Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Programas de ejercicio dinámico (capacidad aeróbica y entrenamiento de la fuerza muscular) en pacientes con artritis reumatoide

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006853.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud musculoesquelética

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Emalie Hurkmans

    Correspondencia a: Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Florus J van der Giesen

    Department of Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

  • Thea PM Vliet Vlieland

    Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

  • Jan Schoones

    Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

  • Els CHM Van den Ende

    Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

EJ Hurkmans
Coordinator and writer of this review and independent review author for: selection based on title and abstract; check for inclusion criteria; assessment of methodological quality; data extraction.

F van der Giesen
Independent review author for: selection based on title and abstract; check for inclusion criteria; assessment of methodological quality; data extraction.

TPM Vliet Vlieland
In cases of disagreement between the two independent review authors, Vliet Vlieland made the final decision.

CHM van den Ende
Overview of the whole review process, helped with writing the protocol and review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, Not specified.

External sources

  • None, Not specified.

Declarations of interest

None known

Acknowledgements

The review authors would like to thank the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group editorial team for their editorial suggestions.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2009 Oct 07

Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Review

Emalie Hurkmans, Florus J van der Giesen, Thea PM Vliet Vlieland, Jan Schoones, Els CHM Van den Ende

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006853.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Dynamic exercise therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Protocol

Emalie Hurkmans, Florus J van der Giesen, Thea PM Vliet Vlieland, Els CHM Van den Ende

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006853

Differences between protocol and review

Analysis: in the protocol the analysis consisted of a quantitative analysis and, if a meta‐analysis was not appropriate, a qualitative analysis. Furthermore, an overall grading of the evidence according to Tugwell 2004 was to be applied. During the process of developing this review it was found that there were too many analyses, the readability of the results was not very clear. For this reason we decided to apply a best‐evidence synthesis for all data and, if possible, a meta‐analysis was applied to establish the effect size.

Subgroup analysis: in the protocol we indicated our intention to perform various subgroup analyses. However, in the included studies no specific data were reported for these subgroups, for example separate data for men and women or patients with a high or low disease activity. As a number of studies were quite old, it was considered not feasible to ask for the original data sets.

Notes

This is an update of the withdrawn review "Dynamic exercise for treating rheumatoid arthritis" (van den Ende 1998). We changed the title from "Dynamic exercise therapy for treating rheumatoid arthritis" into "Dynamic exercise programs (aerobic capacity and/or muscle strength training) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis" because we think this is more correct.

In the protocol we intended to grade the evidence according to the grading system of Tugwell 2004. During the process of analysing the data we used three different methods (meta‐analysis, best‐evidence synthesis, and Tugwell), which did not make the results clear. So for the readibility of this review we decided to perform best‐evidence synthesis and meta‐analysis.