Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Agonistas monoaminérgicos para la lesión cerebral traumática aguda

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies excluded from this review

Bleiberg 1993 {published data only}

Bleiberg J, Garmoe W, Cederquist J, Reeves D, Lux W. Effects of dexedrine on performance consistency following brain injury. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology 1993;6(4):245‐8.

Evans 1987 {published data only}

Evans RW, Gualtieri CT, Patterson D. Treatment of chronic closed head injury with psychostimulant drugs: a controlled case study and an appropriate evaluation procedure. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1987;175(2):106‐10.

Green 2004 {published data only}

Green LB, Hornyak JE, Hurvitz EA. Amantadine in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury: A retrospective, case‐controlled study. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2004;83:893‐7.

Gualtieri 1988 {published data only}

Gualtieri CT, Evans RW. Stimulant treatment for the neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1988;2(4):273‐90.

Hornstein 1996 {published data only}

Hornstein A, Lennihan L, Seliger G, Lichtman S, Schroeder K. Amphetamine in recovery from brain injury. Brain Injury 1996;10(2):145‐8.

Hornyak 1997 {published data only}

Hornyak JE, Nelson VS, Hurvitz EA. The use of methylphenidate in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Pediatric Rehabilitation 1997;1(1):15‐7.

Kaelin 1996 {published data only}

Kaelin DL, Cifu DX, Matthies B. Methylphenidate effect on attention deficit in the acutely brain‐injured adult. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996;77(1):6‐9.

Mahalick 1998 {published data only}

Mahalick DM, Carmel PW, Greenberg JP, Molofsky W, Brown JA, Heary RF, et al. Psychopharmacologic treatment of acquired attention disorders in children with brain injury. Pediatric Neurosurgery 1998;29(3):121‐6. [MEDLINE: PBS Record: 360; 1016‐2291]

Meyers 1998 {published data only}

Meyers CA, Weitzner MA, Valentine AD, Levin VA. Methylphenidate therapy improves cognition, mood, and function of brain tumor patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1998;16(7):2522‐7.

Meythaler 2002 {published data only}

Meythaler JM, Brunner RC, Johnson A, Novack TA. Amantadine to improve neurorecovery in traumatic brain injury‐associated diffuse axonal injury: a pilot double‐blind randomised trial. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002;17(4):300‐13.

Mooney 1993 {published data only}

Mooney GF, Haas LJ. Effect of methylphenidate on brain injury‐related anger. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993;74:153‐60.

Passler 2001 {published data only}

Passler MA, Riggs RV. Positive outcomes in traumatic brain injury‐vegetative state: patients treated with bromocriptine. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2001;82(3):311‐5.

Plenger 1996 {published and unpublished data}

Plenger PM, Dixon CE, Castillo RM. Subacute methylphenidate treatment for moderate to moderately severe traumatic brain injury: a preliminary double‐blind placebo‐controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996;77:536‐40.

Schneider 1999 {published data only}

Sneider WM, Drew‐Cates J, Wong TM, Dombovy ML. Cognitive and behavioural efficacy of Amantadine in acute traumatic brain injury: an initial double‐blind placebo‐controlled study. Brain Injury 1999;13(11):863‐72.

Speech 1993 {published data only}

Speech TJ, Rao SM, Osmon DC, Sperry LT. A double‐blind controlled study of methylphenidate treatment in closed head injury. Brain Injury 1993;7(4):333‐8.

Whyte 1997 {published data only}

Whyte J, Hart T, Schuster K, Fleming M, Polansky M, Coslett HB. Effects of methylphenidate on attentional function after traumatic brain injury ‐ A randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997;76(6):440‐50.

Whyte 2004 {published data only}

Whyte J, Hart T, Vaccaro M, Grieb‐Neff P, Risser A, Polansky M, et al. Effects of Methylphenidate on attention deficits after traumatic brain injury: a multidimensional, randomised, controlled trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2004;83(6):401‐20.

Williams 1998 {published data only}

Williams SE, Ris MD, Ayyangar R, Schefft BK, Berch D. Recovery in pediatric brain injury: is psychostimulant medication beneficial?. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1998;13(3):73‐81.

References to ongoing studies

Blum 2002 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

US NLM NCT00035139. Ongoing study Starting date of trial not provided. Contact author for more information.

Philips 2002 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Ongoing study Starting date of trial not provided. Contact author for more information.

Additional references

Bales 2009

Bales JW, Wagner AK, Kline AE, Dixon CE. Persistent cognitive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: A dopamine hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2009:1‐23.

Boyeson 1991

Boyeson M, Feeney DM. Adverse effects of catecholaminergic drugs following unilateral lesions. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1991;3(2):227‐33.

Butefisch 2002

Butefisch CM, Davis BC, Sawaki L, Waldvogel D, Classen J, Kopylev L, et al. Modulation of use‐dependent plasticity by D‐amphetamine. Annals of Neurology 2002;51(1):59‐68.

Crisostomo 1988

Crisostomo EA, Duncan PW, Propst M, Dawson DV, Davis JN. Evidence that amphetamine with physical therapy promotes recovery of motor function in stroke patients. Annals of Neurology 1988;23(1):94‐7.

Ewing‐Cobbs 1990

Ewing‐Cobbs L, Levin HS, Fletcher JM, Miner ME, Eisenberg HM. The Children's Orientation and Amnesia Test: relationship to severity of acute head injury and to recover of memory. Neurosurgery 1990;27(5):683‐91.

Feeney 1982

Feeney DM, Gonzalez A, Law WA. Amphetamine, haloperidol and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science 1982;217(4562):855‐7.

Feeney 1997

Feeney DM. From laboratory to clinic: noradrenergic enhancement of physical therapy for stroke or trauma patients. In: Freund H‐J, Sabel BA, Witte OW editor(s). Advances in Neurology. Vol. 73, Philadelphia: Lippincott‐Raven, 1997:383‐94.

Feeney 1998

Feeney DM. Noradrenergic modulation of physical therapy: effects on functional recovery after cortical injury. In: Goldstein LB editor(s). Restorative neurology. Advances in pharmacotherapy for recovery after stroke. New York: Futura Publishing Company Inc, 1998:39‐40.

Gladstone 2000

Gladstone DJ, Black SE. Enhancing recovery after stroke with noradrenergic pharmacotherapy: A new frontier?. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 2000;27(2):97‐105.

Goldstein 2000

Goldstein LB. Effects of amphetamines and small related molecules on recovery after stroke in animals and man. Neuropharmacology 2000;39(5):852‐9.

Levin 1979

Levin HS, O'Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1979;167(11):675‐84.

Levin 2000

Levin HS, Grafman J. Cerebral reorganization of function after brain damage. New York: Oxford, 2000.

Martinsson 2001

Martinsson L, Wahlgren NG. Amphetamines for improving recovery in stroke patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002090.pub2]

Miyai 2000

Miyai I, Saito T, Nozaki S, Kang J. A pilot study of the effect of L‐threodops on rehabilitation outcome of stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2000;14(2):141‐7.

Schulz 1995

Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408‐12.

Sonde 2001

Sonde L, Nordstrom M, Nilsson CG, Lokk J, Viitanen M. A double‐blind placebo‐controlled study of the effects of amphetamine and physiotherapy after stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2001;12(3):253‐7.

Stroemer 1998

Stroemer RP, Kent TA, Hulsebosch CE. Enhanced neocortical neuronal sprouting, synaptogenesis, and behavioural recovery with D‐amphetamine therapy after neocortical infarction in rats. Stroke 1998;29:2381‐95.

Sutton 2000

Sutton RL, Hovda DA, Chen MJ, Feeney DM. Alleviation of brain injury‐induced cerebral metabolic depression by amphetamine: A cytochrome oxidase histochemistry study. Neural Plasticity 2000;7(1‐2):109‐25.

Walker‐Batson 1995

Walker‐Batson D, Smith P, Curtis S, Unwin H, Greenlee R. Amphetamine paired with physical therapy accelerates motor recovery after stroke. Further evidence. Stroke 1995;26(12):2254‐9.

Wang 1994

Wang JQ, Daunais JB, McGinty JF. NMDA receptors mediate amphetamine‐induced upregulation of zif/268 and preprodynorphin mRNA expression in rat striatum. Synapse 1994;18(4):343‐3.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Bleiberg 1993

Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled single‐patient study of dextroamphetamine (and other agents) on attentional function after TBI.

Evans 1987

Randomised, multiple‐block, single‐patient study of methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine on attentional function in a single young male adult survivor of TBI.

Green 2004

Retrospective, case‐controlled study to determine effectiveness and tolerability of Amantadine. Significant improvement in amantadine group for Ranchos Los Amigos level. Amantadine was well tolerated.

Gualtieri 1988

Double‐blind, placebo controlled cross‐over study of effects of two doses of methylphenidate on attentional function after TBI.

Hornstein 1996

Retrospectively looked at 27 patients who had been admitted to the head injury rehab unit and had been prescribed dextroamphetamine. Dextroamphetamine enhanced the recovery and functional status in 15 of the 27. The 15 responders showed a significant improvement in GOS following treatment (P = 0.007). The only significant difference between these patients and those that did not respond to dextroamphetamine was duration between the TBI and treatment, with responders being treated more rapidly.

Hornyak 1997

Retrospective uncontrolled study of illustrative case histories.

Kaelin 1996

Multiple baseline, non‐randomised (A‐A‐B‐A) design study of the effect of methylphenidate on measures of attention after TBI. Disability Rating Scale (DRS) changes are also reported. Improvements in DRS are noted both spontaneously during the first seven‐day interval (A‐A) and the second seven‐day interval, during which methylphenidate is administered (A‐B). Friedman two‐way ANOVA by ranks was used to compare average weekly change in DRS score and suggested that the mean improvement in DRS on treatment (27%) approached a significant difference (P < 0.06) from the A‐A change in baseline DRS score (15%).

Mahalick 1998

Study of effects of methylphenidate on attentional function in oriented children after TBI.

Meyers 1998

Non‐randomised, uncontrolled use of methyphenidate in different patient groups (primary malignant gliomas).

Meythaler 2002

Not restricted to severe GCS (<8). Groups by chance not well matched for DRS on entry.

Mooney 1993

Randomised, single‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of effect of methylphenidate on injury‐related anger following TBI.

Passler 2001

Retrospectively looked at the outcome of five patients who were in a vegetative state following TBI. Bromocriptine treatment was given as part of a comprehensive rehabilitation programme. With the DRS being used as a measurement of outcome, there was a significant improvement in all of the five patients compared to the general prediction of recovery.

Plenger 1996

Administration of 0.6mg/kg/day of methylphenidate (divided into two doses at 8 am and noon) versus placebo in a group of 23 adults (ages 16‐64 years) who had made a partial recovery following a "complicated mild" to "moderately severe" TBI. Partial recovery was defined as a minimum Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) score of 65 as a criterion of resolution of post‐traumatic amnesia. Primary outcomes were the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and measures of attention and motor performance at 30 and 90 days. Methylphenidate (or placebo) was discontinued for at least four days before assessment to allow resolution of temporary immediately drug‐related effects. Main outcome endpoint is the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). The maximum score a patient can obtain on the DRS is 29 (extreme vegetative state). A person without disability would score zero. As discussed in the text of the review, the patients in this study were relatively unimpaired at the time of injury. This is reflected in the fact that the DRS score distributions in this study were extremely left‐skewed (in the direction of less disability). Non‐parametric analyses are used in the original paper to claim significant effect on DRS at 30, but not 90 days, in treatment group. Study excluded from review because of marked drop‐out from both treatment and control groups.

Schneider 1999

Cross‐over study (two week treatment phases separated by two week washout) of amantadine up to maximum 150mg/day in TBI (no injury severity threshold). Only 10 of 18 enrolled patients completed study. Neuropsychological and behavioural rating scale endpoints: no statistically significant differences seen.

Speech 1993

Double‐blind, placebo controlled cross‐over study of effects of methylphenidate on attentional endpoints after TBI, plus a social behavioural rating scale. No statistically significant effects seen.

Whyte 1997

Study of short‐term effects of methylphenidate on attentional function in oriented patients after TBI.

Whyte 2004

Randomised, controlled trial of the effects of methyphenidate on attention deficits after TBI.

Williams 1998

Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, within‐patient cross‐over study of attentional function only in oriented, paediatric TBI survivors (concluding no benefit to use of methyphenidate).

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

Blum 2002

Trial name or title

US NLM NCT00035139

Methods

Participants

Interventions

Methylphenidate after childhood TBI

Outcomes

Starting date

Contact information

Notes

Philips 2002

Trial name or title

Methods

Participants

Interventions

Dextroamphetamine after childhood TBI

Outcomes

Starting date

Contact information

Notes

Described as "pilot studies"