Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tratamiento con metformina antes y durante la FIV o la ICSI en pacientes con síndrome de ovario poliquístico

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006105.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 noviembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Ginecología y fertilidad

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Leopoldo O Tso

    Correspondencia a: Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    [email protected]

  • Michael F Costello

    Division of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Women's & Children's Health, Royal Hospital for Women and IVF Australia, Sydney, Australia

  • Luiz Eduardo T Albuquerque

    Human Reproduction Center, Fertivitro Centro de Reprodução Humana, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Régis B Andriolo

    Department of Public Health, Universidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Brazil

  • Cristiane R Macedo

    Brazilian Cochrane Centre, Centro de Estudos de Saúde Baseada em Evidências e Avaliação Tecnológica em Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil

Contributions of authors

For the present update of this review:

  • CRM: revised and updated the review.

  • LT: revised and updated the review.

  • MFC: revised and updated the review.

  • LA: revised and updated the review.

  • RA: revised and updated the review.

For the protocol and review.

  • LA: initiated and conceptualised the protocol and the initial version of the review.

  • RA: initiated and conceptualised the protocol and the initial version of the review.

  • MFC: contributed to the protocol and the initial version of the review.

  • VF: contributed to the protocol and the initial version of the review.

  • LT: contributed to the protocol and the initial version of the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP/EPM), Brazil.

External sources

  • Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UK.

  • School of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Hospital for Women, Australia.

Declarations of interest

Review author Dr Michael Costello is a member of the pharmaceutical company Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) Australia Elonva Advisory Board Committee. He has received funding to attend ART Scientific Meetings including to present papers not on the review topic. These relationships are declared in the interests of transparency and do not constitute a conflict of interest in this review.

Acknowledgements

The review authors wish to express their gratitude to the Brazilian Cochrane Centre and the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group, especially to Ms Helen Nagels and to Marian Showell, for their thoughtful comments and suggestions and for their continued support in developing and updating this systematic review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Dec 21

Metformin treatment before and during IVF or ICSI in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Review

Leopoldo O Tso, Michael F Costello, Luiz Eduardo T Albuquerque, Regis B Andriolo, Cristiane R Macedo

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006105.pub4

2014 Nov 18

Metformin treatment before and during IVF or ICSI in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Review

Leopoldo O Tso, Michael F Costello, Luiz Eduardo T Albuquerque, Régis B Andriolo, Cristiane R Macedo

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006105.pub3

2009 Apr 15

Metformin treatment before and during IVF or ICSI in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Review

L O Tso, Michael F Costello, Régis B Andriolo, Vilmon Freitas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006105.pub2

2006 Jul 19

Metformin treatment before and during IVF/ICSI in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome

Protocol

Leopoldo de Oliveira Tso, Michael F Costello, Luiz Eduardo Albuquerque, Régis B Andriolo, Vilmon Freitas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006105

Differences between protocol and review

The following outcomes were in the original protocol and have since been removed: clinical pregnancy rate (per transfer), pregnancy rate (per transfer and per woman), number of follicles and embryo quality (Methods; Types of outcome measures). Absolute risk was calculated for the primary outcomes.

After the publication of the protocol we decided to stratify the main analysis by type of stimulation protocol used (long GnRH‐agonist or short GnRH‐antagonist), in order to determine whether the type of stimulation used had an influence on the outcomes.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.1 Live birth rate per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.1 Live birth rate per woman.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.2 Clinical pregnancy rate per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.2 Clinical pregnancy rate per woman.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.3 Incidence of OHSS per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, outcome: 1.3 Incidence of OHSS per woman.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Live birth rate per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Live birth rate per woman.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Clinical pregnancy rate per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Clinical pregnancy rate per woman.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 Incidence of OHSS per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 Incidence of OHSS per woman.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Miscarriage rate per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Miscarriage rate per woman.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 Side effects per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 Side effects per woman.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Number of oocytes retrieved per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Number of oocytes retrieved per woman.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Mean total dose of FSH (IU) per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Mean total dose of FSH (IU) per woman.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Mean days of gonadotrophin per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Mean days of gonadotrophin per woman.

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9 Cycle cancellation rate (after ovulation induction).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9 Cycle cancellation rate (after ovulation induction).

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 10 Serum oestradiol level (nmol/ l) per woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 10 Serum oestradiol level (nmol/ l) per woman.

Study

Results

Metformin

Placebo

Onalan 2005

No significant differences in total testosterone measures from women treated with placebo (P = 0.646)

Median 3.1; range 2.5 to 3.9

Median 3.1; range 2.4 to 3

Tang 2006

Testosterone levels did not change significantly in the group taking metformin (P = 0.892); however, participants in the placebo group had a significant increase in testosterone levels (P = 0.040). In the metformin group, on the day of hCG administration, there was a significant decrease in testosterone concentration (P = 0.029) and in the free‐androgen index (P = 0.004)

Baseline geometric mean: 2.03 nmol/l, geometric mean on the day of hCG administration: 1.97 nmol/l. Testosterone concentration (geometric mean: 1.96 nmol/l). Free‐androgen index (geometric mean: 2.43)

Baseline geometric mean: 2.06 nmol/l, geometric mean on the day of hCG administration: 2.52 nmol/l. Testosterone concentration (geometric mean: 2.52 nmol/l). Free‐androgen index (geometric mean: 3.34)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 11 Mean or median serum androgen levels per woman.

Study

Results

Metformin

Placebo

Onalan 2005

There were no significant changes in the glucose/insulin ratio between groups (P = 0.81)

Median 6; range 2.4 to 8.8

Median 6; range 3 to 10

Tang 2006

There were no significant changes in the insulin sensitivity test (QUICKI) between baseline and the day of oocyte retrieval in the metformin group (P = 0.200) and the placebo group (P = 0.572).

Baseline: 0.377

At the day of oocyte retrieval: 0.417

Baseline: 0.386

At the day of oocyte retrieval: 0.400

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Metformin versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 12 Mean or median fasting insulin and glucose levels per woman.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Metformin treatment before and during IVF or ICSI for women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Metformin treatment before or during IVF or ICSI for women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Population: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Settings: Assisted reproduction
Intervention: Metformin treatment before or during IVF or ICSI

Control: Placebo or no treatment

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo or no treatment

Metformin treatment

Live birth rate (per woman) ‐ ITT
Delivery of one or more living infants/pregnancy beyond 20 weeks of gestation.

320 per 1000

395 per 1000

(276 to 530)

OR 1.39
(0.81 to 2.40)

551
(5 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2,4

Clinical pregnancy rate (per woman) ‐ ITT
Identified by the presence of a gestational sac on ultrasonography

307 per 1000

403 per 1000
(322 to 488)

OR 1.52
(1.07 to 2.15)

775
(8 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2,4

Incidence of OHSS

270 per 1000

97 per 1000
(62 to 153)

OR 0.29
(0.18 to 0.49)

798
(8 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Miscarriage rate (per woman)

139 per 1000

110 per 1000
(65 to 182)

OR 0.76
(0.43 to 1.37)

521
(6 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Side effects

106 per 1000

347 per 1000
(182 to 559)

OR 4.49
(1.88 to 10.72)

431
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,3

*The basis for the assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Inconsistency: unexplained heterogeneity (I2 = 52%)

2 Imprecision: total number of events is fewer than 300

3Inconsistency: unexplained heterogeneity (I2 = 57%)

4There was a data discrepancy in one of these studies (Palombo 2011). According to the study publication, in both the metformin group and the placebo group the clinical pregnancy rate was lower than the live birth rate. Sensitivity analyses excluding this study yielded an OR of 1.48 (95% CI 0.72 to 3.02) for live birth and 1.61 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.40) for pregnancy, which did not substantially change our findings.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Metformin treatment before and during IVF or ICSI for women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Comparison 1. Metformin versus placebo or no treatment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Live birth rate per woman Show forest plot

5

551

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.81, 2.40]

1.1 Long protocol GnRH agonist

5

551

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.81, 2.40]

2 Clinical pregnancy rate per woman Show forest plot

8

775

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.52 [1.07, 2.15]

2.1 Long protocol GnRH agonist

8

775

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.52 [1.07, 2.15]

3 Incidence of OHSS per woman Show forest plot

8

798

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.18, 0.49]

3.1 Long protocol GnRH agonist

7

758

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.16, 0.51]

3.2 Short protocol GnRH antagonist

1

40

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.03, 3.15]

4 Miscarriage rate per woman Show forest plot

6

521

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.43, 1.37]

4.1 Long protocol GnRH agonist

6

521

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.43, 1.37]

5 Side effects per woman Show forest plot

4

431

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.88, 10.72]

5.1 Long protocol GnRH agonist

4

431

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.49 [1.88, 10.72]

6 Number of oocytes retrieved per woman Show forest plot

8

635

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.76 [‐2.02, 0.50]

6.1 Long protocol with GnRH agonist

7

595

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.67 [‐2.12, 0.79]

6.2 Short protocol with GnRH antagonist

1

40

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.0 [‐3.95, 1.95]

7 Mean total dose of FSH (IU) per woman Show forest plot

8

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Long protocol with GnRH agonist

7

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Short protocol with GnRH antagonist

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Mean days of gonadotrophin per woman Show forest plot

8

643

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.19 [‐0.77, 0.40]

8.1 Long protocol with GnRH agonist

7

603

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐0.89, 0.45]

8.2 Short protocol with GnRH antagonist

1

40

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐1.30, 1.30]

9 Cycle cancellation rate (after ovulation induction) Show forest plot

6

624

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.32, 1.28]

9.1 Long protocol with GnRH agonist

5

584

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.31, 1.45]

9.2 Short protocol with GnRH antagonist

1

40

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.03, 3.15]

10 Serum oestradiol level (nmol/ l) per woman Show forest plot

5

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Long protocol with GnRH agonist

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Short protocol with GnRH antagonist

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Mean or median serum androgen levels per woman Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

12 Mean or median fasting insulin and glucose levels per woman Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Metformin versus placebo or no treatment