Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Personal assistance for non‐demented older adults (65+) with impairments

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006855Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 17 octubre 2007see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Problemas de desarrollo, psicosociales y de aprendizaje

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2007 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Evan Mayo‐Wilson

    Correspondencia a: The Centre for Evidence‐Based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    [email protected]

  • Paul Montgomery

    The Centre for Evidence‐Based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • Jane A Dennis

    School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Contributions of authors

EMW wrote the background and methods with PM and JD. JD developed the search strategy with EMW and PM.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Unit for Disabilities Issues, The National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen), Sweden.

  • The Institute for Evidence‐Based Social Work Practice, The National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen), Sweden.

Declarations of interest

This review was funded by a grant from the Swedish government, the Unit for Disabilities Issues and the Institute for Evidence‐Based Social Work Practice, the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen 2005). The reviewers have no known conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to: Jo Abbott (Trial Search Coordinator of the Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group) for developing and conducting the search with JD; Julie Millener (Research Secretary of the CDPLPG) for coordinating the grey literature search and for support throughout; Maja Frederikson (IMS, Sweden) for conducting searches of Swedish databases; Anette Fomsgaard (Nordic Campbell Center, Denmark) for conducting searches of Danish databases; and Charlotte Couldrey for assistance retrieving articles. We thank Celia Almeida and Katinka Hodin for translating documents.

Input from a reference group chaired by Haluk Soydan and organised by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) has been invaluable. Parts of this review dealing with personal assistance users, government policy, law, and service administration have been shaped by advice from Peter Brusen, Katarina Carlsson, Ulla Clevnert, Johan Glad, Carina Gustafsson, Kerstin Gynnerstedt, Elaine Johansson, Inger Ljung, Anders Printz, Lydia Springer and Karin Tengvald.

Thanks to Georgia Salanti (Cambridge University) for useful comments on the protocol in draft and to David Gordon (Townsend Centre for International Poverty Research, University of Bristol) for helping to identify background information.

Finally, thanks to Geraldine Macdonald (Coordinating Editor of CDPLPG), Jeff Valentine (Campbell Collaboration Methods Group) and anonymous peer reviewers for their feedback and support.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2008 Jan 23

Personal assistance for older adults (65+) without dementia

Review

Paul Montgomery, Evan Mayo‐Wilson, Jane A Dennis, Evan Mayo‐Wilson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006855.pub2

2007 Oct 17

Personal assistance for non‐demented older adults (65+) with impairments

Protocol

Evan Mayo‐Wilson, Paul Montgomery, Jane A Dennis

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006855

Notes

This protocol is co‐registered within the Campbell Collaboration.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.