Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

مداخلات برای پیشگیری یا درمان خونریزی شدید قاعدگی یا درد مرتبط با استفاده از دستگاه داخل‐رحمی

Appendices

Appendix 1. Search strategies, 2020 update

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Ovid EBM Reviews) January 2020

1 (IUB or IUBs or IUC or IUCs or IUD or IUDs or IUCD or IUCDs or IUS or IUSs or CuIUB or Cu‐IUB or CuIUBs or Cu‐IUBs or CuIUD or Cu‐IUD or CuIUDs or Cu‐IUDs or CuIUC or Cu‐IUC or CuIUCs or Cu‐IUCs or CuIUCD or Cu‐IUCD or CuIUDs or Cu‐IUDs or CuIUS or Cu‐IUS or CuIUSs or Cu‐IUSs or LNGIUC or LNGIUCs or LNGIUCD or LNGIUCDs or LNGIUD or LNGIUDs or LNGIUS or LNGIUSs or PPIUC or PPIUCs or PPIUCD or PPIUCDs or PPIUD or PPIUDs or PPIUS or PPIUSs).ti. (488)

2 ((intrauterine or intra‐uterine) adj3 (ball or balls or coil or coils or contraceptive or contraception or device or devices or system or systems)).ti. (878)

3 (Jaydess or Kyleena or Liletta or Mirena or Skyla or Copper‐T or CuSafe or Cu‐Safe or Cu375 or Cu‐375 or CuT380* or Cu‐T380* or FlexiT or Flexi‐T or Gyne or Gynefix or Gyneplus or IUB* or Liberte or "Lippes Loop" or Load‐375 or MLCu* or Mini‐TT or MiniTT or Mona Lisa or Multiload or Multi‐load or MultiSafe or Multi‐Safe or MYCu or NeoSafe or Neo‐Safe or NovaT or Nova‐T or Paragard or TCu or TSafe or T‐Safe or T380* or T‐380* or TT380* or TT‐380* or UT380 or UT‐380).ti. (316)

4 or/1‐3 (1372)

5 (analges* or antagonist* or "pain control" or "pain relief" or "pain reliever" or "pain relievers" or NSAID or NSAIDs or tenaculum or ((nonsteroidal or non‐steroidal) adj1 (antiinflammatory or anti‐inflammatory)) or adapalene or alclofenac or ampyrone or antipyrine or apazone or arylpropionic or aspirin or "acetylsalicylic‐acid" or baofuxin or benzydamine or bufexamac or celecoxib or clofazimine or clonixin or "Cox 2" or curcumin or cyclooxygenase or cyclo‐oxygenase or desmopressin or dapsone or diclofenac or diflunisal or dipyrone or epirizole or etanercept or etodolac or etoricoxib or fenamate* or fenoprofen or feprazone or flurbiprofen or flufenamic or glycyrrhizic or ibuprofen or indomethacin or indoprofen or inhibit* or ketoprofen or ketorolac or lumiracoxib$ or masoprocol or meclofenamic or mefenamic or meloxicam or mesalamine or nabumetone or naprosyn or naproxen or niflumic or norpregnadienes or olopatadine hydrochloride or oxaprozin or oxyphenbutazone or paracetamol or parecoxib$ or pentosan or phenylbutazone or piroxicam or prenazone or prophylaxis or prophylactic or prostaglandin or rofecoxib$ or salicylate* or sulfasalazine or sulphonanilide$ or sulindac or suprofen or thiamine or tolfenamic or tolmetin or tranexam?c or trasylol or valdecoxib$).ti,ab. (241691)

6 and/4‐5 (245)

7 6 not ("animal model" or "animal models" or bovine or canine or capra or cat or cats or cattle or cow or cows or dog or dogs or equine or feline or goat or goats or horse or mice or mouse or ovine or pig or pigs or porcine or rabbit or rabbits or rat or rats or rattus or sheep or sow or sows).ti. (244)

MEDLINE ALL (Ovid) 1946 to 20 February 2020

1 Intrauterine Devices/ or Intrauterine Devices, Medicated/ or Intrauterine Devices, Copper/ (11362)
2 (IUB or IUBs or IUC or IUCs or IUD or IUDs or IUCD or IUCDs or IUS or IUSs or CuIUB or Cu‐IUB or CuIUBs or Cu‐IUBs or CuIUD or Cu‐IUD or CuIUDs or Cu‐IUDs or CuIUC or Cu‐IUC or CuIUCs or Cu‐IUCs or CuIUCD or Cu‐IUCD or CuIUDs or Cu‐IUDs or CuIUS or Cu‐IUS or CuIUSs or Cu‐IUSs or LNGIUC or LNGIUCs or LNGIUCD or LNGIUCDs or LNGIUD or LNGIUDs or LNGIUS or LNGIUSs or PPIUC or PPIUCs or PPIUCD or PPIUCDs or PPIUD or PPIUDs or PPIUS or PPIUSs).ti,ab,kf. (10663)
3 ((intrauterine or intra‐uterine) adj3 (ball or balls or coil or coils or contraceptive or contraception or device or devices or system or systems)).ti,ab,kf. (9192)
4 (Jaydess or Kyleena or Liletta or Mirena or Skyla or Copper‐T or CuSafe or Cu‐Safe or Cu375 or Cu‐375 or CuT380* or Cu‐T380* or FlexiT or Flexi‐T or Gyne or Gynefix or Gyneplus or IUB* or Liberte or "Lippes Loop" or Load‐375 or MLCu* or Mini‐TT or MiniTT or Mona Lisa or Multiload or Multi‐load or MultiSafe or Multi‐Safe or MYCu or NeoSafe or Neo‐Safe or NovaT or Nova‐T or Paragard or TCu or TSafe or T‐Safe or T380* or T‐380* or TT380* or TT‐380* or UT380 or UT‐380).ti,ab,kf. (3496)
5 or/1‐4 (18799)
6 Anti‐Inflammatory Agents, Non‐Steroidal/ or Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/ or Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/ or "4,5‐Dihydro‐1‐(3‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐amine"/ or Adapalene/ or Adapalene, Benzoyl Peroxide Drug Combination/ or Ampyrone/ or Antipyrine/ or Apazone/ or Aspirin/ or Bufexamac/ or Celecoxib/ or Clonixin/ or Curcumin/ or Diclofenac/ or Diflunisal/ or Dipyrone/ or Epirizole/ or Etanercept/ or Etodolac/ or Etoricoxib/ or Fenoprofen/ or Feprazone/ or Flurbiprofen/ or Ibuprofen/ or Indomethacin/ or Indoprofen/ or Ketoprofen/ or Ketorolac/ or Ketorolac Tromethamine/ or Masoprocol/ or Meclofenamic Acid/ or Mefenamic Acid/ or Meloxicam/ or Mesalamine/ or Nabumetone/ or Naproxen/ or Niflumic Acid/ or Olopatadine Hydrochloride/ or Oxaprozin/ or Oxyphenbutazone/ or Phenylbutazone/ or Piroxicam/ or Prostaglandin Antagonists/ or Salicylates/ or Sodium Salicylate/ or Sulfasalazine/ or Sulindac/ or Suprofen/ or Thiamine/ or Tolmetin/ or Tranexamic Acid/ (209751)
7 (analges* or antagonist* or "pain control" or "pain relief" or "pain reliever" or "pain relievers" or NSAID or NSAIDs or ((nonsteroidal or non‐steroidal) adj1 (antiinflammatory or anti‐inflammatory)) or adapalene or alclofenac or ampyrone or antipyrine or apazone or arylpropionic or aspirin or "acetylsalicylic‐acid" or baofuxin or benzydamine or bufexamac or celecoxib or clofazimine or clonixin or "Cox 2" or curcumin or cyclooxygenase or cyclo‐oxygenase or desmopressin or dapsone or diclofenac or diflunisal or dipyrone or epirizole or etanercept or etodolac or etoricoxib or fenamate* or fenoprofen or feprazone or flurbiprofen or flufenamic or glycyrrhizic or ibuprofen or indomethacin or indoprofen or inhibit* or ketoprofen or ketorolac or lumiracoxib$ or masoprocol or meclofenamic or mefenamic or meloxicam or mesalamine or nabumetone or naprosyn or naproxen or niflumic or norpregnadienes or olopatadine hydrochloride or oxaprozin or oxyphenbutazone or paracetamol or parecoxib$ or pentosan or phenylbutazone or piroxicam or prenazone or prophylaxis or prophylactic or prostaglandin or rofecoxib$ or salicylate* or sulfasalazine or sulphonanilide$ or sulindac or suprofen or thiamine or tolfenamic or tolmetin or tranexam?c or trasylol or valdecoxib$).ti,ab,kf,rn. (3018163)
8 or/6‐7 (3031564)
9 (controlled clinical trial or randomized controlled trial or comparative study).pt. (2276529)
10 (blind or blinded or control* or groups or placebo or random* or trial).ti,ab,oa. (5763664)
11 (meta‐analysis or systematic review).pt. (182738)
12 (meta‐analy* or metaanaly* or ((evidence or systematic) adj2 (review or synthesis))).ti,kf. (188827)
13 or/9‐12 (7143280)
14 13 not ((exp Animals/ not Humans/) or ("animal model" or "animal models" or bovine or canine or capra or cat or cats or cattle or cow or cows or dog or dogs or equine or feline or goat or goats or horse or mice or mouse or ovine or pig or pigs or porcine or rabbit or rabbits or rat or rats or rattus or sheep or sow or sows).ti.) (5647953)
15 and/5,8,14 (537)

Embase.com

#1 'intrauterine contraceptive device'/de OR 'levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system'/exp OR 'copper intrauterine device'/exp OR 'multiload copper intrauterine device'/exp (19,888)

#2 iub:ti,ab,kw OR iubs:ti,ab,kw OR iuc:ti,ab,kw OR iucs:ti,ab,kw OR iud:ti,ab,kw OR iuds:ti,ab,kw OR iucd:ti,ab,kw OR iucds:ti,ab,kw OR ius:ti,ab,kw OR iuss:ti,ab,kw OR cuiub:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu iub':ti,ab,kw OR cuiubs:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu iubs':ti,ab,kw OR cuiud:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu iud':ti,ab,kw OR cuiuc:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu iuc':ti,ab,kw OR cuiucs:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu iucs':ti,ab,kw OR cuiucd:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu iucd':ti,ab,kw OR cuiuds:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu iuds':ti,ab,kw OR cuius:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu ius':ti,ab,kw OR cuiuss:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu iuss':ti,ab,kw OR lngiuc:ti,ab,kw OR lngiucs:ti,ab,kw OR lngiucd:ti,ab,kw OR lngiucds:ti,ab,kw OR lngiud:ti,ab,kw OR lngiuds:ti,ab,kw OR lngius:ti,ab,kw OR lngiuss:ti,ab,kw OR ppiuc:ti,ab,kw OR ppiucs:ti,ab,kw OR ppiucd:ti,ab,kw OR ppiucds:ti,ab,kw OR ppiud:ti,ab,kw OR ppiuds:ti,ab,kw OR ppius:ti,ab,kw OR ppiuss:ti,ab,kw (11,890)

#3 ((intrauterine OR 'intra uterine') NEAR/3 (ball OR balls OR coil OR coils OR contraceptive OR contraception OR device OR devices OR system OR systems)):ti,ab,kw (12,449)

#4 jaydess:ti,ab,kw OR kyleena:ti,ab,kw OR liletta:ti,ab,kw OR mirena:ti,ab,kw OR skyla:ti,ab,kw OR 'copper t':ti,ab,kw OR cusafe:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu safe':ti,ab,kw OR cu375:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu 375':ti,ab,kw OR cut380*:ti,ab,kw OR 'cu t380*':ti,ab,kw OR flexit:ti,ab,kw OR 'flexi t':ti,ab,kw OR gyne:ti,ab,kw OR gynefix:ti,ab,kw OR gyneplus:ti,ab,kw OR iub*:ti,ab,kw OR liberte:ti,ab,kw OR 'lippes loop':ti,ab,kw OR 'load 375':ti,ab,kw OR mlcu*:ti,ab,kw OR 'mini tt':ti,ab,kw OR minitt:ti,ab,kw OR 'mona lisa':ti,ab,kw OR multiload:ti,ab,kw OR 'multi load':ti,ab,kw OR multisafe:ti,ab,kw OR 'multi safe':ti,ab,kw OR mycu:ti,ab,kw OR neosafe:ti,ab,kw OR 'neo safe':ti,ab,kw OR novat:ti,ab,kw OR 'nova t':ti,ab,kw OR paragard:ti,ab,kw OR tcu:ti,ab,kw OR tsafe:ti,ab,kw OR 't safe':ti,ab,kw OR t380*:ti,ab,kw OR 't 380*':ti,ab,kw OR tt380*:ti,ab,kw OR 'tt 380*':ti,ab,kw OR ut380:ti,ab,kw OR 'ut 380':ti,ab,kw (5,404)

#5 #1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4 (27,836)

#6 'nonsteroid antiinflammatory agent'/exp OR 'prostaglandin receptor blocking agent'/exp OR '3 amino 1 (3 trifluoromethylphenyl) 2 pyrazoline'/de OR 'adapalene'/de OR 'adapalene plus benzoyl peroxide'/de OR '4 aminophenazone'/de OR 'phenazone'/de OR 'azapropazone'/de OR 'curcumin'/de OR 'dipyrone'/de OR 'etanercept'/de OR 'indometacin'/de OR 'ketorolac trometamol'/de OR 'nordihydroguaiaretic acid'/de OR 'mesalazine'/de OR 'olopatadine'/de OR 'salicylic acid derivative'/exp OR 'salazosulfapyridine'/de OR 'tranexamic acid'/de (841,263)

#7 analges*:ti,ab,kw OR antagonist*:ti,ab,kw OR 'pain control':ti,ab,kw OR 'pain relief':ti,ab,kw OR 'pain reliever':ti,ab,kw OR 'pain relievers':ti,ab,kw OR nsaid:ti,ab,kw OR nsaids:ti,ab,kw OR (((nonsteroidal OR 'non steroidal') NEAR/1 (antiinflammatory OR 'anti inflammatory')):ti,ab,kw) OR adapalene:ti,ab,kw OR alclofenac:ti,ab,kw OR ampyrone:ti,ab,kw OR antipyrine:ti,ab,kw OR apazone:ti,ab,kw OR arylpropionic:ti,ab,kw OR aspirin:ti,ab,kw OR 'acetylsalicylic‐acid':ti,ab,kw OR baofuxin:ti,ab,kw OR benzydamine:ti,ab,kw OR bufexamac:ti,ab,kw OR celecoxib:ti,ab,kw OR clofazimine:ti,ab,kw OR clonixin:ti,ab,kw OR 'cox 2':ti,ab,kw OR curcumin:ti,ab,kw OR cyclooxygenase:ti,ab,kw OR 'cyclo oxygenase':ti,ab,kw OR desmopressin:ti,ab,kw OR dapsone:ti,ab,kw OR diclofenac:ti,ab,kw OR diflunisal:ti,ab,kw OR dipyrone:ti,ab,kw OR epirizole:ti,ab,kw OR etanercept:ti,ab,kw OR etodolac:ti,ab,kw OR etoricoxib:ti,ab,kw OR fenamate*:ti,ab,kw OR fenoprofen:ti,ab,kw OR feprazone:ti,ab,kw OR flurbiprofen:ti,ab,kw OR flufenamic:ti,ab,kw OR glycyrrhizic:ti,ab,kw OR ibuprofen:ti,ab,kw OR indomethacin:ti,ab,kw OR indoprofen:ti,ab,kw OR inhibit*:ti,ab,kw OR ketoprofen:ti,ab,kw OR ketorolac:ti,ab,kw OR lumiracoxib?:ti,ab,kw OR masoprocol:ti,ab,kw OR meclofenamic:ti,ab,kw OR mefenamic:ti,ab,kw OR meloxicam:ti,ab,kw OR mesalamine:ti,ab,kw OR nabumetone:ti,ab,kw OR naprosyn:ti,ab,kw OR naproxen:ti,ab,kw OR niflumic:ti,ab,kw OR norpregnadienes:ti,ab,kw OR 'olopatadine hydrochloride':ti,ab,kw OR oxaprozin:ti,ab,kw OR oxyphenbutazone:ti,ab,kw OR paracetamol:ti,ab,kw OR parecoxib?:ti,ab,kw OR pentosan:ti,ab,kw OR phenylbutazone:ti,ab,kw OR piroxicam:ti,ab,kw OR prenazone:ti,ab,kw OR prophylaxis:ti,ab,kw OR prophylactic:ti,ab,kw OR prostaglandin?:ti,ab,kw OR rofecoxib?:ti,ab,kw OR salicylate*:ti,ab,kw OR sulfasalazine:ti,ab,kw OR sulphonanilide*:ti,ab,kw OR sulindac:ti,ab,kw OR suprofen:ti,ab,kw OR thiamine:ti,ab,kw OR tolfenamic:ti,ab,kw OR tolmetin:ti,ab,kw OR tranexam?c:ti,ab,kw OR trasylol:ti,ab,kw OR valdecoxib*:ti,ab,kw (3,769,595)

#8 #6 OR #7 (4,236,328)

#9 'crossover procedure':de OR 'double‐blind procedure':de OR 'randomized controlled trial':de OR 'single‐blind procedure':de OR random*:de,ab,ti OR factorial*:de,ab,ti OR crossover*:de,ab,ti OR ((cross NEXT/1 over*):de,ab,ti) OR placebo*:de,ab,ti OR ((doubl* NEAR/1 blind*):de,ab,ti) OR ((singl* NEAR/1 blind*):de,ab,ti) OR assign*:de,ab,ti OR allocat*:de,ab,ti OR volunteer*:de,ab,ti (2,541,220)

#10 'meta analysis'/de OR 'network meta‐analysis'/de OR 'systematic review'/de (326,469)

#11 'meta analy*':ti OR metaanaly*:ti OR (((evidence OR systematic) NEAR/2 (review OR synthesis)):ti) OR 'meta analy*':kw OR metaanaly*:kw OR (((evidence OR systematic) NEAR/2 (review OR synthesis)):kw) (236,552)

#12 #9 OR #10 OR #11 (2,758,267)

#13 #5 AND #8 AND #12 (574)

#14 #13 NOT ('animal model':ti OR 'animal models':ti OR bovine:ti OR canine:ti OR capra:ti OR cat:ti OR cats:ti OR cattle:ti OR cow:ti OR cows:ti OR dog:ti OR dogs:ti OR equine:ti OR feline:ti OR goat:ti OR goats:ti OR horse:ti OR mice:ti OR mouse:ti OR ovine:ti OR pig:ti OR pigs:ti OR porcine:ti OR rabbit:ti OR rabbits:ti OR rat:ti OR rats:ti OR rattus:ti OR sheep:ti OR sow:ti OR sows:ti) (563)

Scopus

( ( ( TITLE ( iub OR iubs OR iuc OR iucs OR iud OR iuds OR iucd OR iucds OR ius OR iuss OR cuiub OR cu‐iub OR cuiubs OR cu‐iubs OR cuiud OR cu‐iud OR cuiuds OR cu‐iuds OR cuiuc OR cu‐iuc OR cuiucs OR cu‐iucs OR cuiucd OR cu‐iucd OR cuiuds OR cu‐iuds ) OR TITLE ( cuius OR cu‐ius OR cuiuss OR cu‐iuss OR lngiuc OR lngiucs OR lngiucd OR lngiucds OR lngiud OR lngiuds OR lngius OR lngiuss OR ppiuc OR ppiucs OR ppiucd OR ppiucds OR ppiud OR ppiuds OR ppius OR ppiuss ) OR TITLE ( ( ( intrauterine OR intra‐uterine ) PRE/3 ( ball OR balls OR coil OR coils OR contraceptive OR contraception OR device OR devices OR system OR systems ) ) ) OR TITLE ( jaydess OR kyleena OR liletta OR mirena OR skyla OR copper‐t OR cusafe OR cu‐safe OR cu375 OR cu‐375 OR cut380* OR cu‐t380* OR flexit OR flexi‐t OR gyne OR gynefix OR gyneplus OR iub* OR liberte OR "Lippes Loop" OR load‐375 ) OR TITLE ( mlcu* OR mini‐tt OR minitt OR "Mona Lisa" OR multiload OR multi‐load OR multisafe OR multi‐safe OR mycu OR neosafe OR neo‐safe OR novat OR nova‐t OR paragard OR tcu OR tsafe OR t‐safe OR t380* OR t‐380* OR tt380* OR tt‐380* OR ut380 OR ut‐380 ) ) ) AND ( ( TITLE‐ABS‐KEY ( analges* OR antagonist* OR "pain control" OR "pain relief" OR "pain reliever" OR "pain relievers" OR nsaid OR nsaids OR ( ( nonsteroidal OR non‐steroidal ) PRE/1 ( antiinflammatory OR anti‐inflammatory ) ) OR adapalene OR alclofenac OR ampyrone OR antipyrine ) OR TITLE‐ABS‐KEY ( apazone OR arylpropionic OR aspirin OR "acetylsalicylic‐acid" OR baofuxin OR benzydamine OR bufexamac OR celecoxib OR clofazimine OR clonixin OR "Cox 2" OR curcumin OR cyclooxygenase OR cyclo‐oxygenase OR desmopressin OR dapsone OR diclofenac ) OR TITLE‐ABS‐KEY ( diflunisal OR dipyrone OR epirizole OR etanercept OR etodolac OR etoricoxib OR fenamate* OR fenoprofen OR feprazone OR flurbiprofen OR flufenamic OR glycyrrhizic OR ibuprofen OR indomethacin OR indoprofen OR inhibit* OR ketoprofen OR ketorolac ) OR TITLE‐ABS‐KEY ( lumiracoxib* OR masoprocol OR meclofenamic OR mefenamic OR meloxicam OR mesalamine OR nabumetone OR naprosyn OR naproxen OR niflumic OR norpregnadienes OR olopatadine AND hydrochloride OR oxaprozin OR oxyphenbutazone OR paracetamol OR parecoxib* ) OR TITLE‐ABS‐KEY ( pentosan OR phenylbutazone OR piroxicam OR prenazone OR prophylaxis OR prophylactic OR prostaglandin OR rofecoxib* OR salicylate* OR sulfasalazine OR sulphonanilide* OR sulindac OR suprofen OR thiamine OR tolfenamic OR tolmetin OR tranexam?c OR trasylol ) OR TITLE‐ABS‐KEY ( valdecoxib* ) ) ) ) AND ( TITLE‐ABS‐KEY ( blind OR blinded OR control* OR groups OR placebo OR random* OR trial ) )

(509)

Global Health (Ovid) 1973 to 2020 Week 07

1 (IUB or IUBs or IUC or IUCs or IUD or IUDs or IUCD or IUCDs or IUS or IUSs or CuIUB or Cu‐IUB or CuIUBs or Cu‐IUBs or CuIUD or Cu‐IUD or CuIUDs or Cu‐IUDs or CuIUC or Cu‐IUC or CuIUCs or Cu‐IUCs or CuIUCD or Cu‐IUCD or CuIUDs or Cu‐IUDs or CuIUS or Cu‐IUS or CuIUSs or Cu‐IUSs or LNGIUC or LNGIUCs or LNGIUCD or LNGIUCDs or LNGIUD or LNGIUDs or LNGIUS or LNGIUSs or PPIUC or PPIUCs or PPIUCD or PPIUCDs or PPIUD or PPIUDs or PPIUS or PPIUSs).ti,ab. (1162)

2 ((intrauterine or intra‐uterine) adj3 (ball or balls or coil or coils or contraceptive or contraception or device or devices or system or systems)).ti,ab. (1392)

3 (Jaydess or Kyleena or Liletta or Mirena or Skyla or Copper‐T or CuSafe or Cu‐Safe or Cu375 or Cu‐375 or CuT380* or Cu‐T380* or FlexiT or Flexi‐T or Gyne or Gynefix or Gyneplus or IUB* or Liberte or "Lippes Loop" or Load‐375 or MLCu* or Mini‐TT or MiniTT or Mona Lisa or Multiload or Multi‐load or MultiSafe or Multi‐Safe or MYCu or NeoSafe or Neo‐Safe or NovaT or Nova‐T or Paragard or TCu or TSafe or T‐Safe or T380* or T‐380* or TT380* or TT‐380* or UT380 or UT‐380).ti,ab. (201)

4 or/1‐3 (1985)

5 (analges* or antagonist* or "pain control" or "pain relief" or "pain reliever" or "pain relievers" or NSAID or NSAIDs or tenaculum or ((nonsteroidal or non‐steroidal) adj1 (antiinflammatory or anti‐inflammatory)) or adapalene or alclofenac or ampyrone or antipyrine or apazone or arylpropionic or aspirin or "acetylsalicylic‐acid" or baofuxin or benzydamine or bufexamac or celecoxib or clofazimine or clonixin or "Cox 2" or curcumin or cyclooxygenase or cyclo‐oxygenase or desmopressin or dapsone or diclofenac or diflunisal or dipyrone or epirizole or etanercept or etodolac or etoricoxib or fenamate* or fenoprofen or feprazone or flurbiprofen or flufenamic or glycyrrhizic or ibuprofen or indomethacin or indoprofen or inhibit* or ketoprofen or ketorolac or lumiracoxib$ or masoprocol or meclofenamic or mefenamic or meloxicam or mesalamine or nabumetone or naprosyn or naproxen or niflumic or norpregnadienes or olopatadine hydrochloride or oxaprozin or oxyphenbutazone or paracetamol or parecoxib$ or pentosan or phenylbutazone or piroxicam or prenazone or prophylaxis or prophylactic or prostaglandin or rofecoxib$ or salicylate* or sulfasalazine or sulphonanilide$ or sulindac or suprofen or thiamine or tolfenamic or tolmetin or tranexam?c or trasylol or valdecoxib$).ti,ab. (373116)

6 and/4‐5 (60)

7 6 not ("animal model" or "animal models" or bovine or canine or capra or cat or cats or cattle or cow or cows or dog or dogs or equine or feline or goat or goats or horse or mice or mouse or ovine or pig or pigs or porcine or rabbit or rabbits or rat or rats or rattus or sheep or sow or sows).ti. (57)

8 (blind or blinded or control* or groups or placebo or random* or trial).ti,ab. (1018071)

9 (meta‐analy* or metaanaly* or ((evidence or systematic) adj2 (review or synthesis))).ti. (36292)

10 or/8‐9 (1031128)

11 and/7,10 (25)

LILACS

Words: IUB OR IUBs OR IUC OR IUCs OR IUD OR IUDs OR IUCD OR IUCDs OR IUS OR IUSs OR CuIUB OR Cu‐IUB OR CuIUBs OR Cu‐IUBs OR CuIUD OR Cu‐IUD OR CuIUDs OR Cu‐IUDs OR CuIUC OR Cu‐IUC OR CuIUCs OR Cu‐IUCs OR CuIUCD OR Cu‐IUCD OR CuIUDs OR Cu‐IUDs OR CuIUS OR Cu‐IUS OR CuIUSs OR Cu‐IUSs OR LNGIUC OR LNGIUCs OR LNGIUCD OR LNGIUCDs OR LNGIUD OR LNGIUDs OR LNGIUS OR LNGIUSs OR PPIUC OR PPIUCs OR PPIUCD OR PPIUCDs OR PPIUD OR PPIUDs OR PPIUS OR PPIUSs OR ((intrauterine OR intra‐uterine) AND (ball OR balls OR coil OR coils OR contraceptive OR contraception OR device OR devices OR system OR systems)) OR Jaydess OR Kyleena OR Liletta OR Mirena OR Skyla OR Copper‐T OR CuSafe OR Cu‐Safe OR Cu375 OR Cu‐375 OR CuT380 OR Cu‐T380 OR FlexiT OR Flexi‐T OR Gyne OR Gynefix OR Gyneplus OR IUB OR Liberte OR Lippes OR Load‐375 OR MLCu OR Mini‐TT OR MiniTT OR Mona Lisa OR Multiload OR Multi‐load OR MultiSafe OR Multi‐Safe OR MYCu OR NeoSafe OR Neo‐Safe OR NovaT OR Nova‐T OR Paragard OR TCu OR TSafe OR T‐Safe OR T380 OR T‐380 OR TT380 OR TT‐380 OR UT380 OR UT‐380

AND

Words: analges? OR antagonist? OR "pain control" OR "pain relief" OR "pain reliever" OR "pain relievers" OR NSAID OR NSAIDs OR nonsteroidal OR non‐steroidal OR adapalene OR alclofenac OR ampyrone OR antipyrine OR apazone OR arylpropionic OR aspirin OR "acetylsalicylic‐acid" OR baofuxin OR benzydamine OR bufexamac OR celecoxib OR clofazimine OR clonixin OR "Cox 2" OR curcumin OR cyclooxygenase OR cyclo‐oxygenase OR desmopressin OR dapsone OR diclofenac OR diflunisal OR dipyrone OR epirizole OR etanercept OR etodolac OR etORicoxib OR fenamate? OR fenoprofen OR feprazone OR flurbiprofen OR flufenamic OR glycyrrhizic OR ibuprofen OR indomethacin OR indoprofen OR inhibit? OR ketoprofen OR ketorolac OR lumiracoxib? OR masoprocol OR meclofenamic OR mefenamic OR meloxicam OR mesalamine OR nabumetone OR naprosyn OR naproxen OR niflumic OR norpregnadienes OR olopatadine hydrochloride OR oxaprozin OR oxyphenbutazone OR paracetamol OR parecoxib? OR pentosan OR phenylbutazone OR piroxicam OR prenazone OR prophylaxis OR prophylactic OR prostaglandin OR rofecoxib? OR salicylate? OR sulfasalazine OR sulphonanilide? OR sulindac OR suprofen OR thiamine OR tolfenamic OR tolmetin OR tranexam?c OR trasylol OR valdecoxib?

(49)

Appendix 2. Previous search strategies

2011 Search strategies

MEDLINE via PubMed (2009 to 17 Aug 2011)

(intrauterine devices OR intrauterine system* OR IUD* OR IUC* OR IUS) AND (NSAID* OR anti inflammatory agents, nonsteroidal)

CENTRAL (2009 to 17 Aug 2011)

contracept* in Title, Abstract or Keywords
AND (non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory OR NSAID*) in Title, Abstract or Keywords

POPLINE (17 Aug 2011 and past five years)

(iud*/iuc*/intrauterine device*) & (NSAID*/nonsteroidal anti inflammatory agent*)

LILACS (17 Aug 2011)

intrauterine devices or intrauterine device or dispositivos intrauterinos or dispositivos Intra‐uterinos OR IUD or iuds OR IUC or IUCD or iucds [Words] and bleeding or pain [Words]

ClinicalTrials.gov (01 Jan 2009 to 18 Aug 2011)

Search terms: non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory OR NSAID*
Intervention: contraceptive OR contraception

ICTRP

Title or Intervention: non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory OR NSAID
Condition: contraception OR contraceptive

2006 Search strategies

MEDLINE via PubMed

(intrauterine devices OR intrauterine system* OR IUD* OR IUCD* OR IUS) AND (NSAID* OR anti inflammatory agents, nonsteroidal)

CENTRAL

contracept* AND (non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory OR NSAID*) in Title, Abstract or Keywords

POPLINE

(iud*/iucd*/intrauterine device*) & (NSAID*/nonsteroidal anti inflammatory agent*)

LILACS

intrauterine devices or intrauterine device or dispositivos intrauterinos or dispositivos Intra‐uterinos OR IUD or iuds OR IUCD or iucds [Words] and bleeding or pain [Words]

Embase

(INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE or INTRAUTERINE(1N)DEVICE? or IUD? OR IUCD?)
and (NONSTEROID ANTI INFLAMMATORY AGENT or NONSTEROID ANTI INFLAMMATORY DRUG or NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT or NONSTEROIDAL(1N)ANTI(1N)INFLAMMATORY(1N) AGENT or NONSTEROIDAL(1N)ANTI(1N)INFLAMMATORY(1N)DRUG or
NONSTEROIDAL(1N)ANTIINFLAMMATORY(1N)AGENT? or NONSTEROIDAL(1N)ANTIINFLAMMATORY(1N)DRUG? or NSAID?)

CINAHL

(intrauterine device* or IUD* or IUCD*)
and
(non?steroidal anti?inflammatory agent? or non?steroidal anti?inflammatory drug? or non?steroidal anti?inflammatory agent* or non?steroidal anti?inflammatory drug* or NSAID*)

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search terms: non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory OR NSAID
Condition: contraceptive OR contraception

ICTRP

Title or Intervention: non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory OR NSAID
Condition: contraception OR contraceptive

Trial flow diagram

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Trial flow diagram

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial

Comparison 1: Vitamin B1 vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: Number of pads/day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Vitamin B1 vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: Number of pads/day

Comparison 1: Vitamin B1 vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Number of spotting days

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Vitamin B1 vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Number of spotting days

Comparison 1: Vitamin B1 vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 3: Number of bleeding days

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Vitamin B1 vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 3: Number of bleeding days

Comparison 2: Naproxen vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: "More" menstrual flow

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Naproxen vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: "More" menstrual flow

Comparison 2: Naproxen vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Side effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2: Naproxen vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Side effects

Comparison 3: Mefenamic acid vs tranexamic acid (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: Volume of blood loss

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3: Mefenamic acid vs tranexamic acid (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: Volume of blood loss

Comparison 3: Mefenamic acid vs tranexamic acid (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: PBAC score

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3: Mefenamic acid vs tranexamic acid (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: PBAC score

Comparison 3: Mefenamic acid vs tranexamic acid (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 3: Number of bleeding days

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3: Mefenamic acid vs tranexamic acid (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 3: Number of bleeding days

Mean reduction of PBAC score (%)

Study

desmopressin

mefenamic acid

Mercorio 2003

40.5

45.7

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4: Mefenamic acid vs desmopressin (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: Mean reduction of PBAC score (%)

Comparison 4: Mefenamic acid vs desmopressin (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Side effects: headache and insomnia

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4: Mefenamic acid vs desmopressin (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Side effects: headache and insomnia

Comparison 5: Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5: Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Comparison 5: Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Duration of menstruation

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5: Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Duration of menstruation

Comparison 5: Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 3: Side effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5: Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 3: Side effects

Comparison 6: Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: PBAC score

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6: Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: PBAC score

Comparison 6: Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Number of pads/day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6: Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Number of pads/day

Comparison 6: Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 3: Number of bleeding days

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6: Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 3: Number of bleeding days

Comparison 6: Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 4: Side effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6: Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 4: Side effects

Comparison 7: Tranexamic acid vs active comparators (mefenamic acid, flavonoids, diclofenac) (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: Number of bleeding days

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7: Tranexamic acid vs active comparators (mefenamic acid, flavonoids, diclofenac) (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: Number of bleeding days

Comparison 8: Ulipristal acetate vs placebo (LNG IUD, treatment of HMB), Outcome 1: Duration of days until bleeding stops

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8: Ulipristal acetate vs placebo (LNG IUD, treatment of HMB), Outcome 1: Duration of days until bleeding stops

Comparison 8: Ulipristal acetate vs placebo (LNG IUD, treatment of HMB), Outcome 2: Total bleeding in 90 days

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8: Ulipristal acetate vs placebo (LNG IUD, treatment of HMB), Outcome 2: Total bleeding in 90 days

Blood loss reduction (%)

Study

High dose naproxen

Low dose naproxen

Davies 1981

31.6

9.5

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9: High‐dose naproxen vs low‐dose naproxen (unknown IUD, treatment of HMB), Outcome 1: Blood loss reduction (%)

Comparison 10: Mefenamic acid vs Vitex agnus (unknown IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: PBAC score

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10: Mefenamic acid vs Vitex agnus (unknown IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 1: PBAC score

Comparison 10: Mefenamic acid vs Vitex agnus (unknown IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Side effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10: Mefenamic acid vs Vitex agnus (unknown IUD, treatment for HMB), Outcome 2: Side effects

Comparison 11: Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for pain), Outcome 1: Pelvic pain

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11: Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for pain), Outcome 1: Pelvic pain

Comparison 12: Naproxen vs placebo (unknown IUD, treatment for pain), Outcome 1: Overall pain relief score

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.1

Comparison 12: Naproxen vs placebo (unknown IUD, treatment for pain), Outcome 1: Overall pain relief score

Comparison 12: Naproxen vs placebo (unknown IUD, treatment for pain), Outcome 2: Daily pain relief score

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.2

Comparison 12: Naproxen vs placebo (unknown IUD, treatment for pain), Outcome 2: Daily pain relief score

Comparison 12: Naproxen vs placebo (unknown IUD, treatment for pain), Outcome 3: Pain relief

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.3

Comparison 12: Naproxen vs placebo (unknown IUD, treatment for pain), Outcome 3: Pain relief

Comparison 12: Naproxen vs placebo (unknown IUD, treatment for pain), Outcome 4: Need for analgesia

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.4

Comparison 12: Naproxen vs placebo (unknown IUD, treatment for pain), Outcome 4: Need for analgesia

Comparison 13: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.1

Comparison 13: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Comparison 13: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 2: Duration of bleeding

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.2

Comparison 13: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 2: Duration of bleeding

Median menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Study

Ibuprofen

Placebo

Fincoid

Makarainen 1986

51

49

ML Cu 375

Makarainen 1986

47

62

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.3

Comparison 13: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 3: Median menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Comparison 13: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 4: Side effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.4

Comparison 13: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 4: Side effects

Comparison 14: Tolfenamic vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Number of pads/day

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.1

Comparison 14: Tolfenamic vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Number of pads/day

Comparison 14: Tolfenamic vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 2: Menstruation "more abundant than normal"

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.2

Comparison 14: Tolfenamic vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 2: Menstruation "more abundant than normal"

Comparison 14: Tolfenamic vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 3: Clots in menstrual blood

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.3

Comparison 14: Tolfenamic vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 3: Clots in menstrual blood

Comparison 15: Aspirin vs paracetamol (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.1

Comparison 15: Aspirin vs paracetamol (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Occurence of HMB (%)

Study

2g tranexamic

1g tranexamic

Alkaline hematin

Lin 2007

20

11.76

PBAC

Lin 2007

26.79

45.83

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.1

Comparison 16: 2 g tranexamic vs 1 g tranexamic (Cu IUD, prevention HMB), Outcome 1: Occurence of HMB (%)

Comparison 17: Ulipristal acetate (CDB‐2914) vs placebo (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Percentage days bleeding or spotting

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 17.1

Comparison 17: Ulipristal acetate (CDB‐2914) vs placebo (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Percentage days bleeding or spotting

Comparison 17: Ulipristal acetate (CDB‐2914) vs placebo (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 2: Longest consecutive run of days without bleeding or spotting

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 17.2

Comparison 17: Ulipristal acetate (CDB‐2914) vs placebo (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 2: Longest consecutive run of days without bleeding or spotting

Median number of bleeding days

Study

tranexamic acid (n=55)

mefenamic acid (n=57)

placebo (n=56)

Sordal 2013

8

10

11.5

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 18.1

Comparison 18: Tranexamic acid vs mefenamic acid (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Median number of bleeding days

Median number of bleeding and spotting days

Study

Naproxen (n=35)

Estradiol (n=34)

Placebo (n=37)

Madden 2012

27.5

44

32

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 19.1

Comparison 19: Naproxen vs estradiol (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Median number of bleeding and spotting days

Comparison 19: Naproxen vs estradiol (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 2: Satisfied with bleeding pattern at 12 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 19.2

Comparison 19: Naproxen vs estradiol (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 2: Satisfied with bleeding pattern at 12 weeks

Comparison 19: Naproxen vs estradiol (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 3: Side effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 19.3

Comparison 19: Naproxen vs estradiol (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 3: Side effects

Percentage bleeding and spotting days

Study

Mifepristone

Vitamin B

Papaikonomou 2018

Fewer women reported bleeding or spotting. Less days with normal or heavy intensity bleeding

More bleeding or spotting days.

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 20.1

Comparison 20: Mifepristone vs vitamin B (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB), Outcome 1: Percentage bleeding and spotting days

Comparison 21: Tolfenamic acid vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of pain), Outcome 1: Menstruation "more painful than normal"

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 21.1

Comparison 21: Tolfenamic acid vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of pain), Outcome 1: Menstruation "more painful than normal"

Comparison 21: Tolfenamic acid vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of pain), Outcome 2: Side effects

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 21.2

Comparison 21: Tolfenamic acid vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of pain), Outcome 2: Side effects

Comparison 22: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of pain), Outcome 1: Reduction in menstrual cramps

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 22.1

Comparison 22: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of pain), Outcome 1: Reduction in menstrual cramps

Comparison 23: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD,prevention of bleed and pain, IUD removal), Outcome 1: IUD removal by 26 weeks due to pain or increased blood loss

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.1

Comparison 23: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD,prevention of bleed and pain, IUD removal), Outcome 1: IUD removal by 26 weeks due to pain or increased blood loss

Comparison 23: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD,prevention of bleed and pain, IUD removal), Outcome 2: IUD removal due to pain or increased blood loss by 52 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 23.2

Comparison 23: Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD,prevention of bleed and pain, IUD removal), Outcome 2: IUD removal due to pain or increased blood loss by 52 weeks

Summary of findings 1. Interventions (vitamin B1, mefenamic acid, tranexamic acid) compared to placebo or active comparators (desmopressin, sodium diclofenac, flavonoids) for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with Cu IUD

Interventions versus comparisons

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Risk with comparisons

Risk with interventions

Vitamin B1 vs placebo

Menstrual blood loss

Number of pads (diary record)

Follow‐up: 1 month after completion of intervention for 3 months

The mean number of pads was 19 pads

MD 7 pads fewer
(8.5 fewer to 5.5 fewer)

110
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,b

Duration of bleeding

Number of bleeding days

(diary record)

 

Follow‐up: 1 month after completion of intervention for three months

The mean duration of bleeding was 8 days

MD 2 days fewer
(2.38 fewer to 1.62 fewer)

110
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,b

Adverse events or side effects

None reported

 

 

 

 

Mefenamic acid vs tranexamic acid

Menstrual blood loss

Volume blood loss (pictorial chart in mL)

 

Follow‐up: after 3rd month of intervention

The mean volume of menstrual blood loss was 160 mL

MD 64.26 mL lower
(105.65 lower to 22.87 lower)

94
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowc

Duration of bleeding

Number of bleeding days (menstrual record)

 

Follow‐up: after 3rd month of intervention

Recorded on daily diary

The mean number of bleeding days was 3.5 to 6.4 days

MD 0.08 days more
(0.27 fewer to 0.42 more)

152
(2 RCTs)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowd

Adverse events or side effects

No data available

 

 

 

 

Mefenamic acid vs desmopressin

Menstrual blood loss

Mean reduction of PBAC score

Follow‐up: after 3rd month of intervention

The mean reduction of PBAC score was 40.5% in desmopressin and 45.7% in mefenamic acid

 

24
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowb,e

Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac

Menstrual blood loss

Volume of blood loss (alkaline hematin method)

Follow‐up: each intervention cycle (cross‐over) for 5 menstrual cycles

The mean blood loss was 102mL

MD 42.7mL lower
(73.33 lower to 12.07 lower)

38
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowc,f

Duration of bleeding

 

Follow‐up: each intervention cycle (cross‐over) for 5 menstrual cycles

The mean duration of bleeding was 5.1 days

MD 0 days 
(0.62 lower to 0.62 higher)

38
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowb,f

Side effects: gastrointestinal disturbances (diarrhoea, lower abdominal pain), headache and sweating

316 per 1000

684 per 1000 (356 to 895)

OR 4.69

(1.2 to 18.44)

38

(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowb,f

Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids

Menstrual blood loss

PBAC score

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

The mean PBAC score was 125

MD 32 lower
(39.84 lower to 24.16 lower)

100
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowb,g

Menstrual blood loss

Number of pads per day

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

The mean number of pads was 3 pads per day

MD 0.5 pads lower
(0.91 lower to 0.09 lower)

100
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowb,g

Duration of bleeding

Number of bleeding days

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

The mean number of bleed days was 6.8 days

MD 1.4 days lower
(1.93 lower to 0.87 lower)

100
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowb,g

Side effects: headache

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

160 per 1000

99 per 1000 (33 to 268)

OR 0.58 (0.18 to 1.92)

100
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowb,g

Side effects: vomiting

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

180 per 1000

140 per 1000 (33 to 268)

OR 0.74 (0.25 to 2.18)

100
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowb,g

Tranexamic acid vs active comparators (mefenamic acid, flavonoid, sodium diclofenac)

Duration of bleeding

Number of bleeding days

Follow‐up: 2‐5 menstrual cycles

 

The mean number of bleeding days was 5.1 to 6.8 days

MD 0.27 days lower
(1.14 lower to 0.6 higher)

290
(4 RCTs)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowf,h

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; PBAC: pictorial blood assessment chart; RCT: randomized controlled trial; vs: versus

aDowngraded one level due to unclear risk of selection bias.
bDowngraded one level for imprecision as effects were measured by one trial.
cDowngraded two levels for imprecision as effects were measured by one trial and the confidence interval was wide.
dDowngraded two levels due to unclear risk of selection bias and high risk of detection bias.
eDowngraded two levels due to high risk of performance bias and detection bias.
fDowngraded two levels due to unclear risk of selection, performance and reporting bias and high risk of detection bias.
gDowngraded one level due to high risk of detection bias.
hDowngraded one level for inconsistency due to high statistical heterogeneity.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Interventions (vitamin B1, mefenamic acid, tranexamic acid) compared to placebo or active comparators (desmopressin, sodium diclofenac, flavonoids) for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with Cu IUD
Summary of findings 2. Ulipristal acetate compared to placebo for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with LNG IUD

Interventions vs comparisons

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(trials)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Risk with comparisons

Risk with interventions

Ulipristal acetate vs placebo

Duration of bleeding

Total bleeding in 90 days (bleeding calendar)

Follow‐up: 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment initiation

The mean total of bleeding days in 90 days was 29.8 to 39.1 days

MD 9.3 days lower
(26.76 lower to 8.16 higher)

24
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowa,b

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; vs: versus

aDowngraded one level due to high risk of detection bias.
bDowngraded two levels for imprecision as effects were only measured from one trial with small number of participants.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Ulipristal acetate compared to placebo for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with LNG IUD
Summary of findings 3. Mefanamic acid compared to Vitex agnus for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with unknown IUD type

Interventions vs comparisons

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Risk with comparisons

Risk with interventions

Mefenamic acid vs Vitex agnus

Menstrual blood loss

PBAC score

Follow‐up: monthly for 4 months

The mean PBAC score was 89.7

2.4 lower
(13.77 lower to 8.97 higher

84
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,b

Side effects: nausea

Follow‐up: monthly for 4 months

24 per 1000

24 per 1000 (1 to 287)

OR 1.00 (0.06 to 16.53)

84
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowc

Side effects: abdominal pain

Follow‐up: monthly for 4 months

24 per 1000

8 per 1000 (0 to 167)

OR 0.33 (0.01 to 8.22)

84
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowc

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; PBAC: pictorial blood assessment chart; RCT: randomized controlled trial; vs: versus

aDowngraded one level due to unclear reporting bias.
bDowngraded one level for imprecision as effects were measured by only one trial.
cDowngraded two levels for imprecision as effects were measured from only one trial and confidence interval was wide.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Mefanamic acid compared to Vitex agnus for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with unknown IUD type
Summary of findings 4. Tranexamic acid compared to sodium diclofenac for the treatment of pain associated with Cu IUD

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Risk with comparisons

Risk with interventions

Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac

Pelvic pain

Follow‐up: each intervention cycle (cross over) for 5 menstrual cycles

53 per 1000

53 per 1000
(3 to 489)

OR 1.00
(0.06 to 17.25)

38
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowa,b

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; vs: versus

aDowngraded two levels due to unclear risk of selection, performance and reporting bias and high risk of detection bias.
bDowngraded one level for imprecision as effect measures were from one small trial.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 4. Tranexamic acid compared to sodium diclofenac for the treatment of pain associated with Cu IUD
Summary of findings 5. Naproxen compared to placebo for the treatment of pain associated with unknown IUD type

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Risk with comparisons

Risk with interventions

Naproxen vs placebo

Overall pain relief score (4‐point scale)

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

The mean overall pain relief score was 7.9

MD 4.1 higher
(0.91 higher to 7.29 higher)

33
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,b

Daily pain relief score (6‐point scale)

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

The mean daily pain relief score was 10.8

3.1 higher
(0.27 higher to 5.93 higher)

33
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,b

Need for additional analgesia (self‐recorded)

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

313 per 1000

116 per 1000
(22 to 450)

OR 0.29
(0.05 to 1.80)

33
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,b

Side effects: gastrointestinal symptoms

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

48 per 1000

95 per 1000 (9 to 557)

OR 2.11 (0.18 to 25.17)

33
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,b

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; vs: versus

aDowngraded two levels due to unclear risk of selection, performance and reporting bias as well as high risk of detection bias.
bDowngraded one level for imprecision as effect measures were from one small trial.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 5. Naproxen compared to placebo for the treatment of pain associated with unknown IUD type
Summary of findings 6. Interventions (ibuprofen, tolfenamic acid, aspirin, tranexamic acid) compared to placebo or active comparators (paracetamol, tranexamic acid) for the prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with Cu IUD

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Outcomes

Ibuprofen vs placebo

Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin method)

Follow‐up: 3 months

The mean menstrual blood loss was 44.7 to 109.2 mL

MD 14.11 mL lower
(36.04 lower to 7.82 higher)

40
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowa,b

Duration of bleeding (menstrual diary)

Follow‐up: 3 months

The mean duration of bleed was 6.4 days

MD 0.2 days lower
(0.14 lower to 1 higher)

28
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowc,d

Side effects: eye and mouth swelling, stomach cramps, fatigue, irritability (diary record)

Follow‐up: 3 months

38 per 1000

79 per 1000 (20 to 271)

OR 2.15 (0.5 to 9.31)

68 (2 RCTs)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,d

Tolfenamic acid vs placebo

Menstrual blood loss

Menstruation "more abundant than normal"

(questionnaire)

Follow‐up: 3 months

658 per 1000

510 per 1000
(396 to 621)

OR 0.54
(0.34 to 0.85)

310
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowd,e

Side effects: dyspepsia, diarrhoea, headache, fatigue

(questionnaire)

Follow‐up: 3 months

129 per 1000

66 per 1000
(20 to 200)

OR 0.48
(0.14 to 1.69)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowd,e

Aspirin vs paracetamol

Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin method)

Follow‐up: 3 cycles

The mean menstrual blood loss was 49.5 mL

MD 0.3mL lower
(26.16 lower to 25.56 higher)

20
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowd,f

Adverse events or side effects

Not reported

2 g tranexamic acid vs 1 g tranexamic acid

Menstrual blood loss

% occurrence of heavy menstrual bleeding (alkaline hematin method)

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

2 g tranexamic acid: 20

1 g tranexamic acid: 11.76

64
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowd,g

Menstrual blood loss

% occurrence heavy menstrual bleeding (PBAC score)

Follow‐up: each cycle for 3 menstrual cycles

2 g tranexamic acid: 26.79

1 g tranexamic acid: 45.83

175
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowd,g

Adverse events or side effects

Not reported

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; PBAC: pictorial blood assessment chart; RCT: randomized controlled trial; vs: versus

aDowngraded one level due to unclear risk of selection and reporting bias.
bDowngraded two levels due to substantially wide confidence interval and effects measures from only one small trial.
cDowngraded two levels due to unclear risk of selection, performance and reporting bias as well as high risk of detection bias.
dDowngraded one level for imprecision as effect measures were from one trial.
eDowngraded two levels due to unclear risk of selection, performance, attrition and reporting bias as well as high risk of detection bias.
fDowngraded two levels due to unclear risk of selection, performance and reporting bias as well as high risk of other sources of bias (4 out of 10 women on intrauterine devices had prior to intervention, prolonged bleeding time, increased capillary fragility and/or a history of bleeding tendencies).
gDowngraded two levels due to unclear risk of selection and performance bias, high risk of detection bias.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 6. Interventions (ibuprofen, tolfenamic acid, aspirin, tranexamic acid) compared to placebo or active comparators (paracetamol, tranexamic acid) for the prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with Cu IUD
Summary of findings 7. Interventions (ulipristal acetate, tranexamic acid, mifepristone, naproxen) compared placebo or active comparators (mefenamic acid, vitamin B, estradiol) for the prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with LNG IUD

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Risk with comparisons

Risk with interventions

Ulipristal acetate vs placebo

Percentage days bleeding or spotting (questionnaire)

Follow‐up: 1, 3 and 6 months after IUD insertion

The mean percentage days bleeding or spotting was 20.7

MD 9.5% higher (1.48 higher to 17.52 higher)

118
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,b

Adverse events or side effects

Not reported

Tranexamic acid vs mefenamic acid

Menstrual blood loss

No data reported

Duration of bleeding

Median number of bleed days (diary)

Follow‐up: 90 days of study assessment followed by 30 days

Tranexamic acid: 8

Mefenamic acid: 10

168
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,c

Side effects: gastrointestinal disorders, headache, breast tenderness, musculoskeletal disorders

Follow‐up: 90 days of study assessment followed by 30 days

468 per 1000

468 per 1000

OR 1.00 (0.49 to 2.02)

168
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,c

Mifepristone vs vitamin B

Menstrual blood loss

No data reported

Duration of bleeding

% spotting and bleeding days

Follow‐up: 1, 3 and 6 months after IUD insertion

Mifepristone: fewer women reported bleeding or spotting. Fewer days with normal or heavy intensity bleeding

Vitamin B: more bleeding or spotting days

58
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowa,d

Adverse events or side effects

Not reported

Naproxen vs estradiol

Menstrual blood loss

Not reported

Duration of bleeding

Median number of bleeding and spotting days (diary)

Follow‐up: every 4 weeks for 16 weeks

Naproxen: 27.5

Estradiol: 44

106
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowa,e

Side effects: gastroesophageal reflux

Follow‐up: every 4 weeks for 16 weeks

0 per 1000

0 per 1000

OR 3.22 (0.13 to 81.19)

86
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowa,e

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; vs: versus

aDowngraded one level for imprecision as effects were measured from one trial.
bDowngraded one level due to unclear risk of performance bias.
cDowngraded one level due to high risk of detection bias
dDowngraded two levels due to high risk of detection bias and unclear risk of performance bias.
eDowngraded two levels due to high risk of performance bias and detection bias.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 7. Interventions (ulipristal acetate, tranexamic acid, mifepristone, naproxen) compared placebo or active comparators (mefenamic acid, vitamin B, estradiol) for the prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with LNG IUD
Summary of findings 8. Interventions (ibuprofen, tolfenamic acid) compared to placebo for the prevention of pain associated with Cu IUD

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(trials)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Risk with comparisons

Risk with interventions

Ibuprofen vs placebo

Reduction in painful menstruation

Follow‐up: end of 1st, 2nd and 3rd months

200 per 1000

200 per 1000
(27 to 691)

OR 1.00
(0.11 to 8.95)

20
(1 RCT)

⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,b

Tolfenamic acid vs placebo

Menstruation "more painful than normal"

Follow‐up: 3 months

387 per 1000

310 per 1000
(217 to 476)

OR 0.71
(0.44 to 1.44)

310
(1 RCT)

⨁◯◯◯
Very lowc,d

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; vs: versus

aDowngraded one level due to unclear risk of selection and reporting bias.
bDowngraded one level for imprecision as effect measures were from one relatively small trial.
cDowngraded one level for imprecision as effect measures were from one trial.
dDowngraded two levels due to unclear risk of selection, performance, attrition and reporting bias as well as high risk of detection bias.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 8. Interventions (ibuprofen, tolfenamic acid) compared to placebo for the prevention of pain associated with Cu IUD
Table 1. Summary of treatment trials interventions

Trial

Experimental Intervention

Comparison Intervention

IUD type

Duration of intervention

Follow‐up

Outcome

Effectiveness trials

Bleeding trials

Davies 1981

RCT with cross‐over

Oral naproxen 1250 mg/day

Oral naproxen 500 mg on 1st day then 750 mg on subsequent days

Placebo

Unknown

4 cycles

Each participant took 2 of the 3 treatments, each for 2 menstrual cycles.

Each regimen was begun on the 1st day of menstrual bleeding and continued for a total of 5 days.

After every 2 menstrual cycles

Percentage reduction in menstrual blood loss

Fava 2020

RCT

Oral ulipristal acetate 5 mg/day for 5 days

Oral placebo

LNG IUD

5 days, bleeding was assessed at 30 days, 60 days and 70 days

90 days

Total bleeding days

Jafari 2014

RCT

Oral vitamin B1 100 mg/day during the 2nd, 3rd and 4th months following insertion of the IUD

Oral placebo

during the 2nd, 3rd and 4th months following insertion of the IUD

Cu IUD

3 cycles

1 month after completion of intervention

Number of pads used

Number of spotting days

Duration of bleeding

Pain trials

Buttram 1979

RCT

Oral naproxen sodium 550 mg initially, then 275 mg every 6 hours as needed for uterine pain

Placebo (lactose)

Unknown IUD type

3 cycles

No details

Overall and daily pain relief score (6‐point Likert scale)

Lalos 1983

RCT with cross‐over

Oral naproxen 500 mg followed by 250 mg 2‐4 times a day, with a maximum of 1250 mg, taken at the first sign of menstrual distress.

Oral placebo taken at the first sign of menstrual distress.

Cu IUD

4 cycles

Participant took an intervention for 2 cycles then crossed over to the other intervention for 2 cycles

After 2nd and 4th menstrual cycle

Pain relief (5‐point Likert scale)

Comparative effectiveness trials

Bleeding trials

Alanwar 2018

RCT

Oral tranexamic acid 500 mg, 1 tablet 6‐hourly during the 1st 3 days of menstrual bleeding

Oral micronized flavonoid 500 mg, 1 tablet 6‐hourly during the 1st 3 days of menstrual bleeding

Cu IUD

3 cycles

No details

PBAC score

Number of pads used/day

Number of bleeding days

Kaviani 2013

RCT

Oral mefenamic acid, 250 mg; 1 capsule every 8 hours on the first 3 days of menstruation

Oral tranexamic acid, 250 mg; 1 capsule every 8 hours on the first 3 days of menstruation

Cu IUD

2 cycles

No details

PBAC score

Number of bleeding days

Mercorio 2003

RCT

Desmopressin 300 mcg intranasal spray each morning for the first 5 days after start of menstruation

Oral mefenamic acid 1500 mg/day for the first 5 days after the start of menstruation.

Cu IUD

3 months

Monthly for 3 months

PBAC score

Saharkhiz 2017

RCT

Oral tranexamic acid 500 mg 3 times/day for 3‐5 days based on the duration of bleeding

Oral mefenamic acid 500 mg 3 times/day for 3‐5 days based on the duration of bleeding

Cu IUD

3 months

Monthly for 3 months

Volume of blood loss

Duration of bleeding

Yavarikia 2013

RCT

Oral mefenamic acid 250 mg 3 times/day from the 1st day of menstruation until day 8

Oral Vitex agnus 3 times/day from the 1st day of menstruation until day 8

Unknown IUD type

4 months

No details

PBAC score

Ylikorkala 1983

RCT with cross‐over

Oral tranexamic acid 4.5 g/day for 5 days

Oral sodium diclofenac 150 mg on day 1 then 75 mg/day on days 2‐4

Placebo

Cu IUD

5 months

Each participant received placebo for 1 month, 2 months of tranexamic acid, and 2 months of sodium diclofenac

No details

Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Duration of bleeding

Cu IUD: copper intrauterine device; HMB: heavy menstrual bleeding; IUD: intrauterine device; LNG IUD: levonorgestrel intrauterine device; PBAC: pictorial blood loss assessment chart

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Summary of treatment trials interventions
Table 2. Summary of prevention trials interventions

Trial

Experimental intervention

Comparison intervention

IUD type

Duration of intervention

Follow‐up

Outcomes

Effectiveness trials

Bleeding trials

Makarainen 1986

RCT

Oral ibuprofen 1200 mg/day at the beginning of menstruation and to continue to end of bleeding for a maximum of 10 days.

Oral placebo at the beginning of menstruation and to continue to end of bleeding for a maximum of 10 days.

Cu IUD

3 cycles

No details

Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Length of menstruation

Roy 1981

RCT with cross‐over

Oral ibuprofen 1600 mg/day starting with bleeding and continuing until end of bleeding or maximum of 7 days

Placebo starting with bleeding and continuing until end of bleeding or maximum of 7 days

Cu IUD

Cu Lippes loop

3 cycles

Each participant had 1 month of observation, 1 month on ibuprofen or placebo, and 1 month crossed over to the alternative treatment.

End of month 1, 2, 3

Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Warner 2010

RCT

Oral CDB‐2914 50 mg/day

Oral placebo

LNG IUD

Intervention taken for 3 consecutive days with separate treatments starting 21, 49 and 77 days after LNG IUD insertion

1,3 and 6 months after IUD insertion

Percentage days bleeding/ spotting, removal of LNG IUD within 6 months; the longest run of amenorrhoea in the 64 days after third treatment, side effects

Bleeding and pain trials

Hubacher 2006

RCT

Oral ibuprofen 1200 mg/day to be taken with the first 6 menstruations after IUD insertion and for a maximum of 5 days at a time.

Oral placebo to be taken with the first 6 menstruations after IUD insertion and for a maximum of 5 days at a time.

Cu IUD

6 cycles

6, 13, 26 and 52 weeks after IUD insertion

IUD removal within 12 months of insertion due to HMB/pain

Ylikorkala 1978

RCT

Oral tolfenamic acid 600 mg/day starting at IUD insertion and continuing for 7 days; this was to be repeated during the next 3 menstruations.

Placebo starting at IUD insertion and continuing for 7 days; this was to be repeated during the next 3 menstruations

Cu IUD

3 cycles

No details

Number of pads used,

menstruation more abundant than normal, clots,

menstruation more painful than normal

Comparative effectiveness trials

Bleeding trials

Hahn 1979

RCT with cross‐over

Oral aspirin 1500 mg/day

Oral paracetamol 1500 mg/day

Placebo

Cu IUD

3 cycles

Interventions taken on day 1 of menstruation and continued for the duration of bleeding.

Each participant received each treatment in alternating order.

No details

Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin)

Lin 2007

RCT

Oral tranexamic acid 2 g/day, taken for the 1st 5 days of 3 consecutive cycles after IUD insertion

Oral tranexamic acid 1 g/day, taken for the 1st 5 days of 3 consecutive cycles after IUD insertion

Cu IUD

3 cycles

No details

Percentage occurrence of HMB by alkaline hematin and PBAC

Madden 2012

RCT

Oral naproxen 500 mg twice a day first 5 days of a 4‐week period

Transdermal estradiol 0.1 mg on day after insertion of IUD, changing it weekly

Oral placebo twice a day

LNG IUD

First 12 weeks of IUD use

Telephone surveys at 4, 8, and 16 weeks and an in‐person follow‐up visit at 12

weeks

Median bleed days, patient satisfaction, continuation rates of IUD

Papaikonomou 2018

RCT

Oral 50 mg mifepristone every other day starting on the 1st day of the menstrual cycle for the pre‐treatment period

Oral vitamin B every other day starting on the 1st day of the menstrual cycle for the pre‐treatment period

LNG IUD

2 months (corresponding to 2 menstrual cycles i.e. 2 × 28 days) prior to insertion and until 3 days (± 2 days) following the LNG IUD insertion

Monthly for the first 3 months, 6 months post‐LNG IUD

insertion and 12 months end‐of‐trial

evaluation

Bleeding and spotting days

Sordal 2013

RCT

Oral tranexamic acid 1500 mg/day, taken on the 1st day of a bleeding or spotting episode until bleeding or spotting stopped

Oral mefenamic acid 1500 mg/day, taken on the 1st day of a bleeding or spotting episode until bleeding or spotting stopped

Oral placebo (lactose and magnesium stearate), taken on the 1st day of a bleeding or spotting episode until bleeding or spotting stopped

LNG IUD

90 days

No details

Median reduction of bleed days and length of bleed days, satisfaction with drug/placebo, occurrence of pain, number of days pain medication used to alleviate pain, adverse effects

Cu IUD: copper intrauterine device; HMB: heavy menstrual bleeding; IUD: intrauterine device; LNG IUD: levonorgestrel intrauterine device; PBAC: pictorial blood loss assessment chart

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Summary of prevention trials interventions
Comparison 1. Vitamin B1 vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Number of pads/day Show forest plot

1

110

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐7.00 [‐8.50, ‐5.50]

1.2 Number of spotting days Show forest plot

1

110

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.60 [‐1.94, ‐1.26]

1.3 Number of bleeding days Show forest plot

1

110

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.00 [‐2.38, ‐1.62]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Vitamin B1 vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)
Comparison 2. Naproxen vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 "More" menstrual flow Show forest plot

1

40

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.00, 1.78]

2.2 Side effects Show forest plot

1

336

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.72, 5.06]

2.2.1 Irregular flow

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.24 [0.36, 13.78]

2.2.2 Fluor

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.15 [0.12, 81.74]

2.2.3 Tender vagina

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.15 [0.12, 81.74]

2.2.4 Gastrointestinal symptoms

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.11 [0.18, 25.17]

2.2.5 Dizziness

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.15 [0.12, 81.74]

2.2.6 Trembling legs

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.15 [0.12, 81.74]

2.2.7 Blurry vision

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.06, 17.12]

2.2.8 Sore lips

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 8.26]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Naproxen vs placebo (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)
Comparison 3. Mefenamic acid vs tranexamic acid (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3.1 Volume of blood loss Show forest plot

1

94

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐64.26 [‐105.65, ‐22.87]

3.2 PBAC score Show forest plot

1

58

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐8.19 [‐25.24, 8.86]

3.3 Number of bleeding days Show forest plot

2

152

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.08 [‐0.27, 0.42]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Mefenamic acid vs tranexamic acid (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)
Comparison 4. Mefenamic acid vs desmopressin (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

4.1 Mean reduction of PBAC score (%) Show forest plot

1

Other data

No numeric data

4.2 Side effects: headache and insomnia Show forest plot

1

24

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.00, 2.36]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Mefenamic acid vs desmopressin (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)
Comparison 5. Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

5.1 Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin) Show forest plot

1

38

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐42.70 [‐73.33, ‐12.07]

5.2 Duration of menstruation Show forest plot

1

38

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐0.62, 0.62]

5.3 Side effects Show forest plot

1

38

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.69 [1.20, 18.44]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)
Comparison 6. Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

6.1 PBAC score Show forest plot

1

100

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐32.00 [‐39.84, ‐24.16]

6.2 Number of pads/day Show forest plot

1

100

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.50 [‐0.91, ‐0.09]

6.3 Number of bleeding days Show forest plot

1

100

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.40 [‐1.93, ‐0.87]

6.4 Side effects Show forest plot

1

200

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.30, 1.48]

6.4.1 Headache

1

100

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.18, 1.92]

6.4.2 Vomiting

1

100

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.25, 2.18]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Tranexamic acid vs flavonoids (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)
Comparison 7. Tranexamic acid vs active comparators (mefenamic acid, flavonoids, diclofenac) (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

7.1 Number of bleeding days Show forest plot

4

290

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.27 [‐1.14, 0.60]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Tranexamic acid vs active comparators (mefenamic acid, flavonoids, diclofenac) (Cu IUD, treatment for HMB)
Comparison 8. Ulipristal acetate vs placebo (LNG IUD, treatment of HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

8.1 Duration of days until bleeding stops Show forest plot

1

24

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.30 [‐9.07, 2.47]

8.2 Total bleeding in 90 days Show forest plot

1

24

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐9.30 [‐26.76, 8.16]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. Ulipristal acetate vs placebo (LNG IUD, treatment of HMB)
Comparison 9. High‐dose naproxen vs low‐dose naproxen (unknown IUD, treatment of HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

9.1 Blood loss reduction (%) Show forest plot

1

Other data

No numeric data

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 9. High‐dose naproxen vs low‐dose naproxen (unknown IUD, treatment of HMB)
Comparison 10. Mefenamic acid vs Vitex agnus (unknown IUD, treatment for HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

10.1 PBAC score Show forest plot

1

84

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.40 [‐13.77, 8.97]

10.2 Side effects Show forest plot

1

168

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.07, 5.13]

10.2.1 Nausea

1

84

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.06, 16.53]

10.2.2 Abdominal pain

1

84

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.22]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 10. Mefenamic acid vs Vitex agnus (unknown IUD, treatment for HMB)
Comparison 11. Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for pain)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

11.1 Pelvic pain Show forest plot

1

38

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.06, 17.25]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 11. Tranexamic acid vs sodium diclofenac (Cu IUD, treatment for pain)
Comparison 12. Naproxen vs placebo (unknown IUD, treatment for pain)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

12.1 Overall pain relief score Show forest plot

1

33

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.10 [0.91, 7.29]

12.2 Daily pain relief score Show forest plot

1

33

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.10 [0.27, 5.93]

12.3 Pain relief Show forest plot

1

40

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.79 [0.77, 10.04]

12.4 Need for analgesia Show forest plot

1

33

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.05, 1.80]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 12. Naproxen vs placebo (unknown IUD, treatment for pain)
Comparison 13. Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

13.1 Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin) Show forest plot

1

40

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐14.11 [‐36.04, 7.82]

13.1.1 Cu IUD

1

20

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐9.47 [‐34.45, 15.51]

13.1.2 Lippes Loop

1

20

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐29.68 [‐75.44, 16.08]

13.2 Duration of bleeding Show forest plot

1

28

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐1.40, 1.00]

13.3 Median menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin) Show forest plot

1

Other data

No numeric data

13.3.1 Fincoid

1

Other data

No numeric data

13.3.2 ML Cu 375

1

Other data

No numeric data

13.4 Side effects Show forest plot

2

108

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.15 [0.50, 9.31]

13.4.1 Eye and mouth swelling

1

40

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.15 [0.12, 82.16]

13.4.2 Stomach cramps

1

40

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.15 [0.12, 82.16]

13.4.3 Tired, irritable

1

28

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.67 [0.25, 11.07]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 13. Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB)
Comparison 14. Tolfenamic vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

14.1 Number of pads/day Show forest plot

1

122

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.00 [‐1.57, ‐0.43]

14.2 Menstruation "more abundant than normal" Show forest plot

1

310

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.34, 0.85]

14.3 Clots in menstrual blood Show forest plot

1

310

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.27, 0.68]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 14. Tolfenamic vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB)
Comparison 15. Aspirin vs paracetamol (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

15.1 Menstrual blood loss (alkaline hematin) Show forest plot

1

20

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐26.16, 25.56]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 15. Aspirin vs paracetamol (Cu IUD, prevention of HMB)
Comparison 16. 2 g tranexamic vs 1 g tranexamic (Cu IUD, prevention HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

16.1 Occurence of HMB (%) Show forest plot

1

Other data

No numeric data

16.1.1 Alkaline hematin

1

Other data

No numeric data

16.1.2 PBAC

1

Other data

No numeric data

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 16. 2 g tranexamic vs 1 g tranexamic (Cu IUD, prevention HMB)
Comparison 17. Ulipristal acetate (CDB‐2914) vs placebo (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

17.1 Percentage days bleeding or spotting Show forest plot

1

118

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

9.50 [1.48, 17.52]

17.2 Longest consecutive run of days without bleeding or spotting Show forest plot

1

118

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.90 [‐6.93, 3.13]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 17. Ulipristal acetate (CDB‐2914) vs placebo (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB)
Comparison 18. Tranexamic acid vs mefenamic acid (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

18.1 Median number of bleeding days Show forest plot

1

Other data

No numeric data

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 18. Tranexamic acid vs mefenamic acid (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB)
Comparison 19. Naproxen vs estradiol (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

19.1 Median number of bleeding and spotting days Show forest plot

1

Other data

No numeric data

19.2 Satisfied with bleeding pattern at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

73

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.40, 3.03]

19.3 Side effects Show forest plot

1

86

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.22 [0.13, 81.19]

19.3.1 Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

1

86

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.22 [0.13, 81.19]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 19. Naproxen vs estradiol (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB)
Comparison 20. Mifepristone vs vitamin B (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

20.1 Percentage bleeding and spotting days Show forest plot

1

Other data

No numeric data

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 20. Mifepristone vs vitamin B (LNG IUD, prevention of HMB)
Comparison 21. Tolfenamic acid vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of pain)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

21.1 Menstruation "more painful than normal" Show forest plot

1

310

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.44, 1.14]

21.2 Side effects Show forest plot

1

366

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.02, 9.29]

21.2.1 Dyspepsia and diarrhoea

1

122

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

9.96 [0.52, 189.04]

21.2.2 Headache

1

122

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.00, 1.60]

21.2.3 Depression

1

122

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.00, 1.60]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 21. Tolfenamic acid vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of pain)
Comparison 22. Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of pain)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

22.1 Reduction in menstrual cramps Show forest plot

1

20

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.11, 8.95]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 22. Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD, prevention of pain)
Comparison 23. Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD,prevention of bleed and pain, IUD removal)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

23.1 IUD removal by 26 weeks due to pain or increased blood loss Show forest plot

1

1962

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.66, 1.38]

23.2 IUD removal due to pain or increased blood loss by 52 weeks Show forest plot

1

1962

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.93, 1.69]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 23. Ibuprofen vs placebo (Cu IUD,prevention of bleed and pain, IUD removal)