Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Antibiotic regimens for suspected late onset sepsis in newborn infants

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To compare the effectiveness of different antibiotic regimens for initial treatment of suspected late onset sepsis (after 48 hours of age) in newborn infants with respect to mortality, septic shock and neurodevelopmental outcome. Separate comparisons of pre specified antibiotic regimens defined below will be undertaken. Planned subgroup analyses will include very low birth weight (less than approximately 1500g) or very preterm infants (less than approximately 32 weeks gestation) and developing compared with developed countries.

Background

Although advances in neonatal intensive care have led to improved survival of very low birth weight (VLBW) and extremely premature infants, late onset sepsis (systemic infection after 48 hours of age) continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The incidence of late onset sepsis increases with both decreasing birthweight and gestational age, and has been reported as occurring in approximately 25% of VLBW infants (Stoll 2002; Rubin 2002; Isaacs 1996). Infants with the lowest birth weights are also more likely to have multiple episodes of sepsis (Stoll 2002). In developing countries infection is estimated to cause 30 ‐ 40% of neonatal deaths (WHO 1999). The spectrum of organisms responsible for early onset (vertically transmitted) sepsis differs from that associated with late onset (nosocomial) sepsis. This pattern becomes apparent from day two onwards (Isaacs 1996). Nosocomial infections are frequently associated with clinical deterioration including increased apnoea or ventilatory requirement, temperature instability, abdominal distension, acidosis, lethargy, septic shock, necrotising enterocolitis, meningitis and death (Craft 1999). The complications of necrotising enterocolitis and meningitis predispose an infant to an increased risk of future neurological impairment (Blair 1982; Waugh 1996) and the mortality from late onset sepsis remains high at 7 ‐ 10% (Stoll 2002; Isaacs 1996). These infections are often particularly distressing for infants, parents and staff as they affect VLBW infants who have survived early causes of mortality but remain at risk for ongoing infection. This risk is secondary to: immature immune responses, poorly developed skin and mucosal barriers to infection, numerous entry portals for organisms via cannulae, catheters and endotracheal tubes and continuing exposure to oppurtunistic organisms during often a prolonged hospital stay.

The range of organisms causing late onset sepsis includes gram positive and gram negative bacteria as well as fungal infection. As bacterial infections predominate, empiric antibiotic regimens focus on cover for both gram positive and negative bacterial infection. These antibiotics can be either narrow or broad spectrum in the range of organisms that they target. The epidemiology of late onset infection differs between developing and developed countries in the incidence of infection, the organisms responsible, and the subsequent mortality rates. Historical reviews have also demonstrated that the predominant organisms responsible for neonatal sepsis have changed with time (Stoll 1996).

In developing countries the most common gram positive organisms isolated from neonatal blood cultures taken from babies under 90 days of age are streptococcus pneumoniae, staphlyococcus aureus and streptococcus pyogenes. The most frequent gram negative organisms isolated are E coli and salmonella spp (WHO 1999). WHO recommend that initial treatment of suspected neonatal sepsis should be with penicillin and gentamicin. This regimen covers most of the likely organisms but has poor coverage of both salmonella and the increasingly penicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus.

In developed countries staphylococcus aureus was previously responsible for the majority of late onset infections in many neonatal units with other commonly isolated organisms being coagulase negative staphylococci, E coli, group B streptococcus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, enterococcus, candida and pseudomonas. Coagulase negative staphylococci(CoNS) have now emerged as the leading cause of late onset sepsis in almost all industrialised countries and account for > 50% of positive blood cultures (Rubin 2002; Isaacs 1996). As skin commensals, these organisms are also common blood culture contaminants, and there is a lack of consensus as to how to interpret CoNS positive results. In the intensive care setting the vast majority of CoNS are resistant to methicillin and thus infants with suspected late onset infection are typically treated with empiric broad spectrum antibiotics that include vancomycin (Rubin 2002). There are concerns regarding unrestricted vancomycin use as a risk factor for the development of resistant organisms, particularly enterococci (HICAC 1995). Its routine use as prophylaxis against nosocomial infection has not been recommended (Craft 1999). Furthermore, the majority of pathogens associated with fulminant late onset sepsis (lethal within 48 hours) have been shown to be gram negative organisms with pseudomonas leading the table (Karlowicz 2000). Therefore, although CoNS are currently the most prevalent pathogens in late onset sepsis in neonatal intensive care units there is a low frequency of associated mortality.

Empiric antibiotic treatment varies between neonatal intensive care units and countries and there are currently no consensus guidelines on the choice of empiric antibiotics. There are also no definitive guidelines on classification of CoNS as true sepsis or contaminant, the removal of indwelling catheters or the duration of antibiotics for late onset sepsis. The definition of late onset sepsis varies between trials and for the purpose of this review we will not include those infants commenced on antibiotics prior to 48 hours of age.

Objectives

To compare the effectiveness of different antibiotic regimens for initial treatment of suspected late onset sepsis (after 48 hours of age) in newborn infants with respect to mortality, septic shock and neurodevelopmental outcome. Separate comparisons of pre specified antibiotic regimens defined below will be undertaken. Planned subgroup analyses will include very low birth weight (less than approximately 1500g) or very preterm infants (less than approximately 32 weeks gestation) and developing compared with developed countries.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Randomised and quasi randomised controlled trials comparing different initial antibiotic regimens in neonates with suspected late onset sepsis will be evaluated

Types of participants

Newborn infants with suspected late onset sepsis commenced on antibiotics after 48 hours of age

Types of interventions

We will review different antibiotic regimens for infants in whom a decision has been made to treat suspected systemic infection. We will not review antibiotics vs no antibiotics.
The following intravenous antibiotic regimens will be compared:
1) Beta‐lactam antibiotic given as monotherapy, including:
‐ penicillins
‐ cephalosporins
‐ carbapenems
‐ monobactams
2) Combination of beta lactam with aminoglycoside
3) Combination of beta lactam with glycopeptide
4) Combination of glycopeptide with aminoglycoside

We will compare 1 vs 2, 1 vs 3 , 1 vs 4, 2 vs 3, 2 vs 4 and 3 vs 4

Types of outcome measures

Primary
1) Mortality prior to discharge from hospital
2) Septic shock (hypotension requiring inotropes and/or coagulopathy and/or acidosis)
3) Neurodevelopmental outcome (validated scales of neurodevelopment before 5 years of age)

Secondary
1) Complications of antibiotic treatment (ototoxicity ‐ validated hearing test prior to discharge, Nephrotoxicty ‐ renal impairment post treatment)
2) Complications of sepsis (osteomyelitis, meningitis, NEC, hydrocephalus)
3) Treatment failure ‐ ( failed treatment ‐ for example persistent positive blood cultures, recurrence or worsening of clinical signs ‐ that then leads to any modification of the assigned empirical antibiotic treatment )
4) Infection with antibiotic resistant organisms subsequent to treatment (positive blood cultures)
5) Colonisation with antibiotic resistant organisms subsequent to treatment (positive ear/skin/nasal/wound swabs or endotracheal aspirate or sputum or gastric aspirate)
6) Subsequent fungal infection (positive blood culture for candida)
7) Duration of ventilation (days on intermittent positive pressure ventilation via endotracheal tube)
8) Duration of hospitalisation (days)
9) Cost analysis of treatment (as defined by study)

Search methods for identification of studies

The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group will be used. This includes electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 ‐ present), EMBASE (1980 ‐ present) and CINAHL (1982 ‐ present) and previous reviews including cross references (all articles referenced). The search strategy will include the following keywords, using the search fields of abstract, MeSH subject heading, exploded subject heading, publication type, subject heading word, text word, and title: A search on all fields for [infan* OR newborn* OR neonat* ] AND "sepsis", "infection", "septicaemia", "late onset sepsis", "late onset infection" and "antibiotics" or "antimicrobials" will be conducted. The search will be limited to: [random* OR trial* OR comparative study OR controlled study]. We will also search electronic abstracts of Academic Paediatric Society meetings (1996 ‐ present) and personal files.

Data collection and analysis

Eligibility of studies for inclusion will be assessed independently by each reviewer. The criteria and standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group will be used to assess the methodological quality of the included trials. Quality of the trials included will be evaluated in terms of allocation concealment, adequate randomisation, blinding of parents or carers and assessors to intervention, and completeness of assessment (intention to treat) in all randomised individuals (this will be defined as yes, no or unsure for each category). A sensitivity analysis will be performed according to the quality of the trials included. Heterogeneity in the results of the trials will be assessed by calculating a test of heterogeneity (Chi square). Further heterogeneity will be explored through prespecified subgroup analysis.

Additional information will be requested from the authors of each trial to clarify methodology and results as necessary. A data collection form will be used to aid extraction of relevant information and data from each included study. Each reviewer will extract the data separately, compare data, and resolve differences by consensus.

The standard methods of the Neonatal Review Group will be used to synthesise the data. Effects will be expressed as relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical data, and weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI for continuous data. The fixed effect model will be used for meta‐analysis. For significant differences the number needed to treat (NNT) based on 1/RD will be calculated.

Separate comparisons of the following antibiotic regimens will be performed:
1) Beta lactam monotherapy vs beta lactam plus aminoglycoside
2) Beta lactam monotherapy vs beta lactam plus glycopeptide
3) Beta lactam monotherapy vs aminoglycoside plus glycopeptide
4) Beta lactam plus aminoglycoside vs betalactam plus glycopeptide
5) Beta lactam plus aminoglycoside vs aminoglycoside plus glycopeptide
6) Beta lactam plus glycopeptide vs aminoglycoside plus glycopeptide

Subgroup analysis within each of the above comparisons will be performed according to:
1) Very low birth weight ( less than approximately 1500g) and/or very preterm infants ( less than approximately 32 weeks gestation or as defined by study)
2) Developing vs developed countries