Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Fármacos antiinflamatorios no esteroides para el dolor en mujeres con endometriosis

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Referencias de los estudios incluidos en esta revisión

Kauppila 1979 {published data only}

Kauppila A, Puolakka J, Ylikorkala O. Prostaglandin biosynthesis inhibitors and endometriosis. Prostaglandins 1979;18(4):655‐61.
Ylikorkala O, Viinikka L. Postaglandins and endometriosis. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1983;113(Suppl):105‐7.

Kauppila 1985 {published data only}

Kauppila A, Ronnberg L. Naproxen sodium in dysmenorrhea secondary to endometriosis. Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1985;65(3):379‐83.

Referencias de los estudios excluidos de esta revisión

Cobellis 2004 {published data only}

Cobellis L, Razzi S, De Simone S, Sartini A, Fave A, Danero S, et al. The treatment witha COX‐2 specific inhibitor is effective in the management of pain related to endometriosis. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology 2004;116:100‐2.

Referencias adicionales

Barbieri 1990

Barbieri RL. Endometriosis 1990 ‐ current treatment approaches. Drugs 1990;39(4):502‐10.

Berube 1998

Berube S, Marcoux S, Maheux R, Graves G, Wrixon W, O'Keane J, et al. Characteristics related to the prevalence of minimal or mild endometriosis in infertile women. Epidemiology 1998;9(5):504‐10.

Canavan 2000

Canavan TP, Radosh L. Managing Endometriosis. Strategies to minimize pain and damage. Postgraduate Medicine 2000;107(3):213‐6, 222‐4.

Davies 2003

Davies B. The best practice in treatment. Living with Endometriosis ‐ The Way Forward (oral presentation, London, UK)2003; Vol. April 30.

Dawood 1986

Dawood MY. Current concepts in the etiology and treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1986;138(Suppl):7‐10.

Elbourne 2002

Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Worthington HV. Meta‐analyses involving cross‐over trials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:140‐9.

Hart 1984

Hart FD, Huskisson EC. Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs. Current status and rational therapeutic use. Drugs 1984;27(3):232‐55.

Jones 2002

Jones GL, Kennedy SH, Jenkinson C. Health‐related quality of life measurement in women with common benign gynecologic conditions: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002;187(2):501‐11.

Kauppila 1985

Kauppila A, Ronnberg L. Naproxen sodium in dysmenorrhea secondary to endometriosis. Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1985;65(3):379‐83.

Kennedy 2003

Kennedy S. International links. Living with Endometriosis ‐ The Way Forward (oral presentation, London, UK)2003; Vol. April 30.

Marjoribanks 2003

Marjoribanks J, Proctor ML, Farquhar C. Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs for primary dysmenorrhoea (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 4.

Murphy 2002

Murphy AA. Clinical aspects of endometriosis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2002;955:1‐10, Discussion 34‐6, 396‐406.

Prentice 2003

Prentice A, Deary AJ, Bland E. Progestagens and anti‐progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3.

rAFS 1985

Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1985, 43:351‐2. Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1985, 43:351‐2. Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis.. Fertil Steril 1985;43:351‐2..

Rice 2002

Rice VM. Conventional medical therapies for endometriosis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2002;955:343‐52, Discussion 389‐93, 396‐406.

Vessy 1992

Vessey MP, Villard‐Mackintosh L, Painter R. Epidemiology of endometriosis in women attending family planning clinics. BMJ 1992;306(6871):182‐4.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Kauppila 1979

Methods

Trial design: 2 period, 4 treatment cross over trial
Country of principal investigators: Finland
Where trial conducted: Finland
Date of trial: not clear
Single Centre
Funder: Medica Ltd (drugs); Yryo Jahnsson Foundation (finance)
Blinding: double blind
Lost to follow‐up: 6 (for reasons unknown)

Participants

Inclusion criteria: Women with symptomatic endometriosis (stage and severity not described). Women were diagnosed by laparoscopy (n=13) and by pelvic examination (n=5)
Exclusion criteria: not clear
No. randomized: 24
No. analysed: 18
Age: mean=33 (22‐43)
Sex: Female
Ethnicity: not known
Social class: not known

Interventions

Group 1 (Indomethacin was given for 2 menstrual cycles then crossover to acetylsalicylic acid, tolfenamic acid and placebo for 2 menstrual cycles each)
No. randomized: 6
No. analysed: not clear
Type of NSAID: Indomethacin
Dose of NSAID: 25 mg
Frequency of dose: 3 x per day
Duration of treatment: 2 menstrual cycles
Additional interventions: none

Group 2 (Acetylsalicylic acid was given for 2 menstrual cycles then crossover to tolfenamic acid, placebo and indomethacin for 2 menstrual cycles each)
No. randomized: 6
No. analysed: not clear
Type of NSAID: Acetylsalicylic
Dose of NSAID: 500 mg
Frequency of dose: 3 x per day
Duration of treatment: 2 menstrual cycles
Additional interventions: none

Group 3 ( Tolfenamic acid was given for 2 menstrual cycles then crossover to placebo, indomethacin and acetylsalicylic acid, for 2 menstrual cycles each)
No. randomized: 6
No. analysed: not clear
Type of NSAID: Tolfenamic acid
Dose of NSAID: 200 mg
Frequency of dose: 3 x per day
Duration of treatment: 2 menstrual cycles
Additional interventions: none

Group 4 (Placebo was given for 2 menstrual cycles then crossover to indomethacin, acetylsalicylic acid and tolfenamic acid for 2 menstrual cycles each)
No. randomized: 6
No. analysed: not clear
Type of drug: Placebo
Frequency of dose: 3 x per day
Duration of treatment: 2 menstrual cycles
Additional interventions: none

Outcomes

These were self‐reported using a questionnaire completed by the patient immediately after each menstrual cyclePain relief: pelvic pain, lower back pain, pain in walking, dyspareunia, pain on defecation, headache; number not reported but described more common with placebo and indomethacin
Quality of life: not reported
Effect on daily activities: not reported
Absence from work or school: not reported
Unintended effects from treatment: gastro‐intestinal complaints (nausea and vomiting); number not reported but described as more common with indomethacin. Psychic complaints (insomnia and nervousness); number not reported but described as more common with indomethacin
No. of women requiring more invasive treatment: not reported
Requirements for additional medication: not reported
Patient satisfaction with treatment: not reported

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Kauppila 1985

Methods

Trial design: 2 period, 2 treatment cross over trial
Country of principal investigators: Finland
Where trial conducted: Finland
Date of trial: not clear
Single centre trial
Funder: not clear
Blinding: double blind
Lost to follow‐up: 4 (1 pregnant, 1 had psychiatric problems, and 2 lost for unknown reasons).

Participants

Inclusion criteria: women with endometriosis classified by the American Fertility Society (mild endometriosis n=7; moderate endometriosis n=8; severe endometriosis n=6). Women were diagnosed by pelvic examination, history of menstrual distress and by direct visualisation of pelvic regions at laporoscopy or laparatomy
Exclusion criteria: not clear
No. randomized: 24
No. analysed: 20
Age: Group 1 mean=32, Group 2 mean=35
Sex: Female
Ethnicity: not known
Social class: not known

Interventions

Group 1 (Naproxen Sodium ‐ NSAID ‐ was given for 2 menstrual cycles, then crossover to placebo for 2 menstrual cycles)
No. randomized: 12
No. analysed: 11
Type of NSAID: Naproxen sodium
Dose of NSAID: 275mg tablets,
Frequency of dose: 1 ‐ 2 tablets 4 x per day
Duration of treatment: 2 menstrual cycles
Additional interventions: additional analgesia was allowed if no relief after the first two doses of NSAID

Group 2 (Placebo was given for 2 menstrual cycles, then crossover to Naproxen Sodium ‐ NSAID ‐ for 2 menstrual cycles)
No. randomized: 12
No. analysed: 9
Type of drug: placebo
Frequency of dose: 1 ‐ 2 tablets, 4 x per day
Duration of treatment: two menstrual cycles
Additional interventions: additional analgesia was allowed if no relief after first two doses

Outcomes

These were all self‐reported using a questionnaire completed by the patient immediately after each menstrual cycle.

Pain relief: measured after each menstrual cycle (score 3 to ‐1)
Quality of life: not reported
Effect on daily activities: activity of patient (score 4 to 0)
Absence from work or school: not reported
Unintended effects from treatment: fatigue, lightheadedness, eye lid edema, and chest pain (n=4 while taking Naproxen Sodium). Hypomenorrhea, diarrhea, increases diuresis, headache, epigastric pain, nausea and vomiting, and tremor and dizziness (n=7 while taking placebo).
No. of women requiring more invasive treatment: not reported
Requirements for additional medication: supplemental analgesia was more common in the placebo group (14) than in the NSAID group (2).
Patient satisfaction with treatment: not reported

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

B ‐ Unclear

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Cobellis 2004

This trial assessed the use of the COX‐2 specific inhibitor (rofecoxib) for the management of pain related to endometriosis. However this drug was withdrawn from the marketplace in November 2004 on safety grounds and therefore it is inappropriate to assess the efficacy of the product in this review. If the drug is relaunched this decision will be reviewed when the review is updated.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. NSAID versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Overall pain relief Show forest plot

1

odds ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

3.27 [0.61, 17.69]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 1 Overall pain relief.

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 1 Overall pain relief.

2 Supplementary analgesia needed Show forest plot

1

odds ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.01, 1.29]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 2 Supplementary analgesia needed.

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 2 Supplementary analgesia needed.

3 Unintended effects of treatment Show forest plot

1

odds ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.09, 2.47]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 3 Unintended effects of treatment.

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 3 Unintended effects of treatment.

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 1 Overall pain relief.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 1 Overall pain relief.

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 2 Supplementary analgesia needed.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 2 Supplementary analgesia needed.

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 3 Unintended effects of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 NSAID versus placebo, Outcome 3 Unintended effects of treatment.

Comparison 1. NSAID versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Overall pain relief Show forest plot

1

odds ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

3.27 [0.61, 17.69]

2 Supplementary analgesia needed Show forest plot

1

odds ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.01, 1.29]

3 Unintended effects of treatment Show forest plot

1

odds ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.09, 2.47]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. NSAID versus placebo