Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Methotrexate versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Remission and complete withdrawal from steroids.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Methotrexate versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Remission and complete withdrawal from steroids.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Methotrexate versus 6‐Mercaptopurine, outcome: 2.1 Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Methotrexate versus 6‐Mercaptopurine, outcome: 2.1 Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission.

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Methotrexate versus 5‐ASA, outcome: 3.1 Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Methotrexate versus 5‐ASA, outcome: 3.1 Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission.

Comparison 1 Methotrexate versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission and complete withdrawal from steroids.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Methotrexate versus placebo, Outcome 1 Remission and complete withdrawal from steroids.

Comparison 1 Methotrexate versus placebo, Outcome 2 Withdrawal due adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Methotrexate versus placebo, Outcome 2 Withdrawal due adverse events.

Comparison 2 Methotrexate versus 6‐Mercaptopurine, Outcome 1 Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Methotrexate versus 6‐Mercaptopurine, Outcome 1 Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission.

Comparison 3 Methotrexate versus 5‐ASA, Outcome 1 Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Methotrexate versus 5‐ASA, Outcome 1 Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Methotrexate compared to placebo for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis

Methotrexate compared to Placebo for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis

Patient or population: patients with induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Settings: Outpatient
Intervention: Methotrexate
Comparison: Placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Methotrexate

Remission and complete withdrawal from steroids
Follow‐up: mean 36 weeks

486 per 10001

467 per 1000
(282 to 774)

RR 0.96
(0.58 to 1.59)

67
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Control group risk comes from control arm of study
2 Very sparse data (32 events)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Methotrexate compared to placebo for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Summary of findings 2. Methotrexate compared to 6‐mercaptopurine for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis

Methotrexate compared to 6‐Mercaptopurine for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis

Patient or population: patients with induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Settings: Outpatient
Intervention: Methotrexate
Comparison: 6‐Mercaptopurine

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

6‐Mercaptopurine

Methotrexate

Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission
Follow‐up: mean 30 weeks

786 per 10001

581 per 1000
(338 to 1000)

RR 0.74
(0.43 to 1.29)

26
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Control group risk comes from control arm of study
2 Details regarding randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding were not described in the study
3 Very sparse data (18 events)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Methotrexate compared to 6‐mercaptopurine for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Summary of findings 3. Methotrexate compared to 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis

Methotrexate compared to 5‐ASA for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis

Patient or population: patients with induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Settings: Outpatient
Intervention: Methotrexate
Comparison: 5‐ASA

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

5‐ASA

Methotrexate

Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission
Follow‐up: mean 30 weeks

250 per 1000

582 per 1000
(165 to 910)

RR 2.33
(0.66 to 3.64)

20
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Details of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding were not described in the study
2 Very sparse data (9 events)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Methotrexate compared to 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Table 1. Results from excluded studies

Study ID

Description

Results

Baron 1993

Open label clinical trial enrolling patients with steroid dependent or steroid refractory IBD (Crohn's n = 10, UC n = 8)

Patients received oral methotrexate 15 mg/wk and prednisone

The primary outcomes were complete or partial withdrawal from steroids and mean steroid use

UC patients: mean prednisone dose dropped from 26.3 +/‐ 3.2 mg/day to 12.7 +/‐ 2.0 mg/day (P < 0.001)

Three patients had a partial response

Adverse events were mild

Cummings 2005

Retrospective chart review at two hospitals

Steroid dependent or steroid refractory UC patients (n=50) were treated with oral methotrexate (mean dose 19.9 mg/wk for a median of 30 weeks)

The primary outcome was remission defined as lack of treatment with steroids for 3 months or more

Secondary outcomes: response defined as good, partial or nil, and proportionate reduction of steroids

Remission occurred in 42% of patients

The response was good in 54% and partial in 18%

Adverse events occurred in 23%; 10% stopped treatment due to adverse events

Dejica 1998

Unrandomized, open label, preliminary trial enrolled twenty‐two patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis, refractory to steroids or sulfasalazine or both for at least 3 months

The patients were treated with 25 mg weekly intramuscular injection for 20 weeks

The primary outcome was clinical remission with Mayo Clinic Socre ≤ 3, including endoscopy

Clinical remission were obtained in 50% of patients (n=11)

Fifteen of 22 patients (68%) had significant clinical improvement in Mayo Clinic score

Five patients developed side effects, but the drug‐related adverse effects were not severe enough to warrant discontinuation of therapy

Egan 1999a

Randomized, single‐blind trial comparing two doses of subcutaneous methotrexate (15 mg/wk, n=18, versus 25 mg/wk, n=14) in patients with steroid dependent or refractory IBD

The primary outcome was remission at 16 weeks defined as the presence of quiescent disease (IBDQ score > or = 170) and discontinuation of prednisone

The secondary outcome was partial response defined as ability to discontinue prednisone without a decrease in IBDQ or a clinically significant improvement in disease activity.

After 16 weeks 17% (3/18) of patients in the 15 mg group achieved remission compared to 17% (2/12) of patients in the 25 mg group (P = N.S.)

Improvement occurred in 39% (7/18) of the 15 mg group compared to 33% (4/12) of the 25 mg group (P = N.S.)

Adverse events occurred in 11% (2/18) of patients in the 15 mg group compared to 17% (2/12) of patients in the 25 mg group (P = N.S.)

Egan 1999b

Adenosine was thought to play a major role in anti‐inflammatory mechanism of action of methotrexate in animal models

The non‐randomized, open‐label pharmacokinetic study investigating the effects of methotrexate on adenosine concentrations in plasma and at the site of the disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

In 10 patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, rectal adenosine and plasma adenosine concentrations were measured before and immediately after a subcutaneous injection of methotrexate at 15 or 25 mg

There were no significant differences between pre‐injection and post‐injection values in both plasma and rectal adenosine concentrations

The mean pre‐dose and post‐dose mean rectal adenosine concentrations were 2.4 µmol/L and 2.1 µmol/L, respectively (P = 0.17)

The mean pre‐dose and post ‐dose plasma adenosine concentrations were 3.4 µmol/L and 3.4 µmol/L, respectively (P = 0.95)

Therefore, the evidence does not support adenosine as the anti‐inflammatory mediator of methotrexate

Egan 2000

Case series

Three patients with steroid refractory UC and 2 patients with steroid refractory Crohn's disease who failed monotherapy with subcutaneous methotrexate 25 mg/week for 16 weeks were treated with the combination of methotrexate and low‐dose oral cyclosporine (3 mg/kg/day) for an additional 16 weeks

The primary outcome was remission at 16 weeks defined as the presence of quiescent disease (IBDQ score > or = 170) and discontinuation of prednisone

The secondary outcome was partial response defined as ability to discontinue prednisone without a decrease in IBDQ or a clinically significant improvement in disease activity

The three patients with UC experienced clinical improvement with a mean increase in IBDQ score from 164 to 190 points (P = 0.01) One patient developed hypertension

Fraser 2002

Retrospective chart review at two hospitals

Seventy patients were reviewed (Crohn's n = 48, UC n = 22)

Patients were treated with oral methotrexate (n = 62) or intramuscular methotrexate (n=8) at a mean dose of 20 mg/week for a mean duration of 17.1 months

Remission was defined as the lack of a need for oral steroids (either prednisolone or budesonide) for at least 3 months

Patients who were well on low doses of prednisolone or budesonide steroids were recorded as ‘remission not achieved’

The continued use of oral 5‐aminosalicylic acid compounds and steroids or 5‐aminosalicylic acid enemas was allowed within the definition of remission

Relapse was defined as the need for re‐introduction of steroids, the need for a surgical procedure or the use of infliximab

Remission was achieved in 34 of 55 (62%) of patients who completed more than 3 months of treatment

Life‐table analysis showed that the chances of remaining in remission at 12, 24 and 36 months, if treatment was continued, were 90%, 73% and 51% respectively

The chances of remaining in remission after stopping treatment at 6, 12 and 18 months were 42%, 21% and 16% respectively

Fraser 2003

Open label clinical trial

Eight patients with chronically active moderate to severe UC refractory to corticosteroids and azathioprine or 6‐mercaptopurine were treated with intramuscular methotrexate 25 mg/week (and folic acid) for 16 weeks

Efficacy was assessed with the Mayo clinic score

Six of eight patients completed 16 weeks of treatment

One patient withdrew due to severe exacerbation and one withdrew due to failure to improve

Two patients developed anemia and one patient developed hypertransaminasemia

The median Mayo clinic score at 16 weeks was 8 (range 6 to 11) Two patients were referred for colectomy at the end of the study

Gibson 2006

Retrospective chart review at a single IBD clinic including 65 patients (Crohn's n=45, UC n=20) The initial weekly dose was 25 mg in 29 patients, 20 mg in 16 patients, 15 mg in 7 patients or 10 mg in 3

Eighty‐four percent received methotrexate by subcutaneous injection

All patients received folate supplementation

Response was defined as improvement in bowel symptoms or ability to reduce the dose of steroids

Remission was defined as improvement in symptoms with no requirement for steroids for 3 months, or ability to wean off steroids

Remission was achieved by 12 of 19 (63%) patients with UC ‐ an additional patient with UC had a response to treatment

The median duration of treatment was 11 months (range 3 to 36) in responders and 6 months (range 1.5 to 10) in non‐responders Fifteen per cent of patients experienced adverse events

González‐Lama 2012

Retrospective chart review of IBD patients treated with methotrexate in eight hospitals in Madrid, Spain

Seventy‐seven patients were included (Crohn's disease n = 62, ulcerative colitis n = 15) Methotrexate was initiated at a mean dose of 21 mg/week (range: 15‐30), using parenteral administration in 67% of cases and oral route in 33% of patients

Partial response was defined as a decrease in the Harvey‐Bradshaw index of more than three points

Remission was defined as a Harvey‐Bradshaw index without steroid treatment below or equal to four

Fourteen out of 15 UC patients received parenteral methotrexate Two patients achieved clinical remission with induction therapy, and 12 (71%) patients gained some response and started maintenance treatment

Among the twelve patients, five required dose modification during the follow‐up, three showed loss of response after a mean of 28 weeks, and three more patients achieved clinical remission Adverse events led to methotrexate withdrawal in 5% (4/77) of patients

Hayes 2014

Retrospective chart review of UC patients treated with infliximab (IFX) at a regional referral center

Eighty‐five patients with UC were included in the analysis

Duration of efficacious IFX therapy, and serum IFX and antibody‐to‐IFX (ATI) levels were compared between patients, who received IFX as monotherapy (n = 39) and in combination with an immunosuppressant (n = 46)

Immunosuppressants included azathioprine (65.2% of combination group), mercaptopurine (28.3%), and methotrexate (6.5%)

Concomitant immunosuppressant use was associated with increased duration of IFX therapy (90% in combination group vs. 61% of patients in monotherapy group at 1 year, P = 0.016); greater IFX levels (20.4 mg/L vs. 10.5 mg/L, P = 0.025); and less frequent ATI formation (4.5% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.031)

Herrlinger 2005

Case control study of pharmacogenetics of Mtx therapy in IBD

Allele frequencies were assessed in 102 IBD patients treated with methotrexate, 202 patients with Crohn's disease, 205 patients with UC and 189 healthy volunteers

All subjects were genotyped for four polymorphisms

No significant difference in allele frequencies were detected between Crohn's disease, UC and healthy volunteers

Twenty‐one per cent of methotrexate treated patients experienced adverse events

Houben 1994

Case series of 15 IBD patients (Crohn's disease n=13, UC n=2) treated with intramuscular methotrexate 25 mg/week for 12 weeks, followed by a tapering oral dose

One patient was treated twice

Disease activity was determined after 1, 2 and 3 months of treatment

The mean defecation frequency went down from 7 to 2 times daily after 12 weeks and prednisone dose could be lowered from 22 mg to 15 mg after 3 months

Subjective and objective improvement was noted in 12/15 patients No serious adverse events were reported

Khan 2013

Retrospective cohort study using the nationwide Veterans Affairs database to describe the efficacy of methotrexate in achieving steroid‐free remission

Ninety‐one patients with UC were included and they were followed for 15 months after methotrexate initiation by tracking prednisone, methotrexate, thiopurines, and infliximab dispensing records

Endpoints were: 1) successful remission (cessation of prednisone filling activity while continuing methotrexate); 2) failure with continuance, failure to be weaned off steroids while continuing methotrexate; 3) failure with discontinuance, cessation of methotrexate while continuing steroids

The average weekly prescription dose for oral and parenteral methotrexate was 14 mg/week (range: 2.3‐31.25) and 25 mg/week (range: 5.8‐70), respectively

The mean daily prescription dose for oral prednisone within the oral methotrexate group was 12 mg/day (range 0.7‐68 mg/day) and 25 mg/day (range: 5‐113 mg/day) in the parenteral methotrexate group

At the twelfth month, 37% of patients on oral methotrexate and 30% of patients on parenteral methotrexate were able to discontinue steroids

Kozarek 1989

Open label clinical trial including 21 patients with refractory IBD (Crohn's n=14, UC n=7) Patients received intramuscular methotrexate 25 mg/week for 12 weeks

After 12 weeks, patients were switched to a tapering oral dose if clinical and objective improvement was noted

Five of 7 UC patients had an objective response as measured by the Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (13.3 to 6.3, P=0.007) Prednisone dosage decreased from 38.6 mg +/‐ 6.35 (SEM) to 12.9 mg +/‐ 3.4, P=0.01

Five of 7 had histological improvement. None of the UC patients had normal flexible sigmoidoscopy results. Adverse events included mild rises in transaminase levels in 2 patients, transient leukopenia in 1, self‐limited diarrhea and nausea in 2 patients, brittle nails (1 case) and atypical pneumonitis (1 case).

Kozarek 1992

Retrospective chart review, over a 4 year period (1987 to 1991) 86 patients with refractory IBD (Crohn's n=37, UC n=30) were started on 25 mg/week parenteral methotrexate

Those patients who responded clinically at 12 weeks were offered weekly oral methotrexate therapy (7.5 to 15 mg)

Outcomes included the DAI (scored 0 to 15), prednisone dose, and Mtx toxicity

Seventy per cent of UC patients had a symptomatic and objective response

At a mean follow‐up of 59 weeks, only 40% of UC patients continued to respond to Mtx (DAI 5.0 +/‐ 0.9; prednisone 12 +/‐ 3.9 mg), 15 of 30 UC patients required colectomy and one patient stopped methotrexate due to hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Mañosa 2011

Retrospective chart review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate in UC patients Patients were included in the study if they received methotrexate for steroid dependency or steroid refractoriness and for maintenance of remission

Forty patients were identified from databases of 8 Spanish IBD referral hospitals and followed for at least 6 months

Therapeutic success was defined as the absence of UC‐related symptoms, complete steroid withdrawal and no‐requirement of rescue therapies within the first 6 months after starting methotrexate

At 6 months, 45% (18/40) achieved therapeutic success Treatment failure were mainly due to inefficacy (11/22, 50%) or intolerance (8/22, 36%)

After a median follow‐up of 28 months. 38% (7) of patients with initial therapeutic success required new steroid courses, 22% (4) started biological therapy and 1 of them required colectomy

The cumulative probability of maintaining steroid‐free clinical remission was 60%, 48%, and 35% at 6, 12, 24 months after starting methotrexate, respectively

In all, 11 out of 40 patients (27.5%) experienced adverse effects, leading to methotrexate discontinuation in 8 patients

Paoluzi 2002

Open label clinical trial including 42 patients with steroid dependent or steroid resistant active UC Patients were treated with a daily dose of azathioprine (2 mg/kg) and, if intolerant or not responding, with intramuscular methotrexate (12.5 mg/week)

Efficacy was assessed by clinical, endoscopic and histological examinations at 6 months Patients achieving clinical remission continued with treatment and were followed up

Ten patients received methotrexate

The achievement of complete remission with the ability to discontinue oral steroids was defined as the primary outcome

Response to treatment was defined as follows: complete remission equals achievement of clinical, endoscopic and histological remission; improvement equals disappearance of symptoms (clinical remission) with endoscopic and histological improvement of inflammatory changes; failure equals worsening, no benefit or clinical improvement with the persistence of unmodified inflammatory changes of the mucosa

Methotrexate induced complete remission in six patients (60%) and improvement in four (40%)

During follow‐up, a larger number of patients on azathioprine relapsed in comparison with patients on methotrexate [16/28 (57%) vs. 2/10 (20%), respectively; P < 0.05]

Richter 2012

Retrospective study using a large U.S. health insurance database to document treatment of new‐onset ulcerative colitis (UC) and ulcerative proctitis (UP) in routine clinical practice

One thousand five hundred and sixteen UC patients and 636 UP patients were included in the analysis

New‐onset UC or UP were identified based on: 1) initial receipt of an oral 5‐ASA, mesalazine suppository, 5‐ASA enema, steroid, antimetabolite, budesonide or TNF inhibitor; 2) sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in prior 30 days resulting in a new diagnosis of UC or UP and 3) no prior encounters for Crohn's disease

In UC, initial therapies most frequently used were oral 5‐ASAs (53%), oral 5‐ASAs and systemic steroids (12%), systemic steroids (8%) and mesalazine suppositories (6%); in UP, mesalazine suppositories (42%) and oral 5‐ASAs (19%), combination therapy (14%), mesalazine enema (11%) and rectal steroids (10%) were the mostly frequently used therapies

Few patients received maintenance therapy, and there was a limited use of antimetabolites (0.3% in UC, and lower in UP ‐ no specific figures were provided) and biological agents (0.1% in UC)

Saibeni 2012

Retrospective, observational study using 5420 case histories from 8 referral centres in Italy, to evaluate frequency, indications, efficacy and safety of methotrexate in IBD patients

One hundred and twelve patients received methotrexate (2.1%, 89 Crohn's disease, 23 ulcerative colitis)

Indications: first‐line immunosuppressant in 32 (28.6%), alternative (second‐line) to thiopurines in 80 (71.4%)

Efficacy: optimal in 39/112 (34.8%), partial in 29/112 (25.9%), absent in 22/112 (19.6%), not assessable in 22/122 (19.6%)

Side effects happened in 49/112 patients (43.7%, 39 Crohn's disease, 10 ulcerative colitis), leading to drug discontinuation in 38 patients (33.9%)

Folic acid use was related to the lower side effects (35/93, 37.6% in those who received folic acid vs. 14/19, 73.7% in those who did not)

Siveke 2003

Case series of 3 patients with steroid dependent or steroid resistant UC

Patients were treated with intramuscular methotrexate 25 mg/week

These patients received 10 mg of folate orally on the day after injection

An additional patient received 15 mg of methotrexate, with the dose being adjusted to 25 mg following increased activity of colitis

Three of 4 patients achieved remission

One patient had to discontinue methotrexate due to an increase in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels despite dose reduction and prophylactic supplementation of folate

Soon 2004

Retrospective chart review including 72 patients (Crohn's n=66, UC n=6)

Patients were treated with mean dose of 18.2 mg/week of methotrexate for six months

Methotrexate was given orally in 64 patients and intramuscularly in eight patients

Clinical response was defined as sustained withdrawal of oral steroids within 3 months of starting treatment and sustained for a further 3 months or fistula improvement

New episodes of steroid therapy, infliximab or surgery during the first 6 months were considered as failure to achieve clinical response

Fifty‐four patients completed six months of treatment

Clinical response was achieved in 22 (40.7%) patients [19 of 48 (39.6%) with CD and three of six (50%) with UC]

Te 2000

Retrospective chart review looking at hepatotoxicity among IBD patients who had received a minimum cumulative dose of 1500 mg of methotrexate

In 20 patients who had liver biopsies, the mean cumulative methotrexate dose was 2633 mg (range, 1500–5410 mg), given for a mean of 131.7 wk (range, 66–281 weeks)

Nineteen of 20 patients (95%) had mild histological abnormalities (Roenigk’s grade I and II), and one patient had hepatic fibrosis (Roenigk’s grade IIIB)

Wahed 2009

Retrospective chart review to examine the efficacy and safety profile of methotrexate in patients with CD or UC who were either intolerant or non‐responsive to azathioprine/mercaptopurine (AZA/MP)

One hundred and thirty‐one patients with IBD treated with MTX were included (99 CD, 32 UC)

Clinical response was assessed at 6 months and it was defined as steroid withdrawal, normalization of previously raised CRP or physician's clinical assessment of improvements

In CD, clinical response occurred in 18/29 patients (62%) refractory to AZA/MP and 42/70 patients (60%) intolerant to AZA/MP (P = 1.0)

In UC, clinical response occurred in 7/9 patients (78%) refractory to AZA/MP and 15/23 (65%) intolerant to AZA/MP

Side effects were seen in 23 (17.4%) patients and led to discontinuation in 11 (8.3%) patients

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Results from excluded studies
Comparison 1. Methotrexate versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission and complete withdrawal from steroids Show forest plot

1

67

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.58, 1.59]

2 Withdrawal due adverse events Show forest plot

1

67

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.47 [0.23, 25.91]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Methotrexate versus placebo
Comparison 2. Methotrexate versus 6‐Mercaptopurine

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission Show forest plot

1

26

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.43, 1.29]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Methotrexate versus 6‐Mercaptopurine
Comparison 3. Methotrexate versus 5‐ASA

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Proportion of patients achieved clinical remission Show forest plot

1

20

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.33 [0.64, 8.49]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Methotrexate versus 5‐ASA