Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Sildenafil za plućnu hipertenziju u novorođenčadi

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Abstract

disponible en

Background

Persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates (PPHN) is associated with high mortality. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for PPHN is assisted ventilation and administration of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). However, nitric oxide is costly and may not be appropriate in resource‐poor settings. Approximately 30% of patients fail to respond to iNO. High concentrations of phosphodiesterases in the pulmonary vasculature has led to the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as sildenafil or milrinone.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates.

Search methods

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL databases were searched from their inception until December 2010; Clinicaltrials.gov web site, the reference lists of identified trials, and abstracts of meetings were searched without any language restriction.

Selection criteria

Randomised or quasi‐randomised controlled trials of sildenafil compared with placebo or other pulmonary vasodilators, irrespective of dose, route and duration of administration in neonates with PPHN, were included if the trial reported any of the pre‐specified outcomes.

Data collection and analysis

The methodological quality of the trials was assessed regarding how bias was minimized at study entry, during study intervention and at outcomes measurement. Data on relevant outcomes were extracted and the effect size was estimated and reported as relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (MD) as appropriate. The I‐squared (I2) test of heterogeneity was applied.

Main results

Three eligible trials that enrolled 77 infants were identified. The methodological quality of the studies indicated low‐moderate risk of bias. All studies were performed in resource‐limited settings where iNO and high frequency ventilation were not available at the time of study. There was significant reduction in mortality in the sildenafil group (typical RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.57; typical RD ‐0.38, 95% CI ‐0.60 to ‐0.16; Number needed to treat to benefit 3, 95% CI 2 to 6). Physiological parameters of oxygenation (oxygenation index, PaO2) suggested a steady improvement after the first dose of sildenafil. No clinically important side effects were identified.

Authors' conclusions

Sildenafil in the treatment of PPHN has significant potential especially in resource limited settings. However, a large scale randomised trial comparing sildenafil with the currently used vasodilator, inhaled nitric oxide, is needed to assess efficacy and safety.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Plain language summary

Sildenafil za plućnu hipertenziju (povišen krvni tlak u plućnom krvotoku) u novorođenčadi

Dio novorođenčadi razvije perzistentnu plućnu hipertenziju novorođenčadi (PPHN), stanje u kojemu je krvni tlak abnormalno visok u krvnim žilama koje dovode krv prema plućima. Kontinuirano visoki tlak u tim žilama uzrokuje smanjeni protok krvi prema plućima što dovodi do smanjene količine kisika koji se doprema do krvi i svih organa u tijelu. Temeljem informacija iz 3 kliničke studije koje su uključile 77 djece, zaključak je ovog Cochrane sustavnog pregleda da lijek sildenafil može djelovati na opuštanje tih žila te na taj način omogućiti poboljšani protok krvi i bolju dostavu kisika organima. Ta terapija je osobito korisna u slučajevima kada drugi terapijski pristupi nisu dostupni. Međutim, u okolini u kojoj ima dovoljno resursa, potrebne su daljnje studije koje bi usporedile sildenafil s postojećom terapijom da se utvrdi učinkovitost i sigurnost.