Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing injuries in the construction industry

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006251Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 octubre 2006see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Lesiones

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2007 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Henk van der Molen

    Correspondencia a: Arbouw, Coronel Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Marika M Lehtola

    Cochrane Occupational Health FIeld, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Kuopio, Finland

  • Jorma Lappalainen

    Occupational Safety Team, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Tampere, Finland

  • Peter LT Hoonakker

    Center for Quality and Production Improvement, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, USA

  • Hongwei Hsiao

    Protective Technology Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Morgantown, USA

  • Roger Haslam

    Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK

  • Andrew R Hale

    Safety Science Group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

  • Jos H Verbeek

    Dept of Occupational Health Services Research, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Kuopio, Finland

Contributions of authors

Henk van der Molen was involved in designing and writing the protocol.

Marika Lehtola was involved in designing the search strategy, conceptualising and finalising the protocol.

Jorma Lappalainen, Peter Hoonakker, Hongwei Hsiao, Roger Haslam, Andrew Hale and Jos Verbeek commented on all drafts of the protocol.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Cochrane Occupational Health Field, Finland.

  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Finland.

  • Arbouw, Netherlands.

  • Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Centre, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Netherlands.

External sources

  • Australian Government, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, Australia.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

Merja Jauhiainen from the Cochrane Occupational Health Field provided assistance in the development of the search strategy and conducted the searching from electronic databases. Review Group Co‐ordinator Katharine Ker helped with the injury definitions and Trials Search Co‐ordinator Karen Blackhall with the development of the search strategy. Jani Ruotsalainen provided general advice on writing the protocol.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Feb 05

Interventions to prevent injuries in construction workers

Review

Henk F van der Molen, Prativa Basnet, Peter LT Hoonakker, Marika M Lehtola, Jorma Lappalainen, Monique HW Frings‐Dresen, Roger Haslam, Jos H Verbeek

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006251.pub4

2012 Dec 12

Interventions to prevent injuries in construction workers

Review

Henk F van der Molen, Marika M Lehtola, Jorma Lappalainen, Peter LT Hoonakker, Hongwei Hsiao, Roger Haslam, Andrew R Hale, Monique HW Frings‐Dresen, Jos H Verbeek

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006251.pub3

2007 Oct 17

Interventions for preventing injuries in the construction industry

Review

Henk F van der Molen, Marika M Lehtola, Jorma Lappalainen, Peter LT Hoonakker, Hongwei Hsiao, Roger Haslam, Andrew R Hale, Jos H Verbeek

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006251.pub2

2006 Oct 18

Interventions for preventing injuries in the construction industry

Protocol

Henk van der Molen, Marika M Lehtola, Jorma Lappalainen, Peter LT Hoonakker, Hongwei Hsiao, Roger Haslam, Andrew R Hale, Jos H Verbeek

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006251

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Table 1. Development of the search strategy

Preliminary searches were done in PubMed to define useful terms for the search strategy. This revealed that searches could be made sensitive but not specific enough. We developed the definitions described below.

Search terms for types of participants: working at construction sites
The search term construction is truncated as construction* according to the industry name not as construct*, since many other things can be constructed for example, vectors or plasmids in the biochemistry field. The terms "construction industry" or "construction worker" are not used in order to make the search not too specific.

Many articles mentioned the word building instead of the term construction, which is why the term building* was added as a search term.

It is possible that there are articles including neither construction nor building. This is why the most important job titles (trades) were included in the search strategy used in the study by Koningsveld and Van der Molen (Koningsveld 1997). In addition we added the following job titles that appeared many times in the articles found in the preliminary searches: laborer/labourer and contractor.

The terms construction, building and job titles like carpenter are also used for other purposes such as a surname or in a company or street name (location), and that is why the search words concerning the population are followed by a search tag [tiab] (title abstract) or [tw] (text word).

Search terms for outcome: injury
The primary outcome in the search strategy was defined as an injury and the term is truncated as injur* to make it sensitive enough.

Also the terms accident and safety were taken into account. Accident was truncated as accident* to make it sensitive enough.

Search terms for interventions
Intervention in the search strategy was defined as any kind of intervention related to safety management, risk management or accident prevention applied to decrease the rate or severity of injuries. Terms resembling these kinds of interventions were selected for this part of the search strategy.

Search terms for study design
For study design, two search strategies were used to find (cluster) randomized controlled trials and prospective non‐randomized controlled trials or interrupted time series; for the discussion section the last strategy, search #7, will also be used to find before‐after studies and case‐reference studies. For randomized controlled trials we will use the strategy described by Robinson and Dickersin (Robinson 2002) and for non‐randomised studies the strategy described by Verbeek et al. (Verbeek 2005).

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Development of the search strategy