression OR "sports injur*" OR "soft tissue injur*" OR tend?nitis OR "muscle pain" OR periarthritis OR epicondylitis OR tenosynovitis):TI,AB,KY (9158)

  9. 7 OR 8 (9448)

  10. MESH DESCRIPTOR pain EXPLODE ALL TREES (29943)

  11. (pain* OR analgesi*):TI,AB,KY (74815)

  12. 10 OR 11 (80041)

  13. 3 AND 6 AND 9 AND 12 (110)

Appendix 2. MEDLINE search strategy via Ovid (for 2015 update)

  1. exp Anti‐inflammatory Agents, non‐steroidal/ (162888)

  2. (bufexamac OR bufexine OR calmaderm OR ekzemase OR diclofenac OR solaraze OR pennsaid OR voltarol OR emugel OR voltarene OR voltarol OR optha OR voltaren OR etofenamate OR afrolate OR algesalona OR bayro OR deiron OR etofen OR flexium OR flogoprofen OR rheuma‐gel OR rheumon OR traumalix OR traumon OR zenavan OR felbinac OR dolinac OR flexfree OR napageln OR target OR traxam OR fentiazac OR domureuma OR fentiazaco OR norvedan OR riscalon OR fepradinol OR dalgen OR flexidol OR cocresol OR rangozona OR reuflodol OR pinazone OR zepelin OR flufenamic OR dignodolin OR rheuma OR lindofluid OR sastridex OR lunoxaprofen OR priaxim OR flubiprofen OR fenomel OR ocufen OR ocuflur OR "Trans Act LAT" OR tulip OR ibuprofen OR cuprofen OR "deep relief" OR fenbid OR ibu‐cream OR ibugel OR ibuleve OR ibumousse OR ibuspray OR "nurofen gel" OR proflex OR motrin OR advil OR radian OR ralgex OR ibutop OR indomethacin OR indocin OR indospray OR isonixin OR nixyn OR ketoprofen OR tiloket OR oruvail OR powergel OR solpaflex OR ketorolac OR acular OR trometamol OR meclofenamic OR naproxen OR naprosyn OR niflumic OR actol OR flunir OR niflactol topico OR niflugel OR nifluril OR oxyphenbutazone OR californit OR diflamil OR otone OR tanderil OR piketoprofen OR calmatel OR triparsean OR piroxicam OR feldene OR pranoprofen OR oftalar OR pranox OR suxibuzone OR danilon OR flamilon OR ufenamate OR fenazol OR flector OR benzydamine).mp (558284)

  3. 1 OR 2 (664691)

  4. exp Administration, Topical/ (69697)

  5. (topical* OR cutaneous OR dermal OR transcutaneous OR transdermal OR percutaneous OR skin OR massage OR embrocation OR gel OR ointment OR aerosol OR cream OR crème OR lotion OR mouse OR foam OR liniment OR spray OR rub OR balm OR salve OR emulsion OR oil OR patch OR plaster).mp (1982395)

  6. 4 OR 5 (1997720)

  7. exp Athletic Injuries/ (21464)

  8. (strain OR sprain* OR contusion OR distortion OR compression OR "sports injur*" OR "soft tissue injur*" OR tend?nitis OR "muscle pain" OR periarthritis OR epicondylitis OR tenosynovitis).mp (420133)

  9. 7 OR 8 (439228)

  10. Pain/ (113906)

  11. (pain* OR analgesi*).mp (585249)

  12. 10 or 11 (585249)

  13. randomized controlled trial.pt (401171)

  14. randomized.ab (296222)

  15. placebo.ab (155341)

  16. drug therapy.fs (1789858)

  17. randomly.ab (207517)

  18. trial.ab (308477)

  19. groups.ab (1318386)

  20. OR/13‐19

  21. 3 AND 6 AND 9 AND 12 AND 20 (139)

  22. limit 21 to yr="2008‐Current" (56)

Appendix 3. EMBASE search strategy via Ovid (for 2015 update)

  1. exp Anti‐inflammatory Agents, non‐steroidal/ (452266)

  2. (bufexamac OR bufexine OR calmaderm OR ekzemase OR dicoflenac OR solaraze OR pennsaid OR voltarol OR emugel OR voltarene OR voltarol OR optha OR voltaren OR etofenamate OR afrolate OR algesalona OR bayro OR deiron OR etofen OR flexium OR flogoprofen OR rheuma‐gel OR rheumon OR traumalix OR traumon OR zenavan OR felbinac OR dolinac OR flexfree OR napageln OR target OR traxam OR fentiazac OR domureuma OR fentiazaco OR norvedan OR riscalon OR fepradinol OR dalgen OR flexidol OR cocresol OR rangozona OR reuflodol OR pinazone OR zepelin OR flufenamic OR dignodolin OR rheuma OR lindofluid OR sastridex OR lunoxaprofen OR priaxim OR flubiprofen OR fenomel OR ocufen OR ocuflur OR "Trans Act LAT" OR tulip OR ibuprofen OR cuprofen OR "deep relief" OR fenbid OR ibu‐cream OR ibugel OR ibuleve OR ibumousse OR ibuspray OR "nurofen gel" OR proflex OR motrin OR advil OR radian OR ralgex OR ibutop OR indomethacin OR indocin OR indospray OR isonixin OR nixyn OR ketoprofen OR tiloket OR oruvail OR powergel OR solpaflex OR ketorolac OR acular OR trometamol OR meclofenamic OR naproxen OR naprosyn OR niflumic OR actol OR flunir OR niflactol topico OR niflugel OR nifluril OR oxyphenbutazone OR californit OR diflamil OR otone OR tanderil OR piketoprofen OR calmatel OR triparsean OR piroxicam OR feldene OR pranoprofen OR oftalar OR pranox OR suxibuzone OR danilon OR flamilon OR ufenamate OR fenazol OR flector OR benzydamine).mp (790435)

  3. 1 OR 2 (1108683)

  4. exp Administration, Topical/ (68490)

  5. (topical* OR cutaneous OR dermal OR transcutaneous OR transdermal OR percutaneous OR skin OR massage OR embrocation OR gel OR ointment OR aerosol OR cream OR crème OR lotion OR mouse OR foam OR liniment OR spray OR rub OR balm OR salve OR emulsion OR oil OR patch OR plaster).mp (3208844)

  6. 4 OR 5 (3208844)

  7. exp Athletic Injuries/ (24675)

  8. (strain OR sprain* OR contusion OR distortion OR compression OR "sports injur*" OR "soft tissue injur*" OR tend?nitis OR "muscle pain" OR periarthritis OR epicondylitis OR tenosynovitis).mp (804322)

  9. 7 OR 8 (825164)

  10. Pain/ (216406)

  11. (pain* OR analgesi*).mp (971593)

  12. 10 OR 11 (971593)

  13. clinical trials.sh (841252)

  14. controlled clinical trials.sh (389335)

  15. randomized controlled trial.sh (357169)

  16. double‐blind procedure.sh (118945)

  17. (clin* adj25 trial*).ab (331002)

  18. ((doubl* or trebl* or tripl*) adj25 (blind* or mask*)).ab (141726)

  19. placebo*.ab (203390)

  20. random*.ab (906176)

  21. OR/13‐20 (1731380)

  22. 3 AND 6 AND 9 AND 10 AND 19 (439)

  23. limit 22 to yr="2008‐Current" (204)

Appendix 4. Summary of outcomes: efficacy

Study ID

Treatment

Clinical response

Other response

Airaksinen 1993

(1) Ketoprofen gel 2 x 5 g (125 mg) daily, n = 29

(2) Placebo gel, n = 27

PGE "improved" at 7 days

(1) 24/29

(2) 14/27

No additional data

Ăkermark 1990

(1) Indomethacin spray 1% (Elmetacin), 3‐5 x 0.5‐1.5 mL daily, n = 23

(2) Indomethacin capsules, 3 x 25 mg daily, n = 23

(3) Placebo spray and capsules, n = 24

No pain on palpation at 7 days

(1) 12/22

(2) 5/22

(3) 6/24

Patient assessment of improvement at 7 days (scale 0 to 100)

(1) 57

(2) 49

(3) 30

Aoki 1984

(1) Piroxicam gel 5%, 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 84

(2) Indomethacin gel 1%, 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 84

(3) Placebo gel, n = 84

PGE (5 point) "better or much better" at 7 days

(1) 56/72

(2) 41/64

(3) 33/67

Pain on movement "reduced" or "disappeared" at 7 days

(1) 48/61

(2) 38/60

(3) 35/63

Auclair 1989

(1) Niflumic acid gel 2.5%, 3 x 5 g daily, n = 117

(2) Placebo gel, n = 110

PGE (5 point) "good or very good" at 7 days

(1) 69/117

(2) 54/110

Pain on palpation "improved" at 7 days

(1) 69/117

(2) 53/110

Billigmann 1996

(1) Ibuprofen microgel 5% 3 x 200 mg daily, n = 80

(2) Placebo gel, n = 80

Complete remission

(1) 25/80

(2) 10/80

Improvement in pain with movement of 20% at 7 days

(1) 65/80

(2) 55/80

Campbell 1994

(1) Ibuprofen cream 5% (Proflex) 4 x 4" daily, n = 26

(2) Placebo cream, n = 25

Improvement in walking ability (4 point) at 7 days

(1) 21/26

(2) 19/25

No additional data

Chatterjee 1977

(1) Benzydamine HCl cream 3% 3 x daily, n = 25

(2) Placebo cream, n = 25

Pain on movement "absent/slight" at 6 days

(1) 21/25

(2) 12/25

Tenderness with pressure "absent/slight" at 6 days

(1) 21/25

(2) 12/25

Costantino 2011

(1) DHEP‐heparin plaster (Flectorparin) x 1 daily, n = 142

(2) DHEP plaster (Flector) x 1 daily, n = 146

(3) Placebo plaster, n = 142

No responder analysis for efficacy. Overall treatment efficacy not reported

Mean reduction from baseline for PI on movement at 3 days (from graph)
(1) 24 mm
(2) 19 mm
(3) 14 mm

Coudreuse 2010

(1) DHEP‐heparin plaster (Flectorparin), n = 120
(2) Placebo, n = 120

PGE "good" or "excellent" at 7 days

(1) 99/117

(2) 82/116

These are results for physician‐reported judgement ‐ not participant

Mean reduction from baseline for PI on movement over 6 hours
(1) about 30%
(2) about 20%
Overall greater in DHEP‐heparin group than placebo over 7 days

Curioni 1985

(1) Ibuproxam, n = 20

(2) Ketoprofen, n = 20

(3) Etofenamate, n = 20

Resolution of symptoms by 7 days

(1) 15/20

(2) 13/20

(3) 13/20

PGE "good" or "excellent" at 10 days

(1) 19/20

(2) not reported

(3) 16/20

Diebshlag 1990

(1) Ketorolac gel 2% 3 x 3 g daily, n = 13

(2) Etofenamate gel 5% 3 x 3 g daily, n = 12

(3) Placebo gel, n = 12

Improvement in pain at 7 days

(1) 12/13

(2) 10/12

(3) 9/12

No additional data

Dreiser 1988

(1) Ibuprofen cream 5%, 3 x 4 cm daily, n = 32 (3 x 10 cm for large joints)

(2) Placebo cream, n = 32

PGE "improvement" or "complete relief" at 7 days

(1) 26/32

(2) 12/32

(1) significantly better than (2) for mean improvement in spontaneous pain, movement pain, rest pain, tenderness to pressure (VAS)

Dreiser 1989

(1) Ketoprofen gel 2.5%, 2 x 5 cm daily, n = 30

(2) Placebo gel, n = 30

PGE (3 point) "better" at 7 days

(1) 18/30

(2) 5/30

(1) significantly better than (2) for mean improvement in pain (rest and movement) (VAS)

Dreiser 1990

(1) Niflumic acid gel 2.5%, 3 x 5 g daily, n = 30

(2) Placebo gel, n = 30

PGE (4 point) "cured" or "improved" at 7 days

(1) 23/30

(2) 10/30

(1) significantly better than (2) for mean improvement in pain (VAS)

Dreiser 1994

(1) Flurbiprofen plaster 2 x 40 mg daily, n = 65

(2) Placebo plaster, n = 66

PGE (4 point) "good" or "very good" at 7 days

(1) 48/65

(2) 41/66

(1) significantly better than (2) for mean improvement in spontaneous pain, but not pain on movement or palpation (VAS)

Fioravanti 1999

(1) DHEP lecithin gel 3 x 5 g (= 65 mg) daily, n = 50

(2) DHEP gel 3 x 5 g (= 65 mg) daily, n = 50

PGE (4 point) "good" or "excellent" at 10 days

(1) 35/50

(2) 35/50

(1) significantly better than (2) for mean improvement in spontaneous pain at 7 days, but not for pain on movement at 10 days (VAS)

Fujimaki 1985

(1) Piroxicam gel 0.5% 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 92

(2) Indomethacin gel 1% 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 90

(3) Placebo gel, n = 89

PGE (5 point) "better" or "much better" at end of treatment at 14 days

(1) 44/83

(2) 44/82

(3) 40/82

No additional data

Gallacchi 1990

(1) Diclofenac hydroxyethylpyrrolidine gel 1%, 4 x 2 g daily, n = 25 (Flector gel)

(2) Diclofenac sodium 1% 4 x 2 g daily, n = 25 (Voltaren Emugel)

PGE (5 point) "good" or "excellent" at 14 days

(1) 19/25

(2) 19/25

No significant difference between groups for pain on applied pressure at 7 and 14 days

González de Vega 2013

(1) Traumeel gel 3 x 2 g daily, n = 140

(2) Traumeel ointment, n = 143

(3) Diclofenac gel 1% 3 x 2 g daily, n = 137

Pain‐free at 7 days
(1) 7/140
(3) 8/137

PGE (5 point) "good" or "very good"

(1) 128/140

(3) 127/137

Normal function (5 point) score of 0 or 1 at 14 days

(1) 133/140

(3) 131/137

Governali 1995

(1) Ketoprofen gel 5% 3 x 2‐3 g daily, n = 15

(2) Ketoprofen cream 1%, 3 x 2‐3 g daily, n = 15

PGE (5 point) "good" or "excellent" at 7 days

(1) 14/15

(2) 4/15

No additional data

Gualdi 1987

(1) Flunaxaprofen gel 2 x 3‐5 cm daily, n = 30

(2) Ketoprofen gel 2 x 3‐5 cm daily, n = 30

No dichotomous data

No significant difference between groups for pain on movement at 7 days

Haig 1986

(1) Benzydamine cream 3%, 6 x daily, n = 21

(2) Placebo cream, n = 22

Pain on movement "improved" by 6 days

(1) 18/21

(2) 13/22

No additional data

Hoffmann 2012

(1) DHEP‐heparin plaster (Flectorparin) x 1 daily, n = 121
(2) DHEP (Flector) plaster x 1 daily, n = 115
(3) Placebo plaster, n = 118

PGE (5 point) "good" or "excellent": over 80% in all groups

Mean reduction from baseline in PI (100 mm VAS)
Day 3
(1) 19.1 mm
(2) 11.4 mm
(3) 5.2 mm
Day 8
(1) 44.3 mm
(2) 37.2 mm
(3) 29.6 mm

Hofman 2000

(1) Diclofenac sodium gel 1%, 4 x 2 cm daily, n = 69

(2) Lysine clonixinate gel 5%, 4 x 2 cm (22.5 mg) daily, n = 73

PGE (3 point) at 8 days: "good"

(1) 38/69

(2) 36/73

No significant difference between treatments for any pain outcomes

Hosie 1993

(1) Felbinac foam 3% 3 x 2 g daily + placebo tablets, 3 x 1 daily, n = 140 (127 analysed for efficacy)

(2) Ibuprofen tablets 3 x 400 mg daily + placebo foam 3 x 2 g daily, n = 147 (134 analysed for efficacy)

Pain on movement "none" or "mild" at 7 days

(1) 81/127

(2) 96/133

Spontaneous pain "none" or "mild" at 7 days

(1) 99/127

(2) 108/134

Jenoure 1997

(1) DHEP plaster (Tissugel), 2 x daily, n = 44

(2) Placebo plaster 2 x daily, n = 41

Baseline pain in two groups not balanced, and data in table and figure do not agree, so efficacy outcomes not used

No additional data

Joussellin 2003

(1) DHEP plaster (Flector Tissugel 1%), 1 x daily, n = 68

(2) Placebo plaster 1 x daily, n = 66

PGE (4 point) "excellent" at 7 days

(1) 36/68

(2) 24/66

≥ 30% reduction in PI at 7 days

(1) 25/68

(2) 11/66

(1) significantly better than (2) for mean pain on movement at 6 days

Julien 1989

(1) Ketoprofen gel 2.5% 2 x 5 cm (= 50 mg) daily, n = 30

(2) Placebo gel, n = 30

PGE (4 point) "recovered" at 7 days

(1) 18/30

(2) 6/30

PGE (4 point) "recovered" or "improved" at 7 days

(1) 25/30

(2) 13/30

Klainguti 2010

(1) DHEP‐heparin plaster (Flectorparin) x 1 daily, n = 62

(2) DHEP plaster (Flector) x 1 daily, n = 61

(3) Placebo, n = 59

Overall treatment efficacy (participant and investigator) (5 point) "good" or "excellent" at 3 days

(1) 56/62

(2) not reported

(3) 46/59

Mean reduction in PI at day 3 (from graph)
(1) 33 mm

(2) Not reported
(3) 24 mm

Kockelbergh 1985

(1) Ketoprofen gel 2.5% 2 x 5 cm (= 15 mg) daily, n = 38

(2) Placebo gel, n = 36

PGE (3 point) "good" at 7 days

(1) 30/38

(2) 22/36

(1) and (2) slightly better than (3) for mean spontaneous pain at 7 days

Kuehl 2011

(1) DETP 1.3% plaster 2 x daily, n = 207
(2) Placebo plaster, n = 211

No dichotomous data

Percentage reduction from baseline at last application

(1) 73%

(2) 62%

Li 2013

(1) DHEP plaster (Flector) 2 x daily, n = 192
(2) Placebo plaster 2 x daily, n = 192

≥ 50% pain reduction at day 7 (posthoc analysis)

(1) 173/192

(2) 114/192

Overall treatment efficacy (5 point) "good" or "excellent"

(1) 161/192

(2) 81/192

Participant and investigator rating

Mean ± SD reduction in PI on movement at 7 days
(1) 53.8 ± 17.0
(2) 37.0 ± 18.3

Linde 1985

(1) Benzydamine 3% cream 3 x daily, n = 50

(2) Placebo gel, n = 50

No pain on movement (walking) at 8 days

(1) 35/50

(2) 40/50

No additional data

Machen 2002

(1) Ibuprofen gel 5% 3 x daily, n = 40

(2) Placebo gel, n = 41

PGE: (5 point) "marked improvement" or "complete clearance" at 7 days

(1) 25/40

(2) 9/41

Clinically meaningful (≥ 30 mm) pain relief at day 7

(1) 30/40

(2) 16/41

Mahler 2003

(1) DHEP + lethicin gel 3 x 5 g daily, n = 52

(2) DHEP gel 3 x 5 g daily, n = 48

PGE (4 point) "good" or "excellent" at 10 days

(1) 49/52

(2) 39/48

Mean reduction in pain on movement at 3 and 10 days significantly greater with (1) than (2)

Mazières 2005b

(1) Ketoprofen plaster 100 mg, x 1 daily, n = 81

(2) Placebo plaster, n = 82

PGE (4 point) "good" or "excellent" at 14 days

(1) 72/81

(2) 60/82

All mean efficacy measures improved more for (1) than (2), most were statistically significant

Mazières 2005a

(1) Ketoprofen plaster 100 mg, x 1 daily, n = 87

(2) Placebo plaster, n = 85

PGE (4 point) "good" or "excellent" at 14 days

(1) 50/87

(2) 41/85

All mean efficacy measures improved more for (1) than (2), most were statistically significant

McLatchie 1989

(1) Felbinac gel 3% 3 x 3 cm daily, n = 118

(2) Placebo gel, n = 113

No dichotomous data

Patient daily self‐assessment for mean pain on rest, movement, at night, interference with normal and leisure activities show better efficacy for (1) than (2) from day 2 (VAS)

Morris 1991

(1) Felbinac gel 3% 3 x 1 cm daily, n = 41

(2) Placebo gel, n = 43

PGE (5 point) "good" or "very good" at 7 days

(1) 23/41

(2) 27/43

(1) better than (2) for mean improvement in symptoms and sporting function at 7 days

NCT01255423

(1) Diclofenac sodium gel 1% x 4 daily, n = 104
(2) Placebo gel x 4 daily, n = 100

No dichotomous data

VAS (mean ± SD) at 72 hours (baseline PI not reported)

(1) 37.4 ± 25.2

(2) 38.8 ± 24.1

NCT01272934

(1) Diclofenac sodium gel 1% x 4 daily, n = 104
(2) Placebo gel x 4 daily, n = 100

No dichotomous data

VAS (mean ± SD) at 72 hours (baseline PI not reported)

(1) 25.6 ± 15.9

(2) 61.2 ± 16.6

NCT01272947

(1) Diclofenac sodium gel 1% x 4 daily, n = 104
(2) Placebo gel x 4 daily, n = 100

No dichotomous data

VAS (mean ± SD) at 24 hours (baseline PI not reported)

(1) 33.1 ± 21.4

(2) 65.4 ± 16.9

Noret 1987

(1) Ketoprofen gel 2.5% 2 x 5 cm (7.5 mg) daily, n = 48

(2) Placebo gel, n = 45

PGE (4 point) "good" or "excellent" at 8 days

(1) 39/48

(2) 9/45

Decrease in mean spontaneous pain significantly greater in (1) than (2) by 3 days

Parrini 1992

(1) Ketoprofen foam 15% 3 x 2 g (200 mg) daily, n = 83

(2) Placebo foam, n = 86

No dichotomous data

Mean pain on movement and pressure significantly decreased by 7 days in (1) compared with (2)

Picchio 1981

(1) Ibuprofen gel 10% 3 x daily , n = 20

(2) Ketoprofen gel 1% 3 x daily, n = 20

No pain on movement at 8 days

(1) 3/20

(2) 0/20

Spontaneous pain "none" at 8 days

(1) 6/20

(2) 0/20

Predel 2004

(1) Diclofenac sodium plaster, 2 x daily (140 mg/plaster), n = 60

(2) Placebo plaster, n = 60

PGE (4 point) "good" "excellent" at 7 days

(1) 55/60

(2) 5/60

(1) better than (2) for reduction in tenderness, pain, and speed of pain reduction

Predel 2012

(1) Diclofenac gel (Voltaren Emulgel 2.32%) 2 x 5 cm daily, n = 80
(2) Diclofenac gel (Voltaren Emulgel 2.32% ) 3 x 5 cm daily, n = 80
(3) Placebo gel, n = 82

≥ 50% red in PI on movement at 5 days

(1) 57/80
(2) 59/80
(3) 17/82

PGE efficacy (5 point) "good" or "very good" at 8 days

(1) 68/80
(2) 73/80
(3) 24/82

Predel 2013a

(1) Diclofenac 4% spray gel 4 or 5 sprays 3 x daily (96‐120 mg diclofenac sodium), n = 118
(2) Placebo spray gel, n = 114

None or slight PI on movement at 7‐8 days

(1) 111/118

(2) 93/114

None or slight PI on movement at 3‐4 days
(1) 76/118
(2) 58/114

Predel 2013b

(1) Diclofenac gel (Voltaren Emulgel) 4 x 2 g daily, n = 36
(2) Placebo gel 4 x 2 g daily, n = 36

PGE (5 point) "good" or "excellent"

(1) 36/36

(2) 7/36

≥ 50% reduction in PI on movement after 48 hours

(1) 34/36

(2) 3/36

Ramesh 1983

(1) Ibuprofen cream 5% 3 or 4 x 5‐10 cm daily, n = 40

(2) Placebo cream, n = 40

Pain on movement (4 point) "none" or "slight" at 7 days

(1) 23/40

(2) 23/40

Physician global assessment at 10 days: "good"
(1) 29/40
(2) 16/40

Rowbotham 2003

(1) Diclofenac epolamine plaster (Flector Tissuegel) 2 x daily, n = 191

(2) Placebo plaster, n = 181

Pain intensity ≤ 2/10 for 2 days or 4 consecutive evaluations, by 7 days

(1) 75/191

(2) 48/181

Mean pain on rest significantly better with (1) than (2) after 7 days

Russell 1991

(1) Piroxicam gel 0.5% 4 x 5 mg daily, n = 100

(2) Placebo gel, n = 100

PGE (4 point) "good" or "excellent" at 8 days

(1) 79/100

(2) 45/100

Statistically greater reduction in mean pain on movement at 8 days with (1) than (2)

Saillant 1998

(1) DHEP plaster (Flector Tissugel 1%) 1 x daily, n = 70
(2) Placebo plaster 1 x daily, n = 70

PGE (4 point) "excellent" at 7 days

(1) 43/70

(2) 25/70

≥ 30% decrease in PI at 7 days

(1) 64/70

(2) 50/70

Sanguinetti 1989

(1) Felbinac gel 3% 3 x daily, n = 42

(2) Placebo gel, n = 40

PGE "good" or "very good" at 7 days

(1) 34/42

(2) 11/40

(1) better than (2) by 2 days

Sinniger 1981

(1) Fentiazac cream 5% 2 or 3 x daily, n = 10

(2) Placebo cream, n = 10

Complete pain relief within 10 days

(1) 7/10

(2) 1/10

Improvement in active pain on movement at 5 days

(1) 67%

(2) 32%

Spacca 2005

(1) DHEP lecithin gel (Effigel), 3 x 5 g, daily, n = 79

(2) Placebo gel, n = 76

No dichotomous data

Mean pain scores improved more rapidly in (1) than (2) ‐ statistically significant at 3 and 6 days

Sugioka 1984

(1) Piroxicam gel 0.5% 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 183

(2) Indomethacin gel 1% 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 183

PGE (5 point) "better" or "much better" at 14 days

(1) 85/175

(2) 55/165

Pain on movement "reduced" or "disappeared" at 7 days

(1) 77/175

(2) 63/165

Thorling 1990

(1) Naproxen gel 10% 2‐6 x daily, n = 60

(2) Placebo gel, n = 60

PGE (5 point) "good" or "very good" at 7 days

(1) 38/60

(2) 27/60

Participants using naproxen improved more rapidly and had significantly lower severity scores by day 3

Tonutti 1994

(1) Ketoprofen gel 5%, 3 x 2‐3 g daily, n = 15

(2) Etofenamate gel 5%, 3 x 2‐3 g, n = 15

PGE (4 point) "good" or "excellent" at 7 days

(1) 10/15

(2) 11/15

Significant reductions in pain on movement by 7 days in both groups

Vecchiet 1991

(1) Meclofenamic acid gel 5% 2 x 10 cm daily (2 g), n = 30

(2) Placebo, n = 30

PGE (4 point) "good" or "excellent" at 10 days

(1) 30/30

(2) 19/30

(1) significantly better than (2) for mean improvement in spontaneous pain, movement pain, functional restriction

Whitefield 2002

(1) Ibuprofen gel 5% + placebo tablet 3 x daily, n = 50

(2) Ibuprofen 400 mg tablet + placebo gel 3 x daily, n = 50

Participant satisfied at 7 days

(1) 30/50

(2) 36/50

"Completely better" at 14 days

(1) 24/50

(2) 30/50

DHEP: diclofenac epolamine; HCl: hydrochloride; n: number; PGE: participant global evaluation; PI: pain intensity; SD: standard deviation; VAS: visual analogue scale.

Appendix 5. Summary of outcomes: adverse events and withdrawals

Study ID

Treatment

Local AEs

Systemic AEs

Serious AEs

Withdrawals

Airaksinen 1993

(1) Ketoprofen gel 2 x 5 g (125 mg) daily, n = 29

(2) Placebo gel, n = 27

(1) 5/29

(2) 4/27

(1) 1/29 (nausea after paracetamol)

(2) 0/27

None

AE: none

Other: none reported

Ăkermark 1990

(1) Indomethacin spray 1% (Elmetacin), 3‐5 x 0.5‐1.5 mL daily, n = 23

(2) Indomethacin capsules, 3 x 25 mg daily, n = 23

(3) Placebo spray and capsules, n = 24

(1) 4/22

(2) 0/22

(3) 0/24

No usable data ‐ reported for events not participants

None reported

AE: (1) 1, (2) 1, (3) 0

Lost to follow‐up: (1) 1, (2) 2, (3) 3

Aoki 1984

(1) Piroxicam gel 5%, 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 84

(2) Indomethacin gel 1%, 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 84

(3) Placebo gel, n = 84

(1) 1/79

(2) 2/70

(3) 2/74

None

None reported

AE: none

23 excluded for protocol violations: (1) 7, (2) 7, (3) 9

26 withdrew for reasons unrelated to treatment: (1) 5, (2) 13, (3) 8

Auclair 1989

(1) Niflumic acid gel 2.5%, 3 x 5 g daily, n = 117

(2) Placebo gel, n = 110

All AEs

(1) 5/123

(2) 6/116

Most commonly cutaneous eruptions

No usable data

None reported

AE: (1) 1/123, (2) 0/116

26 excluded from efficacy analysis for not meeting entry criteria and protocol violations

Billigmann 1996

(1) Ibuprofen microgel 5% 3 x 200 mg daily, n = 80

(2) Placebo gel, n = 80

(1) 11/80

(2) 4/80

None reported

None reported

AE: (1) 2/80 (allergic rash, dermatitis)

No reason given: (1) 3/80, (2) 5/80
Symptom‐free: (1) 1/80, (2) 1/80

Campbell 1994

(1) Ibuprofen cream 5% (Proflex) 4 x 4" daily, n = 26

(2) Placebo cream, n = 25

No data

(1) 1/26 (headache)

(2) 0/25

No data

AE: none

Exclusions 49: 3 presented late, 2 missing forms, 1 appeared twice, 43 did not return diaries

Chatterjee 1977

(1) Benzydamine HCl cream 3% 3 x daily, n = 25

(2) Placebo cream, n = 25

None

None

None

AE: none

1 participant lost to follow‐up (group not reported)

Costantino 2011

(1) DHEP‐heparin plaster (Flectorparin) x 1 daily, n = 142

(2) DHEP plaster (Flector) x 1 daily, n = 146

(3) Placebo plaster, n = 142

Possibly or probably drug‐related
(1) 2/142
(2) 1/145
(3) 6/142

All mild and gone by 14 days, except 1 (moderate) in placebo group

Not reported
No systemic GI events

None

AE: none

Other:

(1) 0/142
(2) 2/146 (protocol deviation, lost to follow‐up)
(3) 2/142 (lost to follow‐up)

Coudreuse 2010

(1) DHEP‐heparin plaster (Flectorparin), n = 120
(2) Placebo, n = 120

(1) 1/117
(2) 7/116

All AEs mild or moderate, resolved spontaneously

(1) 1/117
(2) 0/116

None

AE:

(1) 1/117 (increased oedema)

(2) 0/116

Other:

(1) 6/117 (recovery 3, no reason 3)

(2) 3/116 (recovery 1, no reason 2)

Curioni 1985

(1) Ibuproxam, n = 20

(2) Ketoprofen, n = 20

(3) Etofenamate, n = 20

None

None

None

AE: none

Other: none

Diebshlag 1990

(1) Ketorolac gel 2% 3 x 3 g daily, n = 13

(2) Etofenamate gel 5% 3 x 3 g daily, n = 12

(3) Placebo gel, n = 12

(1) 1/13

(2) 1/12

(3) 0/12

None

None

AE: none

1 ketorolac participant did not attend 15 day follow‐up due to car accident

Dreiser 1988

(1) Ibuprofen cream 5%, 3 x 4 cm daily, n = 32 (3 x 10 cm for large joints)

(2) Placebo cream, n = 32

No usable data

None

Not reported

AE: none

4 placebo participants lost to follow‐up

Dreiser 1989

(1) Ketoprofen gel 2.5%, 2 x 5 cm daily, n = 30

(2) Placebo gel, n = 30

(1) 0/30

(2) 2/30

None

None reported

AE: (2) 2/30 (intolerance)

LoE: (1) 1/30, (2) 1/30

Dreiser 1990

(1) Niflumic acid gel 2.5%, 3 x 5 g daily, n = 30

(2) Placebo gel, n = 30

(1) 0/30

(2) 3/30

None

None

AE: (2) 1/30 (erythema)

Exclusion: 1 from (2) from efficacy analysis for inadequate baseline pain

Dreiser 1994

(1) Flurbiprofen plaster 2 x 40 mg daily, n = 65

(2) Placebo plaster, n = 66

(1) 2/65

(2) 0/66

None

None

AE: 0

(1) 1/65 excluded from efficacy analysis for protocol violation
(2) 2/66 (1 LoE, 1 cured)

Fioravanti 1999

(1) DHEP lecithin gel 3 x 5 g (= 65 mg) daily, n = 50

(2) DHEP gel 3 x 5 g (= 65 mg) daily, n = 50

(1) 0/50

(2) 1/50

No data

None reported

AE: none

Other: none

Fujimaki 1985

(1) Piroxicam gel 0.5% 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 92

(2) Indomethacin gel 1% 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 90

(3) Placebo gel, n = 89

(1) 1/83

(2) 5/82

(3) 2/82

(1) 0/83

(2) 1/82 (nausea and vomiting)

(3) 0/82

None

AE: (1) 0, (2) 4, (3) 0

Unknown reasons: (1) 2, (2) 1

Did not return after 1st visit/irregular visits: (1) 6, (2) 6, (3) 7

Gallacchi 1990

(1) Diclofenac hydroxyethylpyrrolidine gel 1%, 4 x 2 g daily, n = 25 (Flector gel)

(2) Diclofenac sodium 1% 4 x 2 g daily, n = 25 (Voltaren Emugel)

No AEs

None

None

AE: none

Other: none

González de Vega 2013

(1) Traumeel gel 3 x 2 g daily, n = 140

(2) Traumeel ointment, n = 143
(3) Diclofenac gel 1% 3 x 2 g daily, n = 137

No usable data

Infrequent, mild to moderate

No usable data

None

AE: none

Other:

(1) 11/140
(2) 12/137

Governali 1995

(1) Ketoprofen gel 5% 3 x 2‐3 g daily, n = 15

(2) Ketoprofen cream 1%, 3 x 2‐3 g daily, n = 15

No side effects

None

None

AE: none

Other: none

Gualdi 1987

(1) Flunaxaprofen gel 2 x 3‐5 cm daily, n = 30

(2) Ketoprofen gel 2 x 3‐5 cm daily, n = 30

(1) 1/30

(2) 3/30

No data

None reported

AE: none

Other: none

Haig 1986

(1) Benzydamine cream 3%, 6 x daily, n = 21

(2) Placebo cream, n = 22

No AEs reported

None

None reported

AE: none reported

Other: no data

Hoffmann 2012

(1) DHEP‐heparin plaster (Flectorparin) x 1 daily, n = 121
(2) DHEP (Flector) plaster x 1 daily, n = 115
(3) Placebo plaster, n = 118

Most AEs were minor local reactions (e.g. pruritus and erythema) in area of plaster, of mild to moderate intensity and resolved without interrupting treatment

No treatment‐related systemic AEs recorded

(2) 1 participant had 3 SAEs, none judged related to study medication

AE: none

Exclusions:

(1) 5/121

(2) 10/115

(3) 7/118

Excluded from per protocol analysis due to poor compliance or personal decision

Hofman 2000

(1) Diclofenac sodium gel 1%, 4 x 2 cm daily, n = 69

(2) Lysine clonixinate gel 5%, 4 x 2 cm (22.5 mg) daily, n = 73

(1) 1/58

(2) 1/61

None

None

AE: none

LoE: (1) 9, (2) 8

Hosie 1993

(1) Felbinac foam 3% 3 x 2 g daily + placebo tablets, 3 x 1 daily, n = 140 (127 analysed for efficacy)

(2) Ibuprofen tablets 3 x 400 mg daily + placebo foam 3 x 2 g daily, n = 147 (134 analysed for efficacy)

(1) 1/127

(2) 3/134

GI events: (1) 14/127, (2) 11/134

For (1) more mild, none definitely drug related, for (2) definitely related to study drug

None

AE: none

Exclusions: (1) 13, (2) 13 did not return for 7 day follow‐up

Jenoure 1997

(1) DHEP plaster (Tissugel), 2 x daily, n = 44

(2) Placebo plaster 2 x daily, n = 41

(1) 1/44

(2) 1/41

No data

None reported

AE: none reported

Other: none reported

Joussellin 2003

(1) DHEP plaster (Flector Tissugel 1%), 1 x daily, n = 68

(2) Placebo plaster 1 x daily, n = 66

(1) 1/68 (pruritus)
(2) 3/66 (pruritus 2, burning 1)

All AEs mild or moderate

(1) 1/68 (allergic reaction)
(2) 0/66

None reported

AE:

(1) 0/66

(2) 1/66

Other:

(1) 3/66

(2) 2/66

Julien 1989

(1) Ketoprofen gel 2.5% 2 x 5 cm (= 50 mg) daily, n = 30

(2) Placebo gel, n = 30

(1) 1/30

(2) 0/30

Not reported

None

AE: none

Other: none

Klainguti 2010

(1) DHEP‐heparin plaster (Flectorparin) x 1 daily, n = 62
(2) DHEP plaster (Flector) x 1 daily, n = 61
(3) Placebo, n = 59

(1) 0/62

(2) 0/61

(3) 1/59
All AEs mild in nature and resolved spontaneously

(1) 1/65 (facial infection)

(2) 1/61 (abdominal pain)

(3) 0/59

None

AE: none

Other:

(1) 3/65
(2) 1/61
(3) 3/59

Kockelbergh 1985a

(1) Ketoprofen gel 2.5% 2 x 5 cm (= 15 mg) daily, n = 38

(2) Placebo gel, n = 36

(1) 1/38

(2) 1/26

Not reported

None

AE: none

Other: none

Kuehl 2011

(1) DETP 1.3% plaster 2 x daily, n = 207
(2) Placebo plaster, n = 211

(1) 16/207
(2) 12/211

(1) 15/207
(2) 23/211

None

AE:

(1) 4/207
(2) 9/211

LoE:

(1) 21/207

(2) 25/211

Other:

(1) 58/207

(2) 62/211

Li 2013

(1) DHEP plaster (Flector) 2 x daily, n = 192
(2) Placebo plaster 2 x daily, n = 192

(1) 4/192
(2) 3/192

(1) 10/192
(2) 4/192

None

AE:

(1) 2/192
(2) 0/192

Other:

(1) 5/192
(2) 1/192

Linde 1985

(1) Benzydamine 3% cream 3 x daily, n = 50

(2) Placebo gel, n = 50

(1) 4/40

(2) 2/41

None

None

AE: none

(1) 6, (2) 6 excluded from 1st assessment
(1) 3, (2) 4 excluded from final assessment

Machen 2002

(1) Ibuprofen gel 5% 3 x daily, n = 40

(2) Placebo gel, n = 41

(1) 4/40

(2) 2/41

None

None

AE: none

(1) 1 LoE, 1 protocol violation
(2) 4 LoE

Mahler 2003

(1) DHEP + lethicin gel 3 x 5 g daily, n = 52

(2) DHEP gel 3 x 5 g daily, n = 48

(1) 1/52

(2) 0/48

(1) 1/52

(2) 0/48

None

AE: none

5 lost to follow‐up

Mazières 2005b

(1) Ketoprofen plaster 100 mg, x 1 daily, n = 81

(2) Placebo plaster, n = 82

At 21 days:

(1) 12/81

(2) 6/82

(1) 13/81

(2) 14/82

None

AE: (1) 3/81

(1) 7/81 (1 LoE, 6 cured)

(2) 7/82 (5 LoE, 2 cured)

Mazières 2005a

(1) Ketoprofen plaster 100 mg, x 1 daily, n = 87

(2) Placebo plaster, n = 85

At 21 days:

(1) 29/87

(2) 27/85

(1) 11/87

(2) 7/85

None

AE: (1) 9/87, (2) 6/85

(1) 6/87 (2 LoE, 4 cured)

(2) 5/85 (4 LoE, 1 cured)

McLatchie 1989

(1) Felbinac gel 3% 3 x 3 cm daily, n = 118

(2) Placebo gel, n = 113

(1) 3/118

(2) 2/113

Mild transient local irritation

None reported

None

AE: none

Other: none

Morris 1991

(1) Felbinac gel 3% 3 x 1 cm daily, n = 41

(2) Placebo gel, n = 43

None

None

None

AE: none

(1) 4 (protocol violations)

(2) 1 (lost to follow‐up)

Exclusions: 11 from efficacy analysis because evaluated by 4 different investigators

NCT01255423

(1) Diclofenac sodium gel 1% x 4 daily, n = 104
(2) Placebo gel x 4 daily, n = 100

(1) 1/104

(2) 3/102

Total AE

(1) 11/104

(2) 8/102

None

None

NCT01272934

(1) Diclofenac sodium gel 1% x 4 daily, n = 104
(2) Placebo gel x 4 daily, n = 100

(1) 1/102

(2) 0/103

Total AE (excluding SAE)

(1) 6/102

(2) 3/103

(1) 0/102

(2) 1/103 (ruptured ligaments in wrist)

AE: see SAE

NCT01272947

(1) Diclofenac sodium gel 1% x 4 daily, n = 104
(2) Placebo gel x 4 daily, n = 100

None

(1) 2/104

(2) 2/100

None

None

Noret 1987

(1) Ketoprofen gel 2.5% 2 x 5 cm (7.5 mg) daily, n = 48

(2) Placebo gel, n = 45

(1) 1/51

(2) 0/47

None reported

Not reported

AE: (1) 1/51 (skin allergy)

(1) 1 LoE, 1 unrelated to trial
(2) 1 LoE, 1 unrelated to trial

Parrini 1992

(1) Ketoprofen foam 15% 3 x 2 g (200 mg) daily, n = 83

(2) Placebo foam, n = 86

None

None

None

AE: none

Other: none

Picchio 1981

(1) Ibuprofen gel 10% 3 x daily , n = 20

(2) Ketoprofen gel 1% 3 x daily, n = 20

None

None

None

AE: none

Other: not reported

Predel 2004

(1) Diclofenac sodium plaster, 2 x daily (140 mg/plaster), n = 60

(2) Placebo plaster, n = 60

12 participants experienced 16 mild AEs with no differences between groups

None

None

AE: (1) 1/60

Other: none

Predel 2012

(1) Diclofenac gel (Voltaren Emulgel 2.32%) 2 x 5 cm daily, n = 80
(2) Diclofenac gel (Voltaren Emulgel 2.32%) 3 x 5 cm daily, n = 80
(3) Placebo gel, n = 82

(1) 0/80
(2) 1/80

(3) 1/82

All mild to moderate

(1) 2/80
(2) 1/80
(3) 3/82

None

AE:

(1) 0/80
(2) 0/80
(3) 1/82

Other:

(1) 1/80
(2) 2/80
(3) 2/82

(protocol violations, lost to follow‐up)

Predel 2013a

(1) Diclofenac 4% spray gel 4 or 5 sprays 3 x daily (96‐120 mg diclofenac sodium), n = 118
(2) Placebo spray gel, n = 114

(1) 1/118
(2) 4/114

(1) 5/118
(2) 4/114

All AEs mild, reversible

None

AE:

(1) 1/118
(2) 1/114

Other:

(1) 3/118
(2) 43/114

Predel 2013b

(1) Diclofenac gel (Voltaren Emulgel) 4 x 2 g daily, n = 36
(2) Placebo gel 4 x 2 g daily, n = 36

None

(1) 0/36
(2) 1/36

None

AE: none

Other: none

Ramesh 1983

(1) Ibuprofen cream 5% 3 or 4 x 5‐10 cm daily, n = 40

(2) Placebo cream, n = 40

(1) 1/40

(2) 1/40

None reported

Not reported

AE: (1) 1/40, (2) 1/40

Other: none

Rowbotham 2003

(1) DHEP plaster (Flector Tissuegel) 2 x daily, n = 191

(2) Placebo plaster, n = 181

(1) 27/191 (pruritis 14)

(2) 31/181 (pruritis 21)

(1) 21/191

(2) 22/181

None reported ("vast majority mild")

AE: none

(1) 3/191, (2) 4/181 (did not finish trial and complete daily diaries)

Russell 1991

(1) Piroxicam gel 0.5% 4 x 5 mg daily, n = 100

(2) Placebo gel, n = 100

(1) 4/102

(2) 10/102

GI or CNS events: (1) 4, (2) 7

Any AE: (1) 7/102, (2) 15/102

None reported

AE: (1) 1/102, (2) 8/102

Other: (1) 6 LoE, 1 "other"

(2) 42 LoE

Exclusions: 7 did not comply with study medication schedule, 6 lost to follow‐up, 1 protocol violation

Saillant 1998

(1) DHEP plaster (Flector Tissugel 1%) 1 x daily, n = 70
(2) Placebo plaster 1 x daily, n = 70

None

None

None

AE: none

Other:

(1) 5/70

(2) 5/70

Sanguinetti 1989

(1) Felbinac gel 3% 3 x daily, n = 42

(2) Placebo gel, n = 40

(1) 3/42
(2) 1/40

None

None reported

AE: none

Other: none reported

Sinniger 1981

(1) Fentiazac cream 5% 2 or 3 x daily, n = 10

(2) Placebo cream, n = 10

"No untoward side effects"

None

None

AE: none

Other: none reported

Spacca 2005

(1) DHEP lecithin gel (Effigel), 3 x 5 g, daily, n = 79

(2) Placebo gel, n = 76

"No signs of cutaneous irritation or sensitisation observed"

No AEs observed

None

AE: none

Other: none reported

Sugioka 1984

(1) Piroxicam gel 0.5% 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 183

(2) Indomethacin gel 1% 3 or 4 x 1 g daily, n = 183

(1) 5/178

(2) 26/179

None reported

None reported

AE: none reported

Exclusions due to protocol violations:
(1) 8, (2) 18

Withdrawals:
(1) 11, (2) 12

Thorling 1990

(1) Naproxen gel 10% 2‐6 x daily, n = 60

(2) Placebo gel, n = 60

(1) 1/60

(2) 0/60

None

None

AE: none

(1) 1 LoE, 1 protocol violation
(2) 1 participant request

Tonutti 1994

(1) Ketoprofen gel 5%, 3 x 2‐3 g daily, n = 15

(2) Etofenamate gel 5%, 3 x 2‐3 g, n = 15

None

No AEs attributable to the medication

None

AE: None

LoE: (1) 1, (2) 2

Vecchiet 1991

(1) Meclofenamic acid gel 5% 2 x 10 cm daily (2 g), n = 30

(2) Placebo, n = 30

Tolerability excellent or good in nearly all participants

No data

None

AE: none reported

(2) 5 lost to follow‐up

Whitefield 2002

(1) Ibuprofen gel 5% + placebo tablet 3 x daily, n = 50

(2) Ibuprofen 400 mg tablet + placebo gel 3 x daily, n = 50

No data

6 AEs reported, none judged related to study medication

None reported

AE: none

Recovered: (1) 3, (2) 2

LoE: (2) 1

Lost to follow‐up: (1) 1, (2) 1

AE: adverse event; CNS: central nervous system; DHEP: diclofenac epolamine; GI: gastrointestinal; HCl: hydrochloride; LoE: lack of efficacy; n: number; SAE: serious adverse event.

Appendix 6. Concentration, amount, and frequency of dosing

Study

Drug

Concentration

Quantity

Frequency

Estimated daily dose of topical NSAID

Joussellin 2003

Diclofenac

1%

Plaster

1

180 mg epolamine salt, 140 mg Na salt

Li 2013

Diclofenac

1%

Plaster

2

360 mg epolamine salt, 280 mg Na salt

Rowbotham 2003

Diclofenac

1%

Plaster

2

360 mg epolamine salt, 280 mg Na salt

Saillant 1998

Diclofenac

1%

Plaster

1

180 mg epolamine salt, 140 mg Na salt

Coudreuse 2010

Diclofenac

1%

Plaster

1

180 mg epolamine salt, 140 mg Na salt

Klainguti 2010

Diclofenac

1%

Plaster

1

180 mg epolamine salt, 140 mg Na salt

Predel 2004

Diclofenac

Plaster

2

280 mg Na salt

Predel 2012

Diclofenac

2.32%

5 cm ribbon/˜ 2 g

2 or 3

92‐138 mg (?Na equiv) as diethylamine salt

Predel 2013b

Diclofenac

1.16%

2 g

4

92 mg (?Na equiv) as diethylamine salt

Predel 2013a

Diclofenac

4%

4‐5 sprays

3

96‐120 mg Na salt

Costantino 2011

Diclofenac

1%

Plaster

1

180 mg epolamine salt, 140 mg Na salt

Fioravanti 1999

Diclofenac

5 g

3

195 mg epolamine salt

Gallacchi 1990

Diclofenac

1%

2 g

4

80 mg

González de Vega 2013

Diclofenac

1%

6 cm, 2g

3

60 mg

Hoffmann 2012

Diclofenac

1%

Plaster

1

180 mg epolamine salt, 140 mg Na salt

Hofman 2000

Diclofenac

1%

2 cm

4

probably 30‐40 mg Na salt

Jenoure 1997

Diclofenac

1%

Plaster

2

360 mg epolamine salt, 280 mg Na salt

Mahler 2003

Diclofenac

5 g

3

195 mg epolamine salt

NCT01255423

Diclofenac

1%

4

NCT01272934

Diclofenac

1%

4

NCT01272947

Diclofenac

1%

4

Spacca 2005

Diclofenac

5 g

3

195 mg epolamine salt

Campbell 1994

Ibuprofen

5%

4 inch ribbon

4

Assume 800 mg

Dreiser 1988

Ibuprofen

5%

4 cm ribbon
(10 cm for larger joints)

4

Assume up‐800 mg

Ramesh 1983

Ibuprofen

5%

5‐10 cm ribbon

3‐4

Assume 300‐800 mg

Billigmann 1996

Ibuprofen

5%

10 cm, 4 g gel

3

600 mg

Machen 2002

Ibuprofen

5%

3

Picchio 1981

Ibuprofen

10%

3

Whitefield 2002

Ibuprofen

5%

3

Mazières 2005b

Ketoprofen

Plaster

1

100 mg

Mazières 2005a

Ketoprofen

Plaster

1

100 mg

Airaksinen 1993

Ketoprofen

5 g

2

125 mg

Dreiser 1989

Ketoprofen

2.5%

5 cm

2

100 mg

Julien 1989

Ketoprofen

2.5%

5 cm

2

100 mg

Noret 1987

Ketoprofen

2.5%

5 cm, 7.5 g

2

375 mg

Curioni 1985

Ketoprofen

No details

2

Governali 1995

Ketoprofen

5%

2‐3 g

3

300‐450 mg

Governali 1995

Ketoprofen

1%

2‐3 g

3

60‐90 mg

Gualdi 1987

Ketoprofen

3‐5 cm

2

Kockelbergh 1985

Ketoprofen

2.5%

5 cm

2

100 mg

Parrini 1992

Ketoprofen

15.0%

2 g

3

600 mg

Picchio 1981

Ketoprofen

1%

3

Tonutti 1994

Ketoprofen

5%

2‐3 g

3

300‐450 mg

Ăkermark 1990

Indomethacin

1%

0.5‐1.5 mL

3‐5

12‐60 mg

Aoki 1984

Indomethacin

1%

1 g

3‐4

30‐40 mg

Fujimaki 1985

Indomethacin

1%

1 g

3‐4

30‐40 mg

Sugioka 1984

Indomethacin

1%

1 g

3‐4

30‐40 mg

Aoki 1984

Piroxicam

0.5%

1 g

3‐4

15‐20 mg

Fujimaki 1985

Piroxicam

0.5%

1 g

3‐4

15‐20 mg

Russell 1991

Piroxicam

0.5%

5 mg

4

20 mg

Sugioka 1984

Piroxicam

0.5%

1 g

3‐4

15‐20 mg

Chatterjee 1977

Benzydamine

3%

3

Haig 1986

Benzydamine

3%

6

Linde 1985

Benzydamine

3%

3

Auclair 1989

Niflumic acid

2.5%

10 cm, 5 g

3

375 mg

Dreiser 1990

Niflumic acid

2.5%

10 cm, 5 g

3

375 mg

Curioni 1985

Ibuproxam gel

10%

2

Curioni 1985

Etofenamate

No details

2

Diebshlag 1990

Etofenamate

5%

3 g

3

450 mg

Tonutti 1994

Etofenamate

5%

2‐3 g

3

300‐450 mg

Diebshlag 1990

Ketorolac

2%

3 g

3

360 mg

Dreiser 1994

Flurbiprofen

Patch

2

80 mg

Gualdi 1987

Flunoxaprofen

3‐5 cm

2

Hofman 2000

Lysine clonixinate

5%

2 cm

4

90 mg

Hosie 1993

Felbinac

3%

2 g

3

180 mg

McLatchie 1989

Felbinac

3%

3 cm

3

Morris 1991

Felbinac

3%

1 cm

3

Sanguinetti 1989

Felbinac

3%

3

Sinniger 1981

Fentiazac

5%

Varied according to involved areas

2‐3

Thorling 1990

Naproxen

10%

2‐6

Vecchiet 1991

Meclofenamic acid

5%

10 cm, 4 g

2

400 mg

equiv: equivalent; Na: sodium.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Individual NSAID versus placebo, outcome: 2.1 Clinical success.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Individual NSAID versus placebo, outcome: 2.1 Clinical success.

L'Abbé plot of clinical success in studies of topical diclofenac versus topical placebo. The size of the symbol is proportional to the size of the study (inset scale). Dark blue: Emulgel; light blue: spray/gel; red: Flector; pink: other patch or plaster.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

L'Abbé plot of clinical success in studies of topical diclofenac versus topical placebo. The size of the symbol is proportional to the size of the study (inset scale). Dark blue: Emulgel; light blue: spray/gel; red: Flector; pink: other patch or plaster.

L'Abbé plot of clinical success in studies of topical ketoprofen versus topical placebo. The size of the symbol is proportional to the size of the study (inset scale). Light blue: ketoprofen gel; pink: ketoprofen plaster.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

L'Abbé plot of clinical success in studies of topical ketoprofen versus topical placebo. The size of the symbol is proportional to the size of the study (inset scale). Light blue: ketoprofen gel; pink: ketoprofen plaster.

Comparison 1 Individual NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 1 Clinical success.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Individual NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 1 Clinical success.

Comparison 1 Individual NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 2 Local adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Individual NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 2 Local adverse events.

Comparison 2 Diclofenac versus placebo (effect of formulation), Outcome 1 Clinical success.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Diclofenac versus placebo (effect of formulation), Outcome 1 Clinical success.

Comparison 3 Ibuprofen versus placebo (effect of formulation), Outcome 1 Clinical success.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Ibuprofen versus placebo (effect of formulation), Outcome 1 Clinical success.

Comparison 4 Ketoprofen versus placebo, Outcome 1 Clinical success.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Ketoprofen versus placebo, Outcome 1 Clinical success.

Comparison 5 All topical NSAIDs versus placebo, Outcome 1 Local adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 All topical NSAIDs versus placebo, Outcome 1 Local adverse events.

Comparison 5 All topical NSAIDs versus placebo, Outcome 2 Systemic adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 All topical NSAIDs versus placebo, Outcome 2 Systemic adverse events.

Comparison 5 All topical NSAIDs versus placebo, Outcome 3 Adverse event withdrawals.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 All topical NSAIDs versus placebo, Outcome 3 Adverse event withdrawals.

Comparison 6 Topical NSAID versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Clinical success ‐ topical piroxicam vs topical indomethacin.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Topical NSAID versus active comparator, Outcome 1 Clinical success ‐ topical piroxicam vs topical indomethacin.

Comparison 6 Topical NSAID versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Local adverse events ‐ topical piroxicam vs topical indomethacin.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Topical NSAID versus active comparator, Outcome 2 Local adverse events ‐ topical piroxicam vs topical indomethacin.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Topical NSAIDs compared with topical placebo for acute musculoskeletal pain in adults

Topical NSAIDs compared with topical placebo for acute musculoskeletal pain in adults

Patient or population: adults with strains, sprains, or muscle pull

Settings: community

Intervention: topical NSAID (topical diclofenac, ibuprofen, and ketoprofen gels only shown here for efficacy)

Comparison: topical placebo

Outcomes

Probable outcome with
intervention

Probable outcome with
comparator

RR, NNT, NNTp, or NNH
(95% CI)

No of studies, participants

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Topical diclofenac gel (as Emulgel)

Clinical success (eg 50% reduction in pain)

780 in 1000

200 in 1000

RR

3.4 (2.7 to 55)

NNT

1.8 (1.5 to 2.1)

2 studies

314 participants

High

Consistent results in 2 moderately sized recent studies of high quality

Topical ibuprofen gel

Clinical success (eg 50% reduction in pain)

420 in 1000

160 in 1000

RR

2.7 (1.7 to 4.2)

NNT

3.9 (2.7 to 6.7)

2 studies

241 participants

Moderate

Modest effect size and numbers of participants

Topical ketoprofen gel

Clinical success (eg 50% reduction in pain)

720 in 1000

330 in 1000

RR

2.2 (1.7 to 2.8)

NNT

2.5 (2.0 to 3.4)

5 studies

348 participants

Moderate

Modest effect size and numbers of participants, but studies small, with none recent

All topical NSAIDs

Local adverse events

46 in 1000

50 in 1000

RR

1.0 (0.80 to 1.2)

NNH not calculated

42 studies

6125 participants

High

Large number of studies and participants with consistent results

All topical NSAIDs

Systemic adverse events

32 in 1000

35 in 1000

RR

1.0 (0.7 to 1.3)

NNH not calculated

38 studies

5372 participants

High

Large number of studies and participants with consistent results

All topical NSAIDs

Withdrawals ‐ adverse events

11 in 1000

11 in 1000

RR

1.0 (0.7 to 1.7)

NNH not calculated

42 studies

5790 participants

High

Large number of studies and participants with consistent results

Serious adverse events

1 in total

0 in total

Not calculated

All data

Low

Small numbers of events

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; NNT: number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome; NNTp: number needed to treat to prevent an event happening; NNH: number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Topical NSAIDs compared with topical placebo for acute musculoskeletal pain in adults
Comparison 1. Individual NSAID versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical success Show forest plot

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Diclofenac

10

2050

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.60 [1.49, 1.72]

1.2 Ibuprofen

5

436

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [1.33, 2.01]

1.3 Ketoprofen

7

683

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.56 [1.37, 1.77]

1.4 Piroxicam

3

504

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.48 [1.27, 1.73]

1.5 Indomethacin

3

341

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.26 [1.03, 1.55]

1.6 Benzydamine

3

193

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.15 [0.96, 1.38]

2 Local adverse events Show forest plot

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Diclofenac

15

3271

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.56, 1.10]

2.2 Ibuprofen

3

321

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.30 [0.98, 5.43]

2.3 Ketoprofen

8

852

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.83, 1.70]

2.4 Piroxicam

3

522

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.17, 1.08]

2.5 Felbinac

3

397

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.49, 7.50]

2.6 Indomethacin

3

354

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.65 [0.91, 7.73]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Individual NSAID versus placebo
Comparison 2. Diclofenac versus placebo (effect of formulation)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical success Show forest plot

10

2050

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.60 [1.49, 1.72]

1.1 Plaster ‐ Flector

4

1030

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.53 [1.36, 1.71]

1.2 Plaster ‐ other

3

474

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.55 [1.37, 1.75]

1.3 Gel ‐ Emulgel

2

314

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.84 [2.68, 5.50]

1.4 Gel ‐ other

1

232

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.15 [1.05, 1.27]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Diclofenac versus placebo (effect of formulation)
Comparison 3. Ibuprofen versus placebo (effect of formulation)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical success Show forest plot

5

436

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [1.33, 2.01]

1.1 Cream

3

195

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.03, 1.59]

1.2 Gel

2

241

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.66 [1.69, 4.21]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Ibuprofen versus placebo (effect of formulation)
Comparison 4. Ketoprofen versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical success Show forest plot

7

683

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.56 [1.37, 1.77]

1.1 Plaster

2

335

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [1.04, 1.40]

1.2 Gel

5

348

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.19 [1.74, 2.75]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Ketoprofen versus placebo
Comparison 5. All topical NSAIDs versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Local adverse events Show forest plot

42

6740

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.80, 1.21]

2 Systemic adverse events Show forest plot

36

5576

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.73, 1.26]

3 Adverse event withdrawals Show forest plot

42

6405

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.64, 1.59]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. All topical NSAIDs versus placebo
Comparison 6. Topical NSAID versus active comparator

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical success ‐ topical piroxicam vs topical indomethacin Show forest plot

3

641

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [1.07, 1.44]

2 Local adverse events ‐ topical piroxicam vs topical indomethacin Show forest plot

3

671

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.09, 0.47]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Topical NSAID versus active comparator