Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Funnel plot of comparison: 7 ANP in AKI, outcome: 7.1 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Funnel plot of comparison: 7 ANP in AKI, outcome: 7.1 Mortality.

Funnel plot of comparison: 7 ANP in AKI, outcome: 7.2 Need for RRT.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Funnel plot of comparison: 7 ANP in AKI, outcome: 7.2 Need for RRT.

Flow chart of study selection
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Flow chart of study selection

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 1 Mortality ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 1 Mortality ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 2 Mortality ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 2 Mortality ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 3 Need for RRT ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 3 Need for RRT ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 4 Need for RRT ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 4 Need for RRT ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 5 Length of hospital stay (days) ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 5 Length of hospital stay (days) ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 6 Length of hospital stay (days) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 6 Length of hospital stay (days) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 7 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 7 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 8 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 8 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 9 Change in SCr (mg/dL) ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 9 Change in SCr (mg/dL) ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 10 Change in SCr (mg/dL) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 10 Change in SCr (mg/dL) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 11 Hypotension ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 11 Hypotension ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 12 Hypotension ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 12 Hypotension ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 13 Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation) ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 13 Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation) ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 14 Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 14 Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 15 Arrhythmias (premature ventricular contractions) ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 15 Arrhythmias (premature ventricular contractions) ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 16 Arrhythmias (premature ventricular contractions) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 16 Arrhythmias (premature ventricular contractions) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 17 Arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia) ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 17 Arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia) ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 18 Arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 ANP for preventing AKI, Outcome 18 Arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 1 Mortality ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 1 Mortality ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 2 Mortality ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 2 Mortality ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 3 Need for RRT ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 3 Need for RRT ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 4 Need for RRT ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 4 Need for RRT ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 6 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 6 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 7 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 7 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 13 Hypotension ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 13 Hypotension ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 14 Hypotension ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.14

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 14 Hypotension ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 15 Arrhythmias ‐ low versus high dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.15

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 15 Arrhythmias ‐ low versus high dose studies.

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 16 Arrhythmias ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.16

Comparison 2 ANP for treating AKI, Outcome 16 Arrhythmias ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group.

Comparison 3 Major surgery, Outcome 1 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Major surgery, Outcome 1 Mortality.

Comparison 3 Major surgery, Outcome 2 Need for RRT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Major surgery, Outcome 2 Need for RRT.

Comparison 3 Major surgery, Outcome 3 Mortality in cardiovascular surgery.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Major surgery, Outcome 3 Mortality in cardiovascular surgery.

Comparison 3 Major surgery, Outcome 4 Need for RRT in cardiovascular surgery.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Major surgery, Outcome 4 Need for RRT in cardiovascular surgery.

Comparison 4 Radiocontrast nephropathy, Outcome 1 Incidence of AKI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Radiocontrast nephropathy, Outcome 1 Incidence of AKI.

Comparison 5 Oliguric AKI, Outcome 1 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Oliguric AKI, Outcome 1 Mortality.

Comparison 5 Oliguric AKI, Outcome 2 Need for RRT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Oliguric AKI, Outcome 2 Need for RRT.

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis based on methodological quality, Outcome 1 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis based on methodological quality, Outcome 1 Mortality.

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis based on methodological quality, Outcome 2 Need for RRT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis based on methodological quality, Outcome 2 Need for RRT.

Comparison 7 ANP in AKI, Outcome 1 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 ANP in AKI, Outcome 1 Mortality.

Comparison 7 ANP in AKI, Outcome 2 Need for RRT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 ANP in AKI, Outcome 2 Need for RRT.

Comparison 1. ANP for preventing AKI

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

11

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Low dose studies

10

794

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.21, 2.23]

1.2 High dose studies

1

24

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Mortality ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

11

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Active control group

2

57

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

9

761

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.21, 2.23]

3 Need for RRT ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

11

818

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.32, 0.99]

3.1 Low dose studies

10

794

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.14, 0.71]

3.2 High dose studies

1

24

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.45, 2.23]

4 Need for RRT ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

11

818

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.32, 0.99]

4.1 Active control group

2

57

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.06, 1.13]

4.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

9

761

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.35, 1.20]

5 Length of hospital stay (days) ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Low dose studies

3

201

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐9.50 [‐14.99, ‐4.02]

5.2 High dose studies

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Length of hospital stay (days) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

3

201

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐9.50 [‐14.99, ‐4.02]

6.1 Active control group

1

37

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.0 [‐21.31, 27.31]

6.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

2

164

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐10.17 [‐15.80, ‐4.55]

7 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

4

219

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐1.79, ‐0.01]

7.1 Low dose studies

4

219

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐1.79, ‐0.01]

7.2 High dose studies

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

4

219

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐1.79, ‐0.01]

8.1 Active control group

1

37

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.40 [‐3.45, 0.65]

8.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

3

182

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.88, 0.17]

9 Change in SCr (mg/dL) ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 Low dose studies

2

57

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.15, 0.42]

9.2 High dose studies

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Change in SCr (mg/dL) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 Active control group

2

57

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.15, 0.42]

10.2 Placebo/no treatment control

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Hypotension ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

10

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.1 Low dose studies

9

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 High dose studies

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Hypotension ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

10

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.1 Active control group

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation) ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 Low dose studies

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 High dose studies

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Active control group

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Arrhythmias (premature ventricular contractions) ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 Low dose studies

2

272

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.14, 0.48]

15.2 High dose studies

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Arrhythmias (premature ventricular contractions) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

16.1 Active control group

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Placebo/no treatment group

2

272

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.14, 0.48]

17 Arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia) ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

17.1 Low dose studies

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 High dose studies

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

18.1 Active control group

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. ANP for preventing AKI
Comparison 2. ANP for treating AKI

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

8

1103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.90, 1.24]

1.1 Low dose studies

6

290

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.41, 1.49]

1.2 High dose studies

3

813

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.91, 1.29]

2 Mortality ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

8

1103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.90, 1.24]

2.1 Active control group

1

53

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.18, 1.27]

2.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

7

1050

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.92, 1.27]

3 Need for RRT ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

8

1103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.68, 1.08]

3.1 Low dose studies

6

290

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.30, 0.98]

3.2 High dose studies

3

813

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.83, 1.14]

4 Need for RRT ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

8

1103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.68, 1.08]

4.1 Active control group

1

53

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.45 [0.21, 0.95]

4.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

7

1050

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.74, 1.13]

5 Length of hospital stay (days)

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Low dose studies

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 High dose studies

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Length of ICU stay (days) ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Active control group

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in SCr (mg/dL)

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Change in serum BUN

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Change in CrCl or GFR

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Duration of AKI

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Conversion from oliguric to non‐oliguric AKI

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Hypotension ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

8

1103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.69 [1.29, 2.22]

13.1 Low dose studies

6

290

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.87, 1.81]

13.2 High dose studies

3

813

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.92 [1.33, 2.77]

14 Hypotension ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

8

1103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.69 [1.29, 2.22]

14.1 Active control group

1

53

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.32 [0.10, 54.52]

14.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

7

1050

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.68 [1.26, 2.23]

15 Arrhythmias ‐ low versus high dose studies Show forest plot

3

785

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.65 [0.98, 2.77]

15.1 Low dose studies

1

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.83, 1.74]

15.2 High dose studies

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.03 [1.25, 3.31]

16 Arrhythmias ‐ active versus placebo/no treatment control group Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

16.1 Active control group

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Placebo/no treatment control group

3

785

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.65 [0.98, 2.77]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. ANP for treating AKI
Comparison 3. Major surgery

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality Show forest plot

14

817

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.71, 1.37]

1.1 Prevention studies

9

551

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.21, 2.23]

1.2 Treatment studies

5

266

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.53, 1.65]

2 Need for RRT Show forest plot

14

817

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.37, 0.92]

2.1 Prevention studies

9

551

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.32, 0.99]

2.2 Treatment studies

5

266

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.22, 1.41]

3 Mortality in cardiovascular surgery Show forest plot

8

493

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.37, 1.43]

4 Need for RRT in cardiovascular surgery Show forest plot

8

493

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.18, 0.70]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Major surgery
Comparison 4. Radiocontrast nephropathy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Incidence of AKI Show forest plot

2

267

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.73, 2.03]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Radiocontrast nephropathy
Comparison 5. Oliguric AKI

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality Show forest plot

5

535

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.84, 1.23]

1.1 Prevention studies

1

9

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Treatment studies

4

526

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.84, 1.23]

2 Need for RRT Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Prevention studies

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Treatment studies

4

528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.70, 1.01]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Oliguric AKI
Comparison 6. Sensitivity analysis based on methodological quality

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality Show forest plot

3

785

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.91, 1.29]

1.1 Low dose studies

1

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.38, 2.17]

1.2 High dose studies

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.92, 1.30]

2 Need for RRT Show forest plot

3

785

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.71, 1.14]

2.1 Low dose studies

1

59

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.20, 1.00]

2.2 High dose studies

2

726

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.80, 1.13]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Sensitivity analysis based on methodological quality
Comparison 7. ANP in AKI

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality Show forest plot

19

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Low dose prevention studies

10

794

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.21, 2.23]

1.2 High dose prevention studies

1

24

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Low dose treatment studies

6

290

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.41, 1.49]

1.4 High dose treatment studies

3

813

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.91, 1.29]

2 Need for RRT Show forest plot

19

1921

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.65, 1.01]

2.1 Low dose prevention studies

10

794

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.14, 0.71]

2.2 High dose prevention studies

1

24

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.45, 2.23]

2.3 Low dose treatment studies

6

290

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.30, 0.98]

2.4 High dose treatment studies

3

813

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.83, 1.14]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. ANP in AKI