Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Comparison 1 Any Psychosocial plus any Pharmacological detoxification Intervention versus any Pharmachological alone, Outcome 1 Completion of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Any Psychosocial plus any Pharmacological detoxification Intervention versus any Pharmachological alone, Outcome 1 Completion of treatment.

Comparison 1 Any Psychosocial plus any Pharmacological detoxification Intervention versus any Pharmachological alone, Outcome 2 Use of primary substance.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Any Psychosocial plus any Pharmacological detoxification Intervention versus any Pharmachological alone, Outcome 2 Use of primary substance.

Comparison 1 Any Psychosocial plus any Pharmacological detoxification Intervention versus any Pharmachological alone, Outcome 3 Number of subjects abstinent at follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Any Psychosocial plus any Pharmacological detoxification Intervention versus any Pharmachological alone, Outcome 3 Number of subjects abstinent at follow‐up.

Comparison 2 Any Psychosocial Intervention plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 1 Completion of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Any Psychosocial Intervention plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 1 Completion of treatment.

Comparison 2 Any Psychosocial Intervention plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 2 Use of primary substance.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Any Psychosocial Intervention plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 2 Use of primary substance.

Comparison 2 Any Psychosocial Intervention plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 3 Number of subjects abstinent at follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Any Psychosocial Intervention plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 3 Number of subjects abstinent at follow‐up.

Comparison 2 Any Psychosocial Intervention plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 4 Compliance as clinic absences during the treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Any Psychosocial Intervention plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 4 Compliance as clinic absences during the treatment.

Comparison 3 Contingency Management Approaches plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 1 Completion of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Contingency Management Approaches plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 1 Completion of treatment.

Comparison 3 Contingency Management Approaches plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 2 Compliance as clinical absences during the treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Contingency Management Approaches plus MDT versus MDT alone, Outcome 2 Compliance as clinical absences during the treatment.

Comparison 1. Any Psychosocial plus any Pharmacological detoxification Intervention versus any Pharmachological alone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Completion of treatment Show forest plot

5

184

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.68 [1.11, 2.55]

2 Use of primary substance Show forest plot

3

109

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.59, 1.01]

3 Number of subjects abstinent at follow‐up Show forest plot

3

208

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.43 [1.61, 3.66]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Any Psychosocial plus any Pharmacological detoxification Intervention versus any Pharmachological alone
Comparison 2. Any Psychosocial Intervention plus MDT versus MDT alone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Completion of treatment Show forest plot

4

145

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.48 [0.93, 2.35]

2 Use of primary substance Show forest plot

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.44, 1.07]

3 Number of subjects abstinent at follow‐up Show forest plot

2

169

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.46 [1.61, 3.76]

4 Compliance as clinic absences during the treatment Show forest plot

3

1138

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.38, 0.59]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Any Psychosocial Intervention plus MDT versus MDT alone
Comparison 3. Contingency Management Approaches plus MDT versus MDT alone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Completion of treatment Show forest plot

3

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.51 [0.93, 2.46]

2 Compliance as clinical absences during the treatment Show forest plot

2

196

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.15, 0.56]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Contingency Management Approaches plus MDT versus MDT alone