Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tiagabina para los episodios afectivos agudos del trastorno bipolar

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004694.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 diciembre 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Trastornos mentales comunes

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Akshya Vasudev

    Correspondencia a: University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital, London, Canada

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Karine Macritchie

    Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

  • Sanjay K Rao

    Annapolis Valley Heath, Kentville, Canada

    Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

  • John Geddes

    Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford/Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK

  • Allan H Young

    Division of Brain Sciences, Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

Contributions of authors

Dr A Vasudev: performed the literature search, selection of trials, correspondence with key authors and opinion leaders, co‐wrote the protocol and drafted the review.
Dr KAN MacRitchie: selection of trials, drafted the review.
Dr NSK Rao: drafted the review.
Prof AH Young: drafted the review and supervised work.
Prof JR Geddes: drafted the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Stanley Medical Research Institute, USA.

Declarations of interest

None of the review authors are employees of or have shares in a pharmaceutical company. Professors Vasudev and Young and Dr Macritchie have spoken at meetings and attended conferences sponsored by various pharmaceutical companies and have participated in trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. JRG currently receives research funding from the UK Medical Research Council, the UK Economic and Social Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research, and the Stanley Medical Research Institute. He was expert witness for Dr Reddy's Laboratories and is Chief Investigator on the CEQUEL trial to which GlaxoSmithKline have contributed and supplied investigational drugs and placebo. Dr Karine Macritchie has worked on a project supported by an award NS‐EU‐166 from the Translational Medicine Research Collaboration. This consortium comprises the Universities of Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh and Glasgow, the four associated NHS Health Boards (Grampian, Tayside, Lothian and Greater Glasgow and Clyde), Scottish Enterprise and Pfizer (formerly Wyeth). She has also received funding for travel, accommodation and conference expenses from AstraZeneca. In the last two years Assistant Professor Vasudev has received financial remuneration for advice to Lundbeck.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff at the CCDAN editorial base for their valuable input to this update.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Dec 12

Tiagabine for acute affective episodes in bipolar disorder

Review

Akshya Vasudev, Karine Macritchie, Sanjay K Rao, John Geddes, Allan H Young

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004694.pub3

2006 Jul 19

Tiagabine in the treatment of acute affective episodes in bipolar disorder

Review

Akshya Vasudev, Karine Macritchie, Sanjay NK Rao, John Geddes, Allan H Young

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004694.pub2

2003 Oct 20

Tiagabine in the treatment of acute affective episodes in bipolar disorder: efficacy and acceptability

Protocol

Allan H Young, John Geddes, K AN MacRitchie, Sanjay NK Rao, Akshya Vasudev, Karine Macritchie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004694

Differences between protocol and review

We have updated the Methods section to meet the standards required by the 2008 Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. These include changing the objectives into Cochrane format; we have provided more detail on study inclusion criteria (particularly participants, where an age range has now been introduced); we have separated the outcomes into primary and secondary; and the assessment of risk of bias is now performed using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool.

Notes

This review is up to date as of October 2012. As there is no evidence of ongoing trials in this area, unless specifically requested, this review is not scheduled for another update until 2017.