Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Kieferorthopädische Behandlung für Kinder mit tiefem Überbiss und nach innen gekippten oberen Frontzähnen

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Additional references

Ir a:

Al‐Nimri 2005

Al‐Nimri K, Gharaibeh T. Space conditions and dental and occlusal features in patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines: an aetiological study. European Journal of Orthodontics 2005;27(5):461‐5.

Arvystas 1979

Arvystas MG. Treatment of severe mandibular retrusion in class II, division 2 malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics 1979;76(2):149‐64.

Bilgic 2015

Bilgic F, Gelgor IE, Celebi AA. Malocclusion prevalence and orthodontic treatment need in central Anatolian adolescents compared to European and other nations' adolescents. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2015;20(6):75‐81.

Cunningham 2011

Cunningham S, Bearn D, Benson P, Johal A, Millett D, O'Brien K, Luther F. In search of the sample: recent experiences of a trial team in orthodontics. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2011;32:530‐34.

Dimberg 2015

Dimberg L, Lennartsson B, Arnrup K, Bondemark L. Prevalence and change of malocclusions from primary to early permanent dentition: a longitudinal study. Angle Orthodontist 2‐15;85(5):728‐34.

Dyer 2001

Dyer FM, McKeown HF, Sandler PJ. The modified twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusions. Journal of Orthodontics 2001;28(4):271‐80.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Houston 1996

Houston WJB, Stephens CD, Tulley J. A Text Book of Orthodontics. Oxford (UK): Blackwell, 1996.

Lefebvre 2011

Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

Legovic 1999

Legovic M, Mady L. Longitudinal occlusal changes from primary to permanent dentition in children with normal primary occlusion. Angle Orthodontist 1999;69(3):264‐6.

Litt 1984

Litt RA, Nielsen IL. Class II, division 2 malocclusion. To extract ‐ or not extract?. Angle Orthodontist 1984;54(2):123‐38.

Markovic 1992

Markovic M. At the crossroads of oral facial genetics. European Journal of Orthodontics 1992;14(6):469‐81.

Millett 2012

Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O'Brien KD, Benson PE, De Oliveira CM. Treatment and stability of class II division 2 malocclusion in children and adolescents: a systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2012;142(2):159‐69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.022]

Mossey 1999

Mossey PA. The heritability of malocclusion: part 2. The influence of genetics in malocclusion. British Journal of Orthodontics 1999;26(3):195‐203.

O'Brien 1993

O'Brien M. Children's Dental Health in the United Kingdom. London (UK): HMSO, 1993.

Paquette 1992

Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE. A long‐term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1992;102(1):1‐14.

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Selwyn‐Barnett 1996

Selwyn‐Barnett BJ. Class II, division 2 malocclusion: a method of planning and treatment. British Journal of Orthodontics 1996;23(1):29‐36.

Shaw 1980

Shaw WC, Addy M, Ray C. Dental and social effects of malocclusion and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment: a review. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1980;8(1):36‐45.

Shaw 1991

Shaw WC, Richmond S, O'Brien KD, Brook P, Stephens CD. Quality control in orthodontics: indices of treatment need and treatment standards. British Dental Journal 1991;170(3):107‐12.

Thiruvenkatachari 2013

Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, Worthington HV, O'Brien KD, Worthington HV. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub3]

Worthington 2015

Worthington H, Clarkson J, Weldon J. Priority oral health research identification for clinical decision‐making. Evidence‐based Dentistry 2015;16(3):69‐71.

Wragg 1990

Wragg PF, Jenkins WM, Watson IB, Stirrups DR. The deep overbite: prevention of trauma. British Dental Journal 1990;168(9):365‐7.

References to other published versions of this review

Ir a:

Millett 2006

Millett DT, Cunningham S, O'Brien KD, Benson PE, de Oliveira CM. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005972.pub2]

Millett 2017

Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O'Brien KD, Benson PE, de Oliveira CM. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005972.pub3]

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children

Orthodontic intervention (without extraction) compared with extraction or no orthodontic intervention for treating deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children

Patient or population: children with deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth

Settings: orthodontic clinic

Intervention: orthodontic treatment

Comparison: extraction or no treatment

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Extraction or no treatment

Orthodontic treatment

Dento‐occlusal results of treatment, measured with the PAR index

No data are available as no RCTs or CCTs have been conducted.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial; CCT: controlled clinical trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children
Ir a la tabla de la revisión