Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Skuteczność inhibitorów reniny w obniżaniu ciśnienia krwi u osób z pierwotnym nadciśnieniu tętniczym.

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

CSPA100A1301 {unpublished data only}

Novartis. Efficacy and safety of SPA100 (fixed‐dose combination of aliskiren/amlodipine) in patients with essential hypertension. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01237223 May 11 2012:1‐27. CENTRAL

CSPA100A2305 {published data only}

Littlejohn TW, Jones SW, Zhang J, Hsu H, Keefe DL. Efficacy and safety of aliskiren and amlodipine combination therapy in patients with hypertension: a randomized, double‐blind, multifactorial study. Journal of Human Hypertension 2013;27(5):321‐7. CENTRAL
Novartis. An 8‐week double‐blind, multicenter, randomized, multifactorial, placebo‐controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aliskiren administered alone and in combination with amlodipine in patients with essential hypertension. Novartis Clinical Trial Results Database. 26th May 2010:1‐16. [Little John]CENTRAL

CSPP100A1201 {published data only}

Kushiro T, Hiroshige I, Yoshihisa A, Hiromi G, Shinji T, Keefe D. Aliskiren, a novel oral renin inhibitor, provides dose‐dependent efficacy and placebo‐like tolerability in Japanese patients with hypertension. Hypertension Research ‐ Clinical & Experimental 2006;29(12):997‐1005. CENTRAL
Novartis. Dose‐finding study of SPP100 in essential hypertension. Clinical Study Report. European Medicines Agency October 13th 2005:10531‐665. CENTRAL

CSPP100A1301 {unpublished data only}

Novartis. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo and active‐controlled, multicenter, parallel‐group study comparing SPP100 (Aliskiren) 150 mg to placebo and to Losartan 50 mg to evaluate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Clinical Study Report. European Medicines Agency January 10, 2008:1‐137. CENTRAL

CSPP100A2201 {published data only}

Gradman A, Schmieder R, Lins R, Nussberger J, Chiang Y, Bedigian M. Aliskiren, a novel orally effective renin inhibitor, provides dose‐dependent antihypertensive efficacy and placebo‐like tolerability in hypertensive patients. Circulation 2005;111:1012‐8. CENTRAL
Novartis. A multicentre, randomized, double blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study comparing aliskiren 150 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg and Irbesartan 150 mg in patients with mild‐to‐moderate essential hypertension. Clinical Study Report. European Medicines Agency April 1st 2004:1‐61. CENTRAL
Nussberger J, Gradman AH, Schmieder RE, Lins RL, Chiang Y, Prescott MF. Plasma renin and the antihypertensive effect of the orally active renin inhibitor aliskiren in clinical hypertension. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2007;61(9):1461‐1468. CENTRAL

CSPP100A2203 {published data only}

Novartis. A randomized, double blind, multicentre, multifactorial, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study to confirm the efficacy and safety of aliskiren monotherapy, and evaluate efficacy and safety of combinations of aliskiren and valsartan in hypertensive patients. Clinical Study Report. European Medicines Agency June 8th 2005:1547‐1634. CENTRAL
Pool J, Roland E, Schmieder M, Aldigier JC, Januszewicz A, Zidek W, Chiang Y, Satlin A. Aliskiren, an orally effective renin inhibitor, provides antihypertensive efficacy alone and in combination with valsartan. American Journal of Hypertension 2007;20(1):11‐20. CENTRAL

CSPP100A2204 {published data only}

Novartis. An 8 week, double‐blind, multicenter, randomized, multifactorial, placebo‐controlled, parallel group,study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aliskiren administered alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. Clinical Study Report. European Medicines Agency October 25th 2005:3354‐3454. CENTRAL
Villamil A, Chrysant S, Calhoun D, Schober B, Hsu H, Matrisciano‐Dimichino L, Zhang J. Renin inhibition with aliskiren provides additive antihypertensive efficacy when used in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. Journal of hypertension 2007;25(1):217‐226. CENTRAL

CSPP100A2308 {published data only}

Novartis. An 8 week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel group, multicenter, study comparing aliskiren 150 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg to placebo in patients with essential hypertension. Clinical Study Report. European Medicines Agency November 1st 2005:8458‐543. CENTRAL
Oh B, Mitchell J, Herron J, Chung J, Khan Ml, Keefe D. Aliskiren, an oral renin inhibitor, provides dose‐dependent efficacy and sustained 24‐hour blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. Journal of the Amarican College of Cardiology 2007;49(11):1157‐63. CENTRAL

CSPP100A2323 {published data only}

Novartis. A twenty six‐week, randomized, double‐blind, parallel group, multicenter, active‐controlled, dose titration study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aliskiren compared to HCTZ with the optional addition of amlodipine, followed by a second twenty six weeks of blinded treatment, in patients with essential hypertension. Clinical Study Report. European Medicines Agency May 16th 2006:28012‐9161. CENTRAL
Schmieder RE, Philipp T, Guerediaga J, Gorostidi M, Smith B, Weissbach N, et. al. Long‐term antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the Oral direct renin Inhibitor aliskiren. Circulation 2009;119:417‐25. CENTRAL

CSPP100A2327 {published data only}

Novartis. An eight‐week randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multicenter study comparing aliskiren 150 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg to placebo in patients with essential hypertension. Clinical Study Report. European Medicines AgencySeptember 2006:17604‐20246. CENTRAL
Oparil S, Yarrows S, Patel SF, Ang H, Zhang J, Satlin A. Efficacy and safety of combined use of aliskiren and valsartan in patients with hypertension: a randomised, double‐blind trial. Lancet 2007;370(9583):221‐9. CENTRAL

CSPP100A2328 {published data only}

Novartis. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multicenter study comparing an eight‐week treatment of aliskiren 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg to placebo in patients with essential hypertension. Novartis Clinical Trials Results Database November 4th 2009:1‐14. CENTRAL
Puig JG, Schunkert H, Taylor AA, Boye S, Jin J, Keefe DL. Evaluation of the dose‐response relationship of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor in an 8‐week, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled study in adult patients with stage 1 or 2 essential hypertension. Clinical Therapeutics 2009;31(12):2839‐50. CENTRAL

CSPP100A2405 {published data only}

Novartis. An eight‐week double‐blind, multi‐center, randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aliskiren 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg in elderly patients with essential hypertension when given with a light meal. Clinical Study Report. European Medicines Agency. Date not reported:1‐100. CENTRAL
Villa G, Le Breton S, Ibram G, Keefe D. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of Aliskiren monotherapy administered with a light meal in elderly hypertensive patients: A randomized, double blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐response evaluation study. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2012;52:1901‐11. CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

Andersen 2008 {published data only}

Andersen K, Weinberger MH, Egan B, Constance CM, Ali MA, Jin J, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of aliskiren, an oral direct renin inhibitor, and ramipril in hypertension: A 6‐month, randomized, double‐blind trial. Journal of Hypertension 2008;3:589‐92. CENTRAL

Dorresteijn 2013 {published data only}

Dorresteijn JA, Schrover IM, Visseren FL, Scheffer PG, Oey PL, Danser AH, et al. Differential effects of renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system inhibition, sympathoinhibition and diuretic therapy on endothelial function and blood pressure in obesity‐related hypertension: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled cross‐over trial. Journal of Hypertension 2013;31(2):393‐403. CENTRAL

Frandesen 2008 {published data only}

Frandsen E, Persson F, Boomsma F, Prescott M, Dole WP, Rossing P, et al. The effect of direct renin inhibition alone or in combination with angiotensin II receptor blockade on markers of the renin‐angiotension aldosterone system. Diabetologica 2008;51(Suppl 1):S 491. CENTRAL

Gheorghiade 2013 {published data only}

Gheorghiade M, Bohm M, Greene SJ, Fonarow GC, Lewis EF, Zannad F, et al. ASTRONAUT Investigators and Coordinators. Effect of aliskiren on postdischarge mortality and heart failure readmissions among patients hospitalized for heart failure: the ASTRONAUT randomized trial.. JAMA 2013 March 20;309(11):1125‐35. CENTRAL

Jordan 2007 {published data only}

Jordan J, Engeli S, Boye SW, Le Breton S, Keefe DL. Direct Renin inhibition with aliskiren in obese patients with arterial hypertension. Hypertension 2007;49(5):1047‐55. CENTRAL

Jumar 2015 {published data only}

Jumar A, Ott C, Kistner I, Friedrich S, Schmidt S, Harazny, JM, et al. Effect of aliskiren on vascular remodelling in small retinal circulation. Journal of Hypertension 2015;33(12):2491‐9. CENTRAL

Maser 2013 {published data only}

Maser RE, Lenhard MJ, Kolm P, Edwards DG. Direct renin inhibition improves parasympathetic function in diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2013;15:28‐34. CENTRAL

Mihai 2013 {published data only}

Mihai G, Varghese J, Kampfrath T, Gushchina L, Hafer L, Deiuliis, et al. Aliskiren effect on plaque progression in established atherosclerosis using high resolution 3D MRI (ALPINE): a double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial. Journal of the American Heart Association 2013 June;2(3):e004879. CENTRAL

NCT00219141 {published data only}

Novartis. Aliskiren in combination with losartan compared to losartan on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in overweight patients with essential hypertension (ALLAY). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00219141May 2011:1‐31. CENTRAL

NCT00417170 {published data only}

Novartis. Comparison of aliskiren and amlodipine on insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction in patients with hypertension and metabolic syndrome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00417170September 2011:1‐14. CENTRAL

NCT00654875 {published data only}

Novartis NCT00654875. Efficacy and safety of once daily dosing of aliskiren (300 mg (qd) once a day) to twice daily dosing of aliskiren (150 mg (bid) twice a day) in treating moderate hypertension. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00654875June 2011:1‐18. CENTRAL

NCT00777946 {published data only}

Novartis. Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination aliskiren/amlodipine in patients not adequately responding to aliskiren alone. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00777946June 2011:1‐18. CENTRAL

NCT00819767 {published data only}

Novartis. Efficacy and safety of aliskiren in patients with mild to moderate hypertension during exercise. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00819767January 2009:1‐13. CENTRAL

NCT00865020 {published data only}

Novartis. Efficacy and safety of aliskiren 300 mg compared to telmisartan 80 mg after 1 week of treatment withdrawal (ASSERTIVE). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00865020June 2011:1‐17. CENTRAL

NCT00927394 {published data only}

Novartis. Aliskiren and valsartan vs valsartan alone in patients with stage ii systolic hypertension and type ii diabetes mellitus. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00927394December 2012:1‐29. CENTRAL

NCT01042392 {published data only}

Novartis. Efficacy of aliskiren compared to ramipril in the treatment of moderate systolic hypertensive patients (ALIAS). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01042392March 2012:1‐26. CENTRAL

NCT01138423 {published data only}

Novartis. Treatment of Adiposity Related hypErTension (TARGET). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01138423February 2012. CENTRAL

NCT01318395 {published data only}

Novartis. Randomized, double blind, active‐controlled, parallel study to analyse effects of the combination of aliskiren and valsartan on the vascular structure and function of retinal vessels. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01318395June 2014. CENTRAL

Nicholls 2013 {published data only}

Nicholls SJ, Bakris GL, Kastelein JJ, Menon V, Williams B, Armbrecht J, et al. Effect of aliskiren on progression of coronary disease in patients with prehypertension: the AQUARIUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013 September 18.;310(11):1135‐44. CENTRAL

Nussberger 2007 {published data only}

Nussberger J, Gradman AH, Schmieder RE, LinsRL, Chiang Y, Prescott MF. Plasma renin and the antihypertensive effect of the orally active renin inhibitor aliskiren in clinical hypertension. International Journal ofClinical Practice 2007;61(9):1461‐8. CENTRAL

O'Brien 2007 {published data only}

O'Brien E, Barton J, Nussberger J, Mulcahy D, Jensen C, Dicker P, et al. Aliskiren reduces blood pressure and suppresses plasma renin activity in combination with a thiazide diuretic, an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor, or an angiotensin receptor blocker. Hypertension 2007;49(2):276‐84. CENTRAL

Persson 2009 {published data only}

Novartis. Study to assess the optimal renoprotective dose of aliskiren in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and incipient or overt nephropathy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00464776April 2007. CENTRAL
Persson F, Rossing P, Reinhard H, Juhl T, Stehouwer CDA, Schalkwijk C, et al. Renal effects of aliskiren compared with and in combination with irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and albuminuria. Diabetes Care 2009;10(32):1873‐9. CENTRAL

Pitt 2007 {published data only}

Pitt B, McMurray JJ, Latini R, Maggioni A, Solomon SD, Smith BA, et al. Neurohumoral effects of a new oral direct renin inhibitor in stable heart failure: The Aliskiren Observation of Heart Failure Treatment study (ALOFT. Circulation 2007;116(16 Suppl):S. CENTRAL

Scirica 2010 {published data only}

Scirica BM, Morrow DA, Bode C, Ruzyllo W, Ruda M, Oude Ophuis AJ, et al. Patients with acute coronary syndromes and elevated levels of natriuretic peptides: the results of the AVANT GARDE‐TIMI 43 Trial. European Heart Journal 2010 August;31(16):1993‐2005. CENTRAL

Shah 2012 {published data only}

Shah AM, Shin SH, Takeuchi M, Skali H, Desai AS, Kober L, et al. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, remodelling, and clinical outcomes among patients with diabetes following myocardial infarction and the influence of direct renin inhibition with aliskiren. European Journal of Heart Failure 2012, February;142(2):185‐92. CENTRAL

Solomon 2011 {published data only}

Solomon SD, Shin SH, Shah A, Skali H, Desai A, Kober L, et al. Effect of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren on left ventricular remodelling following myocardial infarction with systolic dysfunction. European Heart Journal 2011;32(10):1227‐34. CENTRAL

Stanton 2003 {published data only}

Stanton A, Jensen C, Nussberger J, O'Brien E. Blood pressure lowering in essential hypertension with an oral renin inhibitor, aliskiren. Hypertension 2003;42(6):1137‐43. CENTRAL

Strasser 2007 {published data only}

Strasser RH, Puig JG, Farsang C, Croket M, Li J, van Ingen H. A comparison of the tolerability of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren and lisinopril in patients with severe hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension 2007;21(10):780‐7. CENTRAL

Teo 2014 {published data only}

Teo KK, Pfeffer M, Mancia G, O'Donnell M, Dagenais G, Diaz R, et al. Aliskiren Prevention of Later Life Outcomes trial Investigators. Aliskiren alone or with other antihypertensives in the elderly with borderline and stage 1 hypertension: the APOLLO trial. European Heart Journal 2014;35(26):1743‐51. CENTRAL

Uresin 2007 {published data only}

Uresin Y, Taylor AA, Kilo C, Tschope D, Santonastaso M, Ibram G, et al. Efficacy and safety of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren and ramipril alone or in combination in patients with diabetes and hypertension. Journal of the Renin‐Angiotensin‐Aldosterone System 2007;8(4)(4):190‐8. CENTRAL

Verdecchia 2007 {published data only}

Verdecchia P, Calvo C, Mockel V, Keeling L, Satlin A. Safety and efficacy of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren in elderly patients with hypertension. Blood Pressure 2007;16(6):381‐91. CENTRAL

ALTITUDE 2012

Parving HH, Brenner BM, McMurray JH, Zeeuw D, Haffner SM, Solomon, et al. ALTITUDE Investigators. Cardiorenal end points in a trial of aliskiren for type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine 2012;367:2204‐13.

AQUARIUS 2013

Nicholls SJ, Bakris GL, Kastelein JP, et al. Effect of Aliskiren on Progression of Coronary Disease in Patients With PrehypertensionThe AQUARIUS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2013;310(11):1135‐44.

ASPIRE 2011

Solomon SD, Shin SH, Shah A, Skali H, Desai A, Kober L, Maggioni AP, Rouleau JL, Kelly RY, Hester A, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA. Aliskiren Study in Post‐MI Patients to Reduce Remodeling (ASPIRE) Investigators. European Heart Journal May 2011;32:1227‐34.

ASTRONAUT 2013

Gheorghiade M, Böhm M, Greene SJ, Fonarow GC, Lewis EF, Zannad F, Solomon SD, Baschiera F, Botha J, Hua TA, Gimpelewicz CR, Jaumont X, Lesogor A, Maggioni AP, ASTRONAUT Investigators and Coordinators. Effect of aliskiren on postdischarge mortality and heart failure readmissions among patients hospitalized for heart failure: the ASTRONAUT randomized trial. JAMA March 20 2013;309(11):1125‐35.

AVANT GARDE ‐ TIMI 43 2010

Scirica BM, Morrow DA, Bode C, Ruzyllo W, Ruda M, Oude Ophuis AJ, Lopez‐Sendon J, Swedberg K, Ogorek M, Rifai N, Lukashevich V, Maboudian M, Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Braunwald E. Patients with acute coronary syndromes and elevated levels of natriuretic peptides: the results of the AVANT GARDE‐TIMI 43 Trial. European Heart Journal 2010;31(16):1993‐2005.

AVOID 2011

Persson F, Lewis JB, Lewis EJ, Rossing P, Hollenberg NK, Parving HH. Aliskiren in combination with losartan reduces albuminuria independent of baseline blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol May 2011;6(5):1025‐31. [DOI: 10.2215/CJN.07590810]

Chalmers 1990

Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA 1990;263(10):1405‐8.

Chen 2013

Chen Y, Meng L, Shao H, Feng Yu. Aliskiren vs. other antihypertensive drugs in the treatment of hypertension: a meta‐analysis. Hypertension Research 2013;36:252‐61.

Doshi 2012

Doshi P, Jefferson T, Del Mar C. The imperative to share clinical study reports: recommendations from the Tamiflu experience. PLoS Medicine 2012;9(4):1‐6.

Doshi 2016

Doshi P, Jefferson T. Open data 5 years on: a case series of 12 freedom of information requests for regulatory data to the European Medicines Agency. Trials 2016;17(78):1‐7.

Duprez 2006

Duprez D. Role of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system in vascular remodeling and inflammation: a clinical review. Journal of Hypertension 2006;24:983‐91.

Dwan 2013

Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ, for the Reporting Bias Group. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias ‐ an updated review. PloS One 2013;8(7):1‐38.

Eyding 2010

Eyding D, Lelgemann M, Grouven U, Harter M, Kromp M, Kaiser T, et al. Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta‐analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials. BMJ 2010;341:816.

FDA Medical Review 2007

Center for drug evaluation and research. Tekturna (Aliskiren) Medical Review. FDA database March 5th 2007, issue Application number 21‐985:1‐283.

Frishman 1994

Frishman WH, Fozailoff A, Lin C, Dike C. Renin inhibition: a new approach to cardiovascular therapy. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1994;34:873‐80.

Gotzsche 2011

Gotzsche P, Jorgenson AW. Opening up data at the European Medicines Agency. BMJ 2011;343:1184‐6.

Gradman 2005

Gradman A, Schmieder R, Lins R, Nussberger J, Chiang Y, Bedigian M. Aliskiren, a novel orally effective renin inhibitor, provides dose‐dependent antihypertensive efficacy and placebo‐like tolerability in hypertensive patients. Circulation 2005;111:1012‐8. CENTRAL

Gradman 2010

Gradman AH, Weir MR, Wright M, Bush CA, Keefe DL. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor, in women with hypertension: a pooled analysis of eight studies. Journal of Human Hypertension 2010;24:721‐9.

Harel 2012

Harel Z, Gilbert C, Wald R, Bell C, Perl J, Juurlink D, et al. The effect of combination treatment with aliskiren and blockers of the renin‐angiotensin system on hyperkalaemia and acute kidney injury: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ 2012;344(e42):1‐13. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e42]

Hart 2012

Hart 2012. Effect of reporting bias on meta‐analyses of drug trials reanalysis of meta‐analyses. BMJ 2012;344:13.

Helmer 1958

Helmer OM. Studies on renin antibodies. Circulation 1958;17(4 part 2):648‐52.

Heran 2008a

Heran BS, Wong MMY, Heran IK, Wright JM. Dose‐related blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the treatment of primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003823]

Heran 2008b

Heran BS, Wong MMY, Heran IK, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003822.pub2]

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.10 [updated March 2011]. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

Hodkinson 2013

Hodkinson A, Kirkham J, Tudur‐Smith C, Gamble C. Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension. BMJ 2013;3:1‐9.

Hodkinson 2016

Hodkinson A, Gamble C, Smith CT. Reporting of harms outcomes: a comparison of journal publications with unpublished clinical study reports of orlistat trials. Trials 2016;17(1):1‐11.

Jefferson 2014

Jefferson T, Jones MA, Doshi P, Del Mar CB, Hama R, Thompson MJ, et al. Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in adults and children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008965.pub4]

Jefferson 2015

Jefferson T. Facing the unreliability of clinical trials literature. Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin of Navarre, Spain 2015;22(2):1‐11.

Kirkham 2010

Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, et al. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ 2010;340:637‐40.

Krum 2007

Krum H, Gilbert RE. Novel therapies blocking the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system in the management of hypertension and related disorders. Journal of Hypertension 2007;25:25‐35.

Kushiro 2006

Kushiro T, Hiroshige I, Yoshihisa A, Hiromi G, Shinji T, Keefe D. Aliskiren, a novel oral renin inhibitor, provides dose‐dependent efficacy and placebo‐like tolerability in Japanese patients with hypertension. Hypertension Research ‐ Clinical & Experimental 2006;29(12):997‐1005. CENTRAL

Law 2003

Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE. Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials. BMJ 2003;326(7404):1427. [PUBMED: 12829555]

Littlejohn 2013

Littlejohn TW, Jones SW, Zhang J, Hsu H, Keefe DL. Efficacy and safety of aliskiren and amlodipine combination therapy in patients with hypertension: a randomized, double‐blind, multifactorial study. Journal of Human Hypertension 2013;27(5):321‐7. CENTRAL

Makani 2013

Makani H, Bangalore S, Desouza K, Shah A, Messerli F. Efficacy and safety of dual blockade of the renin‐angiotensin system: meta‐analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2013;346(f360):1‐15. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f360]

Maund 2014

Maund E, Tendal B, Hrobjartsson A, Jorgenson K, Lundh A, Schroll J, et al. Benefits and harms in clinical trials of duloxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of clinical study reports, trial registries, and publications. BMJ 2014;348:1‐9.

McGauran 2010

McGauran N, Wieseler B, Kreis J, Schuler YB, Kolsch H, Kaiser T. Reporting bias in medical research ‐ a narrative review. Trials 2010;11:1‐15.

Musini 2009

Musini VM, Wright JM. Factors affecting blood pressure variability: lessons learned from two systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2009;4(5):e5673. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005673]

Novartis Clinical Trial Results Database

Novartis. Novartis Clinical Trials Databasehttps://www.novartisclinicaltrials.com/TrialConnectWeb/home.nov.

Oh 2007

Oh B, Mitchell J, Herron J, Chung J, Khan Ml, Keefe D. Aliskiren, an oral renin inhibitor, provides dose‐dependent efficacy and sustained 24‐hour blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. Journal of the Amarican College of Cardiology 2007;49(11):1157‐63. CENTRAL

Oparil 2007

Oparil S, Yarrows S, Patel SF, Ang H, Zhang J, Satlin A. Efficacy and safety of combined use of aliskiren and valsartan in patients with hypertension: a randomised, double‐blind trial. Lancet 2007;370(9583):221‐9. CENTRAL

Pool 2007

Pool J, Roland E, Schmieder M, Aldigier JC, Januszewicz A, Zidek W, Chiang Y, Satlin A. Aliskiren, an orally effective renin inhibitor, provides antihypertensive efficacy alone and in combination with valsartan. American Journal of Hypertension 2007;20(1):11‐20. CENTRAL

Poulter 2015

Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, Caulfield M. Hypertension. Lancet 22nd August 2015;386(9995):801‐12.

Powers 2011

Powers B, Greene L, Balfe LM. Updates on the treatment of essential hypertension: a summary of AHRQ's comparativeeffectiveness review of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptorblockers, and direct renin inhibitors. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy October 2011;17(8):Supplement S1‐S14.

Puig 2009

Puig JG, Schunkert H, Taylor AA, Boye S, Jin J, Keefe DL. Evaluation of the dose‐response relationship of aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor in an 8‐week, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled study in adult patients with stage 1 or 2 essential hypertension. Clinical Therapeutics 2009;31(12):2839‐50. CENTRAL

Rising 2008

Rising K, Bacchett P, Bero L. Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation. PLoS Medicine 2008;5(11):1561‐70.

Schmieder 2009

Schmieder RE, Philipp T, Guerediaga J, Gorostidi M, Smith B, Weissbach N, et. al. Long‐term antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the Oral direct renin Inhibitor aliskiren. Circulation 2009;119:417‐25. CENTRAL

Schünemann 2011

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JPT, Deeks Jj, Glasziou P, et al. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

Sharma 2016

Sharma T, Guski LS, Freund N, Gøtzsche P. Suicidality and aggression during antidepressant treatment: systematic review and meta‐analyses based on clinical study reports. BMJ 2016;352(65):1‐10.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016

FDA Drug Safety Communication: New Warning and Contraindication for blood pressure medicines containing aliskiren (Tekturna). http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm300889.htm#data Last updated on19th January 2016.

Villa 2012

Villa G, Le Breton S, Ibram G, Keefe D. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of Aliskiren monotherapy administered with a light meal in elderly hypertensive patients: A randomized, double blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐response evaluation study. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2012;52:1901‐11. CENTRAL

Villamil 2007

Villamil A, Chrysant S, Calhoun D, Schober B, Hsu H, Matrisciano‐Dimichino L, Zhang J. Renin inhibition with aliskiren provides additive antihypertensive efficacy when used in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. Journal of hypertension 2007;25(1):217‐226. CENTRAL

Weir 2007

Weir MR, Bush C, Anderson DR, Zhang J, Keefe D, Satlin A. Antihypertensive efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren in patients with hypertension: a pooled analysis. Journal of the American Society of Hypertension 2007;1(4):264‐77.

White 2010

White WB, Bresalier R, Kaplan AP, Palmer BF, Riddell RH, Lesogor A, et al. Safety and tolerability of the direct renin Inhibitor Aliskiren: A pooled analysis of clinical experience in more than 12,000 patients with hypertension. Journal of Clinical Hypertension 2010;12(10):765‐75.

Wieseler 2012

Wieseler B, Chrysant SG, Calhoun D, Schober B, Hsu H, Matrisciano‐Dimichino L, et al. Impact of document type on reporting ality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications. BMJ 2012;344:1‐11.

Wright 2009

Wright JM, Musini VM. First‐line drugs for hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub2]

Zhang 2015

Zhang Jing‐Tao, Chen Ke‐Ping, Guan Ting, Zhang Shu. Effect of aliskiren on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with pre ‐hypertension: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015;9:1963‐71.

References to other published versions of this review

Musini 2009

Musini VM, Fortin PM, Bassett K, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of renin inhibitors for primary hypertension:a Cochrane systematic review. Journal of Human Hypertension 2009;23(8):495‐502.

Musini 2008a

Musini VM, Fortin PM, Bassett K, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of renin inhibitors for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007066]

Musini 2008b

Musini VM, Fortin PM, Bassett K, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of renin inhibitors for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007066.pub2]

Musini 2011

Musini VM, Fortin PM, Bassett K, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of renin inhibitors for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007066.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

CSPA100A1301

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel group study.

Participants

1342 patients were randomized to 6 different combination treatment groups.

Inclusion criteria: Not reported

Exclusion criteria: Not reported.

Baseline characteristics: Mean age was 55.1 + 10 years; 19% patients were > 65 years old; 73% participants were male; race not reported, mean sitting SBP and DBP, pulse pressure and heart rate was not reported

Interventions

Placebo (N = 153) and aliskiren 150 mg (N = 157) monotherapy

(Other combination therapy groups and amlodipine 2.5 mg and 5 mg monotherapy groups are not described)

Treatment duration = 8 weeks

Outcomes

Primary: Change From Baseline in MSDBP to End of Study (Week 8);

Secondary: Change From Baseline in MSDBP to End of Study (Week 8); Percentage of patients achieving goal BP; serious adverse events; total adverse events

Notes

Study CSPA100A1301 is not published in a journal.

It is registered on clinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01237223 (results are posted)

It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are not posted)

EMA does not possess CSR for this study.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Stated as randomized ; no description is available.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No description is available.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Clinical study synopsis reported study as double‐blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor). In order to adequately blind the study, patients were required to take a total of 3 tablets and 2 capsules of study medication throughout the study.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

33 (21.6%) patients in placebo group and 15 (9.6%) patients in aliskiren 150 mg group did not complete the study. Reasons for withdrawal differed (adverse events 12 in placebo and 4 in A 150 mg; unsatisfactory therapeutic effect, 20 in placebo and 6 in A 150 mg).

It is not known how missing data were included in the analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol is not available to assess selective reporting bias. Clinical study synopsis does not provide details.

Other bias

High risk

Study sponsored by Novartis.

Study is not published in a journal.

NCT01237223 ‐ short clinical synopsis is posted on clinical Trial.gov

Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are not posted)

CSPA100A2305

Methods

A double‐blind, multicentre, randomized, placebo‐controlled, multifactorial study was conducted at 208 centres across 18 countries (Argentina, Australia, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Italy, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan and the USA).

Participants

1688 patients were randomized to 9 different monotherapy as well as combination treatment groups. 596 were randomized to aliskiren 150 mg, 300 mg and placebo groups.

Inclusion criteria: Men and women aged >18 years with primary hypertension; MSDBP > 95 mmHg and <110 mmHg at randomization; an absolute difference of ≤ 10 mmHg in their MSDBP during the last 2 visits of the single‐blind run‐in period.

Exclusion criteria: grade III hypertension (MSDBP >110 mmHg or MSSBP > 180 mmHg); secondary hypertension; a history of severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease; type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus that was not well‐controlled (glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 48.0%; severe renal impairment; a history of dialysis; or a history of nephrotic syndrome; or hepatic disease; a history of hepatic encephalopathy; oesophageal varices; or portocaval shunt; pregnant or lactating women. Women of childbearing potential had to be using effective contraceptive methods for inclusion in the study;

Baseline characteristics: Mean age 54.1 + 10.7 years; 17.2% of participants aged 65 years or older; Caucasian (62.1%) Black (19.9%), Asian patients (6.6%), others 11.4%; Mean body mass index 30.3 + 5.4 (Kg/m2); 11.0% of participants had diabetes; mean sitting SBP/DBP at baseline was 157 + 11.7/99.5 + 3.8 mmHg; mean sitting pulse pressure or heart rate was not reported.

Interventions

Aliskiren 150 mg (N = 195), aliskiren 300 mg (N = 203), or placebo (N = 198).

(Two amlodipine monotherapy and four aliskiren/amlodipine combination groups)

Treatment was administered once daily at 800 hours, except on clinic visit days, when patients were instructed to delay the treatment until all assessments had been completed. Treatment duration = 8 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary: antihypertensive efficacy of the combination of aliskiren/amlodipine was superior to each of the component monotherapies, as assessed by change in MSDBP from baseline to week‐8 endpoint across doses.

Secondary: change in MSSBP from baseline to week‐8 endpoint; proportion of patients achieving BP control (< 140/90mmHg) at week 8; Change in mean 24 h ambulatory BP from baseline to week‐8 endpoint in a subgroup of patients; Changes in PRA from baseline to week‐8 endpoint in a subset of patients; All adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs.

Notes

Study CSPA100A2305 is published in a journal as Littlejohn 2013

It is registered on clinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00739973 (results are posted)

It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are posted)

EMA does not possess CSR for this study.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomly assigned in an equal ratio, using a validated interactive voice response system, to one of the nine treatment groups.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Described as double‐blind. In order to adequately blind the study, patients were required to take a total of 3 tablets and 2 capsule of study medication throughout the study.

There is no mention of how outcome assessors were blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

30 (15.2%) patients discontinued in placebo group; 19 (9.7%) each in aliskiren 150 mg and 300 mg groups.

The incidence of withdrawal due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect was lower in the combination groups (0.5% to 1.1%) than in the placebo (8.6%) and monotherapy (1.1% to 4.1%) groups. Other common reasons for discontinuation included AEs and withdrawal of consent, with the incidence generally similar across treatment groups.

Three patients were mis‐randomized, as they were discontinued from the single‐blind period and were not treated in the double‐blind period. For endpoint analyses, the last observation was carried forward for patients who did not have a measurement at week 8.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

All primary and secondary outcomes were reported. Pulse pressure and heart rate were not reported at baseline or end of treatment.

Other bias

High risk

J Zhang, H Hsu and DL Keefe are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and are therefore eligible for Novartis stock and stock options. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

EMA does not possess CSR for this study.

CSPP100A1201

Methods

Multicentre, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, parallel group study.

Participants

615 were recruited from 29 clinical centres in Japan and 455 were randomized. 160 withdrew during the single‐blind period (138 not meeting protocol requirements,15 due to adverse events and 7 withdrawal of consent).

Inclusion criteria: Japanese men and women with essential hypertension between the ages of 20 and 80 years; MSDBP > 90 mm Hg and < 110 mm Hg and MSSBP < 180 mmHg

Exclusion criteria: Severe hypertension (MSDBP >110 mmHg and/or mean sitting systolic BP (MSSBP) >180 mmHg); secondary hypertension, suspected malignant hypertension; a history of severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease; type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin or with poor glucose control (glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1c] > 8%); serious hepatic or renal disease; history of pancreatitis; malignant tumours in the last 5 years; autoimmune disease; anaemia; gout or hyperthyroidism; apparent dehydration; pregnancy; Patients receiving treatment for gastric or duodenal ulcer or had taken any investigational medications within the last 12 weeks; patients with autoimmune disease, symptomatic anaemia, hypothyroidism, gout, or unable to comply with the protocol.

Baseline characteristics: Mean age 53 + 11years; Males: 73%; MSSBP 156 + 11.8 mmHg and MSDBP 99.6 + 4.4 mmHg; Mean sitting pulse: 75 + 9.8 beats per minute; Pulse pressure was not reported.

Interventions

455 patients were randomized to Placebo: N = 115; aliskiren 75 mg: N = 115; aliskiren 150 mg: N = 112; aliskiren 300 mg: N = 113

Duration of treatment = 13 weeks

Outcomes

Primary: Change in trough MSDBP from baseline at endpoint.
Secondary: Change in trough MSSBP from baseline; proportion of patients responding to treatment (MSDBP < 90 mmHg and/or with a greater or equal 10 mmHg decrease in MSDBP from baseline to completion; dose‐response relationship in terms of primary and secondary outcomes

Notes

Study CSPP100A1201 is published in a journal as Kushiro 2006

It is not registered on clinicalTrials.gov

It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are not posted)

CSR without appendices was received from EMA on March 11th 2016

BP data were reported at the end of the double‐blind period at 8 weeks.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Drug allocation tables were prepared by computer‐generated random numbers and patients were assigned to treatment groups via central allocation."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"The allocation schedule was then concealed until the key code was broken, so all patients, investigators, collaborators and the sponsor were unaware of the treatment assignments throughout the study."

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"The study drugs and placebo were indistinguishable in terms of appearance, shape, packaging form labelling etc".

"To maintain blinding, all patients took three tablets a day (two aliskiren tablets plus one placebo, two placebo tablets plus one aliskiren, or three placebo tablets)."

"The key code was broken after all CRF were completed and after data for analysis was locked".

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Reasons for withdrawal during washout and single‐blind period:

138 (22.4%) ‐not meeting requirement specified in the protocol; 15 (2.4%) due to adverse events and 7(1.1%) due to withdrawal of consent.

Of 455 patients randomized, 21 (4.4%) were withdrawn due to major protocol deviations. Most withdrawals 11(9.6%) occurred in the placebo group; 5 (4.3%) withdrew in 75 mg group; 3 (2.7%) in 150 mg group and 2 (1.8%) in the 300 mg group. (page 67 of CSR).

Last observation was carried forward in patients with missing data during DB period at week 8.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

All primary and secondary outcomes were reported as stated in the protocol. Pulse pressure was not reported at baseline or endpoint.

Heart rate was reported at baseline but no data are reported on change in heart rate at endpoint. These are available in appendices that were not provided by EMA.

Other bias

High risk

Manufacturer sponsored. Conflict of interest of authors has not been provided. Patients could have been selected based on their response to other drugs acting on the renin‐angiotensin system. Patients with adverse events were excluded during washout and single‐blind period.

Study was not registered with clinicalTrials.gov.

CSPP100A1301

Methods

A randomized , double‐blind, placebo‐ and active‐controlled, parallel‐group, multicentre, comparative study.

Participants

1206 patients were enrolled from 53 Japanese centres and 761 were randomized.

Inclusion criteria: Adult (20 to 75 years old) Asian outpatients with essential hypertension defined as MSDBP > 90 mmHg and < 110 mmHg at visit 2, and > 95 mmHg and < 110 mmHg at visit 3; difference in MSDBP measured at visit 2 and visit 3 needed to be < 10mmHg.

Exclusion criteria: MSSBP measured > 180 mmHg and/or if the MSDBP > 110mmHg at visit 1, 2, or 3; Suspected or confirmed secondary hypertension; malignant hypertension; severe signs of: cardiac disease, renal disease, hepatic disease, cerebrovascular disorder; pancreatitis, or history of pancreatitis; treatment of duodenal or gastric ulcer; over dehydration or electrolyte abnormalities of clinical concern; type I or type II diabetes mellitus (HbA1c greater than 8% at start of run‐in period (visit 1); history of malignant tumours including leukaemia and lymphoma within the past 5 years; history of autoimmune diseases; anaemia; fecal occult blood at start of run‐in period; hypothyroidism; exposure to aliskiren or placebo within 12 weeks of start of run‐in period; history of hypersensitivity to ARBs or drugs with similar chemical structures to aliskiren; alcoholic patients, or those with history of drug abuse within 52 weeks of study start date; patients considered unlikely to comply with the requirements specified in the protocol by the investigator.

Baseline characteristics: Mean age 52 + 10.2 years, with 12.6% of participants aged 65 years or older; Oriental (100%); Male 73.2%; Mean BMI 25.6 + 3.8; Diabetes 8.7%; MSSBP/MSDBP 152.0 + 11.5/99.0 + 4.0 mmHg; Mean sitting pulse was 73.0 + 10.4 bpm; mean sitting pulse pressure was not reported.

Interventions

761 patients were randomized

Placebo (N=156), aliskiren 150 mg (N = 302), losartan 50 mg (N = 303)

Duration of treatment = 8 weeks

Outcomes

Primary: change from baseline in MSDBP

Secondary: change from baseline in MSSBP; responder rate (percentage of patients a MSDBP < 90 mmHg and/or at least 10 mmHg reduction from baseline), blood pressure control rate (percentage of patients with a MSDBP < 90 mmHg and MSSBP < 140 mmHg, changes from baseline of the standing and supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures; adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests, ECG and fecal occult blood.

Notes

Study CSPP100A1301 is not published in a journal.

It is registered on clinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT003344110 (results are not posted)

It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are posted)

CSR without appendices was received from EMA on May 23rd 2016.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Participants were assigned to treatment groups by central randomization. Participants were provided with drug numbers by SPP 100 subject registration Centre and drug numbers were recorded in the eCRF by the investigators for use as randomization numbers and study drug was allocated according to the numbers.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

The allocation table was prepared using computer‐generated random numbers. The table was sealed by the person responsible for drug allocation and kept in strict confidence through unblinding.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double‐blind. Study drugs were identical in packaging, labelling, administration schedule, appearance, and odour.

Patients were required to take a placebo during the placebo run‐in period (4 weeks) and were given 2 tablets according to the patient's assigned group. Participants, investigators, sub investigators, site staff, evaluators and data analysts remained blind to the identity of the treatment from randomization to database lock.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Discontinuations from the study ‐ placebo: N = 15 (9.6%) and aliskiren 150 mg: N = 14 (4.6%). Last observation was carried forward in patients with missing data during DB period at week 8. Missing data at week 8 had very little effect on analysis of results for MSSBP and MSDBP.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Most primary and secondary outcomes were reported. Baseline and endpoint BP data was reported. Pulse rate was reported at baseline but not reported at endpoint. Pulse pressure was not reported. These may be available in appendices that were not provided by EMA.

Other bias

High risk

Manufacturer sponsored. Conflicts of interests unknown.

Study is not published in a journal.

Of the 1206 patients enrolled, 445 were not randomized (286 did not meet protocol requirements; 89 had abnormal laboratory value; 39 had adverse event; 22 withdrew consent and 9 had protocol violation).

CSPP100A2201

Methods

Multicentre randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled parallel‐group study.

Participants

793 patients were enrolled from 56 centres in USA, Germany and Belgium of which 652 were randomized. 141 patients were excluded (69 due to failure to meet BP criteria; 19 due to withdrawal of consent and 15 due to abnormal test procedure results).

Inclusion criteria: Men and women aged 18 years or older, with mild‐to‐moderate essential hypertension (MSDBP > 95 mmHg and < 110 mmHg).

Exclusion criteria: Severe hypertension (MSDBP > 110mmHg and/or MSSBP > 180mmHg); secondary hypertension; a history of severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease; type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin or with poor glucose control (glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1c] > 8%); serious hepatic or renal disease; history of malignancy; history of severe or life‐threatening diseases; history of drug or alcohol abuse; apparent dehydration; and pregnancy or nursing mothers.

Baseline characteristics: Mean age 56 + 11.5 years; 22.7% patients were > 65 years old; Male 50.2% ; Caucasians 76.8%; Black 17.2%; Other 6%; mean BMI 30.8 + 6.3; MSSBP 152.2 + 11.2 mmHg and MSDBP 99.0 + 3.6 mmHg; Mean sitting pulse: 72.8 + 8.7 bpm; and mean pulse pressure was not reported.

Interventions

652 patients randomized

Placebo: N = 131; aliskiren 150 mg: N = 127; aliskiren 300 mg: N = 130; aliskiren 600 mg: N = 130; Irbesartan 150 mg: N = 134

Duration of treatment = 8 weeks

Outcomes

Primary: change from baseline in trough MSDBP
Secondary: change in MSSBP; percentage of patients achieving BP control (SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg; dose‐response analysis; trough‐to‐peak ratio; withdrawal effect; safety and tolerability assessments.

Notes

Study CSPP100A2201 is published in a journal as Gradman 2005.

It is not registered on clinicalTrials.gov

It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are not posted)

CSR without appendices was received from EMA on January 25th 2016

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Randomization with a block size of 5 and stratified by region was performed by the interactive voice response system provider using a validated system that automates the random assignment of treatment groups to randomization numbers."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"Randomization data were kept strictly confidential until completion of the study and blinded data cleaning process. Access during the study was available only to authorized persons who maintained the randomization database and were not involved in the conduct of the study. The database lock procedure was followed to merge clinical data and treatment codes for analyses after the completion of the study and data cleaning."

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All medications were identical in appearance. "All study personnel and participants remained blinded to the treatment assignment for the duration of the study."

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Withdrawal rate was 22 (16.8%) in the placebo group; 12 (9.4%) in aliskiren 150 mg; 11 (8.5%) in aliskiren 300 mg and 10 (7.7%) in aliskiren 600 mg.

Reason for withdrawal differed ‐ 7.6% in placebo group withdrew due to lack of therapeutic effect and 0.8% to 1.6% withdrawal in aliskiren treatment groups. How missing data were analyzed has not been reported.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Most primary and secondary outcomes were reported. Baseline and endpoint BP data was reported. Pulse rate was reported at baseline but not reported at endpoint. Change in pulse pressure was reported without standard deviation on page 53 of the CSR.

Other bias

High risk

Manufacturer sponsored. Authors are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and are therefore eligible for Novartis stock and stock options. Patients could have been selected based on their response to other drugs acting on the renin‐angiotensin system. Study is not registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov

CSPP100A2203

Methods

Multicentre, randomized, double‐blind placebo‐controlled, multifactorial, parallel‐group study

Participants

1441 patients were enrolled from 94 centres in the USA, Germany, France, Denmark, and Poland, of which 1123 were randomized to 11 treatment groups. 318 patients discontinued single‐blind period (13.4% due to abnormal test procedure; 3.3% due to abnormal laboratory values; 2.8% due to withdrawal of consent; 1.5% due to adverse events; 0.5% due to protocol violation; 0.1% due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect; 0.3% due to condition no longer required study drug; 0.1% due to administrative problems and 0.1% due to lost to follow‐up).

Inclusion criteria: Adult men and women 18 years or older with mild‐to‐moderate essential hypertension (MSDBP 95 mmHg to < 110 mmHg).

Exclusion criteria: Severe hypertension (MSSBP 180 mmHg or more or MSDBP of 110 mmHg or more); secondary hypertension; type I or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus; type 2 diabetes mellitus; history of severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease or other life‐threatening medical conditions.

Baseline characteristics: Mean age 56 + 12.2 years; 24.9% were > 65 years of age; Male 55.9%; Caucasians 92.1%; Black 6.28; other 1.2%; mean BMI 29.5 + 5.0; MSSBP 153.3 + 12.0 mmHg and MSDBP 99.0 + 3.5 mmHg; mean sitting pulse 72 + 9.3 bpm; mean pulse pressure is not reported.

Interventions

1123 patients were randomized

Placebo: N = 177; aliskiren 75 mg: N = 179; aliskiren 150 mg: N = 178; aliskiren 300 mg: N = 175; several valsartan monotherapy groups and combination therapy groups.

Duration of treatment = 8 weeks

Outcomes

Primary: change from baseline to endpoint in MSDBP of monotherapy with aliskiren at all doses versus placebo.

Secondary: change from baseline in MSSBP of aliskiren monotherapy as well as in combination therapy groups; safety and tolerability of aliskiren; of aliskiren combination therapy; impact of treatment on selected biomarker.

Notes

Study CSPP100A2203 is published in a journal as Pool 2007.

It is not registered on clinicalTrials.gov

It is not registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database.

CSR without appendices was received from EMA on April 12th 2016.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Randomization by region was performed by the interactive voice response system provider using a validated system that automates the random assignment of treatment groups to randomization numbers."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Each centre received a supply of medication packs each labelled with a unique number. "Randomization codes were kept strictly confidential until the database was locked."

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Aliskiren 75 mg, aliskiren 150 mg were supplied as capsule and aliskiren 300 mg as tablet. Placebo was supplied both as a capsule and in tablet form. To adequately blind the study, patients had to take 3 tablets/capsules of study medication. Insufficient information to determine if blinding was successful. Blinding of outcome assessor is not reported. Appendices were not provided by EMA.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

15 (8.5%) participants withdrew from placebo group; 21 (11.7%) from aliskiren 75 mg group; 13 (7.3%) from aliskiren 150 mg group and 9 (5.1%) from aliskiren 300 mg group. Reason for withdrawal differed between groups ‐ lack of therapeutic effect was noted in 2.8% in placebo group; 5.6% in aliskiren 75 mg; 2.2% in aliskiren 150 mg and 2.3% in aliskiren 300 mg group.

How missing data will be analyzed is not reported.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol was available and primary and secondary outcomes were reported. Pulse rate was reported at baseline but no detail provided at endpoint. Pulse pressure is not reported at baseline or endpoint.

This information may be available in the appendices that were not provided with the CSR by the EMA.

Other bias

High risk

Manufacturer sponsored. Conflict of interest of authors has not been provided. Patients could have been selected based on their response to other drugs acting on the renin‐angiotensin system.

Study is not registered with clinicalTrials.gov or Novartis Clinical Trial Results database.

CSPP100A2204

Methods

Multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, placebo‐ and active‐controlled. multifactorial, parallel‐group study of aliskiren monotherapy compared to placebo and combination therapy of aliskiren with HCTZ compared to component monotherapies.

Participants

3190 patients were enrolled from 19 countries in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Columbia, Finland, France, Germany, Guatemala, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan and USA in the single‐blind placebo run‐in period.

2776 were randomized, of which 2558 (92.1%) completed the study and 204 (7.3%) discontinued. Discontinuation rate was highest in the placebo group most often due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect (2%) and those due to adverse events (2.3%).

Inclusion criteria: Women and men aged 18 years or older with mild‐to‐moderate essential hypertension (MSDBP from > 95 mmHg to < 110 mmHg) at visit 3. Female patients were either postmenopausal, surgically sterile or using effective contraceptive methods.

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant or nursing women; patients with severe hypertension (DBP > 110 mmHg and /or SBP > 180 mmHg) ; those with secondary hypertension; cerebrovascular accident, MI; coronary bypass surgery; TIA within last 12 months; Keith ‐ Wagener grade III to IV hypertensive retinopathy; malignancy including leukaemia and lymphoma within the past five years but excluding basal cell carcinoma; drug or alcohol abuse; gouty arthritis; current diagnosis of heart failure; angina pectoris requiring pharmacotherapy other than sublingual nitroglycerin; second or third degree heart block without a pace maker; any potential life‐threatening arrhythmia or clinically significant valvular disease; surgical or medical conditions which might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of study medication; known or suspected contraindications to aliskiren, including history of allergy to study drug and previous participation in an investigation clinical study within 1 month of visit 1 of the study; Participants with type I or 2 diabetes mellitus with poor glycaemic control; laboratory serum sodium or potassium values ≥ 5.5 mEq/L; hepatic disease; or renal impairment; history of major gastrointestinal tract surgery or current or previously active inflammatory bowel disease were excluded.

Baseline characteristics: Mean age 54.6 + 11.6 years; 21.1% patients were > 65 years of age; Male 54.8%; Caucasians 85.4%; Black 4.6%; Asian 2.5%; Native American 1.8% and others 5.7%; MSSBP 153.6 + 12.2 mmHg and MSDBP 99.2 + 3.6 mmHg; mean sitting pulse pressure was 72.2 beats/minute

Interventions

Placebo: N = 195; aliskiren 75 mg: N = 184; aliskiren 150 mg: N = 185; aliskiren 300 mg: N = 183; HCTZ monotherapy groups and aliskiren combination therapy groups.

Duration of treatment = 8 weeks

Outcomes

Primary: Change from baseline in MSDBP.

Secondary: change from baseline in MSSBP, assessment of dose‐response efficacy, proportion of patients showing a successful response MSDBP < 90 mmHg or 10 mmHg or greater reduction from baseline, proportion of patients achieving BP control (<140 mmHg/90 mmHg), safety and tolerability, effects of treatment on plasma renin activity and renin concentration.

Notes

Study CSPP100A2204 is published in a journal as Villamil 2007. It is registered on clinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00219024 (results are posted). It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are not posted). CSR without appendices was received from EMA on April 6th 2016

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Randomization was performed by Covance Inc. using validated system that automates random assignment. The detail of the method used is not reported in the CSR. The randomization method and list is provided in appendix 5.2, which was not available.

14 patients received randomization numbers in error, were not treated with DB treatment and did not provide post baseline data. One patient completed the single‐blind phase and was assigned DB treatment without randomization and medication assignment by IVRS. Two patients received placebo instead of the assigned medication for 9 or 10 days and were subsequently discontinued due to protocol violation.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Randomization number was provided along with a unique medication number for the packages of study drug to be dispensed. No further detail is provided.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

The identity of the treatment was concealed by the use of drugs that were identical in packaging, labelling, appearance, odour and schedule of administration. A double‐dummy design was used because the identity of the doses of aliskiren and HCTZ could not be disguised due to their different forms.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Total withdrawals were 22 (11.3%) in placebo group 15 (8.2%) in aliskiren 75 mg group; 16 (8.6%) in aliskiren 150 mg group and 17 (9.3%) in aliskiren 300 mg group. (Page 49 of CSR). The reasons for withdrawal in the placebo group were higher due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect as compared to aliskiren groups.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol was available and primary and secondary outcomes were reported. Pulse rate was reported at baseline but no detail provided at endpoint. Pulse pressure is not reported at baseline or endpoint.

This information may be available in the appendices that were not provided with the CSR by the EMA.

Other bias

High risk

Manufacturer sponsored. Conflict of interest of authors has not been reported. Patients could have been selected based on their response to other drugs acting on the renin‐angiotensin system.

CSPP100A2308

Methods

Randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multicentre study.

Participants

Patients were recruited at 68 centres internationally (Canada, Guatemala, Korea, the Netherlands and USA).

Of the 833 patients who entered single‐blind period, 672 were randomized to 4 double‐blind treatment groups. 63 (9.4%) discontinued treatment (15.1% due to abnormal test procedure; 0.4% due to abnormal laboratory values; 2.5% due to withdrawal of consent; 1.5% due to adverse events; 0.4% due to protocol violation; 0.1% due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect; 0.1% due to condition no longer required study drug; 0.1% due to administrative problems and 0.5% due to lost to follow‐up).

Inclusion criteria: Men and women aged 18 years or over with mild‐to‐moderate essential hypertension (MSDBP > 95 mmHg and <110 mmHg.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who previously entered an aliskiren study; severe hypertension (MSDBP > 110 mmHg and/or MSSBP > 180 mmHg); secondary hypertension; known Keith‐Waegner grade III or IV hypertensive retinopathy; history of hypertensive encephalopathy or cerebrovascular accident; TIA during 12 months prior to visit 1; current diagnosis of heart failure (NYHA class II ‐ Iv); history of MI, coronary bypass surgery or any percutaneous intervention during 6 months prior to visit 1; current angina pectoris requiring pharmacotherapy; second or third degree heart block without a pacemaker; potentially life‐threatening arrhythmia; clinically significant valvular disease; type I or II diabetes mellitus with poor glycaemic control HbA1C > 9%; serum sodium less than lower limit of normal and serum potassium < 3.5 mEq/L or > 5.5 mEq/L or dehydration at visit 1; any surgical or medical condition that might significantly alter absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of the drug; history of malignancy including leukaemia or lymphoma; history of drug or alcohol abuse within last 12 months; pregnant or nursing women; and history of non compliance to medical regimens or unwillingness to comply with study protocol.

Baseline characteristics: Mean age 53 + 10.5 years; 13.1% were > 65 years; Male 61.6%; Caucasians 61.3%; Black 12.4%; Asian 18%; Others 8.3%; Mean BMI 29 + 5.9 kg/m2; MSDBP 99.6 + 3.7 mmHg and MSSBP 152.1 + 12.4 mmHg.

Interventions

Placebo: N = 165; aliskiren 150 mg: N = 172; aliskiren 300 mg: N = 169; aliskiren 600 mg: N = 166

Duration of treatment = 8 weeks

Outcomes

Primary: change in MSDBP from baseline
Secondary: change in MSSBP, dose‐response relationship, 24‐h ambulatory BP monitoring profiles and trough‐to‐peak ratios, proportion of patients achieving a successful treatment response (MSDBP < 90 mmHg and /or greater or equal to a 10mm Hg reduction from baseline, BP control (BP < 140/90 mmHg, effects on plasma renin activity, and renin concentration, heart rate, safety and tolerability, and effect of treatment withdrawal on BP, plasma renin activity, and renin concentration.

Notes

Study CSPP100A2308 is published in a journal as Oh 2007

It is registered on clinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00219128 (results are not posted)

It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are not posted)

CSR without appendices was received from EMA on February 20th 2016

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomization list is produced using a validated system that automates the random assignment of treatment groups to randomized numbers in the specified ratios to insure treatment assignment is unbiased and concealed from patients and investigator staff.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomization list is produced using a validated system that automates the random assignment of treatment groups to randomized numbers in the specified ratios to insure treatment assignment is unbiased and concealed from patients and investigator staff.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Patients, investigator and staff performing the assessment and data analysis will remain blind to the identity of the treatment from the time of randomization until database lock and kept strictly confidential.

The identity of the treatments will be concealed by the use of study drugs that are identical in packaging, labelling, schedule of administration, appearance, taste and odour.

Patients were instructed to take 3 tablets of study medication per dose throughout the study at approximately 8.00am.

Unblinding will occur in the case of patient emergencies and at the end of the conclusion of the study.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

of the 833 patients enrolled in SB period, 671 (80.6%) completed SB period and were then randomized to DB treatment and 162 (19.4%) discontinued.

30 (18.2%) patients withdrew in placebo group; 10 (5.8%) in aliskiren 150 mg group; 9 (5.3%) in aliskiren 300 mg group and 14 (8.4%) in aliskiren 600 mg group. Reasons for withdrawal differed between treatment groups ‐ unsatisfactory therapeutic effect in 17 (10.3%) in placebo; 3 (1.7%) in aliskirenA 150 mg; 1 (0.6%) in aliskiren 300 mg and 4 (2.4%) in aliskiren 600 mg.

For each patient, the last post baseline measurement during double blind‐treatment period was carried forward as endpoint measurement for the variable analyzed.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol was available and primary and secondary outcomes were reported. Pulse rate and pulse pressure were not reported at baseline or endpoint. This information may be available in the appendices that were not provided with the CSR by the EMA.

Other bias

High risk

Manufacturer sponsored. Author Keefe D is employee of Novartis. Conflict of interest of other authors has not been provided in the published article. Patients could have been selected based on their response to other drugs acting on the renin‐angiotensin system.

CSPP100A2323

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐ and active‐controlled multicentre dose titration study.

After 3 weeks, randomized patients receiving aliskiren 150 mg or HCTZ 12.5 mg underwent forced titration to doubled doses of their respective treatments. After an additional 3 weeks, patients in the placebo group were reassigned to aliskiren 300 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg for 20 weeks.

Participants

1440 patients were screened of which 1275 were enrolled in the single‐blind run‐in period. During this period 151 (11.8%) patients discontinued (most common reasons were abnormal laboratory test 7.1%, which included patients who did not meet the blood pressure criteria for randomization; withdrawal of consent in 2.6% and adverse events 0.9%). 1124 patients were randomized to receive once‐daily treatment with aliskiren 150 mg, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, or placebo. 978 (87%) completed the double‐blind period.

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged ≥18 years with MSDBP > 90 mmHg and < 110 mmHg at the single‐blind placebo run‐in visit. At randomization, patients had to have a MSDBP > 95 mmHg and < 110 mmHg and show a absolute difference of < 10 mmHg in MSDBP from their previous study visit.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with were severe hypertension (MSDBP ≥110 mmHg and/or MSSBP ≥180 mmHg); suspected secondary or malignant hypertension; Known Keith‐Waegner grade III or IV hypertensive retinopathy; malignancy excluding basal cell carcinoma within the last 5 years; drug or alcohol abuse in the last 12 months; current diagnosis of heart failure (NYHA class II ‐ IV); angina pectoris requiring pharmacological treatment; second or third degree heart block without a pace maker; clinically significant valvular disease; potentially life‐threatening or symptomatic arrhythmia; TIA; coronary bypass surgery or PCI during 12 months prior to visit 1; type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM); type 2 DM, poorly controlled (glycosylated haemoglobin > 9.0% or microalbuminuria at visit 1); serious hepatic, pancreatic, or renal disease; any surgical or medical condition that might significantly alter absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of the drug; history of major gastrointestinal tract surgery such as gastrectomy, gastroenterostomy, or bowel resection; history of active inflammatory bowel disease; currently active gastritis, duodenal or gastric ulcer; gastrointestinal bleeding in the past 3months; any history of pancreatitis, pancreatic injury, or evidence of impaired pancreatic function or abnormal lipase or amylase during past 12 months of visit 1; evidence of hepatic disease, history of hepatic encephalopathy; history of oesophageal varices; history of portocaval shunt; evidence of renal impairment or dialysis or nephrotic syndrome; current treatment with cholesterol absorption inhibitors;

proteinuria or serum sodium less than lower limit of normal and/or serum potassium < 3.5 mEq/L or dehydration at visit 1; clinically significant allergy; pregnant and breast feeding women were excluded.

Baseline characteristics:

Mean age 56 + 11 years; 22.8% were > 65 years of age; male 56%; Caucasians 99%; Asian (0.7%) Black 0.2% and other 0.2%; Mean BMI 29.1 + 4.8 kg/m2;and diabetes in 10.9% patients; MSSBP 154.2 + 11.2 mmHg and MSDBP 99 + 3.4 mmHg

Interventions

Placebo: N = 221; aliskiren 150 mg N = 459; HCTZ 12.5 mg N = 444;

After 3 weeks on therapy, patients underwent forced titration to aliskiren 300 mg and HCTZ 25 mg. After 6 weeks, patients receiving placebo were reassigned to aliskiren 300 mg (N = 108) or HCTZ 25 mg (N = 113).

Duration of treatment = 26 weeks (monotherapy data useful at week 3 for 150 mg dose and at week 6 for 300 mg dose)

Outcomes

Primary: Change from baseline to endpoint in MSDBP.

Secondary: changes in MSSBP at week 26 endpoint and MSDBP and MSSBP at week 52 endpoint; comparison of the BP‐lowering efficacy of aliskiren 300 mg monotherapy and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg monotherapy at week 12 endpoint; evaluation of the proportion of patients with response to treatment and BP control at the week 26 and week 52 endpoints; and comparison of the long‐term safety and tolerability of an aliskiren regimen with a HCTZ regimen.

Notes

Study CSPP100A323 is published in a journal as Schmieder 2009

It is registered on clinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00219154 (results are posted)

It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are not posted)

CSR without appendices was received on May 27th 2016.

BP data at end of the aliskiren monotherapy period is analyzed at the end of 3 weeks for 150 mg and 300 mg dose.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Randomization by centre was performed by the interactive voice response system provider with the use of a validated system that automates the random assignment of patients to randomization numbers." The IVRS assigned a 2=part patient number. The first part was the centre number and the second part was one of the series of numbers allocated to the centre.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"Randomization was performed using the procedure to ensure that treatment assignment was unbiased and concealed from the patient and investigator staff. Data were kept strictly confidential until the time of unblinding. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation was responsible for managing the database and conducting audits"

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Aliskiren 150 mg and 300 mg were provided as film ‐coated tablets each of a different size, shape and colour. The placebos to aliskiren 150 mg and 300 mg were matched in respective size, shape and colour to the active tablets. HCTZ 12.5 and 25 mg and placebo to HCTZ were provided as identically appearing capsules.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

During the 6‐week double‐blind, placebo‐controlled treatment period, 67 patients (6.0%) discontinued study treatment. Discontinuations were significantly higher (P = 0.05) in the placebo group 21 (9.5%) than in the aliskiren group 20 (4.4%) but were not significantly greater than in the HTCZ group 26 (5.9%). The most common reason for discontinuation in placebo group was adverse events, withdrawal of consent and unsatisfactory therapeutic response each occurring in 2.7% patients.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol was available and primary and secondary outcomes were reported at 26 weeks. Pulse rate and pulse pressure are not reported at baseline or at week 3, week 6 and study endpoint. This information may be available in the appendices that were not provided with the CSR by the EMA.

Most data in the CSR are reported at 26 weeks. Data that can be used at 3 and 6 weeks for this review have been partially reported. MSDBP data with SEM are reported at week 6 in the CSR. Other MSSBP and MSDBP data have been calculated from the graph. SAE data detail at week 3 and 6 have not been reported.

Other bias

High risk

Study supported by Novartis. Authors received research grants, consulting and speaker fees from Novartis.

CSPP100A2327

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled, dose‐escalation study

Participants

5133 patients were screened at 194 centres in the USA and Europe. 3980 enrolled in 3‐4 weeks single‐blind placebo run ‐in period. 1797 patients were randomized to once‐daily oral administration of treatment for 4 weeks and all patients underwent a forced titration to double the dose of their treatments, and were treated for another 4 weeks.

Inclusion criteria: Men and women aged 18 years or over with stage 1‐2 hypertension (MSDBP > 95 mmHg to < 110 mmHg) and an absolute difference in MSDBP of < 10 mmHg from the prior visit, as well as a mean 8‐hour daytime ABPM DBP > 90 mmHg.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who previously entered an aliskiren study; severe hypertension (MSDBP > 110 mmHg and/or MSSBP > 180 mmHg); secondary hypertension; known Keith‐Waegner grade III or IV hypertensive retinopathy; history of hypertensive encephalopathy or cerebrovascular accident, TIA; MI, coronary bypass surgery, or PCI; serum sodium less than lower limit of normal; serum potassium > 5.3 mEq/L at visit 1; history of type I or II diabetes mellitus with poor glycaemic control HbA1C > 8% at visit 1; current angina pectoris requiring pharmacological treatment; second or third degree heart block without a pacemaker; potentially life‐threatening arrhythmia; clinically significant valvular disease; any surgical or medical condition that might significantly alter absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of the drug; history of malignancy including leukaemia or lymphoma; history of major gastrointestinal tract surgery such as gastrectomy, gastroenterostomy, or bowel resection; history of active inflammatory bowel disease; currently active gastritis, duodenal or gastric ulcer; gastrointestinal bleeding in the past 3months; any history of pancreatitis, pancreatic injury, or evidence of impaired pancreatic function or abnormal lipase or amylase during past 12 months of visit 1; Evidence of hepatic disease, history of hepatic encephalopathy; history of oesophageal varices; history of portocaval shunt; evidence of renal impairment or dialysis or nephrotic syndrome; Current treatment with cholestyramine or colestipol resins; history of hyper sensitivity to any of the study drugs or those belonging to the same therapeutic class; history of angioedema due to usage of ARB or ACE inhibitors; history of malignancy of any organ system treated or untreated in the past 5 years; history of drug or alcohol abuse within last 12 months; pregnant or nursing women; and history of non‐compliance to medical regimens or unwillingness to comply with study protocol were excluded.

Baseline characteristics:

Mean age was 52 + 10.4 years with 13.9% > 65 years in placebo group and 11.7% in aliskiren group, respectively; Males 58.4 to 61.2%; Caucasian 74.6 to 76%; 15 to 16% Black; 1.5% Asian and 7 to 9% others; Mean BMI 30.2 + 5.7 kg/m2;Baseline MSSBP was 154.1 + 12.8 mmHg and MSDBP was 100.4 + 4.2 mmHg.

Interventions

Placebo: N = 459; aliskiren 150 mg to 300 mg: N = 437; valsartan 160 mg to 320 mg N = 455; aliskiren 150 mg/300 mg/valsartan 160 mg/320 mg: N = 446

Duration of treatment = 8 weeks

Outcomes

Primary: change in MSDBP for baseline to week‐8 endpoint
Secondary: change in MSSBP from baseline to week‐8 endpoint, proportion of patients achieving a successful response to treatment (MSDBP < 90 mmHg or a 10 mmHg or greater reduction from baseline, or both, or achieving BP control (<140 mmHg/90 mmHg). Changes from baseline to week 8 in 24‐h ambulatory BP measurements, changes in biomarker (plasma renin concentration, plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration)

Notes

Study CSPP100A2327 is published in a journal as Oparil 2007.

EudraCT no. 2005‐000039‐73

It is not registered on clinicalTrials.gov

It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are not posted).

CSR without appendices was received from EMA on June 16th 2016.

Data of this study was also reported in the FDA Medical Review.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"The randomisation list was generated by Novartis Drug Supply Management (Basel, Switzerland) with a validated system that automated the random assignment of treatment groups to randomisation numbers."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

The randomization scheme was reviewed by a biostatistics quality assurance group at Novartis and locked by them after approval.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"Placebo and drug tablets and capsules were matched in size, shape, and colour to maintain blinding." Patients were required to take two tablets and two capsules.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

63 (13.7%) withdrew from placebo group and 53 (12%) in aliskiren group. Reason for withdrawal differed between groups ‐ Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect ‐ 36 (8%) in placebo and 13 (3%) in aliskiren 150 mg group.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol was available and primary and secondary outcomes were reported. Pulse rate and pulse pressure are not reported at baseline or endpoint. This information may be available in the appendices that were not provided with the CSR by the EMA.

Other bias

High risk

Manufacturer sponsored. Oparil is the recipient of grants‐in‐aid from Abbot Laboratories, Astra Zeneca, Aventis, Bioavail, Boehringher Ingelhiem, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Forest laboratories, GlaxoSmithkline, Novartis, Merck & Co, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis, and the Salt Institute. Other authors are employees of Novartis and therefore eligible for stock and stock option

Patients could have been selected based on their response to other drugs acting on the renin‐angiotensin system. Manufacturer sponsored.

The overall incidence of major protocol violation was higher in placebo group (10.9%) than in other aliskiren monotherapy groups (5.4%).

CSPP100A2328

Methods

Multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled study.

Participants

1508 patients with essential hypertension were screened from 53 centres in the USA and 48 centres in the European Union. 642 eligible patients were randomized, of which 576 (89.7%) completed the double‐blind treatment period.

Inclusion criteria: Patients who previously entered an aliskiren study; patients aged ≥18 years with stage 1 or 2 essential uncomplicated hypertension. MSDBP ≥95 and <110 mmHg, with a difference of ≤10 mmHg, on their last 2 visits and mean 8‐hour daytime ambulatory DBP ≥90 mmHg. Patients fulfilling these eligibility criteria then underwent ABPM at visit 5. Only patients with mean 8‐hour daytime ambulatory DBP (ADBP) ≥90 mmHg were entered in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with were severe hypertension (MSDBP ≥110 mmHg and/or MSSBP ≥180 mmHg); suspected secondary or malignant hypertension; type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM); type 2 DM, poorly controlled (glycosylated haemoglobin > 8.0%) or requiring insulin; serious cardiac, hepatic, pancreatic, renal, or cerebrovascular disease; serum sodium less than lower limit of normal and/or serum potassium > 5.3 mEq/L or dehydration at visit 1; atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter; clinically significant allergy; and malignant tumours; pregnant and breast‐feeding women were excluded.

Baseline characteristics:

Mean age 52 + 10.7 years; 13.1% > 65 years in placebo group and 9.8%, 15.8% and 14.6% in aliskiren 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg groups respectively; Males 60%; Caucasian 80.8%; Black 14.2%; Asian 2.3% and others 12.6%; Mean BMI 30.4 + 5.6 kg/m2; baseline MSSBP 153.5 + 12.8 mmHg and MSDBP 100.5 + 4.1 mmHg at baseline

Interventions

N = 642 patients were randomized

Placebo: N = 160; aliskiren 75 mg: N =1 53; aliskiren 150 mg: N = 171; aliskiren 300 mg: N = 158

Duration of treatment = 8 weeks

Outcomes

Primary: Change from baseline in MSDBP at the week‐8 endpoint

Secondary: Change from baseline in MSSBP at week‐4 and week‐8 endpoint; change in MSDBP at weeks 4 and 8; proportion of responders (MSDBP < 90 mmHg and/or at least a 10 mmHg reduction from baseline); proportion of patients achieving BP control (MSSBP/MSDBP <140/90 mmHG); dose‐response relationship; safety and tolerability of aliskiren compared to placebo; impact of treatment on plasma renin activity, plasma renin concentration and plasma aldosterone

Notes

Study CSPP100A2328 is published in a journal as Puig 2009.

It is not registered on clinicalTrials.gov

It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are posted).

EMA does not possess CSR for this study.

CSPP100A2328 synopsis has been used to report mean change from baseline in MSSBP and MSDBP with SD and adverse events.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"The randomization list was generated using a validated system that automated the random assignment of treatment groups to randomization numbers. At randomization, eligible patients were assigned the lowest available number on the randomization list and were supplied with a medication pack labelled with the relevant randomization number. The randomization scheme was reviewed by a biostatistics quality assurance group at Novartis Pharma AG and locked by them after approval."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"At randomization eligible patients were assigned the lowest available number on the randomization list and were supplied with a medication pack labelled with he relevant randomization number. Randomization codes were kept confidential until after database lock."

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"Blinding was maintained by providing the study drugs along with matching placebo tablets. All patients took 3 tablets daily at 8:00am, except on the day of visit, when the study drug was taken after the visit procedures were completed."

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

"Of the 642 randomized patients, 576 (89.7%) completed the double‐blind treatment period. The proportion of discontinuations was higher in the aliskiren 150 mg group 21 (12.3%) and the placebo group 19 (11.9%), and lower in the aliskiren 75 mg 12 (7.8%) and aliskiren 300 mg 14 (8.9%) groups."

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Could not be assessed as protocol is not available. SAE data detail not available.

Other bias

High risk

Study funded by manufacturer (Novartis). Medical writers from Novartis drafted manuscript. It is not registered on clinicalTrials.gov.

EMA does not possess CSR for this study

CSPP100A2405

Methods

Randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled study. Randomization was stratified by region and age group (≥ 65 to < 75 years and ≥ 75 years).

Participants

836 patients were enrolled at 95 centres in 8 countries (Argentina, Czech Republic, Germany, Iceland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Slovakia). 754 (90.2%) completed the single‐blind, run‐in period. However, two patients were mistakenly randomized, creating a randomized set with two additional patients (N = 756). Though these two patients did not meet study criteria, they were included in the placebo group for the randomized set, but excluded from the full analysis set and safety set (N = 754).

Inclusion criteria: Men and women in the outpatient setting aged ≥ 65 years with essential hypertension (defined as MSSBP ≥150 mmHg and < 180 mmHg and MSDBP <110 mmHg) and in addition, patients’ MSSBP had to differ by ≤15 mmHg between the last two visits of the placebo run‐in period for inclusion in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with severe hypertension; those with secondary hypertension; cardiac dysfunction; diabetes; malignancy including leukaemia and lymphoma within the past five years; surgical or medical conditions which might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of study medication; known or suspected contraindications to aliskiren including history of allergy to ACE‐inhibitors or ARBS; previous exposure to aliskiren within 3 months of visit 1 of the study; previous participation in an investigation clinical study within 1 month of visit 1 of the study; participants with laboratory serum potassium values ≥ 5.5 mEq/L; with an estimated GFR < 45 mL/min/1.73m2; Women who were pregnant, lactating or women of childbearing potential were also excluded.

Baseline characteristics:

Mean age was 72 + 6 with 30.6 to 32.3% patients > 75 years old; 43.2 to 47.1% patients were male; 98.4 to 100% were Caucasians; 1.1% Black; 0.5 to 1.6% were others; Mean BMI 29 + 5.0 kg/m2; 16 to 21% patients had diabetes; MSSBP at baseline was 160 + 8 mmHg and MSDBP was 90 + 8 mmHg.

Interventions

Aliskiren 75 mg ( N = 192), 150 mg (N = 189), or 300 mg (N = 186) and placebo (N = 189) once daily

Duration of treatment = 8 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary: Change in MSSBP from baseline to week‐8 endpoint.

Secondary: Change in MSDBP from baseline to week‐8 endpoint; changes in MSSBP and MSDBP at week 4 and 8; mean 24‐hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressures; the proportion of patients achieving BP control (MSSBP/DBP < 140 mmHg/90 mmHg) at the week‐8 endpoint; serious adverse events and total adverse events

Notes

Study CSPP100A2405 is published in a journal as Villa 2012.

It is registered on clinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00706134.

It is registered on Novartis Clinical Trial Results database (results are posted).

CSR without appendices was received from EMA on December 22nd 2015.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

An Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) was used to randomly assign patients to study medication. The medication randomization list was produced by Novartis Drug Supply Management that automates the random assignment of medication numbers to medication packs containing each of the study drugs. Randomization was stratified by region and by age group > 65 years and < 75 years and > 75 years of age. The treatment groups were generally well‐matched for baseline and demographic characteristics.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

The IVRS automated the random assignment of patient numbers to randomization numbers, which are linked to the different treatment arms. The treatment assignment is unbiased and concealed from patients and investigator staff.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Placebo tablets were matched to the active study drug, and a double‐dummy design was used to ensure study blinding.

Patients, investigator staff, persons performing assessments and data analysts will remain blind to the identity of the treatment from time of randomization until database lock.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

754 completed the placebo run‐in period and were randomized to study treatment. Overall, 700 patients completed double‐blind treatment, with higher completion rates in the aliskiren 150‐ and 300 mg groups than in the aliskiren 75 mg or placebo groups.

18 (9.5%) discontinued in placebo group; 19 (9.9%) in aliskiren 75 mg; 6 (3.2%) in 150 mg group and 11 (5.9%) in 300 mg group. Reason for withdrawal differed ‐ withdrawal due to lack of therapeutic effect was 4.8% in the placebo group compared to 1.6% in aliskiren 75 mg and 150 mg group.

Last‐observation‐carried‐ forward approach was used for the week‐8 endpoint analyses.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol was available and primary and secondary outcomes were reported. Pulse rate and pulse pressure were not reported at baseline or endpoint. This information may be available in the appendices that were not provided with the CSR by the EMA..

Other bias

High risk

Study supported by Novartis. Most authors were employees of Novartis and therefore eligible for Novartis stock and stock options.

ABPM: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; ACE: angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARB: angiotensin receptor blockers; BMI: body mass index; CRF: case report form; CSR: clinical study report; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; EMA: European Medicines Agency; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; HTCZ: hydrochlorothiazide; IVRS: Interactive Voice; Response System; MI: myocardial infarction; MSDBP: mean sitting diastolic blood pressure; MSSBP: mean sitting systolic blood pressure; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; PRA: plasma renin activity; SAE: serious adverse event; SBP: systolic blood pressure; TIA: transient ischaemic attack

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Andersen 2008

No placebo monotherapy arm.

Dorresteijn 2013

A randomized, four‐way, double‐blind, single‐centre, cross‐over study was performed in 31 adult white patients. Screening was followed by a 40‐week study period in which patients received each of four once‐daily monotherapies sequentially in a random order: aliskiren 300 mg, moxonidine 0.4 mg, HCTZ 25 mg and matching placebo. Each treatment period began with a 2‐week titration phase during which halved doses were used. Thereafter, patients were force titrated to full medication doses. The efficacy and tolerability of each treatment was assessed after 8 weeks, followed by a 1‐week tapering period and a 1‐week washout period. Therefore, each treatment cycle lasted 10 weeks in total. Patients subsequently crossed over to the next treatment period. The parallel group phase of aliskiren 300 mg monotherapy for 8 weeks fixed dose compared to placebo meets the inclusion criteria but data have not been provided for office systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements during the first phase of treatment when patients were randomized to aliskiren monotherapy and placebo.

Frandesen 2008

A randomized double blind cross‐over study meets the inclusion criteria but is available as abstract only with no details of methodology to assess risk of bias. Also the study does not provide data on SBP or DBP.

Gheorghiade 2013

No aliskiren monotherapy arm.

Jordan 2007

No placebo monotherapy arm.

Jumar 2015

No aliskiren monotherapy arm.

Maser 2013

Although this study is a double‐blind randomized placebo‐controlled study it included patients untreated for hypertension as well as those patients on antihypertensive medication other than aliskiren and whose systolic BP (SBP) was 115 mmHg to 159 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) was 60 mmHg to 99 mmHg at screening. Therefore all patients were not on aliskiren monotherapy.

Mihai 2013

No aliskiren monotherapy arm.

NCT00219141

Aliskiren in combination with losartan compared to losartan on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in overweight patients with essential hypertension (ALLAY). There is no parallel placebo group.

NCT00417170

Comparison of aliskiren and amlodipine on insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction in patients with hypertension and metabolic syndrome. There is no parallel placebo group.

NCT00654875

This study compared the efficacy and safety of once daily dosing of aliskiren (300 mg (qd) once a day) to twice‐daily dosing of aliskiren (150 mg (twice a day) in treating moderate hypertension. There is no parallel placebo group.

NCT00777946

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination aliskiren/amlodipine in patients not adequately responding to aliskiren alone. There is no parallel placebo group.

NCT00819767

Efficacy and safety of aliskiren in patients with mild‐to‐moderate hypertension during exercise. No details of the study are provided.

NCT00865020

This study compared efficacy and safety of aliskiren 300 mg compared to telmisartan 80 mg after 1 week of treatment withdrawal (ASSERTIVE). There is no parallel placebo group.

NCT00927394

This study compared aliskiren and valsartan vs valsartan alone in patients with stage II systolic hypertension and type II diabetes mellitus. There is no parallel placebo group.

NCT01042392

Efficacy of aliskiren compared to ramipril in the treatment of moderate systolic hypertensive patients (ALIAS). No other detail provided.

NCT01138423

Treatment of Adiposity Related hypErTension (TARGET). No details of the study are provided.

NCT01318395

This is a randomized, double‐blind, active‐controlled, parallel study to analyze effects of the combination of aliskiren and valsartan on the vascular structure and function of retinal vessels. It compares aliskiren 150 mg for 1 week then 300 mg/day for 7 weeks to placebo once per day. Results have not been reported.

Nicholls 2013

No aliskiren monotherapy arm.

Nussberger 2007

Dose selection/different formulation of drug than one marketed used in this study.

O'Brien 2007

Open‐label combination therapy.

Persson 2009

It is a double‐blind randomized cross‐over study. Patients were randomized to placebo, aliskiren 300 mg or irbasartan 300 mg or combination therapy. However all patients also received furosemide in a stable dose throughout the study so it was excluded as there is no aliskiren monotherapy arm.

Pitt 2007

Combination therapy study.

Scirica 2010

No aliskiren monotherapy arm.

Shah 2012

No aliskiren monotherapy arm.

Solomon 2011

Also identified as NCT00414609. No aliskiren or placebo monotherapy arm as these drugs were added to standard therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Stanton 2003

Dose selection study with no placebo control.

Strasser 2007

No placebo control.

Teo 2014

No aliskiren monotherapy arm. Patients were given additional antihypertensives HCTZ 25 mg or amlodipine 5 mg or respective placebos

Uresin 2007

No placebo control.

Verdecchia 2007

No placebo control.

DBP: diastolic blood pressure;HTCZ: hydrochlorothiazide; SBP: systolic blood pressure

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Aliskiren vs. placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Systolic BP Show forest plot

12

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

1.1 Aliskiren 75 mg vs. placebo

5

1100

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.97 [‐4.76, ‐1.18]

1.2 Aliskiren 150 mg vs. placebo

12

3786

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.95 [‐6.85, ‐5.06]

1.3 Aliskiren 300 mg vs. placebo

10

3009

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.88 [‐8.94, ‐6.82]

1.4 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. placebo

2

393

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐11.35 [‐14.43, ‐8.27]

2 Diastolic BP Show forest plot

12

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

2.1 Aliskiren 75 mg vs placebo

5

1100

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.05 [‐3.13, ‐0.96]

2.2 Aliskiren 150 mg vs placebo

12

3783

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.16 [‐3.74, ‐2.58]

2.3 Aliskiren 300 mg vs placebo

10

3001

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.49 [‐5.17, ‐3.82]

2.4 Aliskiren 600 mg vs placebo

2

393

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.86 [‐7.73, ‐3.99]

3 Withdrawals due to adverse event Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 3 Withdrawals due to adverse event.

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 3 Withdrawals due to adverse event.

3.1 75 mg vs. placebo

5

1653

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.33, 1.07]

3.2 150 mg vs. placebo

10

3421

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.30, 0.71]

3.3 300 mg vs. placebo

10

4216

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.47, 1.03]

3.4 600 mg vs placebo

2

592

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.19, 1.64]

4 Cough Show forest plot

5

2886

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.49, 2.64]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 4 Cough.

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 4 Cough.

5 Diarrhoea Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 5 Diarrhoea.

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 5 Diarrhoea.

5.1 Aliskiren 75 mg

4

1276

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.21 [0.85, 5.76]

5.2 Aliskiren 150 mg

7

2277

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [0.78, 3.46]

5.3 Aliskiren 300 mg

7

2268

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.84 [0.89, 3.81]

5.4 Aliskiren 600 mg

2

592

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.00 [2.48, 19.72]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Systolic BP Show forest plot

5

1651

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.89 [‐3.16, ‐0.62]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

Comparison 2 Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

2 Diastolic BP Show forest plot

5

1651

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.80 [‐1.58, ‐0.03]

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

Comparison 2 Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

3

904

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.10 [‐6.79, ‐3.40]

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 3 Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 1 SBP.

2 DBP Show forest plot

3

904

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.49 [‐3.53, ‐1.45]

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 3 Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 2 DBP.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Systolic BP Show forest plot

10

4405

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.62 [‐3.38, ‐1.87]

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

Comparison 4 Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

2 Diastolic BP Show forest plot

10

4405

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.80 [‐2.28, ‐1.32]

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

Comparison 4 Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 5. Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

2

590

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.40 [‐5.58, ‐1.23]

Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 5 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 1 SBP.

2 DBP Show forest plot

2

590

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.20 [‐3.55, ‐0.85]

Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 5 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 2 DBP.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 6. Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Systolic BP Show forest plot

2

592

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.61 [‐2.78, 1.56]

Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

Comparison 6 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

2 Diastolic BP Show forest plot

2

592

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.68 [‐2.03, 0.67]

Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

Comparison 6 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

PRISMA Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

PRISMA Study flow diagram.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgments about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgments about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, outcome: 1.1 Systolic BP.Highly significant subgroup differences were observed therefore mean overall effect size across all doses is not shown. The number of placebo group patients are divided equally in dose ranging studies when more than one dose of aliskiren was used.CSPP100A2308 study the SBP reduction in the treatment and placebo group are reported from the CSR page 61.CSPP100A2405 study the SD for all treatment groups are calculated from SEM reported on page 7 in the CSR .
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, outcome: 1.1 Systolic BP.

Highly significant subgroup differences were observed therefore mean overall effect size across all doses is not shown. The number of placebo group patients are divided equally in dose ranging studies when more than one dose of aliskiren was used.

CSPP100A2308 study the SBP reduction in the treatment and placebo group are reported from the CSR page 61.

CSPP100A2405 study the SD for all treatment groups are calculated from SEM reported on page 7 in the CSR .

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, outcome: 1.2 Diastolic BP.Highly significant subgroup differences were observed, therefore mean overall effect size across all doses is not shown. The number of placebo group patients are divided equally in dose ranging studys when more than one dose of aliskiren was used.CSPP100A2308 study the DBP reduction in the treatment and placebo group are reported from the CSR which differ from those reported in the published article. The previous version of this review used data from the published article.CSPP100A2405 study the SD for all treatment groups are calculated from SEM reported from the CSR on page 8.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, outcome: 1.2 Diastolic BP.

Highly significant subgroup differences were observed, therefore mean overall effect size across all doses is not shown. The number of placebo group patients are divided equally in dose ranging studys when more than one dose of aliskiren was used.

CSPP100A2308 study the DBP reduction in the treatment and placebo group are reported from the CSR which differ from those reported in the published article. The previous version of this review used data from the published article.

CSPP100A2405 study the SD for all treatment groups are calculated from SEM reported from the CSR on page 8.

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 3 Withdrawals due to adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 3 Withdrawals due to adverse event.

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 4 Cough.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 4 Cough.

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 5 Diarrhoea.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Aliskiren vs. placebo, Outcome 5 Diarrhoea.

Comparison 2 Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

Comparison 2 Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

Comparison 3 Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 1 SBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 3 Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 2 DBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 4 Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

Comparison 4 Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

Comparison 5 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 1 SBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 1 SBP.

Comparison 5 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 2 DBP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg, Outcome 2 DBP.

Comparison 6 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg, Outcome 1 Systolic BP.

Comparison 6 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg, Outcome 2 Diastolic BP.

Aliskiren compared to placebo for primary hypertension

Patient or population: primary hypertension

Setting: Outpatient

Intervention: Aliskiren

Comparison: Placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)mmHg

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Effect with placebo1

Effect with Aliskiren2

Systolic BP ‐ Aliskiren 75 mg vs. placebo

2.9 lower to 10.0 lower

2.97 lower (4.76 lower to 1.18 lower)

1100
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 3

Systolic BP ‐ Aliskiren 150 mg vs. placebo

2.0 lower to 10.0 lower

5.95 lower (6.85 lower to 5.06 lower)

3786
(12 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 4

Systolic BP ‐ Aliskiren 300 mg vs. placebo

2.9 lower to 10.0 lower

7.88 lower (8.94 lower to 6.82 lower)

3009
(10 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 5

Systolic BP ‐ Aliskiren 600 mg vs. placebo

3.8 lower to 5.3 lower

11.35 lower (14.43 lower to 8.27 lower)

393
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 6,7

Diastolic BP ‐ Aliskiren 75 mg vs placebo

3.2 lower to 8.6 lower

2.05 lower (3.13 lower to 0.96 lower)

1100
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 3

Diastolic BP ‐ Aliskiren 150 mg vs placebo

3.0 lower to 8.6 lower

3.16 lower (3.74 lower to 2.58 lower)

3783
(12 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 4

Diastolic BP ‐ Aliskiren 300 mg vs placebo

3.2 lower to 8.6 lower

4.49 lower (5.17 lower to 3.82 lower)

3001
(10 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 5

Diastolic BP ‐ Aliskiren 600 mg vs placebo

6.2 lower to 6.3 lower

5.86 lower (7.73 lower to 3.99 lower)

393
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 6,7

Diarrhoea ‐

Aliskiren 600 mg vs placebo

14 per 1,000

95 per 1,000
(34 to 266)

RR 7.00
(2.48 to 19.72)

592
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 6,7

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk Ratio; MD: Mean Difference

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Range of mean decrease in SBP and DBP mmHg as compared to baseline in the individual trials in the placebo group.

2. Effects in Aliskiren group represent the blood pressure lowering effect in excess of that with placebo.

3. Downgraded by 1 level for serious risk of bias (due to high likelihood of attrition, selective reporting and funding bias in all 5 included studies). Also study CSPP100A2204 had high likelihood of selection bias.

4. Downgraded by one level for serious risk of bias (due to high likelihood of attrition, selective reporting and funding bias in all 12 included studies).

5. Downgraded by one level for serious risk of bias (due to high likelihood of attrition, selective reporting and funding bias in all 10 included studies).

6. Downgraded by 1 level for serious risk of bias (due to high likelihood of attrition, selective reporting and funding bias in both included studies).

7. Downgraded by 1 more level due to wide confidence interval.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Reported as table 21 in the FDA medical review (page 51): Reviewers mean placebo‐corrected change from baseline in BP by dose and gender based on 5 placebo controlled studies

Dose

Female

Male

SBP mmHg

DBP mmHg

SBP mmHg

DBP mmHg

75 mg

‐1.3

‐1.1

‐3.6

‐2.9

150 mg

‐5.5

‐2.9

‐5.9

‐3.5

300 mg

‐9.4

‐4.8

‐9.0

‐5.4

600 mg

‐12.6

‐6.4

‐10.7

‐6.5

75 mg

‐1.3

‐1.1

‐3.6

‐2.9

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Reported as table 21 in the FDA medical review (page 51): Reviewers mean placebo‐corrected change from baseline in BP by dose and gender based on 5 placebo controlled studies
Table 2. Reported as table 22 in the FDA medical review (page 51): Reviewers mean placebo‐corrected change from baseline in BP by dose and age based on 5 placebo controlled studies

Dose

Age < 65 years

Age > 65 years

SBP mmHg

DBP mmHg

SBP mmHg

DBP mmHg

75 mg

‐2.7

‐1.9

‐3.6

‐3.4

150 mg

‐5.5

‐2.9

‐6.9

‐4.8

300 mg

‐9.7

‐5.2

‐7.1

‐4.4

600 mg

‐11.5

‐6.6

‐11.6

‐6.4

75 mg

‐2.7

‐1.9

‐3.6

‐3.4

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Reported as table 22 in the FDA medical review (page 51): Reviewers mean placebo‐corrected change from baseline in BP by dose and age based on 5 placebo controlled studies
Table 3. Reported as table 23 in the FDA medical review (page 52): Reviewers mean placebo‐corrected change from baseline in BP by dose and race based on 5 placebo controlled studies

Dose

White

Black

Asian

SBP mmHg

DBP mmHg

SBP mmHg

DBP mmHg

SBP mmHg

DBP mmHg

75 mg

‐2.1

‐1.7

‐2.8

0.2

‐8.8

‐3.2

150 mg

‐6.5

‐3.5

‐5.5

‐1.4

‐3.7

‐2.9

300 mg

‐9.6

‐4.8

‐6.1

‐2.6

‐12.7

‐6.3

600 mg

‐12.3

‐6.7

‐8.7

‐3.5

‐11.2

‐9.4

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Reported as table 23 in the FDA medical review (page 52): Reviewers mean placebo‐corrected change from baseline in BP by dose and race based on 5 placebo controlled studies
Table 4. Comparing MSSBP and MSDBP effect size of previous review versus present update after obtaining information from Clinical study Reports

Dose of Aliskiren mg/day

Previous version without access to information from CSR

Present version with access to information from CSR

MSSBP mmHg

MD with 95% CI

MSDBP mmHg

MD with 95% CI

MSSBP mmHg

MD with 95% CI

MSDBP mmHg

MD with 95% CI

Aliskiren 75 mg vs. Placebo

‐2.64 (‐4.06 to ‐1.23)

‐2.07 (‐2.94 to ‐1.20)

‐2.97 (‐4.76 to ‐1.18)

‐2.05 (‐3.13 to ‐0.96)

Aliskiren 150 mg vs. Placebo

‐5.55 (‐6.39 to ‐4.71)

‐2.91 (‐3.46 to ‐2.37)

‐5.95 (‐6.85 to ‐5.06)

‐3.16 (‐3.74 to ‐2.58)

Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Placebo

‐7.93 (‐8.77 to ‐7.08)

‐4.76 (‐5.33 to ‐4.19)

‐7.88 (‐8.94 to ‐6.82)

‐4.49 (‐5.17 to ‐3.82)

Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Placebo

‐11.36 (‐13.53 to ‐9.19)

‐6.57 (‐7.92 to ‐5.23)

‐11.35 (‐14.43 to ‐8.27)

‐5.86 (‐7.73 to ‐3.99)

MSSBP: mean sitting systolic blood pressure; MSDBP: mean sitting diastolic blood pressure;

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Comparing MSSBP and MSDBP effect size of previous review versus present update after obtaining information from Clinical study Reports
Table 5. Study identifier(s) in various websites of individual studies meeting the inclusion criteria

Novartis Clinical Trial Results Database identifier

used for study identification

in this review

Journal‐Published

Author /year

Registered on

Novartis Clinical Trial

Results Database

Registered on

ClinicalTrials.gov

CSR* received from EMA

Request to

EMA was made on

November 15th 2015.

Weeks waited

to obtain CSR

CSPA100A1301

No journal publication

Results NOT posted

NCT01237223

Results posted

EMA does NOT possess

CSPA100A2305

Littlejohn 2013

Results posted

NCT00739973

Results posted

EMA does NOT possess

CSPP100A1201

Kushiro 2006

Results NOT posted

NOT registered

Mar 11, 2016

16

CSPP100A1301

No journal publication

Results posted

NCT00344110

Results NOT posted

May 23, 2016

27

CSPP100A2201

Gradman 2005

Results NOT posted

NOT registered

Jan 25, 2016

10

CSPP100A2203

Pool 2007

NOT FOUND

NOT registered

Apr 12, 2016

21

CSPP100A2204

Villamil 2007

Results NOT posted

NCT00219024

Results posted

Apr 6, 2016

20

CSPP100A2308

Oh 2007

Results NOT posted

NCT00219128

Results NOT posted

Feb 20, 2016

14

CSPP100A2323

Schmieder 2009

Results posted

NCT00219154

Results NOT posted

May 27, 2016

27

CSPP100A2327

Oparil 2007

Results NOT posted

NOT registered

June 16, 2016

30

CSPP100A2328

Puig 2009

Results posted

NOT registered

EMA does NOT possess

CSPP100A2405

Villa 2012

Results posted

NCT00706134

Results posted

December 22, 2015

5

Figuras y tablas -
Table 5. Study identifier(s) in various websites of individual studies meeting the inclusion criteria
Table 6. Comparing MSSBP and MSDBP reduction between aliskiren doses from the same study

Dose comparison

SBP WMD with 95% CI

DBP WMD with 95% CI

Comment

Aliskiren 150 mg vs 75 mg

‐1.89 (‐3.16 to ‐0.62)

‐0.80 (‐1.58 to ‐0.03)

Aliskiren 150 mg reduces SBP and DBP more than

75 mg by 2/1 mmHg

Aliskiren 300 mg vs 75 mg

‐5.10 (‐6.79 to ‐3.40)

‐2.49 (‐3.53 to ‐1.45)

Aliskiren 300 mg reduces SBP and DBP more than

75 mg 5/3 mmHg

Aliskiren 300 mg vs 150 mg

‐2.62 (‐3.38 to ‐1.87)

‐1.80 (‐2.28 to ‐1.32)

Aliskiren 300 mg reduces SBP and DBP more than

150 mg 3/2 mmHg

Aliskiren 600 mg vs 150 mg

‐3.40 (‐5.58 to ‐1.23)

‐2.20 (‐3.55 to ‐0.85)

Aliskiren 600 mg reduces SBP and DBP more than

150 mg by 3/2mmHg

Aliskiren 600 mg vs 300 mg

‐0.61 (‐2.78 to 1.56)

‐0.68 (‐2.03 to 0.67)

No significant difference was observed

Figuras y tablas -
Table 6. Comparing MSSBP and MSDBP reduction between aliskiren doses from the same study
Table 7. Mortality during single‐blind, double‐blind and withdrawal period in the 12 included studies

Study identifier

Single‐blind period

Double‐blind period

Withdrawal period

CSPA100A1301

No deaths

No deaths

No deaths

CSPA100A2305

No deaths

No deaths

No deaths

CSPP100A1201

One death in placebo group during observation period due to pancreatic carcinoma and metastases to liver.

One death occurred in aliskiren 150 mg monotherapy on day 41 of the study, due to drug intoxication. The overdose was attributed to a psychiatric drug prescribed prior to start of the study, and a diagnosis of manic depressive psychosis was recorded.

No deaths

CSPP100A1301

No deaths

No deaths

No deaths

CSPP100A2201

No deaths

No deaths

No deaths

CSPP100A2203;

No deaths

One death occurred in the placebo arm on day 16 from "natural causes".

One death occurred in the valsartan 160 mg arm (day 26) as a result of motor vehicle accident.

No deaths

CSPP100A2204

No deaths

One death was reported in the Aliskiren/HCTZ 150/25 mg group due to thoracic trauma from a motor vehicle accident.

No deaths

CSPP100A2308

No deaths

No deaths

No deaths

CSPP100A2323

1 death occurred in placebo run‐in phase. Patient hospitalized due to supraventricular tachycardia and abdominal pain and died due to stroke after discontinuing from the study.

No deaths

One death occurred in the aliskiren/HCTZ 150/300 mg group from acute bronchopneumonia and associated sepsis during the 30‐day follow‐up period after discontinuing the study.

CSPP100A2327

No deaths

2 deaths reported.

1 death in aliskiren group on day 41 due to myocardial infarction.

1 death in valsartan group on day 13 and the cause was reported as hypertensive arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease with SAE of sudden death.

There were no deaths in placebo arm or combination therapy group.

No deaths

CSPP100A2328

No deaths

No deaths

No deaths

CSPP100A2405:

One death occurred during the follow‐up period of the study from pneumonia leading to respiratory failure (day of death not provided). Further information regarding this death is described in the patient narratives of the CSR, which we do not have access to yet. Within the CSR body, the arm of the study that this participant belongs to has been redacted.

In the 2008 FDA Medical Review report, a death due to colon cancer is reported as occurring within CSPP100A2204 (N = 1, aliskiren 300 mg). The medical review states "no other details were provided". For our comments on this please see Discussion.

CSR: clinical study report; HTCZ: hydrochlorothiazide; SAE: serious adverse event

Figuras y tablas -
Table 7. Mortality during single‐blind, double‐blind and withdrawal period in the 12 included studies
Table 8. Non‐fatal serious adverse events during wash out, single‐blind, double‐blind and withdrawal period

Study identifier

Wash out period

Single blind period

Double blind period

Withdrawal period

CSPA100A1301

Not reported

Not reported

No SAEs were reported in the aliskiren monotherapy group.

2 in amlodipine 2.5 mg; 1 in amlodipine 5 mg; and 1 in aliskiren 150/amlodipine 5 mg combination arm (detail regarding SAE was not reported)

Not reported

CSPA100A2305

Not reported

Not reported

9 SAEs reported.

2 in placebo and 7 in other treatment groups (retinal detachment, abdominal mass, bronchitis, calculus ureteric, gastroenteritis, hand fracture, hydronephrosis, pneumonia, and cerebrovascular accident).

None occurred in aliskiren 150 mg or 300 mg groups.

Not reported

CSPP100A1201

Not reported

Reported 1 SAE in the single‐blind period ‐ infectious enterocolitis/dehydration (N = 1, 55M, placebo).

2 SAEs in the double‐blind period:

cerebral infarction (N = 1, 69F, placebo);

acute myocardial infarction (N = 1, 58F, aliskiren 75 mg).

Not reported

CSPP100A1301

Not reported

Not reported

2 SAEs reported.

1 SAE in placebo due to myocardial infarction.

The other in the losartan 50 mg group due to right medullary infarction.

None in aliskiren 150 mg group.

Not reported

CSPP100A2201

One in washout period ‐ transient Ischaemic attack

Two in the single‐blind run‐in phase ‐ anxiety; and diverticulitis and

2 SAEs in irbesartan group ‐ Intravertebral disc protrusion; and bipolar depression.

Two in the withdrawal period in placebo group ‐ Left ventricular failure; and gout and infective arthritis).

CSPP100A2203;

Not reported

Reported 6 SAE.

1 bile duct cancer, 1 diverticulitis, 1 pregnancy, 1 mild melanorrhagia and gastric pain, 1 myocardial infarction, and 1 squamous cell carcinoma.

8 SAEs reported.

2 in Placebo: 1 due to natural cause and 1 due to myocardial infarction requiring hospitalization on day 46 resulting in study drug discontinuation.

1 in aliskiren 75 mg on day 4 coronary artery disease requiring hospitalization resulting in study discontinuation. Patient required quadruple bypass surgery.

1 in aliskiren 300 mg on day 42 pregnancy resulting in study discontinuation.

1 in valsartan 160 mg on day 28 ‐ angioneurotic oedema resulting in study discontinuation, dyspnoea and chest pressure.

Aliskiren 150 mg/valsartan 160 mg (N = 1, Day 29) motor vehicle accident requiring hospitalization; not discontinued from study.

1 in aliskiren 75 mg/valsartan 80 mg on day 3 post‐study.

CSPP100A2204*

Not reported

4 SAE due to (lung cancer, fractured leg, angina and urinary tract infection)

28 patients experienced at least 1 SAE in the monotherapy and combination therapy treatment groups.

1 in A 75 mg ‐ due to renal colic; 1 in aliskiren 150 mg due to haemorrhagic diarrhoea; none in aliskiren 300 mg; 1 in HCTZ 6.25 mg due to neoplasm of skin; 3 in HCTZ 12.5 mg ‐ due to breast cancer, joint injury and pregnancy; 2 in HCTZ 25 mg due to deep vein thrombosis and lymphadenopathy; 5 in aliskiren 75 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg due to (diplopia, IIIrd nerve paresis, mood disorder, phlebothrombosis, psychotic disorder, small intestinal obstruction and syncope); 4 in aliskiren 75 mg/HCTZ 25 mg due to (cerebral infarction, dysarthria, physical disability, pregnancy and renal colic); 2 in aliskiren 150 mg/ HCTZ 6.25 mg ulcerative colitis, pregnancy); 3 in aliskiren 150 mg/ HCTZ 12.5 mg (non‐cardiac chest pain, pregnancy, syncope); 2 in aliskiren 150 mg/ HCTZ 25 mg (lung neoplasm, road traffic accident); 2 in aliskiren 300 mg/ HCTZ 12.5 mg (diabetes mellitus, lung disorder); 1 in aliskiren 300 mg/HCTZ 25 mg (coronary artery disease).

There were no SAEs in the placebo group.

Not reported

CSPP100A2308

2 SAEs reported during washout period ‐ 1 due to subarachnoid haemorrhage due to rupture of cerebral aneurysm on day 8;

1 due to partial small bowel obstruction on day 13

One SAE ‐ bladder carcinoma prior to randomization and before receiving double‐blind study drug. Patient was randomized to placebo but later discontinued due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect;

4 SAEs reported.

1 SAE in aliskiren 150 mg on day 27‐ unstable angina and increased blood pressure;

2 SAEs in aliskiren 300 mg ‐ hospitalization for acute appendicitis on day 34; hospitalization for depression on day 51;

1 SAE in aliskiren 600 mg of hospitalization for pain/bodily injury on day 35.

No SAE reported in the placebo group.

One SAE was reported during withdrawal period in aliskiren 150 mg of serious venous occlusion and thrombosis of the right eye on day 8 withdrawal period).

CSPP100A2323

data at week 3 and week 6 not available

Not reported

Not reported

During 26 weeks double‐blind treatment period

19 SAEs reported. 10 in aliskiren group and 9 in HCTZ group.

Not reported

CSPP100A2327*

not reported

Not reported

20 SAEs reported.

5 in placebo group ‐ atrial flutter, cerebrovascular accident, headache, hypertension, hypertensive crisis and ventricular tachycardia);

8 in aliskiren group ‐ 1 gastritis, 1 grand mal convulsions, 1 intestinal poly, 2 myocardial infarction, 1 non‐cardiac chest pain, 1 peripheral vascular disease, 1 acute renal failure);

6 in valsartan group ‐ 1 angina pectoris, 1 arteriosclerosis, 1 breast cancer, 1 bronchitis, 1 COPD, 1 facial paresis, 1 ovarian cancer, 1 pneumonia, 1 pulmonary oedema);

3 in aliskiren/valsartan group ‐ 1 aortic aneurysm, 1 intravertebral disc protrusion, 1 prostate cancer and 1 thyroidectomy).

The FDA medical review (2007) also reported two cases of renal carcinoma occurred (N = 1, placebo, day 20 post‐study; N = 1, aliskiren, day 44 post‐study). For our comments on this, please see Discussion.

Not reported

CSPP100A2328

11 patients had serious AEs during the washout and placebo run‐in periods (detail of which are not provided).

Not reported

1 SAE was reported in aliskiren 75 mg group ‐ cardiac chest pain;

2 in aliskiren 150 mg group ‐ rectal bleeding due to anal ulcer and episode of secondary anaemia; basal cell carcinoma;

1 in the 300 mg group ‐TIA with concomitant nausea and dyspnoea; and

2 in the placebo group ‐ prostate cancer; accelerated hypertension with left facial numbness.

Not reported

CSPP100A2405:

Reported 2 SAEs in the washout period; Detail not provided in CSR.

Three in the single‐blind placebo run‐in period. Detail not provided in CSR.

6 SAEs were reported.

2 in aliskiren 75 mg group ‐ erysipelas (skin infection) and osteoarthritis;

3 in aliskiren 150 mg group ‐ severe glaucoma; moderate haemorrhoids; and mild hemorrhagic stroke;

none in aliskiren 300 mg group; and

1 in the placebo group ‐ vertigo, wrist fracture, concussion, and head contusion subsequent to a fall.

Not reported

COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CSR: clinical study report; HTCZ: hydrochlorothiazide; SAE: serious adverse event; TIA: transient ischaemic attack

Figuras y tablas -
Table 8. Non‐fatal serious adverse events during wash out, single‐blind, double‐blind and withdrawal period
Table 9. Total adverse events during double blind treatment period

Study Identifier

Total AEs and Common AEs as reported in the corresponding available CSR

A = Aliskiren; P = Placebo

CSPA100A1301

Total AEs: A150 =15(7.8%); A 300 = 18(8.9%) and P = 22(7.7%)

Headache: A150 =13( 6.7%); A 300 =15(7.4%) and P = 20(10.1%)

Periphaeral edema: A150 = 2(1.0%); A 300 = 3(1.5%) and P = 2(1%)

CSPA100A2305

Total AEs: A150 = 40.1%; A 300 = 46.7%; A 600 = 52.4%; P = 43%

Headache: A150 = 12(7%); A300 = 13(7.7%); A600 = 9(5.4%); P = 16(9.7%)

Nasopharyngitis: A 150 = 5(2.9%); A 300 = 6(3.6%); A 600 = 3(1.8%); P = 10(6.1%)

Dizziness: A 150 = 2(1.2%); A 300 = 9(5.3%); A 600 = 5(3%); P = 7(4.2%)

Diarrhoea:A 150 = 2(1.2%); A 300 = 3(1.8%); A 600 = 19 (11.4%); P = 2(1.2%)

Nausea: A 150 = 2(1.2%); A 300 = 3(1.8%); A 600 = 0%; P = 4(2.4%)

CSPP100A1201

Total AEs: A75 = 61(53%); A150 = 58(51.8%); A 300 = 62(54.9%); P = 58(50.4)%

Headache: A75 = 3(2.6%); A 150 = 3(2.7%); A 300 = 6 (5.3%) and P = 4(3.5%)

Nasopharyngitis:A75 = 24(20.9%); A150 = 20(17.9%); A300 = 20(17.7%); P = 16(13.9%)

Back pain:A75 = 2(1.7%); A150 = 0%; A300 = 0% and P = 0%

Diarrhoea: A75 = 1(0.9%); A150 = 1(0.9%); A300 = 4(3.5%) and P = 1(0.9%)

Vertigo: A75 =0%; A150 = 0%); A300 = 1(0.9%) and P = 2(1.7%)

CSPP100A1301

Total AEs: A150 = 152(50.3%), P = 66(42.3%)

Nasopharyngitis: A150 = 48(15.9%), P = 13(8.3%)

Headache: A150 = 9(3.0%), P = 6(3.8%)

Occult blood positive: A150 = 9 (3.0%), P =5 (3.2%)

CSPP100A2201

Total AEs: A150 = 127 (26.8%); A300 = 130 (36.2%); A600 = 43 (33.1%); P = 32 (32.1%)

Headache: A150 = 3 (2.4%); A300 = 8 (6.2%); A600 = 6 (4.6%); P = 7 (5.3%)

Diarrhoea: A150 = 2 (1.6%); A300 = 1 (0.8%); A600 = 9 (6.9%); P = 2 (1.5%)

Dizziness: A150 = 2 (1.6%); A300 = 4 (3.1%); A600 = 3 (2.3%); P = 5 (3.8%)

Fatigue: A150 = 1 (0.8%); A300 = 5 (3.8%); A600 = 2 (1.5%); P = 4 (3.1%)

CSPP100A2203;

Total AEs: A75 = 63(35.2%); A150 = 59(33.1%); A300 = 50(28.6%) and P = 57(32.2%)

Headache: A75 = 15(8.4%); A150 = 9(5.1%;) A 300 = 7(4.0%) and P = 15(8.5%)

Fatigue: A75 = 7(3.9%); A150 = 4(2.2%;) A 300 = 4(2.3%) and P = 4(2.3%)

Back pain: A75 = 2(1.1%); A150 = 4(202%;) A 300 = 3(1.7%) and P = 2(1.1%)

Diarrhoea: A75 = 2(1.1%); A150 = 1(0.6%;) A 300 = 5(2.9%) and P = 3(1.7%)

Dizziness: A75 = 4(2.2%); A150 = 4(2.2%;) A 300 = 3(1.7%) and P = 2(1.1%)

CSPP100A2204

Total AEs: A75 = 69(37.5%); A150 = 69(37.3%); A300 = 71 (39.2%); P = 85(44%)

Headache: A75 = 13(7.1%); A 150 = 13(7%); A 300 = 10 (5.5%); P = 26 (13.5%)

Nasopharyngitis: A75 = 9( 4.9%); A150 = 5(2.7%;) A300 = 3 (1.7%); P = 10 (5.2%)

Diarrhoea: A75 = 3(1.6%); A150 = 3(1.6%); A300 = 4(2.2%); P = 1(0.5%)

Cough: A75 = 1(0.5%); A150 = 2(1.1%); A300 = 1(0.6%); P = 1(0.5%)

Dizziness: A75 = 1(0.5%); A150 = 1(0.5%); A300 = 3(1.7%); P = 2(1.0%)

Peripheral edema: A75 = 4(2.2%); A150 = 3(1.6%); A300 = 2(1.1%); P = 1(0.5%)

CSPP100A2308

Total AEs: A150 = 40.1%; A 300 = 46.7%; A 600 = 52.4%; P = 43%

Headache: A150 = 12(7%); A300 = 13(7.7%); A600 = 9(5.4%); P = 16(9.7%)

Nasopharyngitis: A 150 = 5(2.9%); A 300 = 6(3.6%); A 600 = 3(1.8%); P = 10(6.1%)

Dizziness: A 150 = 2(1.2%); A 300 = 9(5.3%); A 600 = 5(3%); P = 7(4.2%)

Diarrhoea: A 150 = 2(1.2%); A 300 = 3(1.8%); A 600 = 19 (11.4%); P = 2(1.2%)

Nausea: A 150 =2 (1.2%); A 300 = 3(1.8%); A 600 =0%; P = 4(2.4%)

CSPP100A2323

Total AEs at 6 weeks : A 26.4%; P = 28.5% (numbers not reported)

Other AE were not reported at week 6.

CSPP100A2327

Total AEs: A150 to 300 = 149(34%) and P = 168(37%)

Headache: A150 to 300 = 14(3.2%); P = 41(9%)

Diarrhoea*: A150 to 300 = 2.3%; P = not reported

Nasopharyngitis: A150 to 300 = 16(3.7%) ; P = 9(2%)

Dizziness: A 150 to 300 = 8(1.8%) ; P = 9(2%)

Fatigue:A 150 to 300 = 4(0.9%) ; P = 5(1.1%)

Nausea: A 150 to 300 = 6(1.4%) ; P = 11(2.4%)

CSPP100A2328

Total AEs: A75 = 57(37.3%); A150 = 59(34.7%); A300 = 56(35.4%); P = 60(37.5%)

Headache: A75 = 12(7.8%); A150 = 7(4.1%); A300 = 10(6.3%) and P = 9(5.6%)

Nasopharyngitis: A75 = 2(1.3%); A150 = 2(1.2%); A300 = 5(3.2%) and P = 3(1.9%)

Diarrhoea: A75 = 7(4.6%); A150 = 2(1.2%); A300 = 1(0.6%) and P = 1(0.6%)

Cough: A75 = 1(0.7%); A150 = 4(2.4%); A300 = 1(0.6%) and P = 3(1.9%)

Dizziness: A75 = 1(0.7%); A150 = 5(2.9%); A300 = 1(0.6%) and P = 3(1.9%)

CSPP100A2405:

Total AEs: A75 = 36(18.8%); A150 = 41(21.7%); A300 = 36(19.1%); P = 39(21.0%)

Headache: A75 = 4(2.1%);A150 = 2(1.1%); A300 = 1(1.1%); P = 4(2.1%)

Influenza: A75 = 1(0.5%); A150 = 4(2.1%); A300 = 1(1.1%); P = 1(0.5%)

Figuras y tablas -
Table 9. Total adverse events during double blind treatment period
Table 10. Listing reasons for withdrawal due to adverse events

Study Identifier

Reasons for increased withdrawal due to adverse events

CSPA100A1301

Not reported.

CSPA100A2305

Not reported.

CSPP100A1201

Significant adverse events occurred for N = 7 patients, leading to discontinuation from study, as described below.

  • Placebo (N = 3): moderately elevated blood pressure (N = 1); moderate rotary vertigo and moderately elevated blood pressure (N = 1); cerebral infarction (N = 1); aliskiren 75 mg (N = 1): acute myocardial infarction (N = 1).

  • Aliskiren 150 mg (N = 1): moderately elevated blood pressure (N = 1); aliskiren 300m g (N = 2); moderately elevated blood pressure (N = 1; drug eruption (N = 1). Adverse events suspected to be study drug‐related occurred in N = 5 patients. These events improved or resolved upon discontinuation of study drug.

CSPP100A1301

  • Placebo = 7(4.5%): blood pressure increased (N = 3, 1.9%); headache (N =1, 0.6%); SBP increased (N = 1, 0.6%); gastroenteritis (N = 1, 0.6%); myocardial infarction (N = 1, 0.6%). Also, 6 (3.8%) patients withdrew due to abnormal test procedure results.

  • Aliskiren 150 mg = 5 (1.7%); 5 (1.7%): joint pain (N =1, 0.3%); blood pressure increased (N =1, 0.3%); dizziness (N =1, 0.3%); head discomfort (N =1, 0.3%); headache (N = 1, 0.3%); and nausea (N =1, 0.3%). Also 5(1.7%) patients withdrew due to abnormal test procedure results.

CSPP100A2201

A total of N = 18 patients discontinued from the study due to AEs. It was suspected that 2/3 of these discontinuations were for reasons drug‐related. Headaches resulted in the discontinuation for N = 3 patients.

CSPP100A2203;

Most frequent reasons for 12 discontinuations are: fatigue (N = 5, 0.4%), headache (N = 3, 0.3%), diarrhoea (N = 2, 0.2%), and peripheral oedema (N = 2, 0.2%).

Reasons for 14 discontinuations from AE (safety population).

  • Placebo (N = 6, 3.4): myocardial infarction (N = 1, 0.6%); tachycardia (N = 1, 0.6%); diarrhoea (N = 1, 0.6%); fatigue (N = 1; 0.6%), peripheral oedema (N = 1, 0.6%); sudden death (N = 1, 0.6%); headache (N = 1, 0.6%).

  • Aliskiren 75 mg (N = 5): coronary artery disease (N = 1, 0.6%); abdominal pain (N = 1, 0.6%); diarrhoea (N = 1, 0.6%); oedema (N = 1, 0.6%); headache (N = 1, 0.6%); syncope (N = 1, 0.6%); dermatitis bullous (N = 1, 0.6%); eczema (N = 1, 0.6%).

  • Aliskiren 150 mg (N = 3, 1.7%): fatigue (N = 1, 0.6%); blood creatine phosphokinase increased (N = 1, 0.6%); pulse pressure increased (N = 1, 0.6%); migraine (N = 1, 0.6%); cold sweat (N = 1, 0.6%).

The FDA medical review reports facial oedema (N = 1, 0.6%) that appears to be angioedema, resulting in discontinuation from study; however, this is not reported in CSR 2203.

  • Aliskiren 300 mg (N = 3, 1.7%): vertigo (N = 1, 0.6%); influenza‐like illness (N = 1, 0.6%); flank pain (N = 1, 0.6%); pregnancy (N = 1, 0.6%).

  • Additionally, in the aliskiren 150 mg arm, discontinuation from study occurred for (N = 1, 0.6%) abnormal laboratory values.

CSPP100A2204

The range of AEs resulting in study discontinuation is 0% is the aliskiren 150 mg arm of the study to 4.4% in the aliskiren 300 mg arm (N = 7). The most frequent AE resulting in study discontinuation is headache (N = 12, 0.4%).

Reasons for discontinuations from adverse events ‐ N = 62 (2.2%).

  • Placebo (N = 7, 3.6%): blood pressure increased (N = 1, 0.5%; depression (N = 1, 0.5%); dizziness (N = 1, 0.5%); eye pruritis (N = 1, 0.5%); gastritis (N = 1, 0.5%); insomnia (N = 1, 0.5%): lacrimation increased (N = 1, 0.5%); tinnitus (N = 1, 0.5%).

  • Aliskiren 75 mg (N = 1, 0.5%): dizziness (N = 1, 0.5%); nausea (N = 1, 0.5%).

  • Aliskiren 150 mg (N = 0).

  • Aliskiren 300 mg (N = 8, 4.4%): angina pectoris (N = 1, 0.6%); asthenia (N = 2, 1.1%); cough (N = 1, 0.6%); dizziness (N = 1, 0.6%); peripheral oedema (N = 1, 0.6%); emotional disorder (N = 1, 0.6%); fatigue (N = 1, 0.6%); headache (N = 1, 0.6%).

Additionally four patients discontinued from the study due to abnormal laboratory values.

  • Placebo (N = 1,Day 43): asymptomatic low white blood cell count.

  • Aliskiren 75 mg (N = 1, Day 15): abnormal ranges found for haematology and chemistry parameters.

  • Aliskiren 150 mg (N = 1, Day 6): elevated cholesterol and liver enzymes.

  • Aliskiren/HCTZ 150 25 mg/25 mg (N=1, Day 9): elevated cholesterol, BUN, uric acid.

CSPP100A2308

Most frequent reasons for 9 discontinuation from study: headache (N = 4), dizziness (N = 3), and diarrhoea (N = 2).

Reasons for discontinuations from AE (safety population).

  • Headache (placebo: N = 4); dizziness (placebo; N = 2; aliskiren 300 mg; 1), diarrhoea (placebo: N = 1; aliskiren 600 mg: N = 1); increased blood pressure (1 in placebo group); duodenal ulcer (placebo: N = 1); hypotension (placebo: N = 1); lethargy (placebo: N = 1); muscle spasm (placebo: N = 1); nausea (placebo: N = 1); and urticaria (placebo: N = 1); flatulence (aliskiren 600 mg: N = 1); altered mood (aliskiren 300 mg: N = 1); rash (aliskiren 300 mg: N = 1); and sense of oppression (aliskiren 150 mg: N = 1).

  • No patients were discontinued for abnormal laboratory values.

We question that a participant withdrew for the reason specified as "unsatisfactory effect" as opposed to being categorized as a discontinuation from an SAE as the event necessitated hospitalization. On Day 27 in CSPP100A2308, the participant (N = 1, 64F, aliskiren 150 mg) was hospitalized for unstable angina and increased blood pressure. The unstable angina was treated with concomitant medication and her condition resolved within 3 days.

CSPP100A2323

We do not have data at week 3 and week 6 for this study.

CSPP100A2327

The range of AEs resulting in study discontinuation is 8 (1.8%) is the aliskiren arm; 8 (2.6%) in valsartan arm; 6 (1.3%) in aliskiren/valsartan combination arm; and 11 (2.4%) in the placebo arm.

Reasons for discontinuations from adverse events ‐ N = 37 (2%).

  • Placebo (N = 11, 2.4%): headache (N = 4, 0.9%); nausea (N = 1, 0.2%); dyspnoea (N = 1, 0.2%); atrial flutter (N = 1, 0.2%); dizziness (N = 1, 0.2%); epistaxis (N = 1, 0.2%): hypertension (N = 1, 0.2%); hypertensive crisis (N = 1, 0.2%); peripheral oedema (N = 1, 0.2%).

  • Aliskiren = 8 (1.8%): blood pressure increased (N =1, 0.2%); gastritis (N =1, 0.2%); grand mal convulsion (N = 1, 0.2%); headache (N = 1, 0.2%); myocardial infarction (N = 2, 0.5%); non‐cardiac chest pain (N = 2, 0.5%); acute renal failure (N = 1, 0.2%).

CSPP100A2328

Aliskiren 75 mg = 3 (2.0%); aliskiren 150 mg = 5 (2.9%); aliskiren 300 mg = 4(2.5%) .

Placebo = 4 (2.5%). Reasons for withdrawal were not reported.

CSPP100A2405:

Reasons for 18 discontinuations from AE (safety population)

  • Placebo (N = 7, 3.8%): hypertension (N = 5, 2.7%); hypertensive crisis (N = 1, 0.5%); gastroenteritis (N = 1, 0.5%).

  • Aliskiren 75 mg (N = 7, 3.7%): hypertension (N = 1, 0.5%); headache (N = 1, 0.5%); dizziness (N = 2, 1.0%); hypertensive crisis (N = 1, 0.5%); dyspepsia (N = 1, 0.5%); nausea (N = 1, 0.5%).

  • Aliskiren 150 mg (N = 1); hypertension (N = 1).

  • Aliskiren 300 mg (N = 3): hypertension (N = 2, 1.1%),;headache (N = 1, 0.5%); vertigo (N = 1, 0.5%)

Figuras y tablas -
Table 10. Listing reasons for withdrawal due to adverse events
Comparison 1. Aliskiren vs. placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Systolic BP Show forest plot

12

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Aliskiren 75 mg vs. placebo

5

1100

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.97 [‐4.76, ‐1.18]

1.2 Aliskiren 150 mg vs. placebo

12

3786

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.95 [‐6.85, ‐5.06]

1.3 Aliskiren 300 mg vs. placebo

10

3009

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.88 [‐8.94, ‐6.82]

1.4 Aliskiren 600 mg vs. placebo

2

393

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐11.35 [‐14.43, ‐8.27]

2 Diastolic BP Show forest plot

12

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Aliskiren 75 mg vs placebo

5

1100

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.05 [‐3.13, ‐0.96]

2.2 Aliskiren 150 mg vs placebo

12

3783

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.16 [‐3.74, ‐2.58]

2.3 Aliskiren 300 mg vs placebo

10

3001

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.49 [‐5.17, ‐3.82]

2.4 Aliskiren 600 mg vs placebo

2

393

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.86 [‐7.73, ‐3.99]

3 Withdrawals due to adverse event Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 75 mg vs. placebo

5

1653

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.33, 1.07]

3.2 150 mg vs. placebo

10

3421

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.30, 0.71]

3.3 300 mg vs. placebo

10

4216

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.47, 1.03]

3.4 600 mg vs placebo

2

592

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.19, 1.64]

4 Cough Show forest plot

5

2886

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.49, 2.64]

5 Diarrhoea Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Aliskiren 75 mg

4

1276

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.21 [0.85, 5.76]

5.2 Aliskiren 150 mg

7

2277

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [0.78, 3.46]

5.3 Aliskiren 300 mg

7

2268

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.84 [0.89, 3.81]

5.4 Aliskiren 600 mg

2

592

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.00 [2.48, 19.72]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Aliskiren vs. placebo
Comparison 2. Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Systolic BP Show forest plot

5

1651

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.89 [‐3.16, ‐0.62]

2 Diastolic BP Show forest plot

5

1651

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.80 [‐1.58, ‐0.03]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Aliskiren150 mg vs. Aliskiren 75 mg
Comparison 3. Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

3

904

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.10 [‐6.79, ‐3.40]

2 DBP Show forest plot

3

904

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.49 [‐3.53, ‐1.45]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Aliskiren 300 mg Vs. Aliskiren 75 mg
Comparison 4. Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Systolic BP Show forest plot

10

4405

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.62 [‐3.38, ‐1.87]

2 Diastolic BP Show forest plot

10

4405

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.80 [‐2.28, ‐1.32]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Aliskiren 300 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg
Comparison 5. Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 SBP Show forest plot

2

590

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.40 [‐5.58, ‐1.23]

2 DBP Show forest plot

2

590

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.20 [‐3.55, ‐0.85]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 150 mg
Comparison 6. Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Systolic BP Show forest plot

2

592

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.61 [‐2.78, 1.56]

2 Diastolic BP Show forest plot

2

592

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.68 [‐2.03, 0.67]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Aliskiren 600 mg vs. Aliskiren 300 mg