Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics for bronchiolitis in children under two years of age

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005189.pub4Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 09 octubre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Infecciones respiratorias agudas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Rebecca Farley

    Discipline of General Practice, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

  • Geoffrey KP Spurling

    Correspondencia a: Discipline of General Practice, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Lars Eriksson

    Herston Health Sciences Library, University of Queensland Library, Brisbane, Australia

  • Chris B Del Mar

    Centre for Research in Evidence‐Based Practice (CREBP), Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia

Contributions of authors

RF joined the review team for this 2014 update. RF reviewed search results, contacted authors, entered data and drafted the text for this update.
GS co‐wrote the protocol, reviewed search results, performed quality appraisal, extracted data, drafted the original text for this review and assisted in writing the text for this update.
CDM gave advice on performing the systematic review, performed quality appraisal, extracted data and assisted in writing the text for this update and previous versions of this review.
LE conducted the literature search and approved the final version.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Queensland, Australia.

    In kind

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Rebecca Farley: none known.
Geoffrey KP Spurling: none known.
Lars Eriksson: none known.
Chris B Del Mar: none known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following people for their comments on the draft review: Anne Lyddiatt, David Isaacs, Federico Martinón‐Torres, Luthful Kabir, Max Bulsara and Juan Lozano. We also thank the following people for commenting on the updated review drafts: Linda Hornbeek, Liz Whamond, Amanda Roberts, Richard Taggart, David Isaacs, Federico Martinón‐Torres, Rob Ware, Teresa Neeman and Inge Axelsson.

We would like to acknowledge Dr Kit Fonseka who co‐wrote the initial protocol, reviewed the search results, performed quality appraisal, extracted data and helped write the first version of this review. Jenny Doust gave advice on performing the systematic review, critically appraised primary data, extracted data and helped write the protocol and the first two versions of this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Oct 09

Antibiotics for bronchiolitis in children under two years of age

Review

Rebecca Farley, Geoffrey KP Spurling, Lars Eriksson, Chris B Del Mar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005189.pub4

2011 Jun 15

Antibiotics for bronchiolitis in children

Review

Geoffrey KP Spurling, Jenny Doust, Chris B Del Mar, Lars Eriksson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005189.pub3

2007 Jan 24

Antibiotics for bronchiolitis in children

Review

Geoffrey KP Spurling, Kithsiri Fonseka, Jenny Doust, Chris B Del Mar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005189.pub2

2005 Apr 20

Antibiotics for bronchiolitis in children

Protocol

Kithsiri Fonseka, Jenny Doust, Geoffrey KP Spurling, Chris Del Mar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005189

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Comparison 1 Use of alternative therapy (including duration of supplementary oxygen requirement), Outcome 1 Days of supplementary oxygen.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Use of alternative therapy (including duration of supplementary oxygen requirement), Outcome 1 Days of supplementary oxygen.

Comparison 1 Use of alternative therapy (including duration of supplementary oxygen requirement), Outcome 2 Use of alternative therapy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Use of alternative therapy (including duration of supplementary oxygen requirement), Outcome 2 Use of alternative therapy.

Comparison 1 Use of alternative therapy (including duration of supplementary oxygen requirement), Outcome 3 Duration of bronchodilator use.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Use of alternative therapy (including duration of supplementary oxygen requirement), Outcome 3 Duration of bronchodilator use.

Comparison 1 Use of alternative therapy (including duration of supplementary oxygen requirement), Outcome 4 Days of tube feeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Use of alternative therapy (including duration of supplementary oxygen requirement), Outcome 4 Days of tube feeding.

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 1 Wheeze.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 1 Wheeze.

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 2 Shortness of breath.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 2 Shortness of breath.

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 3 Oxygen saturation (< 96%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 3 Oxygen saturation (< 96%).

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 4 Not smiling socially.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 4 Not smiling socially.

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 5 Feeding difficulties.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 5 Feeding difficulties.

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 6 Fever.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 6 Fever.

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 7 Cough.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Symptoms, Outcome 7 Cough.

Comparison 3 Duration of symptoms, Outcome 1 Duration of symptoms.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Duration of symptoms, Outcome 1 Duration of symptoms.

Comparison 3 Duration of symptoms, Outcome 2 Duration of fever [days].
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Duration of symptoms, Outcome 2 Duration of fever [days].

Comparison 4 Hospital admissions/time to discharge from hospital, Outcome 1 Length of hospital stay.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Hospital admissions/time to discharge from hospital, Outcome 1 Length of hospital stay.

Comparison 5 Readmissions, Outcome 1 Readmission.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Readmissions, Outcome 1 Readmission.

Comparison 6 PICU admission, Outcome 1 PICU admission.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 PICU admission, Outcome 1 PICU admission.

Comparison 7 Death, Outcome 1 Deaths.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Death, Outcome 1 Deaths.

Table 1. Kneyber: azithromycin versus placebo for bronchiolitis

Variable

Azithromycin (n = 32)

Placebo

(n = 39)

Outcome

Significance level

Days of symptoms

4.94 (SD 3.78)

4.62 (SD 2.05)

Mean difference 0.32 (95% CI ‐1.14 to 1.78)

P value = 0.65

Days in hospital

5.5 (SD 2.54)

5.82 (SD 1.98)

Mean difference ‐0.32 (95% CI ‐1.40 to 0.76)

P value = 0.56

Duration of fever (days)

1.47 (SD 1.41)

1.00 (SD 1.08)

Mean difference 0.47 (95% CI ‐0.12 to 1.06)

P value = 0.12

Duration of bronchodilator use

2.79 (SD 2.49)

2.96 (SD 2.06)

Mean difference ‐0.17 (95% CI ‐1.25 to 0.91)

P value = 0.81

Bronchodilator use

17

23

Odds ratio 0.79 (95% CI 0.31 to 2.02)

P value = 0.62

Supplementary oxygen

20 (62.5%)

31 (79.49%)

Odds ratio 0.43 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.24)

P value = 0.11

Days of extra oxygen

3.75 (SD 1.74)

3.39 (SD 1.78)

Mean difference 0.36 (95% CI ‐0.46 to 1.18)

P value = 0.48

PICU admission

0 (0%)

1 (2.56%)

Odds ratio 0.39 (95% CI 0.02 to 10.03)

P value = 1.00

Tube feeding

16 (50.00%)

16 (41.03%)

Odds ratio 1.44 (95% CI 0.56 to 3.69)

P value = 0.45

Days of tube feeding

1.90 (SD 2.13)

1.83 (SD 2.36)

Mean difference 0.07 (95% CI ‐0.98 to 1.12)

P value = 0.90

CI: confidence interval
PICU: paediatric intensive care unit
SD: standard deviation

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Kneyber: azithromycin versus placebo for bronchiolitis
Table 2. Mazumder: IV ampicillin versus oral erythromycin versus control

Variable

Day 1

Outcome

Day 3

Outcome

Day 5

Outcome

IV ampicillin

Oral erythromycin

Control

Chi2 test (P value)

IV ampicillin

Oral erythromycin

Control

Chi2 test (P value)

IV ampicillin

Oral erythromycin

Control

Chi2 test

(P value)

Wheeze

29/29 (100%)

32/32 (100%)

43/43 (100%)

N/A

16/29 (55%)

2/32 (6%)

26/43 (60%)

24.82 (P value < 0.001)

6/29 (21%)

7/32 (22%)

2/43 (5%)

5.69 (P value = 0.058)

Shortness of breath

29/29 (100%)

32/32 (100%)

43/43 (100%)

N/A

18/29 (62%)

16/32 (50%)

27/43 (63%)

1.97 (P value = 0.37)

8/29 (28%)

8/32 (25%)

15/43 (35%)

0.95 (P value = 0.62)

Oxygen saturation (< 96%)

18/29 (62%)

15/32 (47%)

23/43 (53%)

1.42 (P value = 0.49)

8/29 (28%)

7/32 (22%)

5/43 (12%)

3.05 (P value = 0.22)

2/29 (7%)

3/32 (9%)

2/43 (5%)

0.65 (P value = 0.72)

Not smiling socially

19/29 (66%)

21/32 (66%)

30/43 (70%)

0.20 (P value = 0.90)

3/29 (10%)

3/32 (9%)

5/43 (12%)

0.10 (P value = 0.95)

0/29 (0%)

0/32 (0%)

0/43 (0%)

N/A

Feeding difficulty

12/29 (41%)

13/32 (41%)

25/43 (58%)

2.98 (P value = 0.23)

3/29 (10%)

3/32 (9%)

5/43 (12%)

0.10 (P value = 0.95)

0/29 (0%)

0/32 (0%)

0/43 (0%)

N/A

IV: intravenous

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Mazumder: IV ampicillin versus oral erythromycin versus control
Table 3. Kabir: IV ampicillin versus oral erythromycin versus control

Variable

Intervention

Outcome

IV ampicillin

Oral erythromycin

Control

Chi2 test (P value)

Day 2

Oxygen sats (< 90%)

2/99 (2%)

6/99 (6%)

6/97 (6%)

2.45 (P value = 0.29)

Fever

5/99 (5%)

6/99 (6%)

4/97 (4%)

0.38 (P value = 0.83)

Day 7

Wheeze

8/99 (8%)

9/99 (9%)

4/97 (4%)

2.04 (P value = 0.36)

Shortness of breath

8/99 (8%)

9/99 (9%)

2/97 (2%)

4.68 (P value = 0.10)

Cough

10/99 (10%)

9/99 (9%)

3/97 (3%)

4.06 (P value = 0.13)

CI: confidence interval
IV: intravenous
PICU: paediatric intensive care unit
SD: standard deviation

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Kabir: IV ampicillin versus oral erythromycin versus control
Comparison 1. Use of alternative therapy (including duration of supplementary oxygen requirement)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Days of supplementary oxygen Show forest plot

3

350

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐0.72, 0.33]

2 Use of alternative therapy Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Oxygen

1

71

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.15, 1.24]

2.2 Bronchodilator use

1

71

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.31, 2.02]

2.3 Corticosteroid use

1

71

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [0.02, 1.27]

2.4 Nasogastric feeding

1

71

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.56, 3.69]

3 Duration of bronchodilator use Show forest plot

1

71

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐1.28, 0.88]

4 Days of tube feeding Show forest plot

1

71

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [‐0.95, 1.15]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Use of alternative therapy (including duration of supplementary oxygen requirement)
Comparison 2. Symptoms

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Wheeze Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Day 1

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Day 3

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.12, 0.62]

1.3 Day 5

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.55 [1.18, 26.05]

1.4 Day 7

1

295

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.18 [0.71, 6.68]

2 Shortness of breath Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Day 1

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Day 3

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.34, 1.66]

2.3 Day 5

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.28, 1.55]

2.4 Day 7

1

295

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.46 [1.01, 19.72]

3 Oxygen saturation (< 96%) Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Day 1

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.47, 2.24]

3.2 Day 3

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.48 [0.83, 7.44]

3.3 Day 5

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.83 [0.34, 9.91]

4 Not smiling socially Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Day 1

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.36, 1.91]

4.2 Day 3

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.24, 2.91]

4.3 Day 5

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Feeding difficulties Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Day 1

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.23, 1.10]

5.2 Day 3

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.24, 2.91]

5.3 Day 5

1

104

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Fever Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Day 2

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Cough Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Day 7

1

295

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.33 [0.96, 11.53]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Symptoms
Comparison 3. Duration of symptoms

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Duration of symptoms Show forest plot

2

123

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [‐1.14, 1.78]

2 Duration of fever [days] Show forest plot

1

71

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [‐0.09, 1.09]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Duration of symptoms
Comparison 4. Hospital admissions/time to discharge from hospital

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Length of hospital stay Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Azithromycin versus placebo

3

350

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐1.18, 0.02]

1.2 Erythromycin versus placebo

1

196

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.22, 1.18]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Hospital admissions/time to discharge from hospital
Comparison 5. Readmissions

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Readmission Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Readmissions
Comparison 6. PICU admission

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 PICU admission Show forest plot

1

71

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.02, 10.03]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. PICU admission
Comparison 7. Death

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Deaths Show forest plot

5

543

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Death