Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Tratamentos para o priapismo em crianças e adultos com doença das células falciformes

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Burnett 2014 {published data only}

Burnett AL, Anele U, Trueheart IN, Dimitrakoff JD, Casella JF. Randomized, controlled study of the safety and efficacy of sildenafil for the treatment of recurrent ischemic priapism associated with sickle cell disease. Journal of Sexual Medicine 2014;11 Suppl 3:176. [Abstract no.: 124; CENTRAL: 1023232; CRS: 5500050000000245; EMBASE: 71682862]CENTRAL
Burnett AL, Anele UA, Trueheart IN, Strouse JJ, Casella JF. Randomized controlled trial of sildenafil for preventing recurrent ischemic priapism in sickle cell disease. American Journal of Medicine 2014;127(7):664‐8. [CENTRAL: 995412; CRS: 5500050000000244; EMBASE: 2014427964; PUBMED: 24680796]CENTRAL
NCT00940901. Sildenafil for treatment of priapism in men with sickle cell anaemia. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00940901. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00940901, (accessed 12 December 2016). CENTRAL
Shakeri A, Van Asseldonk B, Elterman DS. Prevention of Ischemic Priapism in Sickle Cell Disease: Sildenafil: Commentary on: Randomized Controlled Trial of Sildenafil for Preventing Recurrent Ischemic Priapism in Sickle Cell Disease. Urology 2015;86(6):1055‐6. CENTRAL

Olujohungbe 2011 {published data only}

ISRCTN54312363. A randomised double blind controlled trial of oral ephedrine/etilefrine in the prevention of recurrent (stuttering) attacks of priapism in sickle cell disease: a multicentre international study in older children and adults. http://isrctn.com/ISRCTN54312363 (accessed 12 December 2016). CENTRAL
Olujohungbe AB, Adeyoju A, Yardumian A, Akinyanju O, Morris J, Westerdale N, et al. A prospective diary study of stuttering priapism in adolescents and young men with sickle cell anemia: report of an international randomized control trial‐the priapism in sickle cell study. Journal of Andrology 2011;32(4):375‐82. [CENTRAL: 802280; CRS: 5500050000000078; PUBMED: 21127308]CENTRAL
Seftel AD. A prospective diary study of stuttering priapism in adolescents and young men with sickle cell anemia: Report of an international randomized control trial; The priapism in sickle cell study (PISCES study). Journal of Urology 2011;185(5):1837‐8. [CENTRAL: 1016434; CRS: 5500050000000464; EMBASE: 2011194426]CENTRAL

Serjeant 1985 {published data only}

Serjeant GR, de Ceulaer C, Maude GH. Stilboestrol and stuttering priapism in homozygous sickle‐cell disease. West Indian Medical Journal 1986;35(Suppl):39. CENTRAL
Serjeant GR, de Ceulaer K, Maude GH. Stilboestrol and stuttering priapism in homozygous sickle‐cell disease. Lancet 1985;2(8467):1274‐6. CENTRAL

Additional references

Bachir 1996

Bachir D, Galacteros E, Lee K, Virag R. Two years experience in management of priapism and impotence in sickle cell disease. Blood 1996;88:14a.

Bivalacqua 2006

Bivalacqua TJ, Burnett AL. Priapism: new concepts in the pathophysiology and new treatment strategies. Current Urology Reports 2006;7(6):497‐502.

Bivalacqua 2012

Bivalacqua TJ, Musicki B, Kutlu O, Burnett AL. New insights into the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease‐associated priapism. Journal of Sexual Medicine 2012;9(1):79‐87.

Broderick 1994

Broderick GA, Gordon D, Hypolite J, Levin RM. Anoxia and smooth muscle dysfunction: a model for ischaemic priapism. Journal of Urology 1994;151(1):259‐62.

Davies 1997

Davies SC, Oni L. The management of patients with sickle cell disease. BMJ 1997;315(7109):656‐60.

Elbourne 2002

Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A. Meta‐analysis involving cross‐over trials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31(1):140‐9.

Emond 1980

Emond AM, Holman R, Hayes RJ, Serjeant GR. Priapism and impotence in homozygous sickle cell disease. Archives of Internal Medicine 1980;140(11):1434‐7.

Hickman 1999

Hickman M, Modell B, Greengross P, Chapman C, Layton M, Falconer S, et al. Mapping the prevalence of sickle cell and beta thalassaemia in England: estimating and validating ethnic‐specific rates. British Journal of Haematology 1999;104(4):860‐7.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC, editor(s). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org2011.

Lue 1998

Lue TF. Physiology of penile erection and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction and priapism. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Darracott Vaughan E, Wein AJ editor(s). Campbell's Urology. 7th Edition. Vol. 2, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1998:1155‐80.

Mantadakis 1999

Mantadakis E, Cavender JD, Rogers ZR, Ewalt DH, Buchanan GR. Prevalence of priapism in children and adolescents with sickle cell anaemia. Journal of Paediatric Hematology/Oncology 1999;21(6):518‐22.

NHLBI 2002

National Institutes of Health, USA. The Management of Sickle Cell Disease. Division of Blood Disease and Resources, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute2002; Vol. NIH Publication No. 02‐2117.

Okpala 2002

Okpala I, Westerdale N, Jegede T, Cheung B. Etilefrine for the prevention of priapism in adult sickle cell disease. British Journal of Haematology 2002;118(3):918‐21.

Review Manager 2014 [Computer program]

The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Upadhyay 1998

Upadhyay J, Shekarriz B, Dhabuwala CB. Penile implant for intractable priapism associated with sickle cell disease. Urology 1998;51(4):638‐9.

Virag 1996

Virag R, Bachir D, Lee K, Galacteros F. Preventive treatment of priapism in sickle cell disease with oral and self‐administered intracavernous injection of etilefrine. Urology 1996;47(5):777‐81.

WHO 1994

World Health Organisation. Joint WHO/TIF Meeting on the Control of Haemoglobinopathies. Report of the 7th Meeting of the WHO Working Group on the Control of Hereditary Anaemias; 1994 April 3‐4; Nicosia, Cyprus. Unpublished document WHO/HDP/TIF/HA/93.1. Geneva, 1994.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Burnett 2014

Methods

Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled parallel group trial followed by an open‐label extension for 8 weeks. Conducted prospectively from June 2008 to November 2012.

Participants

13 participants recruited from regional haematology and urology clinics randomised to sildenafil or placebo. Inclusion criteria were occurrences of at least two self‐reported priapism episodes per week and ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria were estimated GFR < 50 mL/min, clinical cirrhosis, pulmonary hypertension based on echocardiography, alcohol use exceeding 2 standard drinks daily, formal contraindications for using phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor therapy.

Participant age: sildenafil (n = 6) mean (SD) age: 21.7 (5.3) years; placebo (n = 7) mean (SD) age: 23.0 (8.7) years.

Disease status: SCD (confirmed SS or SC haemoglobinopathy) and recurrent ischaemic priapism.

Hypertension no (%) placebo 1 (14.3%), sildenafil 2 (33.3%).

Stroke no (%) placebo 3 (42.9%), sildenafil 1 (16.7%).

Avascular necrosis no (%) placebo 1 (14.3%), sildenafil 0 (0).

Acute chest syndrome no (%) placebo 1 (14.3%), sildenafil 2 (33.3%).

Asthma no (%) placebo 2 (28.6%), sildenafil 2 (33.3%).

Smoker no (%) placebo 1 (14.3%), sildenafil 2 (33.3%).

Alcohol use no (%) placebo 3 (42.9%), sildenafil 3 (50%).

Interventions

Intervention: sildenafil 50 mg.

Placebo: sugar pill.

Either placebo or sildenafil was taken daily for 8 weeks. Participants were instructed to take the medication in the morning a few hours after awakening and without sexual stimulation.

An 8‐week open‐label phase followed.

Outcomes

Primary efficacy outcome was 50% reduction in frequency in priapism episodes bi‐weekly from baseline at the end of the 8‐week double‐blind phase.

Secondary outcomes included subjective improvements in episode frequency/duration and decrease in the number of of bi‐weekly episodes of priapism using a scoring system:

0 = no episodes;

1 = 1 to 2 episodes;

2 = 3 to 4 episodes;

3 = 5 to 8 episodes;

4 = 9 to 16 episodes;

5 = > 16 episodes.

Adverse effects were also recorded for the whole trial period including the open label phase.

Outcomes were measured via twice‐weekly nurse co‐ordinator phone calls to record progress, medication changes and adverse events.

In‐clinic evaluations were carried out at baseline, week four and week eight which included repeat administration of trial instruments.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Participats were randomised in a 1:1 allocation. Method of randomisation not described.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Allocation concealment not described.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind trial where the participant, caregiver and investigator were blinded.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind trial where the participant, caregiver and investigator were blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All participants were included in the analysis. Both ITT and per protocol analyses were carried out.

No data were shown for decreased median weekly change in priapism episode score, just that there were no significant differences between groups.

Adverse effects were not listed in the methods section but were reported in the results. Adverse events were reported for the whole trial period including the open label phase (confirmed by author team).

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The publication states that there were no significant differences between groups for decreased median weekly change in priapism episode score but no data were shown. The same paper reported adverse effects in the published paper but did not include this as an outcome in either the methods section or in the trial registration document.

Other bias

Low risk

None identified.

Olujohungbe 2011

Methods

Double‐blind, placebo controlled parallel group trial with four arms. The first phase of the trial was an observational phase lasting a minimum of three weeks and a maximum of 13 weeks to give a baseline before participants were randomised to intervention or placebo. The intervention phase ran for 26 weeks.

Participants

131 participants were enrolled onto the trial.

86 participants completed the observational phase of the trial.

78 participants were randomised to 1 of the 4 treatment arms.

Inclusion criteria: males aged 12 or over with confirmed sickle cell anaemia or sickle cell beta‐thalassaemia on haemoglobin electrophoresis and stuttering priapism.

Participants had to be in active attendance at a designated care centre (1 visit in last 6 months).

Participant characteristics were only reported for the complete group of 86 not specifically for the 46 randomised participants.

Age (participants who completed phase A n = 86): mean age was 23.6 (range 14.5 ‐ 46.1).

Median weekly number of attacks in phase A ‐ 1.5 (range 0 – 7).

Median weekly duration of attacks in phase A – 2.0h (range 0 – 42 h).

Number (%) of weekly attacks > 4h duration in phase A – 22 (26%).

Average attack pain score (mean (range)) in phase A – 3.4 (0 – 8.8).

Participants were excluded if there was a history of an attack lasting longer than 4 hours or who needed acute hospital. admission and intervention or history of cerebrovascular accident or hypertension.

Interventions

Group 1: participants received 15 mg ephedrine per day.

Group 2: participants received 30 mg ephedrine per day.

Group 3: participants received 50 mg etilefrine per day.

Group 4: participants received a placebo.

All treatments were taken once a day at bedtime for 6 months.

Outcomes

Weekly total number of attacks expressed as a ratio of phase B to phase A.

Mean difference in pain score from phase A to phase B.

Number of participants who had an attack lasting more than four hours.

Adverse events (palpitations, tachycardia, lack of sleep, hand shaking, anxiety, dry mouth) experienced during the trial period.

Participants were reviewed on a 6‐weekly basis when diaries were monitored and BP was taken.

Notes

None of the participants were on a chronic hypertransfusion program. One participant had been on hydroxyurea for 18 months prior to the trial.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Method of randomisation not stated.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No description of allocation concealment.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Blinding of the trial drug was carried out by Bilcare Ltd clinical trial supplies although the authors do not state who was blinded and what methods were used. It is a double‐blind trial.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Blinding of the trial drug was carried out by Bilcare Ltd clinical trial supplies although the authors do not state who was blinded and what methods were used. It is a double‐blind trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

86 participants completed the observational phase and of these, 59% entered the intervention phase.

78 participants were randomised to the intervention phase but data was only available for 46. The remainder were lost to follow‐up.

46 participants entered the intervention phase and 25 participants (54%) completed 26 weeks.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

No protocol available therefore outcomes reported in the results section against the methods section of the paper; no discrepancies found.

Other bias

Low risk

None identified.

Serjeant 1985

Methods

Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled cross‐over trial, with two 14‐day treatment periods. Allocation concealment and method of randomisation was unclear.

Participants

11 males with stuttering priapism and homozygous sickle cell (SS) disease were randomised. 9 completed the trial, 1 participant defaulted after baseline and 1 participant had a painful crisis which aborted the priapism before any tablets were taken. Participants came from the sickle cell clinic of the University Hospital of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.

Interventions

Stilboestrol 5 mg daily versus placebo.

Outcomes

Reduction in frequency of stuttering priapism. Return of priapism.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not described.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Described as double blind.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Not described if outcome assessors were blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

1 participant defaulted, and in two participants the attacks of stuttering priapism ceased spontaneously during the baseline observation period. There was a fourth participant who initially did not take the placebo because a painful crisis aborted the stuttering priapism prior to taking the assigned tablet. In this participant (identified as patient 9) attacks of priapism recurred 2 weeks later and data on a second baseline period were collected.

The paper did not discuss an ITT analysis.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

No protocol available therefore outcomes reported in the results section against the methods section of the paper; no discrepancies found.

Other bias

Low risk

None identified.

BP: blood pressure
ITT: intention‐to‐treat
SCD: sickle cell disease

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Reduction in frequency of priapism (after 2 weeks of 5 mg silboesterol) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in frequency of priapism (after 2 weeks of 5 mg silboesterol).

Comparison 1 Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in frequency of priapism (after 2 weeks of 5 mg silboesterol).

1.1 No attacks into the second week of treatment

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier (after 8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier (after 8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier (after 8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).

2 Reduction in frequency of priapism after (8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Reduction in frequency of priapism after (8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Reduction in frequency of priapism after (8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).

1.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).

2.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).

3.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).

4.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).

5.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).

6.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).

1.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).

2.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).

3.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).

4.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).

5.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).

6.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in frequency of priapism (after 2 weeks of 5 mg silboesterol).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in frequency of priapism (after 2 weeks of 5 mg silboesterol).

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier (after 8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier (after 8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Reduction in frequency of priapism after (8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Reduction in frequency of priapism after (8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Silboesterol versus placebo

Silboesterol compared with placebo for stuttering priapism

Patient or population: men and boys with SCD and stuttering priapism

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: stilboestrol 5 mg

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Stilboestrol 5 mg

Detumescence

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Reduction in stuttering priapism

Follow‐up: 2 weeks

250 per 1000

730 per 1000
(183 to 1000)

RR 2.92

(95% CI 0.73 to 11.70)

7
(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

Immediate side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Effect on later sexual function

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Other untoward side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Efficacy of a prevention strategy

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across trials) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; N/A: not applicable; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Downgraded once due to unclear methods of randomisation and allocation.
2. Downgraded twice for imprecision: confidence intervals around the relative effect are very wide as the trial has a small number of participants and a low event rate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Silboesterol versus placebo
Summary of findings 2. Sildenafil versus placebo

Sildenafil 50 mg compared with placebo for stuttering priapism

Patient or population: men and boys with SCD and stuttering priapism

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: sildenafil 50 mg daily

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Sildenafil 50 mg daily

Detumescence

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Reduction in frequency of priapism

Follow‐up: 8 weeks

286 per 1000

166 per 1000

(20 to 1000)

RR

0.58 (95% CI 0.07 to 4.95)

13

(1)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

There was also no significant difference between treatments for the reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier: RR 1.17 (95% CI 0.36 to 3.76).

Immediate side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: 16 weeks

See comment

See comment

N/A

13

(1)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,3

Side effects of treatment were reported for the whole treatment phase including the open label phase. No significant differences were found between sildenafil and placebo.

Effect on later sexual function

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Other untoward side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Efficacy of a prevention strategy

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across trials) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; N/A: not applicable; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Downgraded once due to unclear methods of randomisation and allocation.
2. Downgraded once due to imprecision. Confidence intervals around the relative effect are very wide as the trial has a low number of participants.
3. Downgraded once due to indirectness as we are only interested in the treatment phase but they have included the open label phase for reporting of adverse effects.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Sildenafil versus placebo
Summary of findings 3. Etilefrine versus placebo

Etilefrine 50 mg compared with placebo for stuttering priapism

Patient or population: men and boys with SCD and stuttering priapism

Settings: outpatient

Intervention: etilefrine 50mg once daily

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Etilefrine 50 mg

Detumescence

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Reduction in frequency of priapism

Follow‐up: 6 months

See comment

See comment

N/A

23

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was found between etilefrine and placebo but there were concerns over the reliability of the published results.

Immediate side effects of treatment (palpitations)

Follow‐up: 6 months

333 per 1000

546 per 1000

(206 to 1000)

RR

1.64 (95% CI 0.62 to 4.30)

23

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was seen between etilefrine and placebo for any of the other immediate side effects measured (lack of sleep, hand shaking, anxiety, dry mouth).

Immediate side effects of treatment (tachycardia)

Follow‐up: 6 months

250 per 1000

545 per 1000

(178 to 1000)

RR 2.18 (95% CI 0.71 to 6.68)

23

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was seen between etilefrine and placebo for any of the other immediate side effects measured (lack of sleep, hand shaking, anxiety, dry mouth).

Effect on later sexual function

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Other untoward side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Efficacy of a prevention strategy

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across trials) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; N/A: not applicable; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Downgraded twice due to high risk of bias from incomplete outcome data and unclear risk of bias from randomisation and allocation concealment.
2. Downgraded once due to imprecision:confidence intervals around the relative effect are very wide as the trial has a low number of participants.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Etilefrine versus placebo
Summary of findings 4. Ephedrine versus placebo

Ephedrine 15 mg compared with placebo for stuttering priapism

Patient or population: men and boys with SCD and stuttering priapism

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: ephedrine 15 mg/30 mg once daily

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Ephedrine

Detumescence

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Reduction in frequency of priapism

Follow‐up: 6 months

See comment

See comment

N/A

24

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was found between ephedrine 15mg and placebo or ephedrine 30mg and placebo but there were concerns over the reliability of the published results.

Immediate side effects of treatment with 30 mg ephedrine (palpitations)

Follow‐up: 6 months

333 per 1000

333 per 1000

(107 to 1000)

RR

1.00 (95% CI 0.32 to 3.10)

24

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was seen between ephedrine 15mg or 30mg and placebo for any of the other immediate side effects measured (lack of sleep, hand shaking, anxiety, dry mouth).

Immediate side effects of treatment with 30 mg ephedrine (tachycardia)

Follow‐up: 6 months

250 per 1000

168 per 1000

(33 to 825)

RR

0.67 (95% CI 0.13 to 3.30)

24

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was seen between ephedrine 15mg or 30mg and placebo for any of the other immediate side effects measured (lack of sleep, hand shaking, anxiety, dry mouth).

Effect on later sexual function

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Other untoward side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Efficacy of a prevention strategy

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across trials) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; N/A: not applicable; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Downgraded twice due to high risk of bias from incomplete outcome data and unclear risk of bias from randomisation and allocation concealment.
2. Downgraded once due to imprecision: confidence intervals around the relative effect are very wide as the trial has a low number of participants.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 4. Ephedrine versus placebo
Comparison 1. Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Reduction in frequency of priapism (after 2 weeks of 5 mg silboesterol) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 No attacks into the second week of treatment

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism)
Comparison 2. Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier (after 8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Reduction in frequency of priapism after (8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism)
Comparison 3. Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism)
Comparison 4. Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism)