Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Antiviral therapy for Ramsay Hunt syndrome (herpes zoster oticus with facial palsy) in adults

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To determine the effectiveness of antiviral agents in the treatment of adult patients with Ramsay Hunt syndrome (herpes zoster oticus with facial palsy).

Background

Definition, prevalence and aetiology
Herpes zoster oticus is a viral infection of the inner, middle and external ear characterised by herpetic blisters (small vesicles) of the skin of the external canal, pinna and/or the oral mucosa and severe otalgia (ear pain). These symptoms can be accompanied by one or more of the following: vestibulocochlear dysfunction (e.g. vertigo, hearing loss, hyperacusis, tinnitus), taste impairment, dry mouth and eyes.

When herpes zoster oticus is associated with acute peripheral facial paralysis the condition is known as Ramsay Hunt syndrome type 2 (Ramsay Hunt 1907). Although the terms 'herpes zoster oticus' and 'Ramsay Hunt syndrome' are frequently used interchangeably in the literature, this review will focus only on Ramsay Hunt syndrome and will include trials with participants suffering from herpes zoster oticus with accompanying facial weakness.

The incidence of Ramsay Hunt syndrome is about five cases per 100,000 of the US population annually, with a significantly increased incidence in patients older than 60 years (Murakami 1997). The condition is considered to be both less frequent and less severe in children (Hato 2000; Sweeney 2001), but reports of children are limited in the literature and the clinical features and prognosis of paediatric Ramsay Hunt syndrome remain unclear. Vaccination against chickenpox (both in childhood and in later life) may prevent or reduce its occurrence (Guess 1985; Hato 2000; Oxman 1995).

Ramsay Hunt syndrome is caused by the reactivation of latent varicella‐zoster virus in the geniculate ganglion (the sensory ganglion of the facial nerve) which affects the seventh and eighth cranial nerves. This is due to the close proximity of the facial nerve (cranial nerve VII) and the vestibulocochlear nerve (cranial nerve VIII) (Sweeney 2001). The subsequent dysfunction of cranial nerves VII and VIII is thought to be caused primarily by varicella‐zoster virus neuritis and to a lesser extent by inflammatory oedema. Maximal facial paralysis is generally seen within one week. Although less common than Bell's palsy (i.e. idiopathic facial palsy), Ramsay Hunt syndrome generally causes more severe dysfunction and has a poorer prognosis for facial nerve recovery (Uri 2003).

History, examination and diagnosis
Early diagnosis of Ramsay Hunt syndrome is extremely important, as antiviral treatment within the first 72 hours of the onset of symptoms is generally considered to be crucial to the resolution of some (if not all) symptoms (Dworkin 2007).

Diagnosis is primarily clinical and is based on the presentation of a combination of severe ear pain, small vesicles on the pinna or oral mucosa and facial palsy. When patients present with acute facial weakness a high index of suspicion is required in order to recognise the condition, deliver prompt treatment and obtain the best possible outcome. Although the appearance of vesicles usually precedes or presents simultaneously with facial paralysis, it may be delayed until after facial weakness is clinically evident, thus making the condition initially indistinguishable from Bell's palsy. Symptoms and signs of vestibulocochlear dysfunction are not always present, but can include hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo, nystagmus, nausea and vomiting.

The clinical picture remains the cornerstone of diagnosis, as serum titres of varicella‐zoster virus antibodies are only useful when comparing the acute and convalescent stages of the condition (Dickins 1988). The use of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect varicella‐zoster virus from skin of the affected area of the ear may help to distinguish between patients with Bell's palsy and patients with Ramsay Hunt syndrome in the very early stages (Murakami 1998).

If diagnosis is made and antiviral treatment commenced within 72 hours of the onset of symptom(s), the facial palsy recovery rate has been reported in non‐randomised studies to be as high as 75% (Murakami 1997; Dickins 1988). However, even with early treatment, the absence of demonstrable lack of nerve excitability, complete paralysis and age over 50 years at presentation are said to be significant factors for increased risk of poor prognosis (Sweeney 2001). By contrast, the prognosis for associated sensorineural hearing loss associated with Ramsay Hunt syndrome is excellent, and only around 5% of patients will have residual hearing impairment (Kaberos 2002; Murakami 1997). Other potentially chronic sequelae are post‐herpetic neuralgia, tinnitus and vestibular dysfunction (Dworkin 2007).

Management options
The standard first‐line treatment for herpes zoster infections at sites in the body other than the ear is the anti‐viral agent acyclovir, which is given either intravenously for immunocompromised patients or orally in otherwise healthy patients. Other antiviral agents that may be prescribed include valacyclovir, famcyclovir or brivudin (Dworkin 2007).

Antiviral therapy is only effective against virus replication in herpes zoster ‐ that is, it can prevent further proliferation and spread of the varicella‐zoster virus ‐ and cannot eradicate herpes viruses. Oral antiviral treatment has been shown by two meta‐analyses (of four and five randomised controlled trials respectively) to lessen the severity of herpes zoster virus infection in immunocompetent adults by reducing the duration of viral shedding and new lesion formation, thereby accelerating rash healing and reducing the duration of pain (Wood 1996; Jackson 1997).

It is generally held that the use of oral antivirals is limited to a period of seven to ten days and needs to be started within 72 hours of the onset of a rash. They are generally very well tolerated if administered at standard doses (acyclovir: 800 mg five times/day for 7 to 10 days; famcyclovir: 500 mg three times/day for seven days; valacyclovir: 1000 mg three times/day for seven days) and providing patients are kept well hydrated (Goodman 2006; Lampee 1986; Kinishi 2001; Dworkin 2007). The most common side effects are nausea (and occasionally vomiting) and headache, which occur in 10% to 20% of cases. Other possible side effects include renal impairment, diarrhoea, dizziness, fatigue, skin rash, anorexia, leg pain, medication taste, sore throat and hair loss from prolonged use (Bean 1982; Dickins 1988). Any allergic reaction to antiviral medications is a contraindication to their use (Peterslund 1981).

Oral brivudin appears to have a higher potency against varicella‐zoster virus than the oral regimes of acyclovir, valacyclovir and famcyclovir. It also has a simpler regime (once a day) and no nephrotoxic effects (Dworkin 2007; Gross 2003). However, antivirals cannot prevent either the acute or chronic pain experienced by about 20% of patients over 50 years of age with herpes zoster and therefore supplementary therapies, most frequently adjuvant corticosteroids, are often prescribed for herpes zoster infections, including Ramsay Hunt syndrome. The rationale for their use is to reduce nerve inflammation and associated pain.

Although antivirals have become standard therapy for Ramsay Hunt syndrome in Europe and the US in recent years, and a number of primary studies assessing their effectiveness have been published, we found no systematic review of randomised studies addressing this question. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate whether antiviral therapy does significantly improve outcomes in patients with Ramsey Hunt syndrome.

Objectives

To determine the effectiveness of antiviral agents in the treatment of adult patients with Ramsay Hunt syndrome (herpes zoster oticus with facial palsy).

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

All randomised controlled trials will be included in which antiviral agents are used in the treatment of Ramsay Hunt syndrome.

Types of participants

Adults (≥18 years) clinically diagnosed with Ramsay Hunt syndrome within seven days of onset. Studies of adults and children will be included if adult data can be extracted separately. Paediatric patients (<18 years) will be excluded on the grounds that specific immunity against the virus and its reactivation is generally considered to be significantly stronger in children than in adults, resulting in milder clinical manifestations and better outcomes in this patient group (Hato 2000); as a result, we have decided that paediatric patients should be reviewed separately from adults. It is expected that trials will have excluded immunocompromised adults.

Types of interventions

We will include trials using any antiviral agent irrespective of the route of administration (oral, enteral or parenteral) and the length of treatment.

Types of outcome measures

Primary outcome measure
Proportion of patients with complete recovery of facial palsy six months after initial diagnosis. Complete recovery is defined as equivalent to Grade II or higher on the House‐Brackmann scale (House 1985). Studies using equivalent recognised and/or validated grading scales will also be included.

Secondary outcome measures
1. Proportion of patients with motor synkinesis (involuntary facial movement, e.g. facial spasm) or autonomic dysfunction (e.g. crocodile tears) at six months.

2. Proportion of patients with persistent vestibulocochlear symptoms, e.g. symptoms of balance impairment, sensorineural hearing loss (measured using pure tone audiometry), tinnitus at six months.

3. Any adverse effects.

Search methods for identification of studies

We will search the Cochrane ENT Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, current issue), MEDLINE (1950 onwards) and EMBASE (1974 onwards).

The following databases will also be searched: CINAHL (1982 onwards), LILACS, KoreaMed, IndMed, PakMediNet, ZETOC, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts (Conference Proceedings Database), ISI Proceedings (Web of Science), the National Research Register (NRR), the UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio Database (UKCRN), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), the Research Findings Register (ReFeR) and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT).

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) will be searched using the following search terms:

#1 HERPES ZOSTER OTICUS single term (MeSH)
#2 FACIAL PARALYSIS single term (MeSH)
#3 HERPES ZOSTER single term (MeSH)
#4 #2 AND #3
#5 (ramsay OR ramsey) NEXT hunt*
#6 (hunt* NEXT (disease OR syndrome OR neuralgia)) NOT (tolosa OR tolusa OR hunter* OR hunting*)
#7 (zoster* OR herpe* OR herpesvirus*) AND (otic* OR auric* OR cephalic* OR pinna* OR otologic* OR acoustic OR auditory OR ear* OR geniculate OR cochleovestibular OR vestibulocochlear OR facial NEAR weakness OR facial NEAR palsy OR facial NEAR paralys*)
#8 #1 OR #4 OR #5 OR #6 OR #7

These terms will be combined with the first two sections of the highly sensitive search strategy designed by The Cochrane Collaboration for identifying randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Strategies for all other databases will be modelled on the CENTRAL version. The strategies will also be combined with a search filter designed to retrieve cost‐effectiveness studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (in The Cochrane Library) will also be searched for relevant studies.

References of retrieved articles from electronic searches will be searched. A search for existing meta‐analyses and non‐Cochrane systematic reviews will be performed and their reference lists scanned for additional trials. Authors of published trials and other experts in the field will be contacted. Pharmaceutical companies/manufacturers will be contacted for information on possible unpublished trials. There will be no language, publication year or publication status restrictions on searching.

Data collection and analysis

Study selection
Randomised controlled trials including adults receiving antiviral therapy for Ramsay Hunt syndrome will be selected. There will be no language exclusions.

Data extraction
Data from studies will be independently extracted by two groups of authors using standardised data forms. Data will be extracted so as to allow an intention‐to‐treat analysis. Where data are missing, the authors will write to the authors of the study requesting the missing data.

Quality assessment
The quality of all trials will be assessed and graded independently by two authors according to the criteria described in The Cochrane Handbook 4.2.6 (Higgins 2006). Gradings will be compared and any inconsistencies between the authors in the interpretation of inclusion criteria and their significance to the selected studies will be discussed and resolved.

The selected studies will be assessed for the following characteristics:

1. The adequacy of the randomisation process (possible selection bias). Adequate randomisation includes any one of the following methods: computer generated or table of random numbers, drawing of lots, coin‐toss, shuffling cards or throw of a dice. Inadequate methods of randomisation include the following: case record number, date of birth or alternate numbers.

2. The adequacy of the allocation concealment (possible selection bias). Adequate methods of allocation concealment include either central randomisation (i.e. separate to other aspects of trial administration) or sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes. Inadequate concealment means an open allocation sequence in which either participants or trialists were able to foresee the upcoming assignment.

3. The blinding of outcome assessors (i.e. whether the persons assessing the outcome of care were aware of which treatment the participant had received ‐ possible performance bias).

4. The extent and handling of losses to follow up (possible attrition bias). Adequate handling of losses to follow up involves a clear description and explanation being given of any significant difference between the losses of the intervention groups. An unacceptable loss in any one intervention group was considered to be loss greater than 20%.

A: Minimisation of bias in all four categories above: i.e. adequate randomisation, few losses to follow up and intention‐to‐treat analysis, blinding of outcome assessors, high quality outcome assessment;
B: Each of the criteria in A partially met;
C: One or more of the criteria in A not met.

Data analysis
We intend to perform a meta‐analysis if appropriate data are available. Our primary measure of treatment effect is dichotomous (presence or otherwise of complete recovery of facial palsy at six months) and the risk ratio (RR) of this will be determined for each included study. Data will be analysed by intention‐to ‐treat (ITT). Sensitivity analyses will be performed in which we will assume that 1) all missing participants failed to recover and 2) all missing participants recovered completely. The Mantel‐Haenszel fixed‐effect method will be used for the meta‐analysis and the I2 statistic used to investigate heterogeneity.