Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Češnjak za prehladu

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006206.pub4Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 11 noviembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Infecciones respiratorias agudas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Elizabeth Lissiman

    Correspondencia a: Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Alice L Bhasale

    Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare, Sydney, Australia

  • Marc Cohen

    School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia

Contributions of authors

Alice Bhasale (AB) and Elizabeth Lissiman (EL) were responsible for searching for studies, data extraction and analysis and writing and editing the review.
Marc Cohen (MC) provided expert advice and guidance on the final drafts of the review.

Declarations of interest

Elizabeth Lissiman: none known.
Alice Bhasale: support was received for professional development to learn Cochrane methodology, but not to conduct this particular review.
Marc Cohen: none known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Liz Dooley (ARI Group Managing Editor), Ruth Foxlee (former ARI Group Trials Search Co‐ordinator) and Sarah Thorning (current ARI Group Trials Search Co‐ordinator) for their guidance and support. The authors also wish to thank the following people for commenting on the draft protocol: Claire Allen, Leonard Bielory, Theresa Capriotti, Rick Shoemaker and Antonio Cunha and on the draft review: Max Pittler, Yuri Clement, Margarita Corry, Mark Jones and Paul Little. Peter Josling, Abed Burgos Arias and Susan Percival assisted the review authors by providing additional information about their studies. Finally, we wish to thank Oleg Borisenko for his help with translating Russian language articles and Ludovic Reveiz and Elaine Beller for their expertise in translating the Spanish trial.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Nov 11

Garlic for the common cold

Review

Elizabeth Lissiman, Alice L Bhasale, Marc Cohen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006206.pub4

2012 Mar 14

Garlic for the common cold

Review

Elizabeth Lissiman, Alice L Bhasale, Marc Cohen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006206.pub3

2009 Jul 08

Garlic for the common cold

Review

Elizabeth Lissiman, Alice L Bhasale, Marc Cohen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006206.pub2

2006 Oct 18

Garlic for the common cold

Protocol

Alice L Bhasale, Elizabeth Lissiman

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006206

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.