Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tratamiento para la meralgia parestésica

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004159.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 diciembre 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Neuromuscular

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Nofal Khalil

    Correspondencia a: Clinical Neurophysiology, West London Neurosciences Centre, London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Alessia Nicotra

    West London Neurosciences Centre, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK

  • Wojtek Rakowicz

    West London Neurosciences Centre, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK

Contributions of authors

The three authors searched for studies dealing with treatment of meralgia paraesthetica, independently abstracted the data from the relevant studies identified by the search and then checked these data together. Any disagreement about inclusion was resolved by discussion between the authors. NK drafted the review. AN and WR read the review and added their comments independently. All three authors agreed the final version of the review and subsequent updates.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, Not specified.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We are deeply grateful to Prof Hughes for his advice and comments throughout the preparation of this review.

The editorial base of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group is supported by the MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Dec 12

Treatment for meralgia paraesthetica

Review

Nofal Khalil, Alessia Nicotra, Wojtek Rakowicz

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004159.pub3

2008 Jul 16

Treatment for meralgia paraesthetica

Review

Nofal Khalil, Alessia Nicotra, Wojtek Rakowicz

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004159.pub2

2003 Apr 22

Treatment for meralgia paraesthetica

Protocol

Nofal Khalil, Nigel Legg

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004159

Differences between protocol and review

We replaced previous quality assessment methods with the 'Risk of bias' tool as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011).

We included searches of clinical trials registries ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) to identify ongoing trials in our searches.

Changes in authorship: N Legg withdrew following protocol publication; A Nicotra and W Rakowicz became authors at the review stage.

Notes

Significant new data are very slow to emerge in this field, therefore scheduled updates are every four years. If new evidence emerges contrary to this, an earlier update will be scheduled.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.