Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Элективное повторное кесарево сечение в сравнении с индукцией/стимуляцией родов у женщин с предыдущими родами путем кесарева сечения

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004906.pub5Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 26 julio 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jodie M Dodd

    Correspondencia a: School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Caroline A Crowther

    Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    ARCH: Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies, Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

  • Rosalie M Grivell

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia

  • Andrea R Deussen

    School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

Contributions of authors

J Dodd drafted the original protocol and review, and J Dodd and C Crowther contributed to all subsequent drafts. For this update, A Deussen drafted the update of the review, and all authors contributed to the final draft. J Dodd is the guarantor of the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • The University of Adelaide, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Australia.

  • The University of Auckland, The Liggins Institute, New Zealand.

External sources

  • Neil Hamilton Fairley Fellowship, supported by the NHMRC (ID 399224), Australia.

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    NIHR Cochrane Programme Grant: 13/89/05 ‐ Pregnancy and Childbirth systematic reviews to support clinical guidelines

  • National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia.

Declarations of interest

Jodie Dodd and Caroline Crowther were investigators on "The BAC study: Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: Patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial," which was published in 2012 (Crowther 2012).

Jodie Dodd: is the recipient of an NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship.

Rosalie Grivell: none known.

Andrea R Deussen: none known.

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Programme Grant funding to Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Jul 26

Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth

Review

Jodie M Dodd, Caroline A Crowther, Rosalie M Grivell, Andrea R Deussen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004906.pub5

2014 Dec 19

Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth

Review

Jodie M Dodd, Caroline A Crowther, Rosalie M Grivell, Andrea R Deussen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004906.pub4

2012 May 16

Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth

Review

Jodie M Dodd, Caroline A Crowther

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004906.pub3

2006 Oct 18

Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth

Review

Jodie M Dodd, Caroline A Crowther

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004906.pub2

2004 Jul 19

Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth

Protocol

Jodie M Dodd, Caroline A Crowther

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004906

Differences between protocol and review

We have updated methods to the current Pregnancy and Childbirth Group standard text (2014).

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Female; Humans; Pregnancy;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.