Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Suplementos alimenticios para el eccema atópico establecido

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005205.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 15 febrero 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Piel

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Fiona J Bath‐Hextall

    Correspondencia a: School of Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    [email protected]

  • Claire Jenkinson

    School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Rosemary Humphreys

    c/o Cochrane Skin Group, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Hywel C Williams

    Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Contributions of authors

Link with editorial base and co‐ordinate contributions from co‐authors (FB‐H)
Draft protocol (FB‐H, FD, and HW)
Consumer ‐ input to draft protocol (RH)
Run searches (FB‐H and FD)
Identify relevant titles and abstracts from searches (FB‐H and CJ)
Obtain copies of trials (FB‐H)
Selection of trials (FB‐H and CJ)
Extract data from trials (FB‐H and CJ)
Enter data into RevMan (FB‐H)
Carry out analysis (FB‐H)
Interpret data (FB‐H and HW)
Writing of final review (FB‐H and HW)

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Nottingham, School of Nursing, UK.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Finola Delamere and Weija Zhang for their contribution to the published protocol.

The editorial base would like to thank the Key Editor, Urba Gonzalez, Jo Leonardi‐Bee and Sarah Garner who were our Statistics and Methods Editors respectively, Eric Simpson who was a clinical referee, and another clinical referee who wishes to remain anonymous. We also wish to thank Kim Thomas who was our consumer referee.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Feb 15

Dietary supplements for established atopic eczema

Review

Fiona J Bath‐Hextall, Claire Jenkinson, Rosemary Humphreys, Hywel C Williams

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005205.pub3

2005 Oct 19

Dietary supplements for established atopic eczema

Protocol

Fiona J Bath‐Hextall, Finola M Delamere, Rosemary Humphreys, Hywel C Williams, Weiya Zhang

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005205.pub2

2005 Apr 20

Dietary supplements for established atopic eczema

Protocol

Fiona Bath‐Hextall, Finola M Delamere, Rosemary Humphreys, Hywel C. Williams, Weiya Zhang

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005205

Differences between protocol and review

Finola Delamere and Weija Zhang are no longer authors for the full review, and Claire Jenkinson has been added as an author.

We made minor changes to the Background, mainly to include relevant references since the protocol was published. We changed to the effect measure risk ratio (RR) in line with Skin Group policy.

We had not planned to search the GREAT database, but this has been developed since the protocol to this review was published. Therefore, it was searched, but we found no further studies.

Notes

A search of the GREAT (The Global Resource of Eczema Trials) database in February 2013 found just 1 study on Vitamin D supplementation, and another search of the GREAT database in May 2014 found only a few papers. Thus, this review has been marked stable because most of the papers were on probiotics and prebiotics, which are dealt with in another Cochrane review, and the paper on vitamin D is unlikely to move the existing vitamin D data in the review on in any meaningful way. An update has not been considered necessary for two successive years. Our Trials Search Co‐ordinator will run a new search in 2015 to re‐assess whether an update is needed.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.