Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005555Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 octubre 2005see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud ocular y de la visión

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2006 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • David S Friedman

    Correspondencia a: Ophthalmology Department, Wilmer Eye Institute / John Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA

    [email protected]

  • Swaroop S Vedula

    CEVG, US Project, Brown University, Providence, USA

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the review: DSF, VSS
Designing the review: DSF, VSS
Coordinating the review: VSS
Undertaking manual searches: VSS, DSF
Screening search results: DSF, VSS
Organizing retrieval of papers: VSS
Screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria: DSF, VSS
Appraising quality of papers: DSF, VSS
Abstracting data from papers: DSF, VSS
Writing to authors of papers for additional information: DSF, VSS
Providing additional data about papers: VSS
Obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies: DSF
Data management for the review: VSS
Entering data into RevMan: DSF, VSS
Analysis of data: VSS, DSF
Interpretation of data: DSF, VSS
Writing the review: DSF, VSS
Performing previous work that was the foundation of current study: DSF
Guarantor for the review: DSF

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Brown University, USA.

External sources

  • Contract N01‐EY‐2‐1003, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We thank Karen Blackhall, Trials Search Coordinator for CEVG, for devising and running the electronic searches. We thank Zbys Fedorowicz, Suzanne Brodney‐Folse and Jennifer Burr for their comments on an earlier version of this protocol. We thank the CEVG editorial base and Kay Dickersin, PhD for their guidance in designing this protocol.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Mar 24

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma

Review

Ariel Yuhan Ong, Sueko M Ng, S Swaroop Vedula, David S. Friedman

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005555.pub3

2006 Jul 19

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma

Review

David Friedman, Satyanarayana S Vedula

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005555.pub2

2005 Oct 19

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma

Protocol

David S Friedman, Swaroop S Vedula

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005555

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.