Aislamiento como estrategia para el control de la transmisión de la infección por virus de la hepatitis C (HCV) en unidades de hemodiálisis
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006420.pub2Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 11 agosto 2016see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Riñón y trasplante
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2016 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
Writing of protocol and review: JB, CLM, JLA
Screening of titles and abstracts: JB, CLM, JLA
Assessment for inclusion: JB, CLM, JLA
Quality assessment: JB, CLM, JLA
Data extraction: JB, CLM
Data entry into RevMan: JB, CLM
Data analysis: JB, CLM, JLA
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
None known, Peru.
External sources
-
No sources of support supplied
Declarations of interest
-
Jessica I Bravo Zuñiga: none known
-
César Loza Munárriz: none known
-
Jesús López‐Alcalde: none known
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant editorial team and the referees for the comments and feedback during the preparation of this review.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2016 Aug 11 | Isolation as a strategy for controlling the transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in haemodialysis units | Review | Jessica I Bravo Zuñiga, César Loza Munárriz, Jesús López‐Alcalde | |
| 2007 Jan 24 | Isolation as a strategy for controlling the transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in haemodialysis units | Protocol | Jessica I Bravo Zuñiga, Cesar Loza Munarriz, Jesús López‐Alcalde | |
Differences between protocol and review
Additional risk of bias assessments have been added due to the inclusion of cluster RCTs.
Keywords
MeSH
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords
Medical Subject Headings Check Words
Humans;
PICO
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across one included study.
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for one included study.
Comparison 1 Dialysis machine separation vs Usual care, Outcome 1 Incidence of HCV infection: 9 months.
Comparison 1 Dialysis machine separation vs Usual care, Outcome 2 Incidence of HCV infection: 18 months.
| Should patients with HCV be isolated in haemodialysis units for controlling the transmission of HCV? | ||||||
| Patient or population: patients in haemodialysis Intervention: isolation | ||||||
| Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect | No. of participants | Quality of the evidence | Comments | |
| Risk with usual care | Risk with isolation | |||||
| Incidence of HCV infection (9 months) | Study population | RR 0.34 | 446 (1) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ | Very low quality of evidence due to high risk of bias and imprecision | |
| 47 per 1.000 | 16 per 1.000 | |||||
| Incidence of HCV infection (18 months) | Study population | RR 0.22 | 281 (1) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ | Very low quality of evidence due to high risk of bias and imprecision | |
| 58 per 1.000 | 13 per 1.000 | |||||
| *The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). | ||||||
| GRADE Working Group grades of evidence | ||||||
| Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
| 1 Incidence of HCV infection: 9 months Show forest plot | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 2 Incidence of HCV infection: 18 months Show forest plot | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
