Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Alongamento para prevenir ou reduzir dor muscular após o exercício

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004577.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 06 julio 2011see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Lesiones óseas, articulares y musculares

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Robert D Herbert

    Correspondencia a: Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Marcos de Noronha

    Physiotherapy, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil

  • Steven J Kamper

    Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia

Contributions of authors

The protocol for the current review was written by Rob Herbert. Data collection, data extraction, quality assessment, data analysis and interpretation were carried out by Marcos de Noronha, Steve Kamper and Rob Herbert. Rob Herbert wrote the first draft of the review. Marcos de Noronha and Steve Kamper commented on drafts and approved the final version. Rob Herbert is guarantor for the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Sydney, Australia.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known. However, as Rob Herbert is the contact investigator for Jamtvedt 2010, data collection and risk of bias assessment of this trial was done independently by the two other authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Nigel Hanchard, Helen Handoll, Peter Herbison and Gisela Sole for valuable comments on this updated review.

The authors thank Helen Handoll, Vicki Livingstone, Janet Wale, Gisela Sole and Lindsey Elstub for helpful comments on earlier versions of the review, and Lisa Harvey for assistance with data extraction. The first version of this review is based on an earlier "non‐Cochrane" review conducted by Rob Herbert and Michael Gabriel and published in 2002 (Herbert RD, Gabriel M. BMJ 2002;325(7362):468‐72). Through that earlier work, Michael Gabriel indirectly contributed to the current review and his contribution is gratefully acknowledged.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2011 Jul 06

Stretching to prevent or reduce muscle soreness after exercise

Review

Robert D Herbert, Marcos de Noronha, Steven J Kamper

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004577.pub3

2007 Oct 17

Stretching to prevent or reduce muscle soreness after exercise

Review

Robert D Herbert, Marcos de Noronha

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004577.pub2

2004 Jan 26

Stretching to prevent or reduce muscle soreness after exercise

Protocol

Rob Herbert, Michael Gabriel

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004577

Differences between protocol and review

The original protocol specified that study quality would be assessed using the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group quality assessment tool. In keeping with the change in Cochrane Collaboration policy, the update of the review used instead the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. In addition, GRADE was used to assess the quality of evidence.

In the first issue of the review, outcome data were extracted for outcomes at 12 hour intervals, rather than at 24 hour intervals. Extracting data at 12 hour intervals yielded little more data than when extracting data only at 24 hour intervals, substantially increased the number of tables and analyses, and had no effect on the findings of the review. Consequently, in the second round of review, only data from 24 hour intervals were included.

The protocol specified that a criterion for inclusion was that studies measured as outcomes either muscle soreness (pain) or tenderness (pain on palpation of the muscle). The first published version of the review did not identify any eligible studies which included only tenderness (not soreness) as an outcome. However, the second version identified one study that might have been considered to have measured tenderness (Wang 2006). We were uncertain whether this study could be said to have measured tenderness and, had it been included, it would have been the only study included in the review that provided only tenderness data. Moreover, we were uncertain about how data on tenderness would contribute to the objective of the review ("to determine the effect of stretching before or after exercise on the development of post‐exercise muscle soreness"). Consequently, we decided to exclude studies which measured tenderness but not soreness.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.