Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

암 예방에 대한 녹차(차나무)

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005004.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 julio 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Cáncer ginecológico, neurooncología y otros cánceres

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2016 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Katja Boehm

    Correspondencia a: Medizinische Klinik 5‐Schwerpunkt Onkologie/Haematologie, Klinikum Nord, Nuernberg, Germany

    [email protected]

  • Francesca Borrelli

    Department of Experimental Pharmacology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy

  • Edzard Ernst

    Complementary Medicine Department, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

  • Gabi Habacher

    Feline Centre, Small Animal Hospital, Langford, UK

  • Shao Kang Hung

    Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK

  • Stefania Milazzo

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology and Hematology, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nuernberg, Nuernberg, Germany

  • Markus Horneber

    Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology and Hematology, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany

Contributions of authors

The following contributions will be made by the reviewers stated:

Link with editorial base and coordination of contributions from co‐reviewers (KB)
Draft protocol (KB with contributions from all)
Run searches (KB, SKH)
Identify relevant titles (KB, MH, SKH)
Selection of included trials (KB, MH, SKH)
Extraction of data from trials (KB, GH, MH, SKH, SM)
Methodological quality assessment (KB, MH)
Interpretation of analysis (KB, MH)
Drafting final review (KB with contributions from all)

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Pilkington Family Trusts, UK.

External sources

  • AG Biologische Krebstherapie, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Bonn, Germany.

  • Cochrane Gyneacological Cancer Review Group, UK.

  • Nordic Cochrane Centre / ViFab, Denmark.

Declarations of interest

None known

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all members of the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group for their valuable support. Furthermore, we would like to thank Dr. Hitoshi Yamashita for his valuable help in acting as a translator.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Mar 02

Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer

Review

Tommaso Filippini, Marcella Malavolti, Francesca Borrelli, Angelo A Izzo, Susan J Fairweather-Tait, Markus Horneber, Marco Vinceti

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005004.pub3

2009 Jul 08

Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer

Review

Katja Boehm, Francesca Borrelli, Edzard Ernst, Gabi Habacher, Shao Kang Hung, Stefania Milazzo, Markus Horneber

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005004.pub2

2004 Oct 18

Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer

Protocol

Katja Boehm, Markus Horneber, Francesca Borrelli, Edzard Ernst

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005004

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.