Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Ubat untuk merawat malaria tanpa komplikasi pada wanita mengandung

Abstract

disponible en

Background

Women are more vulnerable to malaria during pregnancy, and malaria infection may have adverse consequences for the fetus. Identifying safe and effective treatments is important.

Objectives

To compare the effects of drug regimens for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnant women.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register (February 2008), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2008), EMBASE (1974 to February 2008), LILACS (February 2008), mRCT (February 2008), reference lists, and conference abstracts. We also contacted researchers in the field, organizations, and pharmaceutical companies.

Selection criteria

Randomized and quasi‐randomized controlled trials of antimalarial drugs for treating uncomplicated malaria in pregnant women.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We performed a quantitative analysis only where we could combine the data. We combined dichotomous data using the risk ratio (RR) and presented each result with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Main results

Ten trials (1805 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Two were quasi‐randomized, seven did not describe allocation concealment, and all adjusted treatment failure to exclude new infections. One trial reported fewer treatment failures at day 63 with artesunate plus mefloquine compared with quinine (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.38; 106 participants). One trial reported fewer treatment failures at day 63 with artesunate plus atovaquone‐proguanil compared with quinine (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.57; 80 participants). One trial reported fewer treatment failures at day 28 when amodiaquine was compared with chloroquine (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.46; 420 participants) and when amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine was compared with chloroquine (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.26; 418 participants). Compared with sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine given alone, one trial reported fewer treatment failures at delivery (or day 40) with artesunate plus sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.59; 79 participants) and azithromycin plus sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.76; 82 participants).

Authors' conclusions

Data are scant. Some combination treatments appear to be effective at treating malaria in pregnancy; however, safety data are limited.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Plain language summary

Penyelidikan yang boleh dipercayai tentang faedah dan kemudaratan rawatan untuk malaria pada wanita mengandung adalah terhad

Wanita lebih terdedah kepada malaria semasa mengandung, dan malaria mungkin mempunyai kesan berbahaya kepada bayi. Pilihan rawatan menjadi lebih terhad kerana parasit malaria sedang membina daya tahan terhadap ubat sedia ada dan menyebabkan kebimbangan sama ada ubat boleh membahayakan bayi. Bukti daripada kajian rawak terkawal adalah terhad, dengan beberapa ubat dan gabungan ubat sedang dinilai.