Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Contenido relacionado

Ir a:

Revisiones y protocolos relacionados

Topics

Temas

Flow chart of study selection procedure
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Flow chart of study selection procedure

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1 ESWL versus PCNL, Outcome 1 Success of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 ESWL versus PCNL, Outcome 1 Success of treatment.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1 ESWL versus PCNL, Outcome 2 Re‐treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 ESWL versus PCNL, Outcome 2 Re‐treatment.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1 ESWL versus PCNL, Outcome 3 Auxiliary procedures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 ESWL versus PCNL, Outcome 3 Auxiliary procedures.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1 ESWL versus PCNL, Outcome 4 Procedural and operating time (minutes).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 ESWL versus PCNL, Outcome 4 Procedural and operating time (minutes).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1 ESWL versus PCNL, Outcome 5 Hospital stay (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 ESWL versus PCNL, Outcome 5 Hospital stay (days).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 2 ESWL versus RIRS, Outcome 1 Success of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 ESWL versus RIRS, Outcome 1 Success of treatment.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 2 ESWL versus RIRS, Outcome 2 Procedural and operating time (minutes).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 ESWL versus RIRS, Outcome 2 Procedural and operating time (minutes).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva
Comparison 1. ESWL versus PCNL

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Success of treatment Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Success at 4 weeks

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Success at 3 months

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Success at 1 year

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.4 Success at 3 months according to stone size (1‐10 mm)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.5 Success at 3 months according to stone size 11‐20 mm)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.6 Success at 3 months according to stone size 21‐30 mm)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Re‐treatment Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Overall re‐treatment

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Re‐treatment according to stone size (1‐10 mm)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Re‐treatment according to stone size (11‐20 mm)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.4 Re‐treatment according to stone size (21‐30 mm)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Auxiliary procedures Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Overall auxiliary procedures

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Auxiliary procedures according to stone size (1‐10 mm)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.3 Auxiliary procedures according to stone size (11‐20 mm)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.4 Auxiliary procedures according to stone size (21‐30 mm)

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Procedural and operating time (minutes) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5 Hospital stay (days) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected
Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. ESWL versus PCNL
Ir a la tabla de la revisión
Comparison 2. ESWL versus RIRS

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Success of treatment Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Success at 3 months

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Procedural and operating time (minutes) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected
Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. ESWL versus RIRS
Ir a la tabla de la revisión