Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise programs for people with dementia

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006489.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 04 diciembre 2013see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Demencia y trastornos cognitivos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Dorothy Forbes

    Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Emily J Thiessen

    Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Catherine M Blake

    Correspondencia a: School of Nursing, Health Sciences Addition H022, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

    [email protected]

  • Scott C Forbes

    Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Sean Forbes

    Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA

Contributions of authors

Dorothy Forbes: conceived, designed, and co‐ordinated the review
Catherine Blake: corresponded with trial authors, staff at the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group and team members
Dorothy Forbes, Emily Thiessen, Scott Forbes (SCF): selected trials
Dorothy Forbes, Emily Thiessen, Catherine Blake: assessed risk of bias
Dorothy Forbes, Emily Thiessen, Catherine Blake, Scott Forbes, Sean Forbes (SF): extracted data, analysed data, drafted review versions, and reviewed final submission

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Alberta, Canada.

  • University of Western Ontario, Canada.

  • University of Florida, USA.

External sources

  • Canadian Cochrane Centre, Canada.

    Sponsored Emily Thiessen's attendance at a five day Cochrane Review workshop

  • Nova Scotia Cochrane Centre, Canada.

    Hosted Cochrane Review workshop

Declarations of interest

Dorothy Forbes: none known
Emily Thiessen: none known
Catherine Blake: none known
Scott Forbes: none known
Sean Forbes: none known

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Anna Noel‐Storr, Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, for conducting the literature searches, and Sue Marcus, Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, for her assistance throughout the review. We also wish to thank the following authors who contributed to our previous review: Debra Morgan, Maureen Markle‐Reid, Jennifer Wood, and Ivan Culum. 

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Apr 15

Exercise programs for people with dementia

Review

Dorothy Forbes, Scott C Forbes, Catherine M Blake, Emily J Thiessen, Sean Forbes

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006489.pub4

2013 Dec 04

Exercise programs for people with dementia

Review

Dorothy Forbes, Emily J Thiessen, Catherine M Blake, Scott C Forbes, Sean Forbes

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006489.pub3

2008 Jul 16

Physical activity programs for persons with dementia

Review

Dorothy Forbes, Sean Forbes, Debra G Morgan, Maureen Markle‐Reid, Jennifer Wood, Ivan Culum

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006489.pub2

2007 Apr 18

Physical activity programs for persons with dementia

Protocol

Dorothy Forbes, Sean Forbes, Markle‐Reid, M, Debra G Morgan, B J Taylor, Jennifer Wood, Ivan Culum, Maureen Markle‐Reid

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006489

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgments about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgments about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgments about each risk of bias item for each included trial
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgments about each risk of bias item for each included trial

Forest plot of comparison 1: Physical activity vs usual care: cognition
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison 1: Physical activity vs usual care: cognition

Forest plot of comparison 2: Physical activity vs usual care: Activities of daily living (ADLs)
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison 2: Physical activity vs usual care: Activities of daily living (ADLs)

Forest plot of comparison 3: Physical activity vs usual care: depression
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison 3: Physical activity vs usual care: depression

Comparison 1 Exercise vs usual care: cognition, Outcome 1 Cognition.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Exercise vs usual care: cognition, Outcome 1 Cognition.

Comparison 2 Exercise vs usual care: Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Outcome 1 Comparison of ADL.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Exercise vs usual care: Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Outcome 1 Comparison of ADL.

Comparison 3 Exercise vs usual care: depression, Outcome 1 Depression.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Exercise vs usual care: depression, Outcome 1 Depression.

Comparison 1. Exercise vs usual care: cognition

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Cognition Show forest plot

8

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Cognition: all trials

8

329

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.02, 1.09]

1.2 Cognition: excluded moderate‐severe dementia

7

308

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.31 [‐0.11, 0.74]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Exercise vs usual care: cognition
Comparison 2. Exercise vs usual care: Activities of Daily Living (ADL)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Comparison of ADL Show forest plot

6

289

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.08, 1.27]

1.1 ADL: all trials

6

289

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.08, 1.27]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Exercise vs usual care: Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
Comparison 3. Exercise vs usual care: depression

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Depression Show forest plot

5

341

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [‐0.07, 0.36]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Exercise vs usual care: depression