Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Nortriptyline versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Recurrence of postpartum major depressive disorder.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Nortriptyline versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Recurrence of postpartum major depressive disorder.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Sertraline versus placebo, outcome: 2.1 Recurrence of postpartum major depressive disorde.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Sertraline versus placebo, outcome: 2.1 Recurrence of postpartum major depressive disorde.

Comparison 1 Nortriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 1 Recurrence of postpartum major depressive disorder.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Nortriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 1 Recurrence of postpartum major depressive disorder.

Comparison 2 Sertraline versus placebo, Outcome 1 Recurrence of postpartum major depressive disorde.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Sertraline versus placebo, Outcome 1 Recurrence of postpartum major depressive disorde.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Nortripyline for the prevention of postnatal depression

Nortripyline for the prevention of postnatal depression

Patient or population: women with a history of postnatal depression
Intervention: nortripyline

Control: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Tricyclic antidepressants

Postnatal depression (17 weeks)

240 per 10001

230 per 1000
(86 to 622)

RR 0.96
(0.36 to 2.59)

51
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3

Adverse effects experienced by mother and/or foetus or nursing baby

51
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3

1 woman assigned to nortriptyline developed mania within the first week.

Constipation was reported more frequently in the nortriptyline than placebo group (78% among women taking nortriptyline and 22% among women taking placebo; Fischer's exact test P < 0.001). This was the only side effect that was more common among women taking nortriptyline than placebo, but the other side effects assessed and the proportion of women experiencing these side effects was not reported.

Acceptability of treatment (17 weeks)

51
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3

Acceptability of treatment was not assessed directly but 1 woman was lost to follow‐up from the nortriptyline arm (and 1 women in the nortriptyline arm withdrew after developing mania in the first postpartum week) and 3 withdrew from the placebo arm (owing to side effects, personal reasons and pregnancy).

4 participants declined to take the study drug after randomisation.

Overall maternal satisfaction (17 weeks)

No data available

Improvement in the maternal relationship with the baby (17 weeks)

No data available

Establishment or continuation of breastfeeding (17 weeks)

No data available

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Assumed risk calculated as the proportion of women on placebo with the outcome (postnatal depression) multiplied by 1000

2Downgraded due to high risk of bias in 1 domain (incomplete outcome data)
3Downgraded twice due to imprecision (only 1 small study available for this comparison)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Nortripyline for the prevention of postnatal depression
Summary of findings 2. Sertraline for the prevention of postnatal depression

Sertraline for the prevention of postnatal depression

Patient or population: women with a history of postnatal depression
Intervention: sertraline

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Postnatal depression (17 weeks)

500 per 1000

70 per 1000
(10 to 535)

RR 0.14
(0.02 to 1.07)

22
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3

Adverse effects experienced by mother and/or fetus or nursing baby

22
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3

1 woman taking sertraline had a hypomanic episode.

2 side effects (dizziness and drowsiness) were more common among women taking sertraline than women taking placebo.

Acceptability of treatment (17 weeks)

22
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3

Acceptability of treatment was not assessed directly but no difference was found between the antidepressant and placebo groups in the number of women withdrawing from the study (P = 0.35, Fisher’s exact test).

Overall maternal satisfaction (17 weeks)

No data available

Improvement in the maternal relationship with the baby (17 weeks)

No data available

Establishment or continuation of breastfeeding (17 weeks)

No data available

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Assumed risk calculated as the proportion of women on placebo with the outcome (postnatal depression) multiplied by 1000

2Downgraded due to high risk of bias in 1 domain (incomplete outcome data)
3Downgraded twice due to imprecision (only 1 small study available for this comparison)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Sertraline for the prevention of postnatal depression
Comparison 1. Nortriptyline versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Recurrence of postpartum major depressive disorder Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Nortriptyline versus placebo
Comparison 2. Sertraline versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Recurrence of postpartum major depressive disorde Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Sertraline versus placebo