Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Probióticos para la prevención de infecciones agudas de las vías respiratorias superiores

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 24 agosto 2022

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006895.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 septiembre 2011see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Infecciones respiratorias agudas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Qiukui Hao

    Department of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Zhenchan Lu

    Department of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Bi Rong Dong

    Correspondencia a: Department of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    [email protected]

  • Chang Quan Huang

    Department of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Taixiang Wu

    Chinese Cochrane Centre, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, Chinese Evidence‐Based Medicine Centre, INCLEN Resource and Training Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contributions of authors

Qiukui Hao (QH) searched for trials, assessed quality of trials, extracted data, analysed data and drafted the review.
Zhenchan Lu (ZL) drafted the protocol, searched for trials, assessed quality of trials, extracted data.
Birong Dong (BD) advised and assisted in writing the protocol and the review, searched for trials and developed the review.
Changquan Huang (CH) suggested the title for the review and provided background material.
Taixiang Wu (TW) contributed to the development of the methods of the review and assisted with data extraction and analysis.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China.

External sources

  • Editorial base and team of the Cochrane ARI Group, Australia.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Liz Dooley (Managing Editor) of the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group, Janet Wale, Ann Fonfa, Iva Hojsak, Simone Guglielmetti, Michael de Vrese, Karin Stockert, Nelcy Rodriguez, Teresa Neeman, Roger Damoiseaux and the Chinese Cochrane Center for commenting on the draft protocol and review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2022 Aug 24

Probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections

Review

Yunli Zhao, Bi Rong Dong, Qiukui Hao

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006895.pub4

2015 Feb 03

Probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections

Review

Qiukui Hao, Bi Rong Dong, Taixiang Wu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006895.pub3

2011 Sep 07

Probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections

Review

Qiukui Hao, Zhenchan Lu, Bi Rong Dong, Chang Quan Huang, Taixiang Wu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006895.pub2

2008 Jan 23

Probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections

Protocol

Zhenchan Lu, Bi Rong Dong, Chang Quan Huang, Taixiang Wu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006895

Differences between protocol and review

We have replaced the 'Quality assessment of included studies' in the original version with 'Assessment of risk of bias in included studies' and the methods of analysis according to the new version of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011).

There was only one study focusing on acute otitis media (AOM). Therefore, we treated AOM as one kind of URTI and analysed the data together.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.