Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

نقش ایزونیازید در پیشگیری از ابتلا به سل در کودکان مبتلا به HIV

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Gray 2014 {published data only}

Gray DM, Workman LJ, Lombard CJ, Jennings T, Innes S, Grobbelaar CJ, et al. Isoniazid preventive therapy in HIV infected children on antiretroviral therapy: a pilot study. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2014;18(3):322‐7. CENTRAL

Madhi 2011 {published data only}

Madhi SA, Nachman S, Violari A, Kim S, Cotton MF, Bobat R, et al. Primary isoniazid prophylaxis against tuberculosis in HIV‐exposed children. New England Journal of Medicine 2011;365(1):21‐31. CENTRAL

Zar 2007 {published data only}

Zar HJ, Cotton MF, Strauss S, Karpakis J, Hussey G, Schaaf HS, et al. Effect of isoniazid prophylaxis on mortality and incidence of tuberculosis in children with HIV: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;334:136‐42. CENTRAL

Frigati 2011 {published data only}

Frigati LJ, Kranzer K, Cotton MF, Schaaf HS, Lombard CJ, Zar HJ. The impact of isoniazid preventive therapy and antiretroviral therapy on tuberculosis in children infected with HIV in a high tuberculosis incidence setting. Thorax 2011;66(6):496‐501. CENTRAL

Hesseling 2012 {published data only}

Hesseling AC, Kim S, Madhi S, Nachman S, Schaaf HS, Violari A, et al. High prevalence of drug resistance amongst HIV‐exposed and ‐infected children in a tuberculosis prevention trial. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2012;16(2):192‐5. CENTRAL

Iro 2013 {published data only}

Iro MA, Brown N. Isoniazid prophylaxis started at 3‐4 months of life does not prevent tuberculosis disease or infection in both HIV‐infected and uninfected children. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education and Practice Edition 2013;98(1):40. CENTRAL

le Roux 2009 {published data only}

le Roux SM, Cotton MF, Golub JE, le Roux DM, Workman L, Zar HJ. Adherence to isoniazid prophylaxis among HIV‐infected children: a randomized controlled trial comparing two dosing schedules. BMC Medicine 2009;7(67):1‐13. CENTRAL

Le Roux 2013 {published data only}

le Roux SM, Cotton MF, Myer L, le Roux DM, Schaaf HS, Lombard CJ, et al. Safety of long‐term isoniazid preventive therapy in children with HIV: a comparison of two dosing schedules. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2013;17(1):26‐31. CENTRAL

Marais 2013 {published data only}

Marais BJ, Graham SM, Maeurer M, Zumla A. Progress and challenges in childhood tuberculosis. Lancet. Infectious Diseases 2013;13(4):287‐9. CENTRAL

Akolo 2010

Akolo C, Adetifa I, Shepperd S, Volmink J. Treatment of latent infection in HIV infected persons. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000171.pub3]

Berggren Palme 2002

Berggren Palme I, Gudetta B, Bruchfield J, Muhe L, Giesecke J. Impact of human immunodeficiency virus 1 infection on clinical presentation, treatment outcome and survival in a cohort of Ethiopian children with tuberculosis. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2002;21:1053‐61.

Burman 2005

Burman WJ. Issues in the management of HIV‐related tuberculosis. Clinics in Chest Medicine 2005;26:283‐94.

Chintu 2005

Chintu C, Mwaba P. Tuberculosis in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The International Journal of Tuberculosis Lung Disease 2005;9(5):477‐84.

Cohen 2006

Cohen T, Lipsitch M, Walensky RP, Murray M. Beneficial and perverse effects of isoniazid preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection in HIV‐tuberculosis co‐infected populations. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006;103(18):7042‐7.

Deeks 2008

Deeks J, Higgins JP, Altman D. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analysis. In: Higgins JP, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2008:243‐96.

Donald 2000

Donald PR. Childhood tuberculosis. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine 2000;6:187‐92.

Donald 2002

Donald PR. Childhood tuberculosis: out of control?. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine 2002;8:178‐82.

Edmonds 2009

Edmonds A, Lusiama J, Napravnik S, Kitetele F, Van Rie A, Behets F. Anti‐retroviral therapy reduces incident tuberculosis in HIV‐infected children. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38:1612‐21.

Foster 2003

Foster K, Alton H. Chronic lung infection in children. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 2003;4:225‐9.

Getahun 2010

Getahun H, Granich R, Sculier D, Gunneberg C, Blanc L, Nunn P, et al. Implementation of isoniazid preventive therapy for people living with HIV worldwide: barriers and solutions. AIDS 2010;24(5):S57‐65.

Goletti 1996

Goletti D, Weisman D, Jackson RW, Graham NM, Vlahov D, Klein RS, et al. Effect of mycobacterium tuberculosis on HIV replication: role of immune activation. Journal of Immunology 1996;157:1271‐8.

GRADEpro GDT 2014 [Computer program]

GRADE Working Group, McMaster University. GRADEpro GDT. Hamilton (ON): GRADE Working Group, McMaster University, 2014.

Grant 2005

Grant AD, Charalambous S, Fielding KL, Day JH, Corbertt EL, Chaisson RE, et al. Effect of routine isoniazid preventive therapy on tuberculosis incidence among HIV‐infected men in South Africa. JAMA 2005;293(22):2719‐25.

Gray 2009a

Gray D, Nuttall J, Lombard C, Davies MA, Workman L, Apolles P, et al. Low rates of hepatotoxicity in HIV‐infected children on anti‐retroviral therapy with and without isoniazid prophylaxis. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 2010;56(3):159‐65.

Guyatt 2008

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck‐Ytter Y, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336(7650):924‐6.

Hesseling 2005

Hesseling AC, Westra AE, Werschkull H, Donald PR, Beyers N, Hussey GD, et al. Outcome of HIV infected children with culture confirmed tuberculosis. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2005;90:1171‐4.

Hesseling 2009

Hesseling AC, Cotton MF, Jennings T, Whitelaw A, Johnson LF, Eley B, et al. High incidence of tuberculosis among HIV‐infected infants: evidence from a South African population‐based study highlights the need for improved tuberculosis control strategies. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009;48:108–14.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Ikeogu 1997

Ikeogu Mo, Wolf B, Mathe S. Pulmonary manifestations in HIV seropositivity and malnutrition in Zimbabwe. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1997;76:124–8.

Jeena 1998

Jeena PM, Coovadia HM, Thula SA, Blythe D, Buckels NJ, Chetty R. Persistent and chronic lung disease in HIV‐1‐infected and uninfected African children. AIDS 1998;12:1185‐93.

Jeena 2002

Jeena PM, Pillay P, Pillay T, Coovadia HM. Impact of HIV‐1 co‐infection on presentation and hospital‐related mortality in children with culture proven pulmonary tuberculosis in Durban, South Africa. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2002;6:672‐8.

Kochi 1991

Kochi A. The global tuberculosis situation and the new strategy of the World Health Organisation. Tubercle 1991;72:1‐6.

Liberati 2009

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.

Martinson 2009

Martinson NA, Moultrie H, van Niekerk R, Barry G, Coovadia A, Cotton M, et al. HAART and risk of tuberculosis in HIV‐infected South African children: a multi‐site retrospective cohort. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2009;13(7):862–7.

Mukadi 1997

Mukadi YD, Wiktor Z, Coulibaly IM, Coulibaly D, Mbengue A, Folquet AM, et al. Impact of HIV infection on the development, clinical presentation and outcome of tuberculosis among children in Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire. AIDS 1997;11(9):1151‐8.

Narita 1998

Narita M, Ashkin D, Hollender ES, Pitchenik AE. Paradoxical worsening of tuberculosis following antiretroviral therapy in patients with AIDS. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;158(1):157‐61.

Nelson 2004

Nelson LJ, Wells CD. Global epidemiology of childhood tuberculosis. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2004;8(5):636‐47.

NIAID 2014

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS. Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, 2014. https://rsc.tech‐res.com/docs/default‐source/safety/daids_ae_grading_table_v2_nov2014.pdf?sfvrsn=8 (accessed 03 July 2017).

Perriens 1995

Perriens JH, St Louis ME, Mukadi YB, Brown C, Prignot J, Pouthier F, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV‐infected patients in Zaire. A controlled trial of treatment for either 6 or 12 months. New England Journal of Medicine 1995;332(12):779‐84.

Puthanakit 2006

Puthanakit T, Oberdorfer P, Akarathum N, Wannarit P, Sirisanthana T, Sirianthana V. Immune reconstitution syndrome after highly active antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus‐infected Thai children. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2006;25(1):53‐8.

Rangaka 2014

Rangaka MX, Wilkinson RJ, Boulle A, Glynn JR, Fielding K, van Cutsem G, et al. Isoniazid plus antiretroviral therapy to prevent tuberculosis:a randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet 2014;384(9944):682‐90.

Ren 2008

Ren Y, Nuttall JJ, Egbers C, Eley BS, Meyers TM, Smith PJ, et al. Effect of rifampicin on lopinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV‐infected children with tuberculosis. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2008;47:566–9.

Ren 2009

Ren Y, Nuttall JJ, Egbers C, Eley BS, Meyers TM, Smith PJ, et al. Effect of rifampicin on efavirenz pharmacokinetics in HIV‐infected children with tuberculosis. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2009;50:439–43.

Review Manager 2014 [Computer program]

Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Schaaf 1998

Schaaf HS, Geidenduys A, Gie RP, Cotton MF. Culture‐positive tuberculosis in human immunodeficiency virus type‐1‐infected children. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1998;7:599‐604.

Schaaf 2005

Schaaf HS, Krook S, Hollemans DW, Warren RM, Donald PR, Hesseling AC. Recurrent culture‐confirmed tuberculosis in human immunodeficiency virus‐infected children. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2005;24(8):685‐91.

Smieja 1999

Smieja MJ, Marchettu CA, Cook DJ, Smaill FM. Isoniazid for preventing tuberculosis in non‐HIV infected persons. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001363]

Smith 2009

Smith K, Kuhn L, Coovadia A, Meyers T, Hub CC, Reitz C, et al. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome among HIV infected South African infants initiating antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2009;23(9):1097–107.

UNAIDS/WHO 2013

UNAIDS/WHO. AIDS epidemic update. September. www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/epidemiology/2013/gr2013/201309_epi_core_en.pdf (accessed 25 November 2013).

Verver 2005

Verver S, Warren RM, Beyers N, Richardson M, van der Spuy GD, Borgdorff MW, et al. Rate of reinfection tuberculosis after successful treatment is higher than rate of new tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2005;171:1430–5.

Walters 2008

Walters E, Cotton MF, Rabie H, Schaaf HS, Walters LO, Marais BJ. Clinical presentation and outcome of tuberculosis in human immunodeficiency virus infected children on anti‐retroviral therapy. BMC Pediatrics 2008;8:1.

Whalen 1995

Whalen C, Horsburgh CR, Hom D, Lahart C, Simberkoff M, Ellner J. Accelerated course of human immunodeficiency virus infection after tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1995;151:129‐35.

WHO 2010

World Health Organization. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in infants and children: towards universal access. Recommendations for a public health approach: 2010 revision. www.who.int/hiv/pub/paediatric/infants2010/en/index.html (accessed 16 November 2015).

WHO 2011

World Health Organization. Guidelines for intensified tuberculosis case‐finding and isoniazid preventive therapy for people living with HIV in resource‐constrained settings. www.whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241500708_eng.pdf (accessed 16 November 2015).

WHO 2012

World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report, 2012. apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75938/1/9789241564502_eng.pdf(accessed June 2013).

WHO 2013

World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection, 2013. www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/arv2013/download/en/ (accessed prior to 6 June 2017).

Zampoli 2007

Zampoli M, Kilborn T, Eley B. Tuberculosis during early antiretroviral‐induced immune reconstitution in HIV‐infected children. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2007;11(4):417‐23.

Zar 2001

Zar HJ, Manslo D, Tannebaum E, Klein M, Argent A, Eley B, et al. Aetiology and outcome of pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus‐infected children hospitalized in South Africa. Acta Paediatrica 2001;90(2):119‐25.

Gray 2007

Gray DM, Zar HJ, Cotton M. The impact of tuberculosis preventive therapy on tuberculosis and mortality in HIV‐infected children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006418]

Gray 2009b

Gray DM, Young T, Zar H, Cotton M. Impact of tuberculosis preventive therapy on tuberculosis and mortality in HIV‐infected children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006418.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Gray 2014

Methods

Trial design: double‐blind, randomized placebo‐controlled trial.

Follow‐up: full blood count, liver function tests, urea and electrolyte tests, percentage of CD4 cells and viral load were measured at baseline and 6‐monthly. CXR was performed at baseline, and additional CXRs were taken if clinically indicated.

Adverse events: symptoms of adverse reactions to INH were recorded at each study visit.

Participants

Number of participants: 167

Median (IQR) age at baseline: 35 months (15 to 65)

Inclusion criteria: age > 8 weeks, on ART for greater than 2 months, weight > 2.5 kg, adherence to ART of > 90%, prior history of TB treatment or prophylaxis, informed consent, resident in the area, access to transport.

Exclusion criteria: chronic diarrhoea, currently using isoniazid prophylaxis, exposure to a TB contact, history of prior isoniazid hypersensitivity, severe anaemia (haemoglobin less than 7 gm/dL), neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count less than 400 cells/µL), thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 50 000/µL), non‐reversible renal failure.

Interventions

  1. Isoniazid, 10 mg/kg/dose with a variability of 8 mg/kg to 12 mg/kg, either three times weekly or daily for a median duration of 34 months.

  2. Placebo, had an identical appearance to isoniazid tablet, received either three times weekly or daily for a median duration of 34 months.

All children were on ART and had adherence of at least 90% at baseline.

Outcomes

  1. Active TB

  2. Death

  3. Adverse events

Not included in this review

  1. Adherence to TB treatment

  2. Hospital admissions

Notes

Definitions:

‐ Definite TB: a microbiological or histological identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

‐ Probable TB: based on a combination of typical clinical symptoms and signs, tuberculin skin testing, chest radiography, a history of close TB contact, and a documented response to antimycobacterial therapy.

Country: South Africa

Prevalence of isoniazid resistance: 0%

Positive tuberculin test: 16%

Funding: The study was funded by the Medical Research Council, South Africa; the National Research Foundation, Department of Health, South Africa; and the Discovery Foundation.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomization list was created using permuted blocks, stratified by HIV infection status and balanced by study site.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Treatment groups were centrally allocated.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"Placebo had an identical appearance to INH tablets and was administered in a double blind matter".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"The chest radiographs were reported by a radiologist blinded to the prophylactic regimen to which the child was allocated. Diagnosis of TB was independently reviewed by an experienced clinician blinded to study randomisation".

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Intention‐to‐treat analysis was followed. All participants randomized were included in analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

Outcomes stated in the protocol were included in the published manuscript.

Other bias

Low risk

None suspected.

Madhi 2011

Methods

Trial design: multicentre, phase 2–3, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial.

Follow‐up: TB disease‐free survival and incidence of TB disease at 96 weeks after randomization.

Adverse events: liver enzyme tests, blood counts, clinical neurologic evaluations for peripheral neuropathy, at scheduled visits every 3 months.

Participants

Number of participants: 547

Median (IQR) age at baseline: 3 months (3 to 4)

Inclusion criteria: age of 91 to 120 days, received Bacille Calmette‐Guerin (BCG) vaccine, no history of TB in the infant, known exposure to a microbiological confirmed case of TB, or active anti‐TB treatment in the mother at the time of the infant's birth, no evidence of failure to thrive, recurrent pneumonia, chronic diarrhoea, or immunosuppressive conditions other than HIV infection.

Exclusion criteria: previous diagnosis of TB infection, previous receipt of isoniazid, contact with a known acid fast bacilli (AFB) sputum smear or culture‐positive case of TB before study entry, current acute or recurrent (3 or more prior episodes) lower respiratory tract disease, chronic persistent diarrhoea, significant drop in weight or failure to gain weight appropriately during a 2‐ to 3‐month period, contraindications for use of isoniazid or SMX/TMP, require certain medications, known or suspected immune system diseases other than HIV, current or previous diagnosis of or treatment for cancer, current immunosuppressive therapy greater than 1 mg/kg/day of prednisone or equivalent, anticipated long‐term oral or intravenous corticosteroid therapy (greater than 3 weeks), those receiving nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory agents and inhaled corticosteroids were not excluded, grade 3 or greater AST/SGOT, ALT/SGPT, ANC, haemoglobin, platelet count, rash, neuropathy, or myopathy at screening, any grade 4 clinical or laboratory toxicity within 14 days prior to study entry, other acute or chronic conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study.

Interventions

  1. Isoniazid prophylaxis, daily, at a dose of 10 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg of body weight for 96 weeks

  2. Placebo, daily for 96 weeks

At baseline, 98.7% of the children were on ART. ART mainly included stavudine, lamivudine, and lopinavir‐ritonavir or zidovudine, lamivudine, and lopinavir– ritonavir, following per country‐specific guidelines.

Outcomes

  1. Active TB

  2. Death

  3. Adverse events

Not included in this review

  1. Compliance with study drug

  2. HIV disease progression

Notes

Definitions:

‐ Definite TB: a microbiological or histological identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

‐ Probable TB: based on a combination of typical clinical symptoms and signs, tuberculin skin testing, chest radiography, a history of close TB contact, and a documented response to antimycobacterial therapy.

All infants were enrolled in the first 6 months of life. The study included HIV‐uninfected children with outcomes defined differently for this subgroup, however, analysis of HIV‐uninfected children was not included in this review. All HIV‐infected children also received trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis 5 mg/kg according to WHO guidelines.

TB disease‐free survival was defined as the first occurrence of death from any cause or TB disease, 96 weeks after randomization. HIV disease progression, was defined as the first occurrence of worsening of the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) clinical categorization of HIV infection or death.

Country: South Africa, Botswana

Prevalence of isoniazid resistance (95% CI): 26% (9 to 51)

Positive tuberculin test: not reported

Funding: The study was supported by the Statistical and Data Analysis Center at the Harvard School of Public Health, under NIAID cooperative agreements with the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (5 U01 AI41110) and the IMPAACT Group (1 U01 AI068616); NIAID and the NICHD International and Domestic Pediatric and Maternal HIV Clinical Trials Network (NICHD contract number N01‐DK‐9‐001/HHSN267200‐800001C); Secure the Future Fund, a philanthropy program sponsored by Bristol‐Myers Squibb.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Randomization list was created using permuted blocks".

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Treatment groups were centrally allocated.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants, caregivers and investigators were blinded.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"End point review committee was unaware of study‐group assignments".

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Intention‐to‐treat analysis was followed, however, its not clear if all enrolled participants were included in analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All important outcomes stated in the study protocol were reported in the published manuscript.

Other bias

Low risk

None suspected.

Zar 2007

Methods

Trial design: double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial.

Follow‐up: children underwent a tuberculin skin test and chest radiography if clinically indicated.

Adverse events: alanine transaminase were measured one and three months after randomization and thereafter six‐monthly or more frequently if clinically indicated.

Participants

Number of participants: 277

Median (IQR) age at baseline: 25 months (9 to 52)

Inclusion criteria: age > 8 weeks, weight > 2.5 kg, access to transport, informed consent, children stable on ART for two to three months.

Exclusion criteria: chronic diarrhoea, current use of or need for isoniazid prophylaxis, previous hypersensitivity to isoniazid or sulphur containing drugs, haemoglobin < 70 g/L, neutrophil count < 400 cell/uL, platelet count < 50,000 x109/L, non‐reversible renal failure.

Interventions

  1. Isoniazid: 10 mg/kg/dose with a variability of 8 mg/kg to 12 mg/kg, either daily or three times a week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for a median duration of 5.7 months.

  2. Placebo, identical in appearance to isoniazid tablets, either daily or three times a week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for a median duration of 5.7 months.

ART was not widely available. Some children obtained treatment through participation in pharmaceutical trials or charitable donations. 23 of 263 (9%) were on ART at enrolment and 58 (22%) started treatment during the trial.

Outcomes

  1. Active TB

  2. Death

  3. Adverse events

Not included in this review: none

Notes

Definitions:

‐ Definite TB: a microbiological or histological identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

‐ Probable TB: based on a combination of typical clinical symptoms and signs, tuberculin skin testing, chest radiography, a history of close TB contact, and a documented response to antimycobacterial therapy.

Cotrimoxazole (5 mg/kg/dose of the trimethoprim component): Given to all children < 12 months and those older with clinical CDC category B or C disease, in those with severe immunological impairment (CD4 count of < 15% of total lymphocyte count), or in those with previous episode of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Study was planned to run for 2 years, however, the placebo arm was terminated early on the recommendation of the data safety monitoring board on the basis of the results of interim analyses. About 30% of the children received ART during the trial with similar percentages in isoniazid and placebo groups. Adverse events were graded 1 to 4 according to the toxicity criteria of the National Institutes of Health's division of AIDS (DAIDS). Grade 3 and 4 events were reported.

Country: South Africa

Prevalence of isoniazid resistance: 0%

Positive tuberculin test: 9%

Funding: The study was supported by Rockefeller Foundation, USA.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

A variable block random list was used. Generation of allocation sequence was achieved by variable blocked randomization lists prepared by the trial statistician and sent to each trial site pharmacist in a sealed opaque envelope.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Central allocation (pharmacists labelled trial drugs with sequential numbers). The participants were allocated study numbers sequentially by the study nurse at enrolment. They were then sequentially allocated to treatment group by the pharmacist according to the prepared list.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Placebo was manufactured to have an identical appearance to isoniazid, participants and personnel were blinded to study assignment.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Investigators assessing the outcome and were blinded, the diagnosis of probable TB was subject to independent review by a blinded investigator.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Attrition rate was very low, < 20%.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcomes stated in the study protocol were the same as those in the published manuscript.

Other bias

Unclear risk

The data safety monitoring board recommended randomization into placebo to be stopped after 277 of the planned 432 were enrolled. The placebo arm was ended on 17 May 2004 on the recommendation of the data safety monitoring board on the basis of the results of interim analyses.

Abbreviations:

ALT/SGPT: Alanine aminotransferase (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase)
ANC: Absolute neutrophil count
ART: Antiretroviral therapy
AST/SGOT: Aspartate aminotransferase (serum glutamic‐oxaloacetic transaminase)
CDC: Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention
CXR: Chest x‐rays
INH: Isoniazid
SMX/TMP: Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole
TB: Tuberculosis
WHO: World Health Organization

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Frigati 2011

A cohort study.

Hesseling 2012

Secondary analysis of Madhi 2011.

Iro 2013

Commentary.

le Roux 2009

Not addressing review outcomes; secondary analysis of Zar 2007.

Le Roux 2013

Cohort study. Secondary analysis of Zar 2007.

Marais 2013

Commentary.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Active TB Show forest plot

3

737

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.50, 1.14]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART), Outcome 1 Active TB.

Comparison 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART), Outcome 1 Active TB.

2 Death Show forest plot

3

737

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.78, 2.72]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART), Outcome 2 Death.

Comparison 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART), Outcome 2 Death.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' item for each included study.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Active TB, HIV‐positive children on ART.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Active TB, HIV‐positive children on ART.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo, outcome: 1.2 Death, HIV‐positive children on ART.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo, outcome: 1.2 Death, HIV‐positive children on ART.

Comparison 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART), Outcome 1 Active TB.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART), Outcome 1 Active TB.

Comparison 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART), Outcome 2 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART), Outcome 2 Death.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Isoniazid prophylaxis compared to placebo for HIV‐positive children not on antiretroviral therapy (ART)

Isoniazid prophylaxis compared to placebo for HIV‐positive children not on antiretroviral therapy (ART)

Patient or population: HIV‐positive children not taking ART
Settings: any setting
Intervention: isoniazid prophylaxis daily or three times weekly
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comment

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Isoniazid prophylaxis

Active TB

10 per 100

3 per 100

(1 to 9)

HR 0.31

(95% CI 0.11 to 0.87)

240

(1 trial)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2,3,4,5

due to serious indirectness and imprecision

Isoniazid prophylaxis may reduce active TB

Death

17 per 100

8 per 100

(8 per 17)

HR 0.46

(95% CI 0.22 to 0.95)

240

(1 trial)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2,3,4,5

due to serious indirectness and imprecision

Isoniazid prophylaxis may reduce death

The basis for the assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; HR: hazard ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate certainty: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low certainty: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low certainty: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1No serious risk of bias: this trial was at low risk of selection bias, and adequately blinded study participants and personnel. However, the study was stopped early on the recommendation of the data safety monitoring board after only 277 of the planned 432 were enrolled. Not downgraded.
2No serious inconsistency: a single trial.
3Downgraded by 1 for serious indirectness: this single trial is from a single setting in South Africa. Broad generalization of this result to other settings is difficult given the variation in isoniazid resistance worldwide.
4Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: there were very few events in this trial and as such the finding is fragile. The original paper reports the result using a hazard ratio and the result reached standard levels of statistical significance.
5We reported the study authors' data.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Isoniazid prophylaxis compared to placebo for HIV‐positive children not on antiretroviral therapy (ART)
Summary of findings 2. Isoniazid prophylaxis compared to placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART)

Isoniazid prophylaxis compared to placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART)

Patient or population: HIV‐positive children on ART
Settings: any setting
Intervention: isoniazid prophylaxis daily or three times weekly
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Isoniazid prophylaxis

Active TB

13 per 100

9 per 100
(7 to 15)

RR 0.76
(0.50 to 1.14)

737
(3 trials)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2,3,4

due to serious indirectness and imprecision

We don't know if Isoniazid prophylaxis reduce active TB

Death

4 per 100

6 per 100
(3 to 11)

RR 1.45

(0.78 to 2.72)

737
(3 trials)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2,3,5

due to serious indirectness and imprecision

We don't know if Isoniazid prophylaxis reduce death

The basis for the assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate certainty: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low certainty: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low certainty: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1No serious risk of bias: trials were at low risk of selection bias. Both studies adequately blinded study participants and personnel.
2No serious inconsistency: statistical heterogeneity was low.
3Downgraded by 1 for serious indirectness: all trials were conducted in South Africa. Given the variation in isoniazid resistance globally it is difficult to generalize this result to all settings.
4Downgraded by 2 for serious imprecision: to confidently detect a 25% relative reduction in active TB would require a sample size of nearly 3000 participants. This meta‐analysis is therefore underpowered, and the 95% CI includes both appreciable benefit and no effect.
5Downgraded by 2 for serious imprecision: there were few events and the 95% CI includes both appreciable harm and no effect.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Isoniazid prophylaxis compared to placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART)
Table 1. Number of children with adverse events and number of adverse events (of grade 3 or higher) in HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and not on ART, by study

Number of children with adverse events

Number of adverse events

Zar 2007

Madhi 2011

Gray 2014

Children not on ART

Children on ART

Children on ART

Children on ART

Isoniazid prophylaxis group

N = 91

Placebo group

N = 91

Isoniazid prophylaxis group

N = 41

Placebo group

N = 40

Isoniazid prophylaxis group

N = 273

Placebo group

N = 274

Isoniazid prophylaxis group

N= 85

Placebo group

N = 82

Clinical adverse events

Peripheral neuropathy

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

3

2

Not reported

Not reported

Other clinical adverse events

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

14

23

1

1

Laboratory adverse events

Haematological (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia)

5

6

0

0

10

9

Not reported

Not reported

Liver enzyme abnormalities

0

2

0

0

12

12

3

1

Other laboratory adverse events

Not reported

Not reported

0

0

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Abbreviations: ART: antiretroviral therapy; N: number of participants.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Number of children with adverse events and number of adverse events (of grade 3 or higher) in HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and not on ART, by study
Table 2. Optimal information size calculations

Outcome

Assumed risk

Source

Clinically important relative reduction

Sample size required1,2

Active TB

46/366 (13%)

Analysis 1.1

25%

2990

Death

15/366 (4%)

Analysis 1.2

50%

2282

1We based all calculations on: 2‐sided tests, with a ratio of 1:1, power of 0.8, and confidence level of 0.05.
2We performed all calculations using: sealedenvelope.com/power/binary‐superiority

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Optimal information size calculations
Comparison 1. Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Active TB Show forest plot

3

737

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.50, 1.14]

2 Death Show forest plot

3

737

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.78, 2.72]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Isoniazid prophylaxis versus placebo for HIV‐positive children on antiretroviral therapy (ART)