Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Pharmakologische Interventionen zur Behandlung von Phantomschmerzen

Appendices

Appendix 1. Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) search

#1  MeSH descriptor Phantom Limb, this term only

#2  phantom or fantom

#3  MeSH descriptor Pain explode all trees

#4  pain* or discomfort* or sensation* or sore* or ache* or tender* or irritat* or feel* or syndrome*

#5  (#1 OR #2)

#6  (#3 OR #4)

#7  stump near/6 pain*

#8  (( #5 AND #6 ) OR #7)

Appendix 2. MEDLINE OVID

1 Phantom Limb/

2 (phantom or fantom).mp.

3 exp Pain/

4 (pain* or discomfort* or sensation* or sore* or ache* or tender* or irritat* or feel* or syndrome*).mp.

5 or/1‐2

6 or/3‐4

7 (stump adj6 pain*).mp.

8 (5 and 6) or 7

9. randomized controlled trial.pt.

10. controlled clinical trial.pt.

11. randomized.ab.

12. placebo.ab.

13. drug therapy.fs.

14. randomly.ab.

15. trial.ab.

16. or/9‐15

17. exp animals/ not humans.sh.

18. 16 not 17

19. 8 and 18

Key

mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word, unique identifier

Appendix 3. Embase OVID

1   Agnosia/

2   (phantom or fantom).mp.

3   exp Pain/

4   (pain* or discomfort* or sensation* or sore* or ache* or tender* or irritat* or feel* or syndrome*).mp.

5   or/1‐2

6   or/3‐4

7   (stump adj6 pain*).mp.

8   (5 and 6) or 7

9. random$.tw.

10. factorial$.tw.

11. crossover$.tw.

12. cross over$.tw.

13. cross‐over$.tw.

14. placebo$.tw.

15. (doubl$ adj blind$).tw.

16. (singl$ adj blind$).tw.

17. assign$.tw.

18. allocat$.tw.

19. volunteer$.tw.

20. Crossover Procedure/

21. double‐blind procedure.tw.

22. Randomized Controlled Trial/

23. Single Blind Procedure/

24. or/9‐23

25. (animal/ or nonhuman/) not human/

26. 24 not 25

27. 8 and 26

key:

mp=title, abstract, subject headings, heading word, drug trade name, original title, device manufacturer, drug manufacturer

Study flow diagram.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1: Memantine versus placebo, Outcome 1: Change in pain intensity

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Memantine versus placebo, Outcome 1: Change in pain intensity

Comparison 2: Gabapentin versus placebo, Outcome 1: Change in pain intensity

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Gabapentin versus placebo, Outcome 1: Change in pain intensity

Table 1. Summary of results

Author, year

Intervention

Treatment

duration

Follow‐up

Outcomes

Results

Overall direction of efficacy

Adverse events

BoNTs

BoNT/A

Wu 2012

  1. BoNT/A, 1 mL = 50 units for each injection site

  2. combi l/m, 1 mL = 0.75 mL of 1% lidocaine and 0.25 mL methylprednisolone 40 mg/mL for each painful site

1 tx episode

At 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 mos

Change in VAS, change in pressure pain tolerance

No significant change in phantom pain and pressure pain tolerance

Not described

NMDA antagonists

Memantine

Maier 2003

  1. memantine 30 mg/d; oral

  2. placebo

3 weeks

At end of

3 weeks

Pain intensity 11‐point NRS; number of participants with > 50% pain reduction; NNTB;

mood; disability; adverse events

No sig diff in change in pain level, in number of

participants with > 50% pain relief; depression scores; disability indices

in 2 grps; overall number severe events higher in

memantine grp

Vertigo,

tiredness,

headache,

nausea,

restlessness,

excitation,

cramps

Wiech 2004

  1. memantine titrated up to 30 mg/d; oral

  2. placebo

4 weeks

each

treatment

arm

At end

of 4

weeks

of each

arm

Pain intensity 0‐to‐100 VAS; MEG recording; adverse events

No sig diff in change in pain

intensity, cortical

reorganisation in both grps

Nausea,

fatigue,

dizziness,

agitation,

headaches

Schwenkreis 2003

  1. memantine titrated up to 30 mg/d; oral

  2. placebo

3 weeks

At end of

3 weeks

Pain intensity 11‐point NRS; ICI; ICF

No sig diff in pain intensity;

enhanced ICI; reduced ICF

Not

described

Dextromethorphan

Abraham 2003

  1. dextromethorphan 120 mg/d; oral

  2. dextromethorphan 180 mg/d; oral

  3. placebo

10 days

each

treatment

arm 

At end of

10 days of

each arm

Number of participants with ≥ 50% pain relief; feeling of well‐being; sedation score; adverse events

Dextromethorphan grps with ≥ 50% pain relief; with sig better feeling of well‐being scores; with sig lower sedation scores

+

None

reported

Ketamine

Nikolajsen 1996

  1. ketamine 0.5 mg/kg once, IV infusion

  2. placebo

45 min

each

treatment

arm

At end of IV infusion

Pain intensity 0‐to‐100‐millimetre VAS; adverse events; McGill; pressure pain threshold; wind‐up like pain; thermal stimulus response; temporal

summation of heat‐induced pain; reaction time

Sig dec in pain intensity; in

pain evoked by mechanical

stimulation; inc in pressure

pain threshold; no alteration in temperature sensitivity in

ketamine group

+

Insobriety,

discomfort,

elevation of

mood

Eichenberger 2008

  1. ketamine 0.4 mg/kg once, IV infusion

  2. calcitonin 200 IU, once, IV infusion

  3. combination ketamine/calcitonin, IV

  4. placebo

1 hour

each

arm

At 30, 60

mins, 48

hours after

infusion

Pain intensity; number of participants with ≥ 50% pain reduction on 10‐centimetre VAS; basal sensory assessment; adverse events

Sig dec pain intensity in

ketamine alone and combination vs placebo and calcitonin; sig inc in number of responders in ketamine alone and combination vs placebo and calcitonin; sig

inc in electrical thresholds with

combination treatment but no

change in pressure or heat thresholds

+

Loss of

conscious

ness, light

sedation,

light visual

hallucination,

hearing

impairment,

position/

feeling

impairment

Anticonvulsants

Gabapentin

Bone 2002

  1. gabapentin titrated up to 2400 mg or max tolerable dose; oral

  2. placebo

6 weeks

each arm

Weekly

and at

end of

6 weeks

Pain intensity 100‐millimetre VAS; pain intensity

difference; depression

score (HADS); function (BI); sleep (SIS); no. of rescue tabs; adverse events

Significantly greater pain

intensity diff with gabapentin at end of treatment; no sig diff in depression score, function,

sleep, no. of rescue tablets with the treatments

+a

b

Somnolence, dizziness,

headache,

nausea

Smith 2005

  1. gabapentin titrated up to 3600 mg/d; oral

  2. placebo

6 weeks

At end of 6 weeks of each

arm

Pain intensity 0‐to‐10 NRS;

depression score (CES‐D); function (FIM);

handicap (CHART);

satisfaction; global

improvement rating; pain

inventory; McGill

No sig group diff on any outcomes at end of treatment

c

Not

described

Antidepressants

Amitriptyline

Robinson 2004

  1. amitriptyline 10 mg/d titrated to max of 125 mg/d; oral

  2. benztropine mesylate 0.5 mg/d; oral

6 weeks

At end of 6 weeks

Pain intensity 0‐to‐10 NRS;

depression score (CES‐D); function (FIM); handicap (CHART); pain inventory; McGill; satisfaction

No sig group diff on any outcomes at end of treatment

Dry mouth

(more severe),

dizziness

Calcitonins

Jaeger 1992

  1. s‐calcitonin 200 IU, IV infusion

  2. saline

20‐minute

IV infusion;

once

24 hours

after

infusion

(DB);

7 to 152

days,

weekly

(open

phase)

Pain intensity 0‐to‐10 NAS in open phase/long term; number of participants with > 50%, 75% pain relief; adverse events

Sig dec in median pain intensity with s‐calcitonin at 24

hours after infusion; at 1 yr,

62% of participants with 75% pain

reduction

+

Headache,

vertigo,

nausea,

vomiting,

phantom

sensation,

drowsiness,

hot/cold

flushes

Eichenberger 2008

  1. ketamine 0.4 mg/kg, once, IV infusion

  2. calcitonin 200 IU, once, IV infusion

  3. combination ketamine/calcitonin, IV

  4. placebo

1 hour

each arm

At 30, 60

mins, 48

hours after

infusion

Pain intensity; number of

participants with ≥ 50% pain relief on 10‐centimetre VAS; basal sensory assessments; adverse effects

No sig dec in pain intensity with calcitonin vs placebo at 48 hrs; number of responders

not significantly different from

placebo

Drowsiness,

nausea,

facial

flushing,

hot/cold

flushes,

dizziness

Opioids

Morphine

Huse 2001

  1. Morphine sulfate titrated up to 300 mg/d or max tolerable dose; oral

  2. placebo

4 weeks

each arm

(DB)

End of each

treatment

phase of 4

weeks

Pain intensity 10‐centimetre VAS; number of participants with > 50% pain reduction; depression score; pain‐related self assessment scale;

WHYMPI; BSS; psycho‐

physical thresholds;

2‐point discrimination;

attentional performance;

MEG

Sig pain reduction during morphine; 42% with > 50% pain relief; 8% with 25% to 50% pain relief during morphine; no sig change in perception and

pain thresholds; significantly

lower attentional performance

during morphine; scores on pain experience scale, depression score, WHYMPI, BSS with no sig relationship with pain reduction; 2 of 3 with clear cortical reorganisation

+

Constipation only sig

adverse

effect among

others, e.g.

tiredness,

dizziness,

sweating,

micturition

difficulty,

vertigo,

itching,

respiration

Wu 2002

  1. morphine 0.2 mg/kg, IV infusion

  2. lidocaine 4 mg/kg, IV infusion

  3. placebo (diphenhydramine)

40 mins of IV

infusion

30 mins

after end of infusion

Pain relief 0‐to‐100% numeric scale; NNTB for

30% pain reduction;

satisfaction; sedation

scores; adverse events

Sig dec in phantom and stump pain intensity during IV morphine; NNTB 1.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 3.7); significantly higher satisfaction with morphine; no sig diff in sedation scores

+

Sedation

(but no sig

diff with other groups)

Local anaesthetics

Lidocaine

Wu 2002

  1. morphine 0.2 mg/kg, IV infusion

  2. lidocaine 4 mg/kg, IV infusion

  3. placebo (diphenhydramine)

40 mins

of IV

infusion

30 mins

after end of

infusion

Pain relief 0‐to‐100% numeric scale; NNTB for

30% pain reduction;

satisfaction; sedation

scores; adverse events

No sig dec in PLP vs placebo; NNTB 3.8 (95% CI 1.9 to 16.6); significantly higher satisfaction with lidocaine vs

placebo; no sig diff in sedation scores

Sedation

scores not

significantly

different

from

placebo

Bupivacaine

Casale 2009

  1. bupivacaine 2.5 mg/mL, 1mL, contralateral myofascial injection

  2. placebo (saline)

Injections

given

once

After 1

hour

Pain intensity 0‐to‐10 VAS from 0 no pain to 10 worst pain ever experienced;

pain intensity difference;

phantom sensation;

mirror displacement

in healthy limbs; adverse

effects

Sig pain relief with bupivacaine; reduction in phantom sensation in 6 of 8 participants

+

 None

BI, Barthel Index; BoNT/A, botulinum toxin A; BSS, Brief Stress Scale; CES‐D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; CHART, Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique; CI, confidence interval; combo, combination; d, day; DB, double‐blind; dec, decrease; diff, difference; dx, diagnosis; FIM, Functional Independence Measure; grp, group; grps, groups; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; ICI, intracortical inhibition; ICF, intracortical facilitation; inc, increase; IU, international units; IV, intravenous; l/m, lidocaine/methylprednisolone; max, maximum; MEG, magnetoencephalography; min, minutes; mos, months; NAS, numerical analogue scale; NNTB, number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome; NRS, numerical rating scale; PLP, phantom limb pain; sig, significant; SIS, Sleep Interference Scale; tx, treatment; VAS, visual analogue scale; WHYMPI, West Haven‐Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory; yr, year; apain intensity; bmood, sleep, function; cpain intensity, mood, function, handicap, satisfaction

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Summary of results
Comparison 1. Memantine versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Change in pain intensity Show forest plot

2

52

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.24 [‐0.31, 0.79]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Memantine versus placebo
Comparison 2. Gabapentin versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 Change in pain intensity Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.16 [‐1.94, ‐0.38]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Gabapentin versus placebo