Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Forest plot of comparison: 1 mobile phone intervention v. control, outcome: 1.2 short‐term self‐reported point prevalence abstinence.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Forest plot of comparison: 1 mobile phone intervention v. control, outcome: 1.2 short‐term self‐reported point prevalence abstinence.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 mobile phone plus internet intervention v. control, outcome: 2.1 12 month self‐reported repeated point abstinence.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Forest plot of comparison: 2 mobile phone plus internet intervention v. control, outcome: 2.1 12 month self‐reported repeated point abstinence.

Comparison 1 mobile phone intervention v. control, Outcome 1 26 week continuous abstinence (<5 lapses).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 mobile phone intervention v. control, Outcome 1 26 week continuous abstinence (<5 lapses).

Comparison 1 mobile phone intervention v. control, Outcome 2 short‐term self‐reported point prevalence abstinence.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 mobile phone intervention v. control, Outcome 2 short‐term self‐reported point prevalence abstinence.

Comparison 2 mobile phone plus internet intervention v. control, Outcome 1 12 month self‐reported repeated point abstinence.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 mobile phone plus internet intervention v. control, Outcome 1 12 month self‐reported repeated point abstinence.

Comparison 2 mobile phone plus internet intervention v. control, Outcome 2 12 month self‐reported point prevalence abstinence.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 mobile phone plus internet intervention v. control, Outcome 2 12 month self‐reported point prevalence abstinence.

Comparison 2 mobile phone plus internet intervention v. control, Outcome 3 short‐term self‐reported point prevalence abstinence.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 mobile phone plus internet intervention v. control, Outcome 3 short‐term self‐reported point prevalence abstinence.

Comparison 1. mobile phone intervention v. control

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 26 week continuous abstinence (<5 lapses) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2 short‐term self‐reported point prevalence abstinence Show forest plot

2

1905

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.18 [1.80, 2.65]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. mobile phone intervention v. control
Comparison 2. mobile phone plus internet intervention v. control

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 12 month self‐reported repeated point abstinence Show forest plot

2

696

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.03 [1.40, 2.94]

2 12 month self‐reported point prevalence abstinence Show forest plot

2

696

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.49 [1.18, 1.90]

3 short‐term self‐reported point prevalence abstinence Show forest plot

2

696

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.89 [1.52, 2.35]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. mobile phone plus internet intervention v. control