Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included trials. The unclear category for incomplete outcome data represents trials that did not report this outcome.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included trials. The unclear category for incomplete outcome data represents trials that did not report this outcome.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included trial.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included trial.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1. Iron versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.1 Clinical malaria (grouped by presence of anaemia).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Funnel plot of comparison: 1. Iron versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.1 Clinical malaria (grouped by presence of anaemia).

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Clinical malaria (grouped by presence of anaemia).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Clinical malaria (grouped by presence of anaemia).

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Clinical malaria (grouped by age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Clinical malaria (grouped by age).

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 Clinical malaria (P. falciparum only).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 Clinical malaria (P. falciparum only).

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment (by anaemia at baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment (by anaemia at baseline).

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Clinical malaria with high‐grade parasitaemia or requiring admission.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Clinical malaria with high‐grade parasitaemia or requiring admission.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment ( by age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment ( by age).

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment (P. falciparum only).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment (P. falciparum only).

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment (by allocation concealment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment (by allocation concealment).

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 10 High‐grade parasitaemia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 10 High‐grade parasitaemia.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 11 Any parasitaemia, end of follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 11 Any parasitaemia, end of follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 12 Hospitalizations and clinic visits.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 12 Hospitalizations and clinic visits.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 13 Haemoglobin, end of treatment (by anaemia at baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 13 Haemoglobin, end of treatment (by anaemia at baseline).

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 14 Weight, end value.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 14 Weight, end value.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 15 Anaemia, end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 15 Anaemia, end of treatment.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 16 Weight, change from baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 16 Weight, change from baseline.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 17 Diarrhoeal episodes per patient‐month (by zinc administration).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 17 Diarrhoeal episodes per patient‐month (by zinc administration).

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 18 Infections per patient‐month.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 18 Infections per patient‐month.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 19 Haemoglobin, change from baseline, end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 19 Haemoglobin, change from baseline, end of treatment.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 20 URTI/pneumonia episodes per patient‐month.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 20 URTI/pneumonia episodes per patient‐month.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 21 Height, end value.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 21 Height, end value.

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 22 Height, change from baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 Iron versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 22 Height, change from baseline.

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Severe malaria (malaria requiring admission).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Severe malaria (malaria requiring admission).

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Severe malaria (cerebral malaria).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Severe malaria (cerebral malaria).

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Any hospitalization.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Any hospitalization.

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 Haemoglobin, end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 Haemoglobin, end of treatment.

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Anaemia, end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Anaemia, end of treatment.

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Weight, end value.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Weight, end value.

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Height, end value.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Height, end value.

Comparison 3 Iron with or without folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Clinical malaria (grouped by presence of malaria prevention or management).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Iron with or without folic acid versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Clinical malaria (grouped by presence of malaria prevention or management).

Comparison 4 Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo, Outcome 1 Clinical malaria.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo, Outcome 1 Clinical malaria.

Comparison 4 Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo, Outcome 2 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo, Outcome 2 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 4 Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo, Outcome 3 Hospitalizations and clinic visits.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo, Outcome 3 Hospitalizations and clinic visits.

Comparison 4 Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo, Outcome 4 Haemoglobin at end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo, Outcome 4 Haemoglobin at end of treatment.

Comparison 4 Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo, Outcome 5 Anaemia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo, Outcome 5 Anaemia.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Oral iron versus placebo or no treatment for children in malaria‐endemic areas

Does iron supplementation or fortification increase malaria and related morbidity and mortality among children in malaria‐endemic areas?

Participant or population: children in malaria‐endemic areas
Setting: areas which are malariaendemic, and where children may benefit from iron treatment.
Intervention: iron
Comparison: placebo or no treatment

Subgroup

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect results
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo or no treatment

Risk with iron supplementation

Clinical malaria

27/100

25/100

(23 to 27)

RR 0.93 (0.87 to 1.00)

7168 (14 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕

High1

Overall, among anaemic or non‐anaemic children, iron does not cause an excess of clinical malaria

Clinical malaria

Subgrouped by population anaemia (trial level)

Anaemic at baseline

RR 0.92
(0.84 to 1.00)

7168 (14 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate2

In populations where anaemia is common, iron probably does not cause an excess of clinical malaria

256 per 1000

236 per 1000
(256 to 216)

Not anaemic at baseline

RR 0.97
(0.86 to 1.09)

2112
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate3

In populations where anaemia is uncommon, iron probably does not cause an excess of clinical malaria

326 per 1000

316 per 1000
(280 to 355)

Severe malaria

Defined as clinical malaria with high‐grade parasitaemia or requiring admission

397 per 1000

357 per 1000
(389 to 321)

RR 0.90
(0.81 to 0.98)

3421
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
High

Iron supplementation does not cause an excess of severe malaria

Death

10 per 10000

10 per 1000

(10 to 10)

Not estimated

7576

(18 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

Low4

Iron may have no effect on mortality

Hospitalization plus clinic visits

295 per 1000

295 per 1000
(294 to 296)

RR 0.99
(0.95 to 1.04)

12,578
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low5,6

It is uncertain whether iron affects hospitalizations or clinic visits

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; OR: odds ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Funnel plot asymmetry favouring the control arm, publication bias not suspected. The CIs range from important benefits of iron supplementation in reducing clinical malaria to no excess of clinical malaria.
2Downgraded by 1 for inconsistency. The CIs range from important benefits of iron supplementation in reducing clinical malaria to no excess of clinical malaria.
3Downgraded by 1 for imprecision. The upper CI of 9% could be regarded as representing clinically important harms.
4Downgraded by 1 for imprecision and by 1 for suspected publication bias.
5Study population and number of participants expressed as children‐months.
6Downgraded by 1 for inconsistency and 2 for indirectness of the outcome. Hospitalizations and clinic visits do not necessarily reflect the burden of malaria.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Oral iron versus placebo or no treatment for children in malaria‐endemic areas
Summary of findings 2. Effects of oral iron with or without folic acid on malaria among children in malaria‐endemic areas

Does iron with or without folic acid increase malaria among children in malaria‐endemic areas?

Participant or population: children in malaria‐endemic areas
Setting: areas which are malariaendemic, and where children may benefit from iron treatment.
Intervention: Iron ± folic acid
Comparison: placebo or no treatment

Subgroup

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect results
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo or no treatment

Risk with iron supplementation

Clinical malaria

Subgrouped by presence of malaria prevention or management services

Malaria prevention or management services present

RR 0.91 (0.84 to 0.97)

5586
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1

In areas where there are prevention and management services for malaria, iron supplementation may reduce clinical malaria

24 per 100

22 per 1000
(20 to 23)

Malaria prevention or management services not present

RR 1.16
(1.02 to 1.31)

19,086
(9 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low2

In areas where there are no prevention and management services for malaria, iron may increase the number of children with clinical malaria

6 per 100

7 per 1000
(6 to 8)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; OR: odds ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Downgraded by 1 for inconsistency and 1 for funnel plot asymmetry and suspected publication bias.
2Downgraded by 1 for indirectness, since the analysis is dominated by Sazawal 2006 (C)a that assessed only admissions for malaria resulting a spuriously low event rate and 1 for funnel plot asymmetry and suspected publication bias.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Effects of oral iron with or without folic acid on malaria among children in malaria‐endemic areas
Summary of findings 3. Oral iron with antimalarial prophylaxis versus placebo or no treatment for children in malaria‐endemic areas

Is iron supplementation with antimalarial treatment safe and beneficial for children living in malaria‐endemic areas?

Participant or population: children with or without anaemia at baseline
Settings: hyper‐ or holoendemic areas for malaria
Intervention: oral iron supplement plus antimalarial

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Iron supplementation plus antimalarial

Clinical malaria

41 per 100

22 per 100
(18 to 28)

RR 0.54
(0.43 to 0.67)

728
(3 (RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
High1,2

Iron given together with antimalarial antimicrobials reduce malaria

All‐cause mortality

42 per 1000

44 per 1000

(23 to 85)

RR 1.05
(0.52 to 2.11)

728

(3 (RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low 3

Iron given together with antimalarial antimicrobials may have no effect on mortality

*The basis for the assumed risk (for example, the median control group risk across studies) is provided in the footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1All trials were individually randomized, with adequate concealment, double‐blinded, and no loss to follow‐up.
2We measured heterogeneity as P = 0.08, I² statistic = 60%, but all trials point in the same direction.
3We downgraded by 2 for imprecision.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Oral iron with antimalarial prophylaxis versus placebo or no treatment for children in malaria‐endemic areas
Table 1. Description and location of malaria‐endemic areas

Area definition

Parasite rates

Description

Geographical location

Hypoendemicity (also called designated unstable malaria)

10% or fewer children aged 2 to 9 years, but may be higher for part of the year

Areas where there is little transmission and during the average year the effects upon the general population are unimportant

AFRO: Chad
AMRO: Belize, Bolivia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Paraguay
EMRO: Afghanistan, Iraq, Oman
EURO: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan
SEARO: Nepal
WPRO: China

Mesoendemicity (also called unstable and stable malaria)

11 to 50% of children aged 2 to 9 years

Typically found among rural communities in subtropical zones where wide geographical variations in transmission exist

AFRO: Angola, Botswana, Cape Verde, Chad, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya (considered hyper‐ or holoendemic in review, as indicated in most of the trials), Mauritania, Namibia, Niger, Zambia, Zimbabwe
AMRO: Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Panama, Peru, Venezuela
EMRO: Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia
SEARO: Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Thailand
WPRO: Malaysia

Hyperendemicity (also called stable malaria)

Consistently > 50% among children aged 2 to 9 years

Areas where transmission is intense but seasonal; immunity is insufficient in all age groups

AFRO: Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea‐Bissau, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Nigeria, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo, Uganda,Tanzania, Zambia
SEARO: Timor‐Leste
WPRO: Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Vietnam

Holoendemicity (also called stable malaria)

Consistently > 75% among infants aged 0 to 11 months

Intense transmission resulting in a considerable degree of immunity after early childhood

AFRO: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Tanzania, Uganda, Burundi, Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique
AMRO: Dominican Republic, Suriname
EMRO: Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen
SEARO: Myanmar
WPRO: Cambodia, Lao People's Democratic Republic

Abbreviations: AFRO: WHO African Regional Office; AMRO: WHO Americas Regional Office; EMRO: WHO Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office; EURO: WHO Europe Regional Office; SEARO: WHO South East Asian Regional Office; WPRO: WHO Western Pacific Regional Office.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Description and location of malaria‐endemic areas
Table 2. WHO RDA of iron by age group

Age group

Minimal daily dose

< 6 months

2 mg/kg

6 to 24 months

12.5 mg or 2 mg/kg

2 to 5 years

20 mg

6 to 11 years

30 mg

11 to 18 years

60 mg

Abbreviations: WHO: World Health Organization; RDA: recommended dietary allowance.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. WHO RDA of iron by age group
Table 3. Detailed search strategies

Search set

CIDG SRa

CENTRAL

MEDLINEb

EMBASEb

LILACSb

1

iron

iron

iron

iron

iron

2

ferrous

ferrous

ferrous

FERROUS‐SULPHATE

ferrous

3

1 or 2

IRON COMPOUNDS

IRON COMPOUNDS

1 or 2

1 or 2

4

malaria

1 or 2 or 3

1 or 2 or 3

supplem$

malaria

5

anaemia

supplem*

supplem*

3 and 4

anaemia

6

anaemia

4 and 5

4 and 5

malaria

anaemia

7

4 or 5 or 6

malaria

malaria

anaemia

4 or 5 or 6

8

3 and 7

anaemia

anaemia

6 or 7

3 and 7

9

anaemia

anaemia

5 and 8

10

7 or 8 or 9

7 or 8 or 9

child$

11

6 and 10

6 and 10

infant$

12

child*

10 or 11

13

infant*

9 and 12

14

12 or 13

15

11 and 14

aCochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register.
bSearch terms used in combination with the search strategy for retrieving trials developed by The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane 2011).

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Detailed search strategies
Table 4. Studies reporting malaria as an outcome: malaria definitions, types of outcomes and methods of surveillance and treatment in the trial

Trial ID

Clinical definition

Laboratory definition

Malaria‐related outcomes reported

Time of assessment

Malaria prevention or management strategies

Malaria prevention or management

Adam 1997 (C)

Physician's diagnosis of malaria

Any parasitaemia (all malaria species, assumed most Plasmodium falciparum since trial conducted in same region as Gebreselassie 1996)

Clinical malaria; any parasitaemia; malaria necessitating hospitalization (used as severe malaria); parasite density (all N events/N individuals, unadjusted for clustering)

3 months to end of treatment

Blood smears for malaria obtained before, during and after treatment. Children with clinical malaria referred to local hospital and treated

No

Ayoya 2009

Fever > 37.5°C (axillary)

Any parasitaemia (P. falciparum)

Clinical malaria; clinical malaria with parasitaemia ≥ 5000/μL (used as severe malaria); parasite density

3 months to end of treatment

Malaria screening was done at baseline for all children and repeated throughout the study in children who had fever. Children infected with P. falciparum also were treated with sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine

Yes

Berger 2000

Isolated fever

Parasite density > 3000 (P. falciparum, Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale assessed. Over 97% were P. falciparum)

Parasite index (%, used as parasitaemia); parasitaemia above 3000 /µL (used as severe malaria) and 10,000 / µL (%); parasite density

3 months to end of treatment

9 months to end of follow‐up (FU)

Blood smears for malaria obtained at baseline, end of treatment (3 months) and end of FU (6 months). Chloroquine treatment given for all isolated fevers

Yes

Desai 2003

Fever ≥37.5°C

Any parasitaemia (P. falciparum) with fever or parasitaemia > 5000/mm3 alone

Clinical malaria; any parasitaemia; hazard ratios for these; parasite density

3 months to end of treatment

Blood smears at baseline and every 4 weeks. Oral quinine given for any fever with parasitaemia and cases of severe malaria referred for further treatment

Yes

Esan 2013

No clinical definition

Any parasitaemia

All cause sick visits (including malaria),

3 months to end of treatment

6 months to end of FU

Routine trimethoprim ‐ sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis

Yes

Fahmida 2007

Not stated

Not stated

Participants with "malaria" (used primarily as clinical malaria)

6 months to end of treatment

Not stated

No

Gebreselassie 1996

Fever ≥ 37.5°C with signs and symptoms suggestive of malaria and other diagnoses ruled out

Presence of parasites in blood (all species, P. falciparum 88.9%)

Children with at least one episode of clinical malaria; cumulative incidence of parasitaemia; parasite density > 5000 µL (used as severe malaria); parasite density

3 months to end of treatment

6 months to end of FU

Blood smears negative at baseline and repeated weekly. Chloroquine with or without primaquine given for any positive smear

Yes

Harvey 1989

Fever and headache at the same time

Any parasitaemia (P. falciparum 67%, P. vivax 26.4%, P. malariae 6.6%)

First episodes of clinically suspected malaria (used primarily as clinical malaria); any parasitaemia

4 months to end of treatment

6 months to end of FU

Blood smears for malaria obtained at 0, 6, 16, and 24 weeks. Chloroquine given for any illness reported as fever or headache, or both

Yes

Latham 1990

Not assessed

Any positive smear (malaria species not stated)

Any positive smear; parasite density

8 months to end of FU

Blood smears for malaria obtained at baseline and end of treatment. Treatment not stated

Yes

Lawless 1994

Child's recall of clinical illness

Any positive blood smear (malaria species not stated)

Malaria is not defined (used as clinical malaria)

3.5 months to end of treatment

No blood smears at baseline or during the trial (only at end of treatment). Treatment not stated

No

Leenstra 2009

Fever ≥ 37.5°C

Positive blood smear (malaria species not stated)

Episodes of clinical malaria and RRs adjusted for school; episodes of malaria parasitaemia and parasitaemia > 500 parasites/mm3 (used as severe malaria) and RRs adjusted for school, age, and baseline parasitaemia

5 months to end of treatment

Blood smears for malaria at baseline (1/4 of participants positive) and monthly during the trial. No treatment offered for positive smears; symptomatic cases referred to physician

Yes

Massaga 2003

History of fever in the previous 24 to 72 hours or measured temperature of ≥ 37.5°C

Any level of parasitaemia (P. falciparum only)

Clinical malaria as first or only episode per participant (used as clinical malaria) and episodes of clinical malaria; episodes of clinical malaria associated with parasitaemia > 5000 parasites/μL (used as severe malaria)

6 months to end of treatment

Blood smears for malaria at baseline and every 2 weeks. Sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine treatment given for uncomplicated cases; complicated and severe malaria referred to the hospital

Yes

Mebrahtu 2004 (C)

Not assessed

Any positive smear (P. falciparum only)

Parasitaemia as OR (95% CI) adjusted for repeated measurements in each child

12 months to end of treatment

Blood smears for malaria at baseline and end of treatment. In addition, monthly smears from a random sample (50% of randomized). Treatment not stated

Yes

Menendez 1997

Fever ≥ 37.5°C

Parasitaemia of any density (P. falciparum only)

First or only episode of clinical malaria

1 year (6 months after end of treatment)

Blood smears for malaria at baseline, week 8 and for any fever. Chloroquine treatment given for clinical malaria

Yes

Richard 2006

Any fever within the previous 72 hours

P. falciparum (29%) or P. vivax (71%), any density

Episodes of falciparum or vivax malaria, or both (used primarily as clinical malaria)

7 months to end of treatment

Blood smears for malaria at baseline and whenever febrile. Treatment given for all clinical cases

Yes

Sazawal 2006 (C)a

Fever > 38°C and

Parasitaemia > 1000 or history of fever and parasitaemia > 3000 or parasitaemia > 10,000 parasites/mm3 regardless of fever (mostly P. falciparum)

Malaria‐related adverse events, defined as hospital admission or death due to malaria (used primarily as clinical malaria). RRs with 95% CI adjusted for multiple events per child and clustering; cerebral malaria (used as severe malaria)

Not fixed. End of treatment about 1 year and end of FU about 18 months

No baseline or routine surveillance for malaria during the trial. Treatment given only if admitted to the hospital and malaria diagnosed

No

Sazawal 2006 (C)b

Fever > 38°C

Parasitaemia > 1000 or history of fever and parasitaemia > 3000 or parasitaemia > 10,000 parasites/mm3 regardless of fever (mostly P. falciparum)

Malaria‐related adverse events, defined as hospital admission or death due to malaria (used primarily as clinical malaria). RRs with 95% CI adjusted for multiple events per child and clustering; cerebral malaria (used as severe malaria)

Not fixed. End of treatment about 1 year and end of FU about 18 months

Blood smear for malaria at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. Sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine treatment delivered to home to all slide‐confirmed malaria participants or clinical disease presenting during the study

Yes

Smith 1989 (C)

Fever > 37.5°C

> 500 parasites/mm3 (mostly P. falciparum)

Visits for clinical malaria; parasitaemia > 500/µL; fever with parasitaemia > 5000 parasites/mm3 (used as severe malaria (all N events/N individuals, unadjusted for clustering)

3 months to end of treatment

Blood smear for malaria at baseline, 2 weeks and end of treatment. No treatment at baseline; clinical malaria referred to local healthcare services

No

Verhoef 2002

Axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C

Dipstick test for P. falciparum

Number of children with malaria infection (used primarily as clinical malaria)

3 months to end of treatment

Dipstick for P. falciparum tested at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Confirmed with blood smear if febrile and treated with sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine, amodiaquine or halofantrine

Yes

Zlotkin 2013 (C)

Axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C

Parasitaemia of any density (mostly P. falciparum)

Incidence of clinical malaria, malaria with parasite density > 5000/µL, cerebral malaria

5 months to end of treatment

6 months to end of FU

Insecticide‐treated bed nets supplied with instructions for use. Children with malaria treated with artemisinin combination therapy

Yes

Time of assessment: refers to time from randomization.
Abbreviations: FU, follow‐up.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Studies reporting malaria as an outcome: malaria definitions, types of outcomes and methods of surveillance and treatment in the trial
Table 5. Analysis of cluster randomized trials adjusting standard errors

Trial ID

Outcome

n Int reported

N Int reported

n Cont reported

N Cont reported

Average cluster size

DE

Unadjusted RR (95% CI)

ln(RR)

Unadjusted SE(lnRR)

Adjusted SE(lnRR)/ sample size

Adam 1997 (C)

Clinical malaria

72

366

49

372

Household (used 1.5)

1.34

1.49 (1.07 to 2.08)

0.40

0.17

0.20

Adam 1997 (C)

Parasitaemia

127

368

101

372

Household (used 1.5)

1.34

1.27 (1.02 to 1.58)

0.24

0.11

0.13

Adam 1997 (C)

Clinical malaria necessitating hospitalization

41

405

32

382

Household (used 1.5)

1.34

1.21 (0.78 to 1.88)

0.19

0.22

0.26

Mebrahtu 2004 (C)

Parasitaemia

307

307

1.5

1.34

OR 0.9 (0.72 to 1.19) Converted to RR 0.98

0.47

0.28

0.32

Mebrahtu 2004 (C)

High‐grade parasitaemia

307

307

1.5

1.34

OR 1.04 (0.82 to 1.34) Converted to RR 1.03

0.03

0.12

0.14

Sazawal 2006 (C)a

Clinical malaria

467

7950

411

8006

1.4

1.16 (1.00 to 1.34)

0.15

0.07

Sazawal 2006 (C)a

Severe malaria (cerebral)

7950

8006

1.4

1.32 (1.02 to 1.70)

0.28

0.13

Sazawal 2006 (C)b

Clinical malaria

14

815

30

804

1.2

0.46 (0.24 to 0.88)

‐0.78

0.33

Sazawal 2006 (C)b

Severe malaria (cerebral)

4

815

15

804

1.2

0.26 (0.09 to 0.81)

‐1.35

0.56

Smith 1989 (C)

Clinical malaria

14

97

8

89

Household (used 1.5)

1.34

1.60 (0.42 to 0.71)

0.47

0.42

0.48

Smith 1989 (C)

Parasitaemia

28

97

16

89

Household (used 1.5)

1.34

1.61 (0.93 to 2.76)

0.47

0.28

0.32

Smith 1989 (C)

High‐grade parasitaemia

17

97

11

89

Household (used 1.5)

1.34

1.42 (0.70 to 2.86)

0.35

0.13

0.15

Zlotkin 2013 (C)

Clinical malaria

338

966

392

989

Compounds

0.87 (0.79 to 0.97)

‐0.14

0.05

Zlotkin 2013 (C)

Clinical malaria with high grade parasitaemia

273

966

308

989

Compounds

0.89 (0.80 to 1.00)

‐0.12

0.06

Text in bold;results provided in publication or from authors adjusted for clustering.
Abbreviations: cont: control; DE: design effect used for adjustment (see methods for derivation of design effect and ICC used per outcome); Int: intervention; n: number of outcomes; N: number evaluated; OR: odds ratio; RR: risk ratio.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 5. Analysis of cluster randomized trials adjusting standard errors
Table 6. Analysis of cluster randomized trials adjusting sample size

Study ID

Outcome

n Int reported

N Int reported

n Cont reported

N Cont reported

Average cluster size

DE

n Int adjusted

N Int adjusted

n Cont adjusted

N Cont adjusted

Adam 1997 (C)

Anaemia

364

368

357

374

Household (used 1.5)

1.4

260

263

255

267

Hall 2002 (C)

Anaemia

273

551

356

562

20

2.77

99

199

129

203

Mebrahtu 2004 (C)

All‐cause mortality

0

340

2

344

1.5

1.001

0

340

2

344

Mebrahtu 2004 (C)

Anaemia

180

232

172

272

1.5

1.4

129

166

123

194

Roschnik 2003 (C)

Anaemia

133

224

110

203

30

3.70

36

61

30

55

Sazawal 2006 (C)a

All‐cause mortality

149

7950

130

8006

1.4

1.001

149

7941

130

7996

Sazawal 2006 (C)b

All‐cause mortality

8

815

9

804

1.2

1.0004

8

815

9

804

Sazawal 2006 (C)b

Anaemia

4

308

7

327

1.2

1.4

3

220

5

234

Zlotkin 2013 (C)

All‐cause mortality

3

967

2

991

Compound

1.001

3

966

2

990

None of the trials provided results adjusted for clustering for the outcomes reported in the table.
Abbreviations: cont: control; DE: design effect used for adjustment (see methods for derivation of design effect and ICC used per outcome); Int: intervention; n: number of outcomes; N: number evaluated.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 6. Analysis of cluster randomized trials adjusting sample size
Table 7. Comparative malaria parasitaemia rates

Trial ID

Intervention

Unit of measurement

Iron

Control

No. iron

No. control

Favours

For prevention or treatment of anaemia

Adam 1997 (C)

Iron versus placebo

Geometric mean, parasites/μL

15,059

8225

368 slides

372 slides

Control

Ayoya 2009

Iron versus placebo

Geometric mean, parasites/μL ± SD

2733 ± 1459

2648 ± 1562

105 children

97 children

Control

Berger 2000

Iron versus placebo

Geometric mean, RBC/mm3

61.2

25.7

49 children with malarial index

39 children with malarial index

Controlor similar

Desai 2003

Iron plus antimalaria versus antimalaria

Iron versus placebo (with single‐dose antimalarial treatment)

Geometric mean, parasites/mm3

1705

2569

2485

3778

129 children

127 children

127 children

108 children

Iron

Gebreselassie 1996

Iron versus placebo

Average parasite density class (parasite density classified in ascending order from 1 to 10)

5.2

5.0

239 children

241 children

Control or similar

Latham 1990

Iron versus placebo

Geometric mean, infected RBCs/100 WBC

4.8

1.9

28 children

26 children

Control

Mebrahtu 2004 (C)

Iron versus placebo

Geometric mean, parasites/μL (counting against 200 to 500 WBC, assuming 8000 WBC/μL

Age < 30 months 3402

Age > 30 months 2188

Age < 30 months 3422

Age > 30 months 2046

273 children (225 households)

265 children (225 households)

Similar

For treatment of malaria

Nwanyanwu 1996

Iron daily plus antimalarial versus iron weekly plus antimalarial versus antimalarial

Mean, parasites/μL (counting against 300 WBC, assuming 6000 WBC/μL

4927 (daily)

2207 (weekly)

1812

77 (daily)

63 (weekly)

children

75 children

Control

van den Hombergh 1996

Iron plus antimalarial plus folic acid versus antimalarial plus folic acid

Geometric mean, parasites/μL

5308

9302

48 children

47 children

Iron (at baseline groups unbalanced favouring placebo)

Abbreviations: RBC: red blood cell; WBC: white blood cell.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 7. Comparative malaria parasitaemia rates
Comparison 1. Iron versus placebo or no treatment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical malaria (grouped by presence of anaemia) Show forest plot

14

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.87, 1.00]

1.1 Anaemia

9

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.84, 1.00]

1.2 No anaemia

5

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.86, 1.09]

2 Clinical malaria (grouped by age) Show forest plot

14

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.87, 1.00]

2.1 < 2 years

5

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.82, 0.97]

2.2 2 to 5 years

3

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.75, 1.26]

2.3 > 5 years

6

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.91, 1.20]

3 Clinical malaria (P. falciparum only) Show forest plot

9

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.84, 0.99]

4 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment (by anaemia at baseline) Show forest plot

9

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [1.00, 1.23]

4.1 Anaemia

6

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.94, 1.23]

4.2 No anaemia

3

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.99, 1.40]

5 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

18

7576

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐0.00, 0.01]

6 Clinical malaria with high‐grade parasitaemia or requiring admission Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.81, 0.98]

7 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment ( by age) Show forest plot

9

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [1.00, 1.23]

7.1 < 2 years

2

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.28 [0.98, 1.68]

7.2 2 to 5 years

4

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.91, 1.23]

7.3 > 5 years

3

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.93, 1.34]

8 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment (P. falciparum only) Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.97, 1.23]

8.1 Iron versus placebo/no treatment

5

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.96, 1.24]

8.2 Iron + antimalarial versus antimalarial

2

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.76, 1.59]

9 Any parasitaemia, end of treatment (by allocation concealment) Show forest plot

9

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [1.00, 1.23]

9.1 Adequate

4

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.83, 1.15]

9.2 Unclear

5

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [1.06, 1.40]

10 High‐grade parasitaemia Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.93, 1.37]

11 Any parasitaemia, end of follow‐up Show forest plot

5

1150

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [1.09, 1.40]

12 Hospitalizations and clinic visits Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.95, 1.04]

12.1 Hospitalization, iron versus placebo

5

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.82, 1.08]

12.2 Hospitalization, iron + antimalarial versus antimalarial

3

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.97, 1.56]

12.3 Clinic visit, iron versus placebo

2

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.88, 1.02]

12.4 Clinic visit, iron + antimalarial versus antimalarial

4

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.96, 1.10]

13 Haemoglobin, end of treatment (by anaemia at baseline) Show forest plot

16

5261

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.48, 1.01]

13.1 Anaemia

7

2481

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.38, 1.51]

13.2 No anaemia

9

2780

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.38, 0.85]

14 Weight, end value Show forest plot

5

1830

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.12, 0.06]

15 Anaemia, end of treatment Show forest plot

15

3784

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.49, 0.82]

16 Weight, change from baseline Show forest plot

4

486

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.13, 0.49]

17 Diarrhoeal episodes per patient‐month (by zinc administration) Show forest plot

8

23912

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.15 [1.06, 1.26]

17.1 Without zinc

7

17566

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.87, 1.13]

17.2 With zinc

3

6346

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [1.15, 1.44]

18 Infections per patient‐month Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

18.1 Febrile episodes

6

15531

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.93, 1.14]

18.2 Days with fever

1

110

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

8.37 [1.91, 36.58]

18.3 All disease episodes

1

1395

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.15 [0.91, 1.46]

19 Haemoglobin, change from baseline, end of treatment Show forest plot

12

2462

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.42, 0.92]

20 URTI/pneumonia episodes per patient‐month Show forest plot

6

21767

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.85, 1.15]

21 Height, end value Show forest plot

5

2102

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.08, 0.10]

22 Height, change from baseline Show forest plot

4

486

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [‐0.09, 0.27]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Iron versus placebo or no treatment
Comparison 2. Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Severe malaria (malaria requiring admission) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Severe malaria (cerebral malaria) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

5

18034

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐0.00, 0.01]

4 Any hospitalization Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5 Haemoglobin, end of treatment Show forest plot

1

124

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.51, 1.29]

6 Anaemia, end of treatment Show forest plot

3

633

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.25, 0.99]

7 Weight, end value Show forest plot

2

1080

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.06 [‐0.18, 0.06]

8 Height, end value Show forest plot

2

1082

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.00 [‐0.12, 0.12]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Iron plus folic acid versus placebo or no treatment
Comparison 3. Iron with or without folic acid versus placebo or no treatment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical malaria (grouped by presence of malaria prevention or management) Show forest plot

16

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.91, 1.03]

1.1 Services present

11

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.84, 0.97]

1.2 Services absent

5

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [1.02, 1.31]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Iron with or without folic acid versus placebo or no treatment
Comparison 4. Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical malaria Show forest plot

3

728

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.43, 0.67]

2 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

3

728

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.52, 2.11]

3 Hospitalizations and clinic visits Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Hospitalization, iron + antimalarial versus placebo

2

5904

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.48, 0.73]

3.2 Clinic visit, iron + antimalarial versus placebo

2

5904

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.82, 0.95]

4 Haemoglobin at end of treatment Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5 Anaemia Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Iron + antimalarial versus placebo, end of treatment

2

295

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.28, 0.70]

5.2 Iron + antimalarial versus placebo, end of follow‐up

1

420

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.37 [0.26, 0.54]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Iron plus antimalarial versus placebo