Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatments for priapism in boys and men with sickle cell disease

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004198.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 septiembre 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Fibrosis quística y enfermedades genéticas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Francis I Chinegwundoh

    Correspondencia a: Department of Urology, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Sherie Smith

    Division of Child Health, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Kofi A Anie

    Haematology and Sickle Cell Centre, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Contributions of authors

The original review was conceived by the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group, who also conducted searches for relevant trials. Dr Chinegwundoh (FC) designed the original review with constructive comments from Dr Anie (KA).

FC and KA conducted further searches for relevant trials. FC took the lead in the write up of the review, with substantial revisions from KA.

FC is responsible for updating the review and acts as guarantor of the review.

For the 2017 version, Sherie Smith (SS) lead on this update with input from FC and KA.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    This systematic review was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group.

Declarations of interest

Francis Chinegwundoh: none known.

Sherie Smith: none known.

Kofi Anie: none known.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the following for comments:

Professor Dame Sally C Davies, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Department of Haematology, Central Middlesex Hospital, London, UK.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Apr 06

Treatments for priapism in boys and men with sickle cell disease

Review

Francis I Chinegwundoh, Sherie Smith, Kofi A Anie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004198.pub4

2017 Sep 19

Treatments for priapism in boys and men with sickle cell disease

Review

Francis I Chinegwundoh, Sherie Smith, Kofi A Anie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004198.pub3

2004 Oct 18

Treatments for priapism in boys and men with sickle cell disease

Review

Francis I Chinegwundoh, Kofi A Anie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004198.pub2

2003 Apr 22

Treatments for priapism in boys and men with sickle cell disease

Protocol

Francis I Chinegwundoh, Banji Adeyoju, Kofi A Anie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004198

Differences between protocol and review

In a post hoc change, we have added summary of findings tables to the review.

For the 2017, we also searched www.clinicaltrials.gov, Embase for 2016 and the WHO trial portal.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in frequency of priapism (after 2 weeks of 5 mg silboesterol).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in frequency of priapism (after 2 weeks of 5 mg silboesterol).

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier (after 8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier (after 8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Reduction in frequency of priapism after (8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Reduction in frequency of priapism after (8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment).

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism), Outcome 6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment).

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Silboesterol versus placebo

Silboesterol compared with placebo for stuttering priapism

Patient or population: men and boys with SCD and stuttering priapism

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: stilboestrol 5 mg

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Stilboestrol 5 mg

Detumescence

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Reduction in stuttering priapism

Follow‐up: 2 weeks

250 per 1000

730 per 1000
(183 to 1000)

RR 2.92

(95% CI 0.73 to 11.70)

7
(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

Immediate side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Effect on later sexual function

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Other untoward side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Efficacy of a prevention strategy

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across trials) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; N/A: not applicable; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Downgraded once due to unclear methods of randomisation and allocation.
2. Downgraded twice for imprecision: confidence intervals around the relative effect are very wide as the trial has a small number of participants and a low event rate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Silboesterol versus placebo
Summary of findings 2. Sildenafil versus placebo

Sildenafil 50 mg compared with placebo for stuttering priapism

Patient or population: men and boys with SCD and stuttering priapism

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: sildenafil 50 mg daily

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Sildenafil 50 mg daily

Detumescence

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Reduction in frequency of priapism

Follow‐up: 8 weeks

286 per 1000

166 per 1000

(20 to 1000)

RR

0.58 (95% CI 0.07 to 4.95)

13

(1)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

There was also no significant difference between treatments for the reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier: RR 1.17 (95% CI 0.36 to 3.76).

Immediate side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: 16 weeks

See comment

See comment

N/A

13

(1)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,3

Side effects of treatment were reported for the whole treatment phase including the open label phase. No significant differences were found between sildenafil and placebo.

Effect on later sexual function

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Other untoward side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Efficacy of a prevention strategy

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across trials) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; N/A: not applicable; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Downgraded once due to unclear methods of randomisation and allocation.
2. Downgraded once due to imprecision. Confidence intervals around the relative effect are very wide as the trial has a low number of participants.
3. Downgraded once due to indirectness as we are only interested in the treatment phase but they have included the open label phase for reporting of adverse effects.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Sildenafil versus placebo
Summary of findings 3. Etilefrine versus placebo

Etilefrine 50 mg compared with placebo for stuttering priapism

Patient or population: men and boys with SCD and stuttering priapism

Settings: outpatient

Intervention: etilefrine 50mg once daily

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Etilefrine 50 mg

Detumescence

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Reduction in frequency of priapism

Follow‐up: 6 months

See comment

See comment

N/A

23

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was found between etilefrine and placebo but there were concerns over the reliability of the published results.

Immediate side effects of treatment (palpitations)

Follow‐up: 6 months

333 per 1000

546 per 1000

(206 to 1000)

RR

1.64 (95% CI 0.62 to 4.30)

23

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was seen between etilefrine and placebo for any of the other immediate side effects measured (lack of sleep, hand shaking, anxiety, dry mouth).

Immediate side effects of treatment (tachycardia)

Follow‐up: 6 months

250 per 1000

545 per 1000

(178 to 1000)

RR 2.18 (95% CI 0.71 to 6.68)

23

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was seen between etilefrine and placebo for any of the other immediate side effects measured (lack of sleep, hand shaking, anxiety, dry mouth).

Effect on later sexual function

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Other untoward side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Efficacy of a prevention strategy

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across trials) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; N/A: not applicable; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Downgraded twice due to high risk of bias from incomplete outcome data and unclear risk of bias from randomisation and allocation concealment.
2. Downgraded once due to imprecision:confidence intervals around the relative effect are very wide as the trial has a low number of participants.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Etilefrine versus placebo
Summary of findings 4. Ephedrine versus placebo

Ephedrine 15 mg compared with placebo for stuttering priapism

Patient or population: men and boys with SCD and stuttering priapism

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: ephedrine 15 mg/30 mg once daily

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Ephedrine

Detumescence

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Reduction in frequency of priapism

Follow‐up: 6 months

See comment

See comment

N/A

24

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was found between ephedrine 15mg and placebo or ephedrine 30mg and placebo but there were concerns over the reliability of the published results.

Immediate side effects of treatment with 30 mg ephedrine (palpitations)

Follow‐up: 6 months

333 per 1000

333 per 1000

(107 to 1000)

RR

1.00 (95% CI 0.32 to 3.10)

24

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was seen between ephedrine 15mg or 30mg and placebo for any of the other immediate side effects measured (lack of sleep, hand shaking, anxiety, dry mouth).

Immediate side effects of treatment with 30 mg ephedrine (tachycardia)

Follow‐up: 6 months

250 per 1000

168 per 1000

(33 to 825)

RR

0.67 (95% CI 0.13 to 3.30)

24

(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

No significant difference was seen between ephedrine 15mg or 30mg and placebo for any of the other immediate side effects measured (lack of sleep, hand shaking, anxiety, dry mouth).

Effect on later sexual function

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Other untoward side effects of treatment

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

Efficacy of a prevention strategy

Follow‐up: N/A

See comment

See comment

N/A

N/A

N/A

This outcome was not measured.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across trials) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; N/A: not applicable; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Downgraded twice due to high risk of bias from incomplete outcome data and unclear risk of bias from randomisation and allocation concealment.
2. Downgraded once due to imprecision: confidence intervals around the relative effect are very wide as the trial has a low number of participants.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 4. Ephedrine versus placebo
Comparison 1. Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Reduction in frequency of priapism (after 2 weeks of 5 mg silboesterol) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 No attacks into the second week of treatment

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Silboesterol versus placebo (stuttering priapism)
Comparison 2. Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Reduction in episodes of priapism by score tier (after 8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Reduction in frequency of priapism after (8 weeks of 50 mg sildenafil) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Sildenafil versus placebo (stuttering priapism)
Comparison 3. Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Etilefrine 50 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Etilefrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism)
Comparison 4. Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Immediate side effects (palpitations) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Immediate side effects (tachycardia) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Immediate side effects (lack of sleep) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Immediate side effects (hand shaking) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Immediate side effects (anxiety) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Immediate side effects (dry mouth) (after 6 months of treatment) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Ephedrine 15 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Ephedrine 30 mg

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Ephedrine versus placebo (stuttering priapism)