Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Functional analysis‐based interventions for challenging behaviour in dementia

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006929.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 15 febrero 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Demencia y trastornos cognitivos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Esme D Moniz Cook

    Correspondencia a: Clinical Psychology & Ageing, Institute of Rehabilitation, University of Hull, Hull, UK

    [email protected]

  • Katie Swift

    Clinical Psychology & Ageing, Institute of Rehabilitation, University of Hull, Hull, UK

  • Ian James

    Centre for the Health of the Elderly, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

  • Reem Malouf

    Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • Marjolein De Vugt

    University Hospital of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands

  • Frans Verhey

    Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

E M‐C ‐ All correspondence; drafting initial protocol and review versions; selection of trials; interpretation of data analyses; updating review.
KS ‐ Extraction, entry and analysis of data; interpretation of data analyses; drafting review versions; liaising with trial and review authors; updating review.

RM ‐ Statistical advice, guidance and extraction of data.

M dV ‐ Drafting initial protocol and review versions; selection of trials; interpretation of data analyses; updating review.
FV ‐ Drafting initial protocol and review versions; selection of trials; interpretation of data analyses; updating review.
IJ ‐ Drafting initial protocol review versions; selection of trials; interpretation of data analyses; updating review.

Contact Editor: Linda Clare
Consumer Editors: Dr Graham Stokes (expert clinician) South Staffordshire and Shropshire NHS Foundation Trust, David Parry Suite, St Michaels Court Trent Valley Road, Lichfield and Tracie Jennings (family carer), Alzheimer's Society, Hull & East Riding Branch.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • E M‐C: Humber Mental Health Teaching NHS Trust & University of Hull, UK.

  • M deV : University of Maastricht, Netherlands.

  • F V : University of Maastricht, Netherlands.

  • I J: Centre for the Health of the Elderly, Newcastle General Hospital, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Trust, UK.

External sources

  • NIHR Programme Grant: 'Management of Challenging Behaviour in dementia at home and in care homes' awarded to authors E M‐C and IJ (2007), UK.

Declarations of interest

Esme Moniz‐Cook

Prof. Moniz‐Cook is an author of a study included in the review (Moniz‐Cook 2008a).

Esme Moniz‐Cook is chief investigator for two ongoing studies‐ Challenge DemCare  Projects  ‐ that relate to this review.

Ian James

Ian James is an author of a study included in the review (Fossey 2006). Ian James is co‐investigator for two ongoing studies ‐ Challenge DemCare Projects ‐ that relate to this review.

Acknowledgements

We thank Linda Clare (Editor), Rupert McShane (Co‐ordinating Editor) and Graham Stokes (expert clinician) for important advice and guidance, and Dymphna Hermans, Anne Eisinga and Helen Collins for assistance in the preparation of this protocol. We thank Carla Ramsay (Branch Manager, Hull & East Riding Branch, Alzheimer's Society) for assisting with and coordinating the consumer (people with personal experience of dementia) response and Tracie Jennings (family carer) for her detailed comments which have contributed to this protocol. We would like to thank the authors of both included and excluded studies for the provision of further information and data. For the provision of further data and willingness to help with this review, we thank authors Clive Ballard & Jane Fossey, Lynn Chenoweth, Louis Burgio, Andres Losada‐ Baltar, Linda Teri, Laura Gibbons, Ken Pike, Carol Farran, Maureen O'Connor, Phillip McCallion, Sandy Burgener, Ann Steffen and Marita McCabe.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Feb 15

Functional analysis‐based interventions for challenging behaviour in dementia

Review

Esme D Moniz Cook, Katie Swift, Ian James, Reem Malouf, Marjolein De Vugt, Frans Verhey

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006929.pub2

2008 Jan 23

Functional analysis‐based interventions for challenging behaviour in dementia

Protocol

Esme D Moniz Cook, Marjolein De Vugt, Frans Verhey, Ian James

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006929

Differences between protocol and review

Addition of authors Katie Roberts‐Stride and Reem Malouf to the review.

Addition of Banerjee report 2009 and James 2011 to background text.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.