Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 09 octubre 2013

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003992.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 octubre 2004see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Cáncer ginecológico, neurooncología y otros cánceres

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Liat Vidal

    Correspondencia a: Department of Medicine E, Beilinson Campus, Rabin Medical Center, Petah‐Tiqva, Israel

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Itsik Ben dor

    Department of Internal Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Petah‐Tikva, Israel

  • Mical Paul

    Infectious Diseases Unit and Department of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Petah‐Tikva, Israel

  • Ellisheva Pokroy

    Department of Internal Medicine A, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah‐Tikva, Israel

  • Karla Soares‐Weiser

    Enhance Reviews, Kfar‐Saba, Israel

  • Leonard Leibovici

    Department of Medicine E, Beilinson Campus, Rabin Medical Center, Petah‐Tiqva, Israel

Contributions of authors

Liat Vidal (contact reviewer) ‐ reference search, article retrieval, study inclusion/exclusion, data extraction, analysis, and writing.
Mical Paul ‐ data extraction, study inclusion/exclusion, analysis.
Itsik Ben dor ‐ reference search, data extraction, study inclusion/exclusion.
Ellisheva Pokroy‐ reference search, article retrieval.
Karla Soares‐Weiser ‐ analysis, interpretation of results and manuscript review.
Leonard Leibovici (secondary contact) ‐ study inclusion/exclusion, analysis, and manuscript review

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Streering Committee for Research Promotion at Rabin Medical Center, Israel.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known

Acknowledgements

We warmly thank Mrs Gail Quinn of the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group, for her helpful advice and assistance in obtaining manuscripts.

We would like to express our appreciation to all the authors who responded to our letters and supplied additional information on their studies: Drs. Freifeld, Hidalgo, Niho, Paesmans (Kern 1999), Paganini, Shenep, Velasco, Dr. Marshall (Innes 2003) who supplied the full unpublished manuscript and Dr. Anaissie for providing unpublished data from the Samonis 1997. We would like to thank Mr. Ochan Kilama from Bayer Italia for clarifying the details from the Minotti 1999 though not included in the analysis.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2013 Oct 09

Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients

Review

Liat Vidal, Itsik Ben dor, Mical Paul, Noa Eliakim‐Raz, Ellisheva Pokroy, Karla Soares‐Weiser, Leonard Leibovici

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003992.pub3

2004 Oct 18

Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients

Review

Liat Vidal, Itsik Ben dor, Mical Paul, Ellisheva Pokroy, Karla Soares‐Weiser, Leonard Leibovici

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003992.pub2

2003 Jan 20

Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients

Protocol

Liat Vidal, Mical Paul, Itsik Ben‐dor, Ellisheva Pokroy, Karla Soares‐Weiser, Leonard Leibovici

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003992

Notes

A version of this review was published in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2004 Jul;54(1):29‐37.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.