Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Colecistectomía para pacientes con cálculos biliares silenciosos

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006230.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 24 enero 2007see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Hepatobiliar

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

    Correspondencia a: University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital and University College School of Medicine, London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Kumarakrishnan Samraj

    Department of General Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Contributions of authors

KS Gurusamy prepared the review and assessed the trials for inclusion. K Samraj is the co‐author of the protocol and independently assessed the trials for inclusion and contributed to the discussion.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • none, Not specified.

External sources

  • none, Not specified.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

(1) To Martyn Parker, author of more than 15 Cochrane reviews, who inspired me to write Cochrane reviews.
(2) To Brian Davidson who encourages and supports me in the preparation of Cochrane reviews.
(3) To The Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group for the support that they have provided.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2007 Jan 24

Cholecystectomy for patients with silent gallstones

Review

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Kumarakrishnan Samraj

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006230.pub2

2006 Oct 18

Cholecystectomy versus no cholecystectomy in patients with silent gall stones

Protocol

Kurinchi S Gurusamy, Kumarakrishnan Samraj

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006230

Differences between protocol and review

Differences between the protocol and the updated review (Issue 1 2009)

We updated the components for assessing the risk of bias of the trials in line with the recommendations of the updated Cochrane Handbook in 2008. We included two additional secondary outcomes:
‐ other morbidity such as wound infection, intra‐abdominal collections requiring drainage, infected intra‐abdominal collections
and
‐ number of workdays lost (because of surgery or because of symptoms).