Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

抗凝剂(延长疗程)预防全髋关节或膝关节置换术或髋部骨折修复术后静脉血栓栓塞

Appendices

Appendix 1. CENTRAL search strategy

#1

MeSH descriptor: [Thrombosis] this term only

1309

#2

MeSH descriptor: [Thromboembolism] this term only

1067

#3

MeSH descriptor: [Venous Thromboembolism] this term only

461

#4

MeSH descriptor: [Venous Thrombosis] this term only

1060

#5

(thromboprophyla* or thrombus* or thrombotic* or thrombolic* or thromboemboli* or thrombos* or embol*):ti,ab,kw

17234

#6

MeSH descriptor: [Pulmonary Embolism] explode all trees

944

#7

PE or DVT or VTE:ti,ab,kw

4161

#8

(vein* or ven*) near thromb*:ti,ab,kw

6917

#9

#1 or #2 or #3 or #4 or #5 or #6 or #7 or #8

20147

#10

MeSH descriptor: [Anticoagulants] explode all trees

4058

#11

anticoagul* or anti‐coagu* or antithrombotic*

9328

#12

warfarin or (vitamin near/3 antagonist*) or VKA or Nicoumalone or phenindione or acenocoumarol* or Sinthrome or dicoumarol* or nicoumalone or phenprocoumon or Marcoumar or Marcumar or Falithrom or AVK or bishydroxycoumarin* or coumarin* or coumadin* or phenprocoumon*

4024

#13

Ximelagatran or Exanta or Exarta or H 376/95 or dabigatran or rivaroxaban or Xarelto

874

#14

fondaparinux or Arixtra or BAY59‐7939 or TTP889 or odiparcil or LY517717 or YM150 or DU‐176b

395

#15

apixaban or betrixaban or edoxaban or idraparinux

402

#16

LMWH or UFH or heparin or nadroparin* or fraxiparin* or enoxaparin

9899

#17

Clexane or klexane or lovenox or dalteparin or Fragmin or ardeparin

762

#18

normiflo or tinzaparin or logiparin or Innohep or certoparin or sandoparin or reviparin or clivarin*

432

#19

danaproid or danaparoid or antixarin or ardeparin* or bemiparin*

136

#20

Zibor or cy 222 or embolex or monoembolex or parnaparin*

128

#21

rd 11885 or tedelparin or Kabi‐2165 or Kabi 2165

78

#22

emt‐966 or emt‐967 or "pk‐10 169" or pk‐10169 or pk10169 or cy‐216 or cy216

83

#23

seleparin* or tedegliparin or seleparin* or tedegliparin*

19

#24

wy90493 or "wy 90493" or "kb 101" or kb101

21

#25

lomoparan or orgaran or parnaparin or fluxum or lohepa or lowhepa or "op 2123" or parvoparin or AVE5026

113

#26

#10 or #11 or #12 or #13 or #14 or #15 or #16 or #17 or #18 or #19 or #20 or #21 or #22 or #23 or #24 or #25

17458

#27

MeSH descriptor: [Hip] explode all trees

309

#28

MeSH descriptor: [Knee] explode all trees

584

#29

hip:ti,ab,kw (Word variations have been searched)

11495

#30

knee:ti,ab,kw (Word variations have been searched)

13133

#31

orthop?edic

6896

#32

MeSH descriptor: [Orthopedic Procedures] explode all trees

10000

#33

#27 or #28 or #29 or #30 or #31 or #32

31372

#34

#9 and #26 and #33

1182

Appendix 2. Additional Summary of findings table: Heparin compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Heparin compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: heparin
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with heparin

Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic)

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.39
(0.28 to 0.56)

2544
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

83 per 1000

34 per 1000
(25 to 48)

Asymptomatic DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.38
(0.24 to 0.60)

1304
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

112 per 1000

46 per 1000
(29 to 71)

Asymptomatic proximal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not estimable

asymptomatic and proximal DVT reported separately but due to available data it was not possible to determine which events fell into which category

Asymptomatic distal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not estimable

asymptomatic and distal DVT reported separately but due to available data it was not possible to determine which events fell into which category

All‐cause mortality

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.01
(0.31 to 3.26)

2518
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

4 per 1000

4 per 1000
(1 to 11)

Adverse events

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.06
(0.68 to 1.64)

460
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 2

270 per 1000

281 per 1000
(201 to 377)

Reoperation
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

179
(1 RCT)

one study reported no operations in either study arm. Three studies did not report on reoperation and two studies did not report sufficient data to analyse

Wound infection

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

four studies did not report on wound infection. Two studies did not provide specific details for wound infection

Wound healing

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level, low number of events leading to imprecision of results
2 Downgraded by one level due to imprecision

Appendix 3. Additional Summary of findings table: Vitamin K antagonists compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Vitamin K antagonists compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: vitamin K antagonists
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with vitamin K antagonists

Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.10
(0.01 to 0.81)

360
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

51 per 1000

5 per 1000
(1 to 42)

Asymptomatic DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Asymptomatic proximal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Asymptomatic distal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

All‐cause mortality

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

360
(1 RCT)

single included study reported no deaths in either study arm so not possible to assess risk

Adverse events

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

360
(1 RCT)

single included study reported no adverse events in either study arm so not possible to assess risk

Reoperation
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Wound infection

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Wound healing

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level, results from a single study only so heterogeneity could not be assessed

Appendix 4. Additional Summary of findings table: DOAC compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

DOAC compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: DOAC
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with DOAC

Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic)

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.19
(0.11 to 0.33)

1733
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

86 per 1000

18 per 1000
(10 to 30)

Asymptomatic DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Asymptomatic proximal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Asymptomatic distal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

All‐cause mortality

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.33
(0.07 to 1.66)

1733
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

7 per 1000

2 per 1000
(0 to 11)

Adverse events

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.87
(0.74 to 1.03)

2457
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

657 per 1000

625 per 1000
(586 to 663)

Reoperation
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

2457
(1 RCT)

single study reported no cases of reoperation in the study arms

Wound infection

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.34
(0.46 to 3.86)

2457
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

5 per 1000

7 per 1000
(2 to 19)

Wound healing

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DOAC: direct oral anticoagulant; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level, results from a single study so heterogeneity cannot be assessed
2 Downgraded by one level, low number of events leading to wide CI and imprecision of results

Appendix 5. Additional Summary of findings table: Anticoagulants (chosen at investigators' discretion) compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Anticoagulants (chosen at investigators' discretion) compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion)
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion)

Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic)

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.26
(0.14 to 0.50)

557
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

158 per 1000

46 per 1000
(26 to 86)

Asymptomatic DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.26
(0.13 to 0.54)

557
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

125 per 1000

36 per 1000
(18 to 72)

Asymptomatic proximal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Asymptomatic distal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.26
(0.13 to 0.54)

557
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

125 per 1000

36 per 1000
(18 to 72)

All‐cause mortality

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

842
(1 RCT)

the single included study reported no deaths in either study arm

Adverse events

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Reoperation
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

outcome reported as part of the definition of the outcome major bleeding but data not reported separately

Wound infection

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Wound healing

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Ccnfidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level, results from a single study so heterogeneity could not be assessed

Appendix 6. Additional Summary of findings table: Vitamin K antagonists compared to heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Vitamin K antagonists compared to heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: vitamin K antagonists
Comparison: heparin

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with heparin

Risk with vitamin K antagonists

Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic)

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.64
(0.85 to 3.16)

1279
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

23 per 1000

38 per 1000
(20 to 70)

Asymptomatic DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Asymptomatic proximal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Asymptomatic distal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

All‐cause mortality

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

OR 5.07
(0.24 to 105.83)

1279
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 3

no cases of death reported in the heparin study arm

Adverse events

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Reoperation
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 4.60
(0.99 to 21.38)

1279
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 3

3 per 1000

14 per 1000
(3 to 63)

Wound infection

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

Wound healing

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in single included study in this comparison

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VKA: vitamin K antagonist; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level, single study so heterogeneity could not be assessed
2 Downgraded by one level, wide CI
3 Downgraded by one level, low number of events leading to imprecision of results

Appendix 7. Additional Summary of findings table: DOAC compared to heparin for people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

DOAC compared to heparin for people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: DOAC
Comparison: heparin

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with heparin

Risk with DOAC

Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic)

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.53
(0.29 to 0.97)

12447
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

41 per 1000

22 per 1000
(12 to 40)

Asymptomatic DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.56
(0.19 to 1.59)

6559
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2

42 per 1000

24 per 1000
(8 to 65)

Asymptomatic proximal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.73
(0.46 to 1.15)

2704
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 3

35 per 1000

26 per 1000
(16 to 40)

Asymptomatic distal DVT

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.22
(0.75 to 1.99)

2639
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 3

27 per 1000

33 per 1000
(20 to 52)

All‐cause mortality

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.63
(0.64 to 4.16)

14966
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 4

1 per 1000

1 per 1000
(1 to 4)

Adverse events

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.96
(0.88 to 1.05)

9908
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

691 per 1000

682 per 1000
(663 to 701)

Reoperation

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.06
(0.34 to 3.24)

15241
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 4

1 per 1000

1 per 1000
(0 to 2)

Wound infection

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.89
(0.46 to 1.72)

6446
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 4

6 per 1000

5 per 1000
(3 to 10)

Wound healing

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported in five included studies in this comparison

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DOAC: direct oral anticoagulant; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level for inconsistency (heterogeneity, I2 = 87%)
2 Downgraded by two levels for serious inconsistency (heterogeneity, I2 = 92%)
3 Downgraded by one level, single included study so unable to assess heterogeneity
4 Downgraded by one level, few events leading to wide CI and imprecision

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 5 Asymptomatic DVT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 5 Asymptomatic DVT.

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 6 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 6 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 7 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 7 Adverse events.

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 8 Bleeding ‐ major.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 8 Bleeding ‐ major.

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 9 Bleeding ‐ minor.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 9 Bleeding ‐ minor.

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 10 Reoperation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 10 Reoperation.

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 5 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 5 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 6 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 6 Adverse events.

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 7 Bleeding ‐ major.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo, Outcome 7 Bleeding ‐ major.

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 5 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 5 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 6 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 6 Adverse events.

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 7 Bleeding ‐ major.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 7 Bleeding ‐ major.

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 8 Bleeding‐ clinically relevant non‐major.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 8 Bleeding‐ clinically relevant non‐major.

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 9 Bleeding ‐ minor.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 9 Bleeding ‐ minor.

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 10 Reoperation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 10 Reoperation.

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 11 Wound infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 DOAC versus placebo, Outcome 11 Wound infection.

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 5 Asymptomatic DVT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 5 Asymptomatic DVT.

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 6 Asymptomatic distal DVT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 6 Asymptomatic distal DVT.

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 7 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 7 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 8 Bleeding ‐ major.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo, Outcome 8 Bleeding ‐ major.

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 5 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 5 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 6 Bleeding ‐ major.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 6 Bleeding ‐ major.

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 7 Bleeding ‐ minor.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 7 Bleeding ‐ minor.

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 8 Reoperation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5 Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin, Outcome 8 Reoperation.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE).

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal).

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 3 Symptomatic PE.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic).

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 5 Asymptomatic DVT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 5 Asymptomatic DVT.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 6 Asymptomatic proximal DVT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 6 Asymptomatic proximal DVT.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 7 Asymptomatic distal DVT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 7 Asymptomatic distal DVT.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 8 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 8 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 9 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 9 Adverse events.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 10 Bleeding ‐ major.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 10 Bleeding ‐ major.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 11 Bleeding ‐ clinically relevant, non‐major.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.11

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 11 Bleeding ‐ clinically relevant, non‐major.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 12 Bleeding ‐ minor.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.12

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 12 Bleeding ‐ minor.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 13 Reoperation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.13

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 13 Reoperation.

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 14 Wound infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.14

Comparison 6 DOAC versus heparin, Outcome 14 Wound infection.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Heparin compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Heparin compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: heparin
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with heparin

Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.59
(0.35 to 1.01)

2329
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

33 per 1000

20 per 1000
(12 to 33)

Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.73
(0.39 to 1.38)

2019
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

24 per 1000

18 per 1000
(9 to 33)

Symptomatic PE
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.61
(0.16 to 2.33)

1595
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

6 per 1000

4 per 1000
(1 to 15)

Bleeding ‐ major
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.59
(0.14 to 2.46)

2500
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

4 per 1000

2 per 1000
(0 to 9)

Clinically relevant non‐major bleeding
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported

Bleeding ‐ minor
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 2.01
(1.43 to 2.81)

2500
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

46 per 1000

88 per 1000
(65 to 119)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level, low number of events leading to imprecision of results
2 Downgraded by one level, some heterogeneity present (I2 = 49%) leading to wide CIs

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Heparin compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Summary of findings 2. Vitamin K antagonists compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Vitamin K antagonists compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: vitamin K antagonists
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with vitamin K antagonists

Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.10
(0.01 to 1.94)

360
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

23 per 1000

2 per 1000
(0 to 43)

Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.13
(0.01 to 2.62)

360
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

17 per 1000

2 per 1000
(0 to 43)

Symptomatic PE
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.32
(0.01 to 7.84)

360
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

6 per 1000

2 per 1000
(0 to 43)

Bleeding ‐ major
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

OR 2.89
(0.12 to 71.31)

360
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

no events recorded in placebo group

Clinically relevant non‐major bleeding
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported

Minor bleeding
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level, results from a single study only so heterogeneity could not be assessed
2 Downgraded by one level, number of events small leading to wide CI and imprecision of results

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Vitamin K antagonists compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Summary of findings 3. DOAC compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

DOAC compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: DOAC
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with DOAC

Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.20
(0.06 to 0.68)

2419
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

12 per 1000

3 per 1000
(1 to 8)

Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.18
(0.04 to 0.81)

2459
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

9 per 1000

2 per 1000
(0 to 7)

Symptomatic PE
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.25
(0.03 to 2.25)

1733
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

5 per 1000

1 per 1000
(0 to 10)

Bleeding ‐ major
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.00
(0.06 to 16.02)

2457
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

1 per 1000

1 per 1000
(0 to 13)

Bleeding‐ clinically relevant non‐major
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.22
(0.76 to 1.95)

2457
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

27 per 1000

33 per 1000
(21 to 51)

Bleeding ‐ minor
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.18
(0.74 to 1.88)

2457
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

28 per 1000

32 per 1000
(21 to 51)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DOAC: direct oral anticoagulant; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level, results from a single study so heterogeneity cannot be assessed
2 Downgraded by one level, low number of events leading to wide CI and imprecision of results

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. DOAC compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Summary of findings 4. Anticoagulants (chosen at investigators' discretion) compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Anticoagulants (chosen at investigators' discretion) compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion)
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion)

Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.50
(0.09 to 2.74)

557
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

14 per 1000

7 per 1000
(1 to 38)

Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.33
(0.03 to 3.21)

557
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

11 per 1000

4 per 1000
(0 to 34)

Symptomatic PE
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.00
(0.06 to 16.13)

557
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

4 per 1000

4 per 1000
(0 to 55)

Bleeding ‐ major
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

OR 5.05
(0.24 to 105.76)

557
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

no major bleeding recorded in the placebo groups

Clinically relevant non‐major bleeding
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported

Minor bleeding
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

not reported

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level, results from a single study so heterogeneity could not be assessed
2 Downgraded by one level, low number of events leading to wide CIs and imprecision of results

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 4. Anticoagulants (chosen at investigators' discretion) compared to placebo for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Summary of findings 5. Vitamin K antagonists compared to heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Vitamin K antagonists compared to heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: vitamin K antagonists
Comparison: heparin

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with heparin

Risk with vitamin K antagonists

Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.64
(0.85 to 3.16)

1279
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

23 per 1000

38 per 1000
(20 to 70)

Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.36
(0.69 to 2.68)

1279
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

23 per 1000

31 per 1000
(16 to 60)

Symptomatic PE
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

OR 9.16
(0.49 to 170.42)

1279
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 3

no cases of symptomatic PE reported in the heparin study arm

Bleeding ‐ major
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 3.87
(1.91 to 7.85)

1272
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

16 per 1000

58 per 1000
(30 to 111)

Bleeding ‐ clinically indicated non‐major

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

see comment

clinically indicated non‐major bleeding events not reported in single included study in this comparison

Bleeding ‐ minor
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.33
(0.64 to 2.76)

1279
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

20 per 1000

27 per 1000
(13 to 54)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VKA: vitamin K antagonist; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level, single study so heterogeneity could not be assessed
2 Downgraded by one level, wide CI
3 Downgraded by one level, low number of events leading to imprecision of results

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 5. Vitamin K antagonists compared to heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Summary of findings 6. DOAC compared to heparin for people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

DOAC compared to heparin for people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
Intervention: DOAC
Comparison: heparin

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with heparin

Risk with DOAC

Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.70
(0.28 to 1.70)

15977
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2

4 per 1000

3 per 1000
(1 to 8)

Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal)

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.60
(0.11 to 3.27)

15977
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2 3

3 per 1000

2 per 1000
(0 to 9)

Symptomatic PE
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.91
(0.43 to 1.94)

14731
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 2

2 per 1000

2 per 1000
(1 to 4)

Bleeding ‐ major

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.11
(0.79 to 1.54)

16199
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

8 per 1000

9 per 1000
(7 to 13)

Bleeding ‐ clinically relevant, non‐major
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 1.08
(0.90 to 1.28)

15241
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

33 per 1000

36 per 1000
(30 to 42)

Bleeding ‐ minor

Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days

Study population

OR 0.95
(0.82 to 1.10)

11766
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

66 per 1000

63 per 1000
(55 to 72)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; DOAC: direct oral anticoagulant; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level for inconsistency (heterogeneity, I2 = 55%)
2 Downgraded by one level for imprecision due to low number of events leading to wide CI
3 Downgraded by one level for inconsistency (heterogeneity, I2 = 65%)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 6. DOAC compared to heparin for people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Comparison 1. Heparin versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE) Show forest plot

5

2329

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.35, 1.01]

1.1 Hip replacement

4

1296

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.36, 1.30]

1.2 Knee replacement

1

723

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.21, 2.92]

1.3 Hip or knee replacement

1

310

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.05, 1.06]

2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal) Show forest plot

4

2019

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.39, 1.38]

2.1 Hip replacement

4

1296

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.41, 1.55]

2.2 Knee replacement

1

723

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.03, 3.12]

3 Symptomatic PE Show forest plot

3

1595

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.16, 2.33]

3.1 Hip replacement

3

872

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.01, 2.56]

3.2 Knee replacement

1

723

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [0.24, 8.83]

4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic) Show forest plot

6

2544

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.28, 0.56]

4.1 Hip replacement

5

1511

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.37 [0.25, 0.56]

4.2 Knee replacement

1

723

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.21, 2.92]

4.3 Hip or knee replacement

1

310

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.16, 0.90]

5 Asymptomatic DVT Show forest plot

5

1304

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.24, 0.60]

5.1 Hip replacement

4

994

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.21, 0.58]

5.2 Hip or knee replacement

1

310

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.19, 1.52]

6 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

5

2518

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.31, 3.26]

6.1 Hip replacement

4

1485

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.11, 2.75]

6.2 Knee replacement

1

723

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.06, 15.65]

6.3 Hip or knee replacement

1

310

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.69 [0.22, 98.42]

7 Adverse events Show forest plot

2

460

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.68, 1.64]

7.1 Hip replacement

2

460

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.68, 1.64]

8 Bleeding ‐ major Show forest plot

5

2500

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.14, 2.46]

8.1 Hip replacement

4

1494

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.03, 3.10]

8.2 Knee replacement

1

696

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.14, 7.06]

8.3 Hip or knee replacement

1

310

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Bleeding ‐ minor Show forest plot

5

2500

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.01 [1.43, 2.81]

9.1 Hip replacement

4

1494

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.25 [1.53, 3.30]

9.2 Knee replacement

1

696

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.58, 2.59]

9.3 Hip or knee replacement

1

310

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.79 [0.11, 69.13]

10 Reoperation Show forest plot

1

179

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.1 Hip replacement

1

179

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Heparin versus placebo
Comparison 2. Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE) Show forest plot

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.01, 1.94]

1.1 Hip replacement

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.01, 1.94]

2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal) Show forest plot

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.01, 2.62]

2.1 Hip replacement

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.01, 2.62]

3 Symptomatic PE Show forest plot

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 7.84]

3.1 Hip replacement

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 7.84]

4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic) Show forest plot

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.01, 0.81]

4.1 Hip replacement

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.01, 0.81]

5 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.1 Hip replacement

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Adverse events Show forest plot

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.1 Hip replacement

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Bleeding ‐ major Show forest plot

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.89 [0.12, 71.31]

7.1 Hip replacement

1

360

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.89 [0.12, 71.31]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Vitamin K antagonists versus placebo
Comparison 3. DOAC versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE) Show forest plot

1

2419

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.06, 0.68]

1.1 Hip replacement

1

2419

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.06, 0.68]

2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal) Show forest plot

2

2459

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.04, 0.81]

2.1 Hip replacement

2

2459

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.04, 0.81]

3 Symptomatic PE Show forest plot

1

1733

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.03, 2.25]

3.1 Hip replacement

1

1733

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.03, 2.25]

4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic) Show forest plot

1

1733

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.11, 0.33]

4.1 Hip replacement

1

1733

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.11, 0.33]

5 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

1

1733

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.07, 1.66]

5.1 Hip replacement

1

1733

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.07, 1.66]

6 Adverse events Show forest plot

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.74, 1.03]

6.1 Hip replacement

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.74, 1.03]

7 Bleeding ‐ major Show forest plot

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.06, 16.02]

7.1 Hip replacement

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.06, 16.02]

8 Bleeding‐ clinically relevant non‐major Show forest plot

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.76, 1.95]

8.1 Hip replacement

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.76, 1.95]

9 Bleeding ‐ minor Show forest plot

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.74, 1.88]

9.1 Hip replacement

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.74, 1.88]

10 Reoperation Show forest plot

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.1 Hip replacement

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Wound infection Show forest plot

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.46, 3.86]

11.1 Hip replacement

1

2457

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.46, 3.86]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. DOAC versus placebo
Comparison 4. Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE) Show forest plot

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.09, 2.74]

1.1 Knee replacement

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.09, 2.74]

2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal) Show forest plot

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.03, 3.21]

2.1 Knee replacement

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.03, 3.21]

3 Symptomatic PE Show forest plot

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.06, 16.13]

3.1 Knee replacement

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.06, 16.13]

4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic) Show forest plot

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.14, 0.50]

4.1 Knee replacement

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.14, 0.50]

5 Asymptomatic DVT Show forest plot

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.13, 0.54]

5.1 Knee replacement

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.13, 0.54]

6 Asymptomatic distal DVT Show forest plot

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.13, 0.54]

6.1 Knee replacement

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.13, 0.54]

7 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

1

842

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.1 Knee replacement

1

842

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Bleeding ‐ major Show forest plot

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.05 [0.24, 105.76]

8.1 Knee replacement

1

557

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.05 [0.24, 105.76]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Anticoagulant (chosen at investigators' discretion) versus placebo
Comparison 5. Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE) Show forest plot

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [0.85, 3.16]

1.1 Hip replacement

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [0.85, 3.16]

2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal) Show forest plot

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [0.69, 2.68]

2.1 Hip replacement

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [0.69, 2.68]

3 Symptomatic PE Show forest plot

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.16 [0.49, 170.42]

3.1 Hip replacement

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.16 [0.49, 170.42]

4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic) Show forest plot

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [0.85, 3.16]

4.1 Hip replacement

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.64 [0.85, 3.16]

5 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.07 [0.24, 105.83]

5.1 Hip replacement

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.07 [0.24, 105.83]

6 Bleeding ‐ major Show forest plot

1

1272

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.87 [1.91, 7.85]

6.1 Hip replacement

1

1272

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.87 [1.91, 7.85]

7 Bleeding ‐ minor Show forest plot

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.33 [0.64, 2.76]

7.1 Hip replacement

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.33 [0.64, 2.76]

8 Reoperation Show forest plot

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.60 [0.99, 21.38]

8.1 Hip replacement

1

1279

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.60 [0.99, 21.38]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Vitamin K antagonists versus heparin
Comparison 6. DOAC versus heparin

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE) Show forest plot

5

15977

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.28, 1.70]

1.1 Hip replacement

5

15977

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.28, 1.70]

2 Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal) Show forest plot

5

15977

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.11, 3.27]

2.1 Hip replacement

5

15977

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.11, 3.27]

3 Symptomatic PE Show forest plot

5

14731

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.43, 1.94]

3.1 Hip replacement

5

14731

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.43, 1.94]

4 Total VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic) Show forest plot

4

12447

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.29, 0.97]

4.1 Hip replacement

4

12447

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.29, 0.97]

5 Asymptomatic DVT Show forest plot

2

6559

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.19, 1.59]

5.1 Hip replacement

2

6559

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.19, 1.59]

6 Asymptomatic proximal DVT Show forest plot

1

2704

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.46, 1.15]

6.1 Hip replacement

1

2704

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.46, 1.15]

7 Asymptomatic distal DVT Show forest plot

1

2639

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.75, 1.99]

7.1 Hip replacement

1

2639

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.75, 1.99]

8 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

5

14966

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.63 [0.64, 4.16]

8.1 Hip replacement

5

14966

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.63 [0.64, 4.16]

9 Adverse events Show forest plot

3

9908

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.88, 1.05]

9.1 Hip replacement

3

9908

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.88, 1.05]

10 Bleeding ‐ major Show forest plot

5

16199

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.79, 1.54]

10.1 Hip replacement

5

16199

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.79, 1.54]

11 Bleeding ‐ clinically relevant, non‐major Show forest plot

4

15241

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.90, 1.28]

11.1 Hip replacement

4

15241

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.90, 1.28]

12 Bleeding ‐ minor Show forest plot

4

11766

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.82, 1.10]

12.1 Hip replacement

4

11766

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.82, 1.10]

13 Reoperation Show forest plot

4

15241

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.34, 3.24]

13.1 Hip replacement

4

15241

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.34, 3.24]

14 Wound infection Show forest plot

2

6446

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.46, 1.72]

14.1 Hip replacement

2

6446

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.46, 1.72]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. DOAC versus heparin