Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intra‐aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007398Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 octubre 2008see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Corazón

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Susanne Unverzagt

    Correspondencia a: Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics,, Martin‐Luther‐University Halle‐Wittenberg, Halle/ Saale, Germany

    [email protected]

  • Roland Prondzinsky

    Cardiology/Intensive Care Medicine, Carl‐von Basedow‐Klinikum Merseburg, Merseburg, Germany

  • Michael Buerke

    Internal Medicine III, Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

  • Karl Werdan

    Internal Medicine III, Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

  • Johannes Haerting

    Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

  • Holger Thiele

    Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Contributions of authors

Susanne Unverzagt: design and co‐ordination of the review, design and organisation of the search strategy, data collection for the review (screening, appraisal, data extraction, contact authors), data management, analysis of data, methodological interpretation of data, writing the review, securing funding for the review.

Roland Prondzinsky: conceiving the review and performing previous work as the foundation of the study, design of handsearching, appraisal of papers, writing to authors of papers for additional information, obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies, interpretation of data from a clinical and consumer perspective, writing the clinical part of the review.

Michael Buerke: appraising papers, extracting data from papers, obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies, interpretation of data from a clinical and consumer perspective.

Karl Werdan: providing general advice from a clinical and policy perspective.

Johannes Haerting: providing general advice on the analysis of data and the methodology of the review.

Holger Thiele: appraisal of papers (especially the IABP Shock 2003‐2004 trial), interpretation of data from a clinical and consumer perspective.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Ministery for Education and Research (grant number: 01KG0811), Germany.

Declarations of interest

The authors (SU, RP, MB, KW, JH) were involved in the IABP Shock Trial (2003 to 2004), submitted to the European Heart Journal. Judgements of inclusion critreria and risk of bias for this study should be appraised by HT.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Mar 27

Intra‐aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Review

Susanne Unverzagt, Michael Buerke, Antoinette Waha, Johannes Haerting, Diana Pietzner, Melchior Seyfarth, Holger Thiele, Karl Werdan, Uwe Zeymer, Roland Prondzinsky

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007398.pub3

2011 Jul 06

Intra‐aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Review

Susanne Unverzagt, Maria‐Theresia Machemer, Alexander Solms, Holger Thiele, Daniel Burkhoff, Melchior Seyfarth, Antoinette de Waha, E. Magnus Ohman, Michael Buerke, Johannes Haerting, Karl Werdan, Roland Prondzinsky

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007398.pub2

2008 Oct 08

Intra‐aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Protocol

Susanne Unverzagt, Roland Prondzinsky, Michael Buerke, Karl Werdan, Johannes Haerting, Holger Thiele

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007398

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.